HUDBAY MINERALS INC. (HBM): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $25.91, HUDBAY MINERALS INC. (HBM) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~6.1 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HBM
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | HBM |
| Company | HUDBAY MINERALS INC. |
| Current price | $25.91/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 16.8% |
| Operating margin today | 41.5% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -24.7pp |
| Must persist for | 6.1y |
| Multiple paid | 12x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 11: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 14.3% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.7 years.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~0%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: elevated
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.43σ |
| sustained it ~6.1 years at this level | 28% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.59x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 4.05x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.11x | 5 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.13x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $14.04 | 1.85x | yes | FCF base $0.2B, growth 10% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.2%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $26.99 | 0.96x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 8.4x / 13.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $23.28 | 1.11x | yes | P/E 14x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.5x / 14.0x / 16.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $15.42 | 1.68x | yes | BV/sh $8.17, ROE (TTM) 17.5%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $20.92 | 1.24x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $23.03 | 1.13x | yes | Rev $2.2B, growth 10% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.5x / 4.6x / 5.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $17.28 | 1.50x | yes | EPS $1.44, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=10.07 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $4.02 | 6.45x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.37B × (1−38%) / WACC 8.2% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $20.93 | 1.24x | yes | BV $8.17 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.5% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $16.27 | 1.59x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $1.44 × BVPS $8.17) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $24.44 | 1.06x | yes | EBITDA $1.36B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $3.56 | 7.28x | yes | FCF $240.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $46.46 | 0.56x | yes | EPS $1.44 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $12.76 | 2.03x | yes | BV $8.17 × (ROIC 12.8% / WACC 8.2%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $8.39 | 3.09x | yes | Revenue $2.21B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $54.00 | 0.48x | yes | EPS $1.44 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $15.57 | 1.66x | yes | EPS $1.44 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $439.7m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 0.78x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.48x |
| Interest coverage | 15.1x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 10.9% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Hudbay is a copper miner whose by-product gold and zinc credits now do most of the cost work: Q1 2026 cash cost net of by-products fell to a record negative $1.80 per pound, meaning the metal effectively pays customers to take the copper.
- The biggest risk is the commodity itself: at about 12 times trailing operating income the price assumes copper-cycle economics persist, and only about a third of comparable fast-growers have sustained that pace for five years.
- Watch the Copper World definitive feasibility study, due mid-2026, with a sanctioning decision expected later in the year; it is the swing factor between a mature two-mine producer and a growth story.
Bull Case
The number that ordinary valuation math struggles with is Hudbay's cost of producing copper. In the first quarter of 2026 the cash cost net of by-product credits came in at a record negative $1.80 per pound, and the sustaining cash cost at zero. Read that plainly: the gold and zinc Hudbay pulls out alongside the copper sell for enough to cover the entire cost of mining the copper. A discounted cash-flow model fed a single commodity price misses this, because the economics are a portfolio of metals, not a bet on copper alone. When by-product prices are strong, Hudbay's marginal copper is among the cheapest in the world, and the cash that throws off is real.
That cash showed up where it counts. Q1 2026 revenue reached a record $757.3 million and adjusted EBITDA $421.9 million, with net income nearly doubling year over year to $191.5 million. The balance sheet transformed alongside it: cash rose to about $1.0 billion and net debt fell to roughly $5.6 million, leaving the company close to net-cash for the first time in this cycle. A miner that enters a capital decision debt-free is a different animal from one that has to finance growth on a stressed balance sheet.
The forward call option is Copper World in Arizona. Management reaffirmed the definitive feasibility study for mid-2026 with a sanctioning decision later in the year. A standard trailing-multiple lens cannot price a pre-sanction development project; it shows up as nothing in the current numbers and everything in the thesis. Layered on top of the producing Constancia and Snow Lake operations and reaffirmed 2026 copper guidance of 110,000 to 138,000 tonnes, the bull case is a low-cost current producer that has cleaned up its balance sheet just in time to fund the next mine from a position of strength.
