Fortive Corp (FTV): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $59.69, Fortive Corp (FTV) is priced for +16.8% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Exported: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/FTV

Headline

FieldValue
TickerFTV
CompanyFortive Corp
Sector / IndustryTechnology
Current price$59.69/sh
CompositionSales of products and software 80% / Sales of services 20%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)17.0%
Operating margin today17.6%
Margin compression (value-band)-0.6pp
Implied growth16.8%
Multiple paid29x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.77σ
cohort percentile (of 188 peers)49

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset3.15x5expensive
Earnings3.41x4expensive
Relative0
Growth1.07x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=12)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$62.830.95xyesFCF base $1.0B, growth 4% (input: historical growth), terminal g 3.6%, WACC 7.6%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$55.931.07xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 17.1x / 19.1x / 21.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 22.64x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 33x), scenarios: 19.0x / 22.6x / 26.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14.13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$19.283.10xyesBV/sh $19.95, ROE (TTM) 8.9%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$18.953.15xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$41.891.42xyesRev $4.2B, growth 4% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.6x / 4.3x / 5.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$13.864.31xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.76B × (1−17%) / WACC 7.6% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$18.903.16xyesBV $19.95 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 8.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 5.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$27.382.18xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.67 × BVPS $19.95) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $1.16B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$21.022.84xyesFCF $965.7M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$16.953.52xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.85B (FCF $0.97B − SBC $0.11B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$1.4042.64xyesEPS $1.67 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$4.1714.31xyesBV $19.95 × (ROIC 1.6% / WACC 7.6%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $4.24B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$18.053.31xyesEPS $1.67 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Intelligent Operating Solutionsoperatingenterprise$2.9b$738.3m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Advanced Healthcare Solutionsoperatingenterprise$1.3b$138.6m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$3.1b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)5.03x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)4.20x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-4.0%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The market appears to be paying for a growth company. The numbers describe something else, and the something else is arguably better. Core revenue grew 5.3% in the March quarter, which is respectable and not thrilling. What is thrilling, in the quiet way that compounds, is the denominator. Common shares outstanding have gone from 350.7 million at the end of 2023 to 305.6 million on April 3, 2026, and 9 million of that reduction happened in the March quarter alone for 500 million dollars. Total repurchases since the separation reached 1.8 billion dollars across three quarters. Against a company valued near 19.5 billion dollars, that is a meaningful fraction of the equity retired in under a year.

Buybacks at that pace are only sensible if the underlying business throws off cash reliably, and this one does. Trailing free cash flow of 965.7 million dollars sits above trailing operating profit, which happens when depreciation and amortization of acquired intangibles exceed what the business actually needs to spend on plant. Fortive is largely a software and instrument business now, and software does not need factories.

The industrial segment is the engine and it is a good one. Intelligent Operating Solutions earned a 25.1% GAAP operating margin on 743 million dollars of revenue in the March quarter, with core revenue up 5.2%. That is the profitability of a business selling tools and workflow software that customers embed in their own operating procedures. The 10-K describes the revenue that follows from that embedding: software and support contracts that the company expects to fulfil approximately 75 percent within the next two years, approximately 90 percent within the next three years, and substantially all within four years. Contracted revenue arriving over four years is not a backlog in the construction sense. It is a subscription base with a stated shape.

Healthcare is the improvement story, and it moved. Advanced Healthcare Solutions lifted its GAAP operating margin to 10.0% from 7.2% in the year-ago quarter, 280 basis points in a single year, on core revenue growth of 5.8%. The brands doing that work are named in the 10-K: ADVANCED STERILIZATION PRODUCTS "ASP", CENSIS, FLUKE BIOMEDICAL, LANDAUER, and PROVATION. Sterilization consumables and instrument-tracking software sit inside hospital workflows where switching costs are procedural rather than commercial, which is the harder kind to overcome.

