FMC CORPORATION (FMC): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers FMC CORPORATION (FMC) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Exported: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/FMC

Headline

FieldValue
TickerFMC
CompanyFMC CORPORATION
Sector / IndustryBasic Materials
Current price$11.35/sh
CompositionInsecticides 45% / Herbicides 36% / Fungicides 10% / Plant Health 6% / Other 3%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)7.7%
Operating margin (mid-cycle)12.6%
Margin compression (value-band)-4.9pp
Trailing margin (depressed year)-61.9%
Multiple paid13x mid-cycle operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 5.8% sits below it).

How unusual the bet is: n/a

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.06σ

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple value, while growth-DCF lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.92x2justifies
Earnings0.32x1justifies
Relative0.29x2justifies
Growth2.51x1expensive

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative Families that call it expensive: Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 3.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=6)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$0.00noNegative/zero FCF — equity value floored at $0
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$0.00noNegative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0
Relative ValuationRelative$38.940.29xyesP/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 1.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus
Simple DDMGrowth$-0.25noDPS $0.65, g=-168.5% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3%
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$-7.97noStage 1: -200% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$13.070.87xyesReference only (book value floor): BV/sh $13.07, ROE negative
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$11.760.97xyesReference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $13.07, ROE converges to ke
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$4.532.51xyesRev $3.3B, growth -15% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.4x / 0.4x / 0.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$0.00noNegative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$35.990.32xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.34B × (1−21%) / WACC 3.2% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAssetno
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativeno
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarningsno
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelative$38.940.29xyesRevenue $3.25B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarningsno
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Agricultural Solutions (single reportable segment)operatingenterprise3.5B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$3.8b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)11.81x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)9.33x
Interest coverage1.5x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.3%
Burning cashno

Leverage and coverage are computed on normalized mid-cycle operating income (mid-cycle margin 12.6%); the trailing year was depressed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The first thing to settle about FMC is what kind of company you are looking at, because the accounts will mislead you otherwise. This is a mature agricultural chemicals business roughly halfway through a deliberate balance-sheet reset, and almost every figure in the trailing statements describes the reset rather than the operation. Revenue for 2025 includes approximately 422 million dollars of one-time charges taken to prepare the India commercial business for sale, and the Asia line fell to 142.3 million dollars from 848.4 million as a direct consequence. Read as a run rate, that is a company collapsing. Read as what it is, it is a company clearing a subsidiary off its books before selling it.

The reset itself is unusually well documented, because the company listed it. Over recent months FMC amended its revolving credit facility to obtain significant covenant relief, raised 1.2 billion dollars in a secured high-yield bond offering, signed an agreement to sell the India commercial business for 252 million dollars, entered a strategic supply and license agreement with Corteva carrying an initial prepayment of 200 million dollars, and signed a framework agreement for a 114 million dollar sale and leaseback of its Newark, Delaware property. On June 30, 2026 Tessenderlo Group agreed to invest about 400 million dollars for roughly 20% of the shares, and FMC said the proceeds take it to its debt paydown target of approximately one billion dollars. That is five separate sources of cash assembled inside a single year by a company that needed them.

What the reset is protecting is a research pipeline, and the pipeline is the reason a buyer showed up. The annual report describes 16 new active areas in discovery and 19 new active ingredients in development, weighted toward new modes of action, which is the part of crop protection that resists generic competition longest. The nearest of those is already moving: FMC filed its first global regulatory submission for rimisoxafen with the EPA on July 8, 2026, and had already signed a co-exclusive supply and license agreement with Corteva on June 16, 2026 to widen its reach across North and South American corn and soybean markets. A partner of that size taking co-exclusive rights to a molecule before it is registered is an outside opinion on the molecule, paid for in cash.

There is also a simple arithmetic observation underneath all of it. The book-value methods, which value what the company owns rather than what it earns, land above today's share price. That is after the write-downs, not before them. A crop-protection portfolio, a registered product book across dozens of countries and a research organisation are not assets that go to zero, and the market is currently paying less for the equity than the balance sheet says the equity is worth.

The bull case does have to concede the obvious: the operating result over the last twelve months was a large loss, and the leverage is heavy. What changes the shape of that concession is who is now standing behind the balance sheet. An industrial group with an agricultural platform of its own has just agreed to buy a fifth of the company at a price above where the shares trade, after a formal review of strategic options concluded that staying independent with a new cornerstone holder was the better path.

Bear Case

The advantage FMC was built on was a molecule, and the molecule's protection has run out. Rynaxypyr, the chlorantraniliprole active the company describes as the world's leading insect control technology, generated approximately 0.8 billion dollars of revenue in 2025. That is close to a quarter of the entire company on one compound, and the annual report lists managing the post-patent Rynaxypyr strategy as an operational priority for 2026. Off-patent means anyone with a manufacturing licence and a registration can make it. In crop protection that historically means price, not volume, is where the loss shows up first.

The erosion is already in the numbers, and it predates the India charges. Revenue ran 4,486.8 million dollars in 2023, 4,246.1 million in 2024 and 3,467.4 million in 2025. Two consecutive years of decline in a business whose end market, food production, does not shrink is not a demand story. Trailing operating profit for the twelve months to March 2026 came to a loss of 1,767.5 million dollars, and that trailing operating margin of about negative 51% is the trough reading rather than any normalised one. The company's own through-the-cycle margin is closer to 12.6%. The distance between those two figures is the size of the hole that has to be climbed out of.

