FLUOR CORPORATION (FLR): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $56.16, FLUOR CORPORATION (FLR) is priced for +7.2% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.

Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/FLR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerFLR
CompanyFLUOR CORPORATION
Sector / IndustryIndustrials
Current price$56.16/sh
CompositionUrban Solutions 59% / Energy Solutions 23% / Mission Solutions 18%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)1.9%
Operating margin (mid-cycle)2.8%
Margin compression (value-band)-0.9pp
Trailing margin (depressed year)-1.4%
Implied growth7.2%
Multiple paid12x mid-cycle operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: n/a

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.25σ

Valuation X-Ray

Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.80x3expensive
Earnings2.53x1expensive
Relative0
Growth1.82x1expensive

Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=5)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$0.00noNegative/zero FCF — equity value floored at $0
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$0.00noNegative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 2.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$20.082.80xyesReference only (book value floor): BV/sh $20.08, ROE negative
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$18.083.11xyesReference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $20.08, ROE converges to ke
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$30.891.82xyesRev $15.5B, growth -5% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.4x / 0.5x / 0.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$0.00noNegative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$22.192.53xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.11B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.2% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAssetno
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.39B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarningsno
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$31.301.79xyesBV $20.08 × (ROIC 12.8% / WACC 8.2%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $15.54B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarningsno
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Urban Solutionsoperatingenterprise$9.2bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Energy Solutionsoperatingenterprise$3.6bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Mission Solutionsoperatingenterprise$2.7bwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$2.0b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-5.71x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-4.51x (net cash)
Interest coverage10.4x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-4.8%
Burning cashyes

Leverage and coverage are computed on normalized mid-cycle operating income (mid-cycle margin 2.8%); the trailing year was depressed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Two cents. That is what Fluor has converted into operating profit per dollar of revenue across a full cycle, and nearly every argument about the stock resolves into whether that figure moves. It reads worse than it is, because most of the revenue line was never Fluor's to keep. In the first quarter of 2026, at-cost revenue, meaning the materials and equipment a client pays for that pass across the books without markup, ran roughly 2.1 billion dollars of the 3.66 billion dollars reported, about 58% of the total. The company says so directly: "Excluding the amounts of at-cost revenue from both GAAP revenue and from project cost yields an amount that we call adjusted net margin." The fee Fluor actually earns is charged against something closer to 40 cents of every reported dollar.

One segment already shows what that fee business looks like when it works. Energy Solutions produced 74 million dollars of segment profit on 703 million dollars of revenue in the first quarter, against 47 million on 1,206 million a year before. The 10-Q attributes the improvement to favorable close-out items on three projects, which is precisely the point. In engineering and construction the profit is made or lost at the end, when disputed scope and change orders settle. Fluor settled three of them in its own favour inside a single quarter, on a revenue base that had nearly halved. The annual report notes the segment's structural shape too: "During both 2025 and 2024, at-cost revenue for Energy Solutions was approximately $2 billion (or approximately 49% and 37% of their segment revenue)." Take that out and the fee margin on the work Fluor is actually paid to perform looks nothing like the headline.

The clearest read on what management thinks the shares are worth is what it is doing with the proceeds. Sales of NuScale Power shares have generated 2.43 billion dollars since September 2025, and the final 40 million shares went in April 2026 for 473 million dollars, completing the divestiture. In the first quarter alone Fluor spent 516 million dollars buying back and cancelling 11 million shares, the board added 30 million shares to the authorisation in February 2026, and the company is targeting roughly 1.4 billion dollars of repurchases across 2026. Against a market value near 7.7 billion dollars, that is a company retiring close to a fifth of itself inside a single calendar year, funded by selling an asset rather than by borrowing against one.

The balance sheet behind it is unusual for a contractor. Cash and marketable securities stood near 3.2 billion dollars on March 31, 2026 against 1,071 million dollars of long-term debt, with roughly 903 million dollars of undrawn facility behind that. Interest income of 25 million dollars in the quarter ran ahead of interest expense of 10 million. That matters more than it sounds. A contractor who can absorb a long working-capital swing on a large project without asking a bank is a contractor who can walk away from a bad lump-sum bid, and bad lump-sum bids are where this industry's losses are manufactured.

None of which denies the obvious. The margin has to move, and the first quarter did not show it moving. But the room is real and it is measurable against the cohort: AECOM (ACM) converts 6.3% of revenue into operating profit, GRANITE CONSTRUCTION (GVA) 6.3%, JACOBS SOLUTIONS (J) 4.5% and KBR 10.0%. Fluor's own through-the-cycle rate is roughly 2.8%. The distance between those figures is simultaneously the opportunity and the indictment, and the bull case is the plain claim that a business with this balance sheet and this shareholder register gets to close some of it.

Bear Case

The uncomfortable sentence is a short one: the operating business lost money over the last twelve months, and the reported profit came from selling things. Filed operating income for the twelve months through March 2026 was a loss of roughly 377 million dollars, against a positive 463 million in fiscal 2024. Even the first quarter of 2026, which printed 92 million dollars of operating profit, contains a 124 million dollar gain on the sale of the CFHI joint venture and a 16 million dollar currency gain. The three segments between them contributed 8 million.

Now the requirement. Paying $52.19 a share works only if you underwrite a normal year rather than this one, and the normal year embedded in the price is one where the through-the-cycle operating margin of roughly 2.8% holds and operating profit compounds at about 2.7% a year from there. The growth rate is not the demanding part. The starting point is. That 2.8% is a multi-year average that leans on fiscal 2024's 463 million dollars of operating income, while fiscal 2025 came in at a loss of 378 million. If the honest mid-cycle margin sits closer to the last two years than to the last five, the multiple embedded in today's price roughly doubles with the share price not moving at all.

