Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $9.06, Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~5.1 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/GNL

Headline

FieldValue
TickerGNL
CompanyGlobal Net Lease, Inc.
Sector / IndustryReal Estate
Current price$9.07/sh
CompositionIndustrial & Distribution 46% / Single-Tenant Retail 27% / Office 28%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)12.3%
Operating margin today36.0%
Margin compression (value-band)-23.7pp
Must persist for5.1y
Multiple paid16x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 8: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 11.7% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.6 years.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~9.6%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.48σ
cohort percentile (of 80 peers)21
sustained it ~5.1 years at this level30%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple; earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.31x4expensive
Earnings2.03x3expensive
Relative1.02x1expensive
Growth1.32x2expensive

Families that justify the price: Relative Families that call it expensive: Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=10)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$7.451.22xnoFCF base $0.2B, growth -10% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 6.7%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$12.430.73xnoExit EV/EBITDA: 6.8x / 8.8x / 10.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 26.76x (blended: static sector reference 35x + trailing (TTM) 14x), scenarios: 22.7x / 26.8x / 30.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 15.51x
Simple DDMGrowth$6.321.43xyesDPS $0.77, g=-2.6% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3%
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$7.511.21xyesStage 1: -10% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$7.291.24xyesReference only (book value floor): BV/sh $7.29, ROE negative
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$6.561.38xyesReference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $7.29, ROE converges to ke
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$4.492.02xnoRev $0.5B, growth -15% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.5x / 4.1x / 4.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$5.551.63xnoNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.17B × (1−21%) / WACC 6.7% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAsset$10.170.89xyes√(22.5 × FFO/share $0.63 × BVPS $7.29) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.35B × sector EV/EBITDA 20.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$5.141.76xyesFCF $203.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$4.462.03xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.19B (FCF $0.20B − SBC $0.01B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$0.5317.10xyesFFO/share $0.63 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$1.018.98xyesBV $7.29 × (ROIC 0.9% / WACC 6.7%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $0.47B × sector P/S 6.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$6.811.33xnoFFO/share $0.63 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelative$8.891.02xyesFFO/share $0.63 × 14.1x P/FFO (route cohort median, n=85); FFO $0.14B (FFO incl. D&A, TTM), shares 214M
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Industrial & Distributionoperatingenterprise$225.7mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Single-Tenant Retailoperatingenterprise$132.8mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Officeoperatingenterprise$136.8mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$808.5m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)6.03x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)4.76x
Interest coverage0.9x
Share count CAGR (dilution)19.9%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Mature is the correct label for this business, and it is doing the one thing mature real estate investment trusts almost never do. It is shrinking. The annual report records the pivot in a single line: the Company completed the sale of 99 of its multi-tenant retail properties to RCG Venture Holdings, LLC, a portfolio that fetched roughly 1.8 billion dollars. Revenue fell as a mechanical consequence. So did the interest bill, and that is the trade.

Read the numbers as a deliberate contraction and they stop looking like decay. Borrowings net of cash came down by 1.3 billion dollars in the year to March 31, 2026, and the quarterly interest charge dropped to $39.2 million from $53.4 million over the same comparison. Overhead followed: annualized general and administrative expense fell by a quarter, to $49 million from $65 million, and capital spending in the quarter came to $1.6 million against $9.8 million a year earlier. A company can shrink into trouble or shrink into strength. The distinguishing evidence is whether the costs come out faster than the revenue, and here they have.

What is left behind is also better. Portfolio occupancy improved to 97% from 95%, office occupancy to 99% from 95%, and the share of straight-line rent owed by tenants carrying an actual or implied investment-grade rating rose to 64% from 60%. The leases run a long way out: the Company's leases had a weighted-average remaining lease term of 5.9 years, with a weighted average annual rent increase of 1.5% written into them and a further fifth of the portfolio tied to inflation indices. On the borrowing side, 99% of the balance is fixed rate once swaps are counted, at a weighted average 4.1%. A landlord with fixed funding costs and contractual rent escalators owns a small, quiet spread that widens by itself.

The industrial book is the piece being fed. Revenue from tenants in our Industrial & Distribution segment was $49.2 million and $58.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and the decline there is disposal arithmetic rather than tenant loss, driven by the loss of revenue of approximately $9.3 million from dispositions. Management is now buying the category back: an industrial asset under contract at an 8.2% cash cap rate, and the pending purchase of Modiv Industrial, whose portfolio carries a 15.0 year weighted average lease term and 2.4% average annual rent escalations.

