FNB CORP/PA/ (FNB): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $18.41, FNB CORP/PA/ (FNB) is priced for 10.1% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/FNB

Headline

FieldValue
TickerFNB
CompanyFNB CORP/PA/
Sector / IndustryFinancial Services
Current price$18.41/sh
CompositionCommunity Banking 94% / Wealth Management 5% / Insurance 1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basisfinancials
Return on equity needed10.1%
Return on equity now8.4%
ROE gap+1.7pp
Price-to-book0.95x

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.4% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 10-year stage, on common book equity (FY2026).

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history+2.40σ
cohort percentile (of 122 peers)5
sustained it ~10 years at this level76%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.00x3justifies
Earnings1.01x1expensive
Relative0
Growth0.55x2justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=6)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
Bank Fair Value (P/TBV)$10.411.77xyesTBVPS $12.26 × 0.85x (ROE (TTM) 8.8% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), credit 1.27% allowance/loans → ×0.94)
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.3x / 10.0x / 11.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax
Simple DDMGrowth$138.560.13xyesDPS $0.53, g=8.8% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3%
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$18.890.97xyesStage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$18.501.00xyesBV/sh $19.37, ROE (TTM) 8.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$18.081.02xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowthnoRev $1.4B, growth 10% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.7x / 4.5x / 5.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $1.68, growth 31% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.35 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAsset$27.060.68xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.68 × BVPS $19.37) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativeno
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarningsnoEPS $1.68 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelativeno
PEG Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $1.68 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$18.161.01xyesEPS $1.68 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

The issuer is a funded financial business. Debt, interest, and cash flows are operating inputs, so industrial EV, net-debt, WACC, and free-cash-flow lenses do not apply; value the common-equity claim with book, earnings, capital, and payout economics.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Community Bankingfinancialequity1.7B reported-currencywithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required
Wealth Managementfinancialequity0.1B reported-currencywithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required
Insurancefinancialequity0.0B reported-currencywithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required

No unit-level total common-equity value is stated. Each financial unit requires supported standalone common equity, normalized earnings, capital adequacy, and payout capacity. Consolidated debt, interest, and cash are operating balances, not an enterprise-to-equity bridge; company-level book, earnings, capital, and payout lenses remain the coherent cross-checks.

Solvency

FieldValue
Share count CAGR (dilution)0.2%

Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

A bank's competitive advantage is almost never in what it lends. It is in what it pays for the money it lends, and that is a question about customers rather than about credit committees. During 2025 the Federal Reserve lowered its target rate by three-quarters of a point, and the yield F.N.B. earned across its earning assets fell 13 basis points to 5.29 percent. The margin between what it earns and what it pays went up 10 basis points anyway. That outcome is only available to a bank whose depositors are not shopping their balances around, because it requires funding costs to fall faster than asset yields.

The deposit book explains why. About 26 percent of total deposits bear no interest, a proportion held for seven straight quarters, and average deposits reached 38.7 billion dollars in the second quarter of 2026, up 4.1 percent on the year. The annual report describes the source of that stability plainly: "Our diversified and granular deposit base is comprised of business, consumer and municipal customers who we serve within our footprint." Granular is doing real work in that sentence. Ten thousand modest relationships reprice far more slowly than a hundred large ones, and they are considerably harder for a competitor to take away in a single phone call.

On top of that sits a structural choice about how the bank is run. Local bankers make local decisions, but the machinery behind them is shared: the 10-K notes that "we have centralized operations, support and risk functions (e.g., loan operations, treasury and enterprise risk management). The centralization of these processes enables us to maintain consistent quality of these functions and to achieve certain economies of scale." The visible result is operating leverage. Second-quarter revenue reached a record 462.7 million dollars, revenue less operating expense before credit provisions rose 8.8 percent from the prior quarter, and earnings came in at $0.42 a diluted share against $0.36 a year earlier.

Capital is being built and returned at the same time, which is a combination that only works when the underlying business is generating more than it consumes. The common equity tier 1 ratio finished June 2026 at an estimated 11.4 percent against 10.8 percent a year earlier, tangible common equity to tangible assets improved to 8.9 percent from 8.5 percent, and tangible book value per share reached $12.24, up 9.9 percent year over year. The bank still repurchased 2.7 million shares during the quarter, and across the prior fiscal year dividends alone consumed 30.8 percent of earnings. The bear's strongest point is that the return on stated equity remains short of what the price assumes, and that is a fair objection. It is worth noting alongside it that the return on tangible common equity, which measures what the capital actually at work produces, ran at 14 percent in the second quarter.

Bear Case

Bank earnings look their best at a specific point in the interest-rate cycle, and this is roughly that point. When the central bank cuts, deposit costs fall quickly because they are repriced by decision, while loan yields fall slowly because they are repriced by contract. Margins widen in the gap. F.N.B.'s did exactly that through 2025, gaining 10 basis points even as asset yields declined. By the second quarter of 2026 the margin was 3.25 percent, flat against the prior quarter. Flat is where that particular tailwind stops. Cycle-peak earnings and sustainable earnings are the same number right up until they are not.

Credit is drifting in the direction credit always drifts first, which is slowly and from a very low base. Net charge-offs equalled 0.19 percent of average loans annualized in the second quarter of 2026, against 0.18 percent in the first quarter and 0.15 percent a year before, and the provision rose to 21.4 million dollars. Across the full prior year the provision totalled 86.0 million dollars against 79.8 million, which the annual report attributes to loan growth and charge-off activity. None of those figures is alarming in isolation. All of them are moving the same way, and a bank earning a single-digit return on equity has less room to absorb a normal credit cycle than one earning mid-teens.