Management has been unusually explicit about what it is doing with all of this. The 10-K sets out its strategy in three parts: The Fortive Accelerated strategy is built on three pillars: profitable organic growth acceleration powered by the amplified Fortive Business System (FBS), disciplined capital allocation, and a commitment to building investor trust. Two of the three are measurable from the outside, and both have moved in the right direction since the separation.

The bear will say the growth rate does not support the valuation, and on a pure revenue reading that is fair. The counter is arithmetic rather than rhetoric: a business growing revenue in the mid single digits while shrinking its share count several percent a year produces per-share growth well above its top line, and it does so without needing a single new end market to cooperate.

Bear Case

Put Fortive next to the companies it wants to be compared with and it is at the bottom of the table. ROP converts 28.1% of an 8.12 billion dollar revenue base into operating profit while growing 12.1%. VLTO converts 23.1% of 5.59 billion dollars while growing 5.9%. TDY runs 19.0% and KEYS 18.2%, the latter growing 19.2%. Fortive's consolidated operating margin over the last four quarters was 17.6%. In healthcare the comparison is no kinder: STE earns 18.6% and GMED 17.2% while growing 23.5%, against the 10.0% Fortive's healthcare segment managed in the March quarter. These are not distant competitors. They are the diversified industrial-technology and medical-workflow companies that set the multiple Fortive is measured by, and on the operating line they are ahead.

The growth number also deserves a closer look than the headline gives it. Reported revenue rose 7.7% in the March quarter, core revenue 5.3%, and the company itself attributes 150 basis points of that to additional selling days in the period. Strip the calendar and the underlying pace is closer to the high threes. That is a perfectly acceptable rate for an industrial. It is a long way from what the market value asks for, which is operating profit compounding near 18.9% a year over a five-year stage. Of comparable fast-growers, roughly 39% sustained that kind of pace for about five years, and Fortive's own recent record does not obviously put it in that group.

The gap between the price and the static methods is correspondingly wide. The earnings-power approaches, which capitalize what the business earns today with no growth credited, sit under the market value by a premium of roughly 261%. Peer multiples sit under by about 84%. The asset-value approaches land far under as well. Only the cash-flow projections arrive near the price, and they get there by extending today's cash generation forward at a rate the reported top line has not yet produced.

Then there is the structural question about what this company is. The 10-K lays out the pattern without editorial: in 2018, we split-off most of our automation and specialty platform in a Reverse Morris Trust transaction with Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and, in 2020 and 2025, we spun-off our former Industrial Technologies segment and our former Precision Technologies segment, respectively. These transactions pose risks and challenges that could negatively impact our business. Three separations in seven years is a portfolio being rearranged repeatedly. The 2025 separation alone cost 112 million dollars in transaction expenses. Each round leaves a smaller company carrying the corporate overhead of a larger one, which is one plausible reading of why the consolidated margin sits below both of the segments that produce it.

Financing is the last piece, and it just got more expensive. On May 14, 2026 the company issued 600 million dollars of 4.750% notes due 2031 and 500 million dollars of 5.250% notes due 2036, with proceeds earmarked in part for repaying 3.150% senior notes maturing June 15, 2026. Roughly a percentage point and a half more on every dollar refinanced is a permanent reduction in what reaches shareholders, and net borrowings sit at about 4.2 times operating profit. A buyback funded partly by rolling low-coupon paper into high-coupon paper is a different transaction from one funded out of surplus cash.

Valuation

Two figures sit awkwardly beside each other. The market values the business near 30 times company-wide operating income. Core revenue grew 5.3% last quarter. Turn the first into an assumption and it asks for operating profit to compound near 18.9% a year across a five-year stage, discounted at 8.0% with 4% terminal growth. Treat that rate as a direction and not a measurement, because the arithmetic is unusually sensitive here: a single percentage point of movement in the cost of capital shifts the implied growth rate by about 8.5 points. What survives the imprecision is the shape of the demand, and the shape is that today's price wants growth several times the rate the top line is currently delivering.