Bear Case
The valuation methods do not agree on Hudbay, and the disagreement is the bear case. The earnings-power and asset-value lenses, which read the company off normalized through-cycle profit and book value rather than this year's commodity boom, land well below the price. Normalized earnings power, built on a five-year average of operating income rather than the recent peak, prices the stock at a fraction of where it trades. The relative-multiple and growth-DCF approaches reach the price, but they get there by crediting today's metal prices and today's margins forward. When two camps of methods split this far apart on a cyclical, the conservative camp is usually telling the more honest story, because it is the one that does not assume the cycle stays at the top.
That is the structural problem with a commodity producer at peak economics. A record cash cost of negative $1.80 per pound is a function of strong by-product gold and zinc prices, not a permanent feature of the orebody; when those credits fade, the all-in cost of copper rises and the margin that justifies the price compresses. At about 12 times trailing operating income the price embeds the assumption that this level of profitability holds for roughly five more years. History is unkind to that bet: only about 31% of comparable fast-growers sustained that pace over a similar horizon. Peak earnings are not sustainable earnings, and the trailing multiple flatters a number sitting near the top of its range.
Growth itself carries dilution and execution risk. The share count has been rising at roughly an 11% annual pace, and Copper World is a major capital project still short of a sanctioning decision; feasibility studies slip, capital budgets inflate, and mine builds run late. The producing assets concentrate the company in Peru and Manitoba, each with its own permitting, water, and jurisdictional exposure, and a single operational setback at Constancia would take a meaningful share of consolidated output with it. The bull frames the balance-sheet clean-up as the platform for the next mine; the bear notes that the next mine is exactly where mining companies most often destroy the value the last cycle created.
Valuation
At about $27.56 (June 27, 2026) the market is paying roughly 12 times trailing operating income, which inverts into an assumption that company-wide operating growth holds at its self-funding ceiling for about five years. For a copper miner that is a bet on the commodity cycle staying near its current level, and the historical record says only about 31% of comparable fast-growers held that pace over a similar horizon.
The methods divide along a cyclical fault line. Relative multiples and the growth-oriented cash-flow approaches reach or slightly exceed the price, because they extrapolate today's strong margins forward. The asset-value and earnings-power methods sit far below it: the earnings-power lens, which normalizes profit to a five-year average and strips one-time items, reads the stock as several times too expensive, and a zero-growth free-cash-flow capitalization lands in the same low neighborhood. That spread is the whole story. The price is not a bet that Hudbay is cheap on any conservative measure; it is a bet that the current metal-price environment, and the record-low by-product-adjusted costs it produces, persist. The relative read anchors on a sector EV/EBITDA near 8 times and a sector P/E near 14 times, both of which the stock roughly satisfies only on peak-cycle earnings.
The balance sheet is the one piece that has unambiguously improved. As of Q1 2026, cash stood near $1.0 billion against net debt of about $5.6 million, with total liquidity of roughly $1.43 billion. Interest coverage is comfortable and the company is not burning cash. That near-net-cash position is the floor under the downside and the funding base for Copper World, but it is not a valuation: it tells you Hudbay can survive a downturn and fund its next mine, not that the price is justified. What a buyer underwrites at this level is the durability of the commodity cycle, with the balance sheet as the safety net rather than the reason to own it.
Catalysts
Hudbay's first quarter of 2026 was a record across the income statement: revenue of $757.3 million, adjusted EBITDA of $421.9 million, and net income of $191.5 million, up from $99.2 million a year earlier. The operational story underneath was low-cost production: 27,929 tonnes of copper and 61,700 ounces of gold, with cash cost net of by-product credits at a record negative $1.80 per pound and sustaining cash cost at zero, both driven by strong by-product pricing and tight cost control. The company reaffirmed 2026 consolidated copper production guidance of 110,000 to 138,000 tonnes.
The balance sheet was the other headline. Cash and equivalents rose to about $1,003.8 million and total liquidity to $1,429.0 million, while net debt fell to roughly $5.6 million, effectively clearing the deck ahead of a major growth decision.