The balance sheet is what turns a difficult period into a dangerous one. Net borrowings stood at 4,732.8 million dollars against liquid assets of 390.9 million, on a company the market values near 1.42 billion dollars. Measured against the operating profit FMC earns in a normal year rather than this one, that is about 10.96 times operating profit measured across the cycle, with interest covered only about 1.8 times on the same basis. The company did not describe that as comfortable either: among the actions it took this year was amending its revolving credit facility "to achieve significant covenant relief". Covenant relief is what a borrower seeks when the existing terms are about to be breached.

Fixing it has cost the existing owners twice over. First in seniority: the 1.2 billion dollars raised this year came as secured high-yield bonds, which sit ahead of everything the equity has a claim on. Then in ownership: Tessenderlo Group is buying roughly 20% of the company for about 400 million dollars at 13.30 dollars a share. Whether that price flatters or insults the existing holder depends on your view of the business, but the mechanical effect is fixed. A fifth of every future dollar of recovery now belongs to someone who was not there for the decline.

Even the valuation methods that flatter the company do not all agree. The book-value approaches land above the price, but the forward-looking approach, the one that takes the recent revenue trajectory and carries it forward, puts the price roughly 151% above where it lands. That method is extrapolating a decline, and extrapolation is a crude tool. It is also the only method in the set that is looking forward at all, and it is the one saying the shares are still expensive.

Valuation

Today's price does something unusual: it declines to pay for any recovery at all. Measured against the operating income FMC earns in a normal year rather than the one it just had, the market is paying roughly 14.5 times, a level low enough that it sits below what even a business shrinking a few percent a year would warrant. That is a bound rather than a target. What it says is that the current quote embeds no growth and some further deterioration, and the question for the reader is whether that is pessimism or arithmetic.

The methods split along exactly the line you would expect for a company in this position. The approaches anchored on what the company owns land above the share price. The approach that projects the recent revenue trajectory forward lands well below it, with the price about 151% above where it reaches. The value lenses see a business trading under its assets; the forward lens sees a business whose revenue has fallen two years running. Both are looking at the same company, and the disagreement is the whole content of the investment decision.

Two operating margins are in play and they need keeping apart. The trailing figure, at about negative 51%, is a trough number produced by impairments and by roughly 422 million dollars of one-time revenue charges taken to prepare the India business for sale. The through-the-cycle figure is closer to 12.6%. Nothing in the recent statements demonstrates which one the future resembles, and the entire spread between the value methods and the forward method reduces to that single unresolved question.

Solvency is where this stops being an academic comparison. Net borrowings of 4,732.8 million dollars against liquid assets of 390.9 million sit on a business the market values near 1.42 billion dollars, which means the lenders own most of the enterprise in economic terms and the equity is the thin residual on top. On the operating income of a normal year that is about 10.96 times operating profit measured across the cycle, with interest covered about 1.8 times on the same basis. Leverage of that shape converts an ordinary earnings disappointment into a capital-structure event, which is precisely why the covenant amendment, the secured bond issue, the asset sales and the equity placement all happened inside the same twelve months.

That sequence also means the record here describes a company that no longer quite exists. The Tessenderlo investment agreed on June 30, 2026 adds roughly 20% more shares and takes about a billion dollars off the borrowings, subject to regulatory approval. Both halves of that trade matter to the equity and they pull in opposite directions: less debt raises the odds the residual survives, more shares reduce what each existing holder owns of it.

Catalysts

Second-quarter results are due July 29, 2026, the first report since the strategic review closed. What matters in it is less the quarter than the schedule: how much of the roughly one billion dollar debt reduction has actually been applied, and what the India divestiture has left behind in the Asia revenue line.

The decisive item is the Tessenderlo Group agreement announced June 30, 2026, under which the Belgian industrial group takes roughly 20% of FMC for about 400 million dollars at 13.30 dollars a share, closing subject to customary conditions including regulatory approvals. It ends a review of strategic options that FMC opened in February 2026, and it settles the outcome as independence with a cornerstone holder rather than a sale. Around it sit the other financing steps of the year: a definitive agreement signed May 7, 2026 to sell the India commercial business to Crystal Crop Protection for 252 million dollars, and a 114 million dollar sale and leaseback of the Newark, Delaware property announced June 23, 2026 with R&D operations continuing on site.

On the product side the relevant clock is regulatory. FMC filed its first global regulatory submission for rimisoxafen with the EPA on July 8, 2026, and on June 16, 2026 established a co-exclusive supply and license agreement with Corteva covering North and South American corn and soybean markets for the same herbicide. Registration timelines in crop protection run in years rather than quarters, so the near-term signal is not approval but whether further partners take positions on the pipeline. Meanwhile the board declared a quarterly dividend of 8 cents a share on July 23, 2026, payable October 15, which is the clearest available statement of how much cash management expects to have spare while the deleveraging runs.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Agricultural Solutions (single reportable segment) (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

FY2025 Form 10-K · Form 8-K, July 1, 2026 · company earnings calendar · company announcement, July 8, 2026 · company announcement, June 16, 2026 · company announcement, May 7, 2026 · company announcement, June 23, 2026 · company announcement, July 23, 2026

View the full interactive FMC report on boothcheck