The methods reflect that. The earnings-power approaches, which capitalize current earning power with no growth assumed, sit under the market value by a premium of roughly 261%. Peer multiples sit under by about 84%, and the asset-value approaches land further under still. The cash-flow projections are the only frames that arrive close, and the reason is visible in how they are built: they carry today's free cash flow forward and apply an exit multiple held at today's level. That is a coherent way to value a business whose cash generation is durable. It is also a construction that assumes the market's current opinion of the company is the right terminal opinion.

Where this gets genuinely interesting is that the growth the price wants does not have to come from revenue. Trailing free cash flow was 965.7 million dollars against a company valued near 19.5 billion dollars, and management has been spending that cash on its own shares at scale. Repurchases retired 9 million shares in the March quarter for 500 million dollars, and 1.8 billion dollars across the three quarters since the separation. Common shares outstanding went from 350.7 million at the end of 2023 to 305.6 million on April 3, 2026. Per-share growth and company growth are not the same number, and here the difference is large.

Cohort position sits in the upper half of the peer multiple range, which is the harder half to defend when the operating line does not lead the group. ROP earns a 28.1% operating margin while growing 12.1%, VLTO 23.1% while growing 5.9%, TRMB 17.3% while growing 3.2%. Fortive's own trailing conversion was 17.6%. Segment detail explains part of it: the industrial segment ran a 25.1% operating margin in the March quarter, healthcare 10.0%. The consolidated figure is dragged by mix and by corporate cost, not by a broken business.

Solvency neither rescues nor threatens the case. Net debt of about 3,133 million dollars runs at roughly 4.2 times operating profit, with 356.1 million dollars of liquid resources on hand and trailing interest expense near 120 million dollars set against trailing operating profit of 746.6 million dollars. The cost of that debt is rising as older paper matures into new coupons. What the buyer is exposed to, then, is not a balance sheet event. It is the question of whether a mid-single-digit grower buying back several percent of itself a year can produce the compounding that a multiple near 30 times operating income has already been paid for.

Catalysts

The March-quarter report, released April 30, 2026, was the third since the Ralliant separation and the first that let the remaining company be judged on its own. Revenue of 1,069 million dollars was up 7.7% reported and 5.3% on a core basis, with 150 basis points of that attributed to extra selling days. GAAP net earnings of 136 million dollars rose 21.1%, GAAP diluted earnings per share reached $0.44 against $0.33, operating cash flow was 220 million dollars, and free cash flow 194 million. Segment detail showed the industrial business at a 25.1% operating margin and healthcare at 10.0%, the latter up 280 basis points year over year.

Guidance was reaffirmed rather than raised, with management saying the full-year adjusted earnings-per-share range of $2.90 to $3.00 is currently trending toward the upper half. That is the company's own adjusted measure and it excludes amortization of acquired intangibles among other items, so it sits well above the GAAP figure. The July print will show whether the upper-half language survives a quarter without the selling-day help.

Two financing events since then are worth noting together. On May 14, 2026 Fortive completed an offering of 600 million dollars of 4.750% notes due 2031 and 500 million dollars of 5.250% notes due 2036, with proceeds intended partly to repay 3.150% senior notes maturing June 15, 2026. Around July 20, 2026 the company filed an automatic mixed securities shelf, which keeps the option open to issue further securities without a fresh registration. Neither is a distress signal; together they describe a company that intends to keep funding buybacks and acquisitions from the capital markets rather than solely from operating cash.

Product and partnership announcements have been steady in the background. Advanced Sterilization Products took a majority stake in UV Smart, a high-level disinfection technology business, in late June 2026, and Accruent announced a partnership with PowerX around July 21, 2026 covering telecom infrastructure energy management. Truist raised its price target to $67 from $61 while keeping a Hold rating in early July 2026. Second-quarter results are scheduled for July 29, 2026.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Intelligent Operating Solutions (reported)

Advanced Healthcare Solutions (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30, 2026 · company 8-K, May 14, 2026 · company shelf registration, July 2026 · company announcements, June and July 2026 · analyst research note, July 2026

View the full interactive FTV report on boothcheck