Global Partners LP (GLP): what the price assumes
The priced-in model claim for Global Partners LP (GLP) is temporarily suppressed because its solve record is unavailable. The separately dated narrative remains a snapshot, not a current quote.
Generated: 2026-07-25 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/GLP
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | GLP |
| Company | Global Partners LP |
| Current price | $48.44/sh |
| Composition | Wholesale 68% / GDSO (Gasoline Distribution & Station Operations) 26% / Commercial 6% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 0.3% |
| Operating margin today | 1.5% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -1.2pp |
| Multiple paid | 7x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.37σ |
| cohort percentile (of 213 peers) | 8 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | — | 0 | — |
| Earnings | 0.93x | 3 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.31x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.69x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=11)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $103.60 | 0.47x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 9% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 6.7%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $69.71 | 0.69x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 12.4x / 14.4x / 16.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $57.47 | 0.84x | yes | P/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 14.9x / 18.0x / 21.1x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $42.04 | 1.15x | yes | Rev $19.3B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.1x / 0.1x / 0.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $153.84 | 0.31x | yes | EPS $4.40, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.31 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $51.89 | 0.93x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.28B × (1−1%) / WACC 6.7% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $28.36 | 1.71x | yes | EBITDA $0.28B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 4844.00x | yes | FCF $126.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 4844.00x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.11B (FCF $0.13B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $141.83 | 0.34x | yes | EPS $4.40 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $968.80 | 0.05x | yes | Revenue $19.29B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $164.83 | 0.29x | yes | EPS $4.40 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $47.52 | 1.02x | yes | EPS $4.40 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $127.2m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 0.45x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.45x |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
Global Partners' balance sheet underwrites a steadily rising payout: low leverage, an expanded $1.8 billion credit facility, and an eighteenth consecutive distribution increase. The cash-return record is the clearest signal of management's confidence.
At $42.60 the unit price implies the partnership's operating profit could decline and still be worth more, about 6 times operating income, below what even a 5%-a-year drop would warrant. Earnings-power, relative, and growth-DCF lenses all support the price.
The nature of the business is a thin-margin, high-volume fuel distributor (a 1.5% operating margin on $5 billion-plus of quarterly sales). Q1 2026 profit surged on richer fuel margins. The bet is that the wholesale and station franchise keeps converting volatility into cash.
Bull Case
The balance sheet and the distribution history are the heart of the Global Partners case, because together they show a partnership built to convert a volatile, low-margin business into reliable cash for unitholders. Global Partners runs fuel wholesale (68% of revenue), gasoline distribution and station operations (26%), and commercial supply (6%), and the model is volume and logistics rather than headline margin. What makes it work for investors is discipline: the partnership carries modest leverage (net debt to operating income of just 0.45 times), expanded its senior secured credit facility from $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion by exercising an accordion feature, and ended Q1 2026 with $1.13 billion of remaining availability. On the back of that financial strength, it raised the quarterly common distribution to $0.7650 per unit, its eighteenth consecutive distribution increase. A partnership that has lifted its payout eighteen times in a row is telling you the cash flows are durable enough to support a rising income stream.
The recent results show the model converting volatility into profit. Q1 2026 net income jumped to $70.1 million from $18.7 million a year earlier, with net income per common unit rising to $1.86 from $0.37. Gross profit climbed to $332.2 million on higher product margins across all three segments, and EBITDA rose to $142.1 million from $91.9 million. The thin reported operating margin, about 1.5%, is the nature of fuel distribution: enormous revenue passes through at small percentage spreads, but the absolute dollars of margin are substantial and, crucially, expand when commodity markets are volatile and the partnership can use pricing and inventory management to capture wider spreads.
The value case rests on that cash-generating engine being priced for decline. At about 6 times operating income, the unit price sits below what even a 5%-a-year drop in operating profit would warrant. The model lenses support the price: DCF perpetual growth lands near $113, earnings-power value near $54, and the EV/EBITDA-relative frame near $28, with several methods well above the $42.60 (June 27, 2026) quote. The gasoline-distribution-and-station segment adds a more stable, retail-fuel-and-convenience leg that diversifies away from pure wholesale volatility. Against the wholesale-distribution peer set of World Kinect, Andersons, and Seaboard, Global Partners is the integrated fuel logistics and retail operator pairing a low-leverage balance sheet, an 18-year distribution-growth record, and a deep-value multiple. The price assumes erosion; the cash-return history argues for durability.
Bear Case
The variable with the most leverage over Global Partners is the one it cannot control: fuel margins, which swing with commodity prices, weather, refinery dynamics, and the broader energy cycle. The blockbuster Q1 2026, net income up nearly fourfold, was driven explicitly by richer fuel margins amid volatile commodity markets. That is the catch in the bull case: the profit surge came from market conditions, not from a structural improvement in the business. When commodity volatility normalizes and spreads compress, the same engine that delivered $70.1 million of net income can deliver a fraction of it. A partnership whose best quarters depend on favorable, unpredictable margin environments is hard to underwrite at face value, and the price does not reflect how cyclical that profit stream is.