The catalyst that matters most over the next several months is Copper World. Management reaffirmed that the definitive feasibility study remains on track for mid-2026, with a formal project sanctioning decision expected later in the year. That sequence, feasibility then sanction, is the swing factor for the forward story, and copper and by-product metal prices remain the external variable with the most leverage on every line above it.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- ARLP (ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP)
- FY2025 10-K: …"Item 1A. Risk Factors". Business Strategy Our primary business strategy is to create sustainable, capital-efficient growth in available cash to maximize unitholder returns by: ● expanding our coal operations by adding and developing mines and coal mineral reserves and resources in existing, adjacent or…
- FY2025 10-K: …volatility, and other attributes. Failure to meet these requirements may result in price adjustments, rejection of shipments, or contract termination. Contracted coal may be sourced from specific approved seams or multiple mines, depending on customer requirements and our operational flexibility. We also…
- AMR (AMR)
- FY2025 10-K: …which such coal is to be sold. Market pricing may vary according to region and lead to different discounts or premiums to the most directly comparable benchmark price for such coal product. Costs. Our results of operations are dependent upon our ability to maximize productivity and control costs. Our primary expenses…
- FY2025 10-K: …deep and surface mines for sale to steel and coke producers, industrial customers, and electric utilities. The Company conducts mining operations only in the United States with mines in Central Appalachia. Refer to Note 22 for the Company's segment information. The Company has disaggregated revenue between met coal…
- WPM (WPM)
- FY2025 40-F: …ended December 31, 2024 were 14% of the Company's total revenue. Comprised of the operating Coleman, Copper Cliff, Garson, Creighton, Stobie and Totten gold interests as well as the non-operating Victor gold interest. Where a silver interest represents less than 10% of the Company's sales, gross margin or aggregate…
- FY2025 40-F: …ability to sell its precious metals or cobalt production at acceptable prices or at all); • risks related to the Mining Operations (including fluctuations in the price of the primary or other commodities mined at such operations, regulatory, political and other risks of the jurisdictions in which the Mining…
- CENX (Century Aluminum Company)
- FY2025 10-K: …withstand reductions in price or other adverse industry or economic conditions. Competitive Advantages While we face significant competition, we also have several competitive advantages. We believe our key competitive advantages are: Focus on Primary Aluminum Business. We operate principally in the production of…
- FY2025 10-K: …production capacities as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Our net sales are impacted primarily by the LME price for aluminum, regional and value-added premiums, and the volume and product mix of aluminum we ship during the period. In general, our results reflect the LME and regional premium pricing on an…
- CCJ (Cameco Corp)
- FY2025 40-F: …in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting…
- FY2025 40-F: ) Cristina Giffin, Power Resources, Inc., Smith Ranch-Highland Operation 762 Ross Road , Douglas , Wyoming , USA, 82633 Telephone: ( 307 ) 358-6541 (Name, address, (including zip code) and telephone number (including area code) of agent for service in the United States) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)…
- CDE (COEUR MINING, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …the loss of any one smelter, refiner, trader or third-party customer would not materially adversely affect us due to the liquidity of the markets and current availability of alternative trading counterparties. Commodities We purchase materials and supplies from third parties to conduct our business, including…
- FY2025 10-K: …the State of Delaware and changed its name to Coeur Mining, Inc. Coeur's corporate headquarters are in Chicago, Illinois. NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Risks and uncertainties As a mining company, the revenue, profitability and future rate of growth of the Company are substantially dependent on…
- EGO (EGO)
- FY2025 40-F: …of the fair value of mineral properties beyond proven and probable reserves. Metal pricing assumptions were based on consensus forecast pricing and discount rates were based on a weighted average cost of capital, adjusted for country and other risks specific to the CGU. For the portion of incremental inferred…
- FY2025 40-F: …attributable to the issue of common shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects. Common shares held by the Company are classified as treasury stock and recorded as a reduction of shareholders' equity. 3.18 Revenue recognition Revenue is generated from the production and…
- EQX (EQX)
- FY2025 40-F: 63 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise noted) 28. SEGMENT INFORMATION Operating results of operating segments are regularly reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker…
- FY2025 40-F: …(note 10) and include a decrease in accrued expenditures of $ 41.5 million (2024 - $ 27.6 million). (2) The above segment information for the current and comparative periods reflects the presentation of the Brazil Operations as discontinued operations (note 9). The following table presents the Company's non-current…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
HBM Q1 2026 results, May 2026 · HBM Q1 2026 earnings call, May 2026