The mechanism by which that happens is written into the risk factors without euphemism: "The nature of our contracts, particularly our lump-sum contracts, subject us to risks associated with delays and cost overruns, which may not be fully recoverable and may result in reduced profits or losses that could have a material impact on us." The first quarter supplied two live examples. Mission Solutions absorbed a 96 million dollar charge from a court ruling on a lawsuit filed against Fluor in 2013, turning a segment that earned 5 million dollars a year earlier into a 71 million dollar loss. Urban Solutions booked 37 million dollars of cost growth on one large mining job. Neither was a macro event. Both were execution and legacy liability, and both were company-specific.

The top line is not compounding either. Energy Solutions revenue fell from 1,206 million dollars to 703 million year over year, Mission Solutions from 597 million to 523 million. Backlog on March 31, 2026 was level with the December 31, 2025 figure, which for a business whose annual report states "Our revenue and earnings are largely dependent on new awards. The award and timing of projects is unpredictable and driven by our clients." describes a holding pattern rather than a build. Urban Solutions is the one segment growing, from 2,157 million dollars to 2,437 million, and all that extra work produced 6 million dollars of segment profit against 70 million a year earlier. The annual report adds a concentration the reader should hold onto: revenue from a single customer amounted to 15% of consolidated revenue during 2025.

What bounds the downside has changed shape, and not in the holder's favour. It used to include an equity position: the NuScale Power investment was carried at 1,579 million dollars at the end of 2025 and 433 million by March 31, 2026, with the remainder sold in April. What remains is liquidity and a buyback. Liquidity is a genuine floor, and it is being spent deliberately, roughly 1.4 billion dollars of it over the course of 2026 if the repurchase target is met. Retiring shares raises per-share claims on whatever the segments eventually earn. It does not raise what the segments earn, and on the evidence of the most recent quarter that is still the only question that matters.

Valuation

Strip out the asset sales and the question the price puts becomes narrow. The market is paying roughly ten times the operating income Fluor produces in a normal year, and to support that it needs operating profit to compound at about 2.7% a year through the back half of the decade before settling into a slower terminal pace. Measured against its own record, 2.7% is not a stretch; the company has cleared that rate. The strain sits underneath it, in the definition of a normal year.

None of the standard methods reach today's price. Peer multiples come closest, with the price sitting about 39% above where the peer-multiple methods land. The asset-value methods, book value adjusted for the returns actually earned on it, sit further back still, with the price about 79% above them. The price sits roughly 141% above the earnings-power methods and about 181% above the forward-growth methods. When every family lands below, the price is not being defended by any standard frame; it is being defended by an expectation of normalisation that none of those frames encodes.

That pattern deserves one qualification, because two of those families are reading a trailing earnings stream that is not what it appears. Trailing earnings per share of $2.19 is carried substantially by equity-method income and disposal gains rather than by project work. Equity-method results swung from a 393 million dollar loss in the first quarter of 2025 to a 51 million dollar gain in the first quarter of 2026. Methods that capitalise that stream are capitalising something the company has now sold.

The concrete version of what has to be true: roughly 2.8% operating margins on about 15.2 billion dollars of revenue. Trailing operating margin is negative, and the segments delivered 0.2% in the most recent quarter. For scale on where that level sits in the cohort, AECOM (ACM) runs a 6.3% operating margin, KBR 10.0%, GRANITE CONSTRUCTION (GVA) 6.3% and JACOBS SOLUTIONS (J) 4.5%. The margin the price requires is not an industry stretch. It is a Fluor-specific one, and the cohort comparison sharpens rather than softens it.

Solvency bounds the downside and bounds it well. Cash and marketable securities near 3.2 billion dollars against 1,071 million dollars of long-term debt leaves no net borrowings, interest income running ahead of interest expense, and undrawn facility capacity behind both. The share count is now falling, with 11 million shares retired in the first quarter. What that floor cannot do is settle the margin question, and the margin question is the one the price is asking.

Catalysts

The next scheduled information event is second-quarter results on August 7, 2026. Two developments since the first-quarter filing change what those numbers will describe. Fluor completed the sale of its remaining 40 million NuScale Power shares in April 2026 for 473 million dollars, closing out a programme that has produced 2.43 billion dollars since September 2025. On July 16, 2026 the company sold its interest in the ICA-Fluor Daniel joint venture to its partner for 175 million dollars. Both are disposals, and both land in a year where management has targeted roughly 1.4 billion dollars of share repurchases.

Award activity has been the busier half of the quarter. Saudi Aramco selected Fluor as a program management consultancy contractor under a long-term agreement covering global capital projects on July 6, 2026. Gulf Petrochemical Industries Company awarded front-end engineering and design work for an aromatics facility in Bahrain on July 21, 2026. Front-end engineering is the reimbursable, low-risk end of this business, and it is also where the later construction awards originate, so both matter more for what they may become than for what they book now.

On delivery, a Fluor joint venture reached substantial completion on the Chicago Transit Authority's Red and Purple Line modernisation programme on July 1, 2026, a project of roughly 2.1 billion dollars. Completions are where engineering and construction profit is recognised or written off, as the first quarter demonstrated in both directions. How that programme closes out is the specific line to read in the August print.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Urban Solutions (reported)

Energy Solutions (reported)

Mission Solutions (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · company earnings calendar · FY2025 Form 10-K and Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · FY2025 Form 10-K · company announcement, July 16, 2026 · company announcement, July 6, 2026 · company announcement, July 21, 2026 · company announcement, July 1, 2026

View the full interactive FLR report on boothcheck