Look at where the loan growth is coming from and the picture gets less comfortable. Average consumer loans grew 1.1 billion dollars over the year to June 2026 while commercial loans and leases fell 66.7 million. The pattern held through the prior year too: consumer balances rose 8.4 percent, driven largely by residential mortgages, while commercial loans and leases declined 1.1 percent. Commercial lending is where a relationship bank earns its spread and, more importantly, its fee and treasury income. Residential mortgage is the most commoditized asset a bank can hold. Meanwhile the loan-to-deposit ratio rose to 92.5 percent at June 2026 from 90.3 percent three months earlier, so the growth that is happening is drawing down the funding cushion that makes the deposit franchise valuable in the first place.

Then there is what the book value is made of. The shares change hands at roughly one times stated book equity, which sounds undemanding until you notice that around a third of that book is goodwill and other intangibles accumulated through acquisitions. Tangible book value per share stood at $12.24 in June 2026, so against the capital genuinely at risk the shares are closer to one and a half times. The approach built specifically for banks, which values tangible book and then scales it by how far the return on equity sits from the cost of that equity before discounting for credit reserves, lands well under today's quote: the price stands at about twice where it comes out. And the return the price requires, near 10.6 percent, runs meaningfully above the roughly 8.4 percent the bank has recently delivered. The gap is not enormous. It is also not something management can simply decide to close.

Valuation

A bank is worth the return it earns on the capital it is required to hold, which is why the read here comes off book value rather than a multiple of profit. The shares trade at roughly one times stated book equity. To make that arithmetic hold, the market assumes a sustained return on equity of about 10.6 percent, against roughly 8.4 percent recently earned. Everything else in this section is commentary on that two-point difference.

Persistence is not the difficult part of the assumption. Around 74 percent of firms earning a return at that level have gone on to hold it for a decade, so the required return is not historically exotic. The difficulty is distance from this bank's own record, which is where the assumption looks stretched, and the shares sit in the lower half of the peer group on price relative to book while asking for a return their own history has not produced.

The methods split in an informative way. Measured against stated book equity, the asset-based, earnings-power and forward-growth approaches all land near today's quote, which is why nothing here reads as expensive on a conventional screen. The one approach designed for banks disagrees sharply. It starts from tangible book rather than stated book, scales it by the ratio of the return on equity to the cost of that equity, then trims for credit reserves running at roughly 1.25 percent of loans, and the price stands at about twice where it finishes. The entire distance between those two answers is the goodwill sitting on the balance sheet from past acquisitions.

Capital and payout are the right solvency lens for a deposit-funded business, and both look comfortable. The common equity tier 1 ratio ended June 2026 at an estimated 11.4 percent, up from 10.8 percent a year earlier, with tangible common equity at 8.9 percent of tangible assets. Dividends plus buybacks returned about 40 percent of the last full fiscal year's earnings, with dividends alone accounting for 30.8 percent of that. The share count has drifted modestly upward since 2022 because acquisitions were paid for in stock; the 2.7 million shares repurchased in the second quarter of 2026 are the first meaningful move the other way.

Asset quality gives the reader little to worry about today. Non-performing loans and foreclosed property together equalled 0.31 percent of loans at June 2026, total delinquency 0.71 percent, and the allowance covered 1.25 percent of the book. Everything within the bank's control is pointing the correct direction: capital building, tangible book per share compounding near ten percent a year, deposit mix holding. What the price wants on top of all that is roughly two additional points of return on equity, and that is the part the rate cycle and the credit cycle decide rather than management.

Catalysts

The second-quarter print landed on July 16, 2026 and it was the strongest in the recent run. Net income of 148.7 million dollars produced earnings of $0.42 a diluted share, against $0.36 in the same quarter a year earlier and $0.38 in the first quarter of 2026. Revenue reached a record 462.7 million dollars, revenue less operating expense before credit provisions rose 8.8 percent from the prior quarter to 209.4 million, and the net interest margin held at 3.25 percent rather than continuing to expand.

Capital deployment turned visible in the same quarter. The company repurchased 2.7 million common shares for 47 million dollars at a weighted average of 17.46 dollars each, while the estimated common equity tier 1 ratio still finished at 11.4 percent and tangible book value per share rose to $12.24, a gain of 9.9 percent over twelve months. Chief executive Vincent Delie tied the quarter to a technology-led operating model, citing investments in digital capability, data analytics and artificial intelligence intended to deepen household penetration. That is a claim to be checked against the efficiency figures in coming prints rather than accepted on its own.

Two items are worth tracking into the second half. Commercial lending, which had been shrinking, grew 238.6 million dollars on a linked-quarter average basis and helped push total average loans up 6.9 percent annualized, so the mix problem may be turning. Against that, the loan-to-deposit ratio moved to 92.5 percent from 90.3 percent in a single quarter. Faster loan growth funded from a shrinking deposit surplus is exactly how a cheap funding advantage gets spent, and the next two quarters will show whether deposit gathering keeps pace.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Community Banking (reported)

Wealth Management (reported)

Insurance (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q2 2026 earnings release, July 16, 2026 · FY2025 Form 10-K

View the full interactive FNB report on boothcheck