Capital allocation is the part a shareholder can check without trusting anyone. The 10-Q states that On February 20, 2025, the Board authorized a share repurchase program for up to an aggregate amount of $300 million of the Company's outstanding Common Stock, and as of May 1, 2026 the company had retired 19.7 million shares for $158.2 million, a weighted average of $8.05 apiece. The effect shows up in the filed statements rather than in a press release: diluted weighted average shares fell to 214.0 million in the first quarter of 2026 from 230.3 million a year earlier. Management's own incentive plan points the same way, paying out on a three-year deleveraging goal measured as net borrowings against adjusted earnings, with the full award reserved for the lowest leverage outcome. Executives who are paid to delever tend to delever.

Bear Case

Broadstone Net Lease and LXP Industrial Trust are chasing the same warehouses, and they are doing it from a stronger footing. BNL runs a book of almost exactly the same revenue scale, $466.8 million over the trailing twelve months, and grew it 7.3% while Global Net Lease's revenue fell. Both BNL and LXP convert roughly 27 cents of every revenue dollar into profit; Global Net Lease posted a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $16.0 million in the first quarter of 2026. BNL's annual report describes an approach in which the company seeks to maintain our portfolio's diversification by property type, geography, tenant, and industry, which is roughly what every net-lease landlord says, so the difference between them is not strategy. It is the cost of capital each one brings to the auction. A buyer funding acquisitions out of asset sales bids against buyers funding them out of retained cash flow, and the seller does not care which is which.

That matters because of what the quote is asking for. Today's price embeds continued growth in company-wide operating income, held at roughly the pace the business can fund from its own earnings, and sustained for the better part of a decade. Set that against the demonstrated record: revenue from tenants of $109.3 million in the first quarter of 2026 against $132.4 million a year earlier, and adjusted funds from operations of $43.9 million against $66.2 million. The requirement is growth. The delivery is contraction, chosen deliberately, but contraction all the same. If redeployment does not eventually reverse it, the multiple being paid has nothing left to attach itself to.

Then there is the composition of the profit. For the year ended December 31, 2025 the company earned $16.3 million of operating income before gains and losses on selling real estate; the reported operating line of $111.0 million got where it did because disposals contributed $94.7 million, and the same year carried $157.5 million of impairment charges. Roll that forward through the March quarter and the twelve-month operating figure comes to $169.8 million, of which $104.2 million is gains on selling buildings. Over that same stretch the interest charge ran roughly 180 million dollars. A landlord whose reported operating profit is mostly the proceeds of disposing of its own inventory is running a liquidation with a growth label on it, and disposals are the one revenue source that cannot repeat indefinitely.

Refinancing is the pressure point, and the annual report says so under its own heading: We may be unable to service our indebtedness. The risk section elaborates that Our ability to make scheduled payments on and to refinance our indebtedness depends on and is subject to our future financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors beyond our control. The weighted average borrowing cost of 4.1% was struck in a cheaper era, and the weighted average maturity is short enough that a meaningful slice reprices before the current strategy has finished running.

Ahead of the common sits a preferred stack the equity story rarely mentions. The balance sheet carries four series of cumulative redeemable preferred stock, beginning with the 7.25 % Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock and running through coupons of 6.875%, 7.50% and 7.375%, and the four together took $10.9 million out of the March quarter before common shareholders were paid anything. Office remains the other overhang. Revenue from tenants in our Office segment was $30.6 million and $37.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and the plan is to keep selling it down. Clearing office into 2026 buyer demand at acceptable cap rates has worked so far. It is not a market that has promised to stay open.

Valuation

Start where a real estate investment trust is actually valued, which is on what it can distribute rather than on what it reports after depreciation. Management guides to adjusted funds from operations of $0.80 to $0.84 a share for 2026, excluding any contribution from the pending acquisition. Against a quoted $8.89, the midpoint of that range puts the shares near eleven dollars of market value for each dollar of distributable earnings. The common dividend of $0.19 a quarter consumes most of that dollar, which means growth from here has to be bought with disposal proceeds and borrowings rather than with retained cash.