The second problem is the secular headwind facing the core product. Global Partners distributes and sells gasoline and refined fuels, a category under long-term pressure from electric-vehicle adoption, improving fuel efficiency, and the energy transition. The gasoline-distribution-and-station business is tied to internal-combustion-engine demand that faces a multi-decade decline in developed markets. A thin-margin, high-volume fuel distributor is exposed precisely because its economics depend on throughput: if gallons sold decline structurally, the absolute margin dollars that fund the distribution decline with them. The deep-value multiple may reflect a market that sees a terminal-decline business, not a temporarily cheap one, and an 18-year distribution-growth record built on a shrinking core product is harder to extend than to start.
The third issue is the structural features of the MLP itself and the limits of the balance-sheet comfort. As a master limited partnership, Global Partners distributes most of its cash flow, which leaves less retained capital to reinvest or cushion a downturn, and the rising distribution is a commitment that becomes harder to sustain if margins revert. The partnership also pays a 9.50% annual distribution on its Series B preferred units, a fixed claim ahead of common unitholders. While net debt is low relative to operating income, the business funds its working capital through a large credit facility ($511.8 million drawn), and fuel inventories carry commodity-price risk. The thin 1.5% operating margin means small adverse moves in spreads have an outsized effect on profit. The bull case rests on the cash engine being durable; the bear case is that fuel-margin cyclicality, a structurally declining product, and the cash-distribution demands of the MLP form make the current profit level a high-water mark rather than a baseline. A holder is betting that a cheap multiple and a strong distribution record outweigh a volatile, secularly-challenged core. That can pay as an income holding, but it is a value-and-yield bet on a cyclical, not a growth story.
Valuation
The inversion points firmly toward value. At $42.60 the unit price implies the market is paying only about 6 times company-wide operating income, a multiple so low the price sits below what even a 5%-a-year decline in operating profit would warrant. This is a bound, not a precise solve: the price is consistent with the market expecting profit to fall rather than implying a specific growth rate. The priced-in assumption reads as within range, and the near-term pace is within what the partnership has recently delivered, so the market is discounting decline into a cash-generative business.
The model X-ray is value-supported, with no family flagging the price as expensive. The growth-DCF frames land at or above the price (DCF perpetual growth near $113, DCF exit multiple near $65). The earnings-power frame lands above it (earnings-power value near $54). The relative-multiple frames are mixed by construction in a thin-margin distributor (EV/EBITDA relative near $28, while revenue-based methods read distorted because the business runs enormous low-margin revenue). The blended cross-method anchor sits near $113, well above the quote, though the high-revenue, thin-margin profile makes some methods less reliable here, so the earnings-power and EV/EBITDA reads deserve the most weight. Both support the price.
The balance sheet underwrites the distribution and removes near-term risk. Global Partners carries net debt of just roughly $127 million against about $285 million of trailing operating income, net debt to operating income of 0.45 times, and it expanded its credit facility to $1.8 billion with $1.13 billion of availability. The Q1 2026 results, net income up to $70.1 million, EBITDA up to $142.1 million, and the eighteenth consecutive distribution increase to $0.7650 per unit, are real and material, though driven substantially by richer fuel margins. The reasonable conclusion is that Global Partners is a low-leverage, distribution-growing fuel logistics and retail partnership trading at a decline-implying multiple, where the upside is the cash engine sustaining its payout and the risk is fuel-margin cyclicality plus the secular decline of its core product. It is a value-and-income bet on durability in a cyclical, secularly-challenged business.
Catalysts
The Q1 2026 report on May 8 was the most recent catalyst and a strong one. Sales were $5.32 billion and net income jumped to $70.1 million from $18.7 million a year earlier, with net income per common unit rising to $1.86 from $0.37. Gross profit increased to $332.2 million on higher product margins across the Wholesale, Gasoline Distribution and Station Operations, and Commercial segments, and EBITDA rose to $142.1 million from $91.9 million. The units rose about 5.8% on the print. (Sources: StockTitan 10-Q summary; The Motley Fool Q1 2026 transcript; Simply Wall St.)
The distribution is the recurring catalyst that defines the investment. The partnership raised its quarterly common distribution to $0.7650 per unit from $0.7600, its eighteenth consecutive increase, alongside steady 9.50% annual distributions on the Series B preferred units. It also expanded its senior secured credit facility from $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion. The signals to watch are fuel-margin trends (the swing factor behind the profit surge), throughput volumes across wholesale and station operations, continued distribution coverage and growth, and any acquisitions that add stable retail or terminal assets. Because the price assumes decline, evidence that the cash engine is sustaining margins and the distribution is the clearest upside, while a normalization in fuel spreads would test how much of the strong quarter was cyclical. (Sources: StockTitan; Sahm Capital; The Motley Fool transcript.)
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Wholesale (reported)
- WKC (World Kinect Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- GEL (GENESIS ENERGY LP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- DKL (DKL)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PAA (PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE LP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CLMT (Calumet, Inc. /DE)
- (no filing in the citation store)
GDSO (Gasoline Distribution & Station Operations) (reported)
- MUSA (MURPHY USA INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CASY (CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- WKC (World Kinect Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Commercial (reported)
- WKC (World Kinect Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- GEL (GENESIS ENERGY LP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- DKL (DKL)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PBF (PBF ENERGY INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.