What today's quote embeds is a longer run of expansion than the record shows. It assumes company-wide operating income keeps growing at about the ceiling the business can fund from its own earnings, sustained for the better part of a decade, and among the companies that have ever grown at that pace, roughly a fifth held it for that long. That is the assumption on the table, and it sits above what the fundamentals comfortably support.

The methods disagree, and the disagreement has a shape worth reading. The earnings-power methods, which capitalize what the business earns today and credit it with no growth at all, land far under the quote, with the price sitting at roughly double their central estimate. The asset-value methods, anchored on depreciated book, come in about 29% under the price. Only the peer-multiple lens reaches above it, and the mechanism there is worth naming: those models apply broad sector reference multiples to revenue and to EBITDA, which flatters any landlord carrying heavy depreciation and a thin bottom line. Take that lens away and no family of method reaches the quote on reported earnings.

The peer read tells the same story from a different angle. BNL carries revenue within a few percent of Global Net Lease's and turns 27% of it into profit while growing; the subject is contracting and lossmaking at the net line. What a buyer is paying for here is not the current earnings stream. It is the proposition that a smaller, cleaner, more industrial portfolio earns a better multiple than the sprawling one it replaced.

The balance sheet decides whether there is time to find out. Borrowings net of cash stood near 2.4 billion dollars at the end of March, which the company itself measures as 7.2 times adjusted EBITDA, above the 6.5 to 6.9 range it guides to for the full year. Liquidity is real, with 911.1 million dollars available once undrawn revolver capacity is counted, and 99% of borrowings are fixed rate, so a rate move does not break anything quickly. The constraint is subtler than distress. Every dollar of disposal proceeds has three claims on it, since the same dollar can repay borrowings, buy an industrial building, or retire stock, and management has been doing all three at once. The pace at which office assets clear is therefore the variable that governs everything else here.

Catalysts

The defining event is a merger this company is making rather than receiving. On May 3, 2026 Global Net Lease signed an agreement to acquire Modiv Industrial in an all-stock transaction, with each Modiv Class C common share converting into 1.975 shares of GNL common stock and Modiv's preferred shares cashed out at $25.00 plus accrued dividends. The registration statement covering the share issuance went effective on June 24, 2026, and the transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2026. Management put the enterprise value near $535 million and expects the deal to be immediately 4% accretive to adjusted funds from operations per share and neutral to leverage, with the acquired portfolio carrying a 15.0 year weighted average lease term and 2.4% average annual rent escalations, enough to extend the combined portfolio's weighted average lease term to 6.7 years on a pro forma basis.

The disposal program runs alongside it and is the more immediate source of numbers. Since the first quarter, the company has closed $74 million of sales, including $66 million of occupied assets at a 7.2% cash cap rate, of which office accounted for $61 million, or 93%. Two of those were sizeable: a 33,000-square-foot building leased to the General Services Administration for $13 million, and a 369,000-square-foot building leased to GE Aviation for $48 million, both sold after management extended the leases to improve their marketability. A 133,000-square-foot office asset in the Netherlands leased to Koninklijke KPN is under contract for approximately $18 million on that lease's expiry in December 2026. Year to date the program totals roughly 145 million dollars, struck at a 7.5% cap rate on the occupied portion, and management expects office to fall to about 21% of portfolio straight-line rent from about 26% at the end of the first quarter.

Two dates bracket the next move. The third-quarter common dividend was declared on July 1, 2026 at $0.190 a share, unchanged from the prior quarter. Second-quarter results are scheduled for release after the close on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, with the call the following morning. Full-year guidance for adjusted funds from operations per share of $0.80 to $0.84, and for leverage of 6.5x to 6.9x, was reaffirmed with the first-quarter print and excludes Modiv entirely, so the guidance itself is due to be reset once that transaction closes.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 results release, May 5, 2026 · GNL Form 8-K, July 16, 2026; GNL Form 8-K, June 29, 2026 · Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · GNL Form 8-K, June 29, 2026 · Q1 2026 Form 10-Q, equity compensation note · FY2025 Form 10-K · FY2025 Form 10-K and Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · GNL Form 8-K, May 4, 2026 · GNL Form 8-K, July 1, 2026 · GNL Form 8-K, July 16, 2026

View the full interactive GNL report on boothcheck