FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG): what the price requires
At today's price, FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) is priced for -2.6% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/FLNG
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | FLNG |
| Company | FLEX LNG Ltd. |
| Current price | $30.30/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 15.1% |
| Operating margin today | 50.6% |
| Margin compression implied | -35.5pp |
| Implied growth | -2.6% |
| Multiple paid | 18x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 9, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~7.5pp (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 6.3% sits below it).
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~13.1%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.76σ |
| cohort percentile (of 225 peers) | 35 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.91x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.60x | 2 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.01x | 3 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.43x | 4 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=14)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $13.20 | 2.30x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 0% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 6.8%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $28.41 | 1.07x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 10.5x / 12.5x / 14.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $30.14 | 1.01x | yes | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.9x / 20.0x / 23.1x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $22.97 | 1.32x | yes | Stage 1: -15% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $14.95 | 2.03x | yes | BV/sh $13.30, ROE (TTM) 10.4%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $15.83 | 1.91x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $19.75 | 1.53x | yes | Rev $0.3B, growth 0% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.0x / 4.7x / 5.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $26.04 | 1.16x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.20B × (1−0%) / WACC 6.8% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $15.99 | 1.89x | yes | BV $13.30 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.4% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 6.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $20.32 | 1.49x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $1.38 × BVPS $13.30) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $32.48 | 0.93x | yes | EBITDA $0.25B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 3030.00x | yes | FCF $140.7M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $1.16 | 26.12x | yes | EPS $1.38 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $15.39 | 1.97x | yes | BV $13.30 × (ROIC 7.8% / WACC 6.8%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $12.85 | 2.36x | yes | Revenue $0.35B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $14.92 | 2.03x | yes | EPS $1.38 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $1.5b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 8.68x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 8.67x |
| Interest coverage | 1.9x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.3% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
FLEX LNG is a mature, single-purpose shipping company: it owns modern LNG carriers and rents them out on long contracts. At about $29.70 the price sits near 18 times company-wide operating income, and the implied bet is modest, roughly flat to slightly declining operating profit over five years, which is broadly within range of what the fleet has delivered.
The defining feature is contract coverage. The company reports about 91% of its 2026 vessel days already chartered and a firm backlog measured in decades, so the cash flow that funds the dividend is contracted rather than left to the spot market. That is what lets a $0.75 quarterly payout reach its 19th consecutive declaration.
The catch is that the dividend currently runs ahead of earnings and cash flow, covered by liquidity rather than profit at recent charter rates. The price asks little of growth but a lot of the LNG shipping cycle staying firm enough to refill the backlog as charters roll.
Bull Case
FLEX LNG should be read as a mature, asset-heavy shipping company, not a growth story, and that framing is the bull case. The business is simple: a fleet of modern LNG carriers earning high daily rates on multi-year time charters. Trailing operating margin is around 56%, which is the kind of number you only see when a company owns scarce, expensive assets and rents them on long contracts. At about $29.70 (June 27, 2026) the market pays roughly 18 times company-wide operating income and implies operating profit grows at about -2.8% a year for five years. For a fleet whose ships are already built and largely chartered, a near-flat assumption is not demanding; it is close to what the company has recently delivered.
The contracted backlog is the substance. FLEX LNG reports roughly 91% contract coverage of its 2026 vessel days and a firm contract backlog measured in decades, with employment on some vessels extended toward the end of the decade and options reaching into the 2030s. The filing describes one set of extensions running under original time charters into 2029 with charterer options "to extend each vessel up to the first quarter of 2039" [FY2025 20-F, accession 0001628280-26-012574]. Recent deals, including a long-term charter for Flex Constellation and multi-year extensions for Flex Aurora and Flex Resolute, push that backlog further out. Contracted revenue this far forward turns a cyclical industry into something closer to an annuity for the duration of the charters.
The cash returns are the point of owning it. The company declared a $0.75 quarterly dividend for the first quarter of 2026, the nineteenth consecutive quarter at that level, and lifted full-year 2026 guidance to revenue of $345 million to $370 million, time-charter-equivalent rates of $73,000 to $78,000 per day, and adjusted EBITDA of $255 million to $280 million after a tightening in the LNG shipping market. With first-quarter net income of $19.5 million, or $0.36 a share, and the X-ray earnings-power and exit-multiple frames landing near the current price, the stock is priced as a yield instrument backed by long charters rather than a bet on rate spikes.
Bear Case
The bear case for FLEX LNG is a macro and rate-cycle case, because almost everything that matters to this company is set by variables it does not control. LNG charter rates are driven by the supply of ships and the demand for gas, and a large pipeline of newbuild LNG carriers is arriving across the industry, which can pressure future charter rates and the margins behind them. The filing is blunt that the work is competitive and cyclical, noting the market is "highly competitive and based primarily on supply and demand" and that the process of winning new charters "generally involves intensive screening and competitive bidding" [FY2025 20-F, accession 0001628280-26-012574]. Demand is exposed to regions the company cannot influence; the 20-F warns that a "prolonged economic downturn in Europe is likely to have a detrimental effect on global LNG demand" [FY2025 20-F, accession 0001628280-26-012574]. Today's 91% coverage protects 2026, but charters roll, and the rate at which they roll off into a softer market is the whole risk.
The dividend, which is the main reason to own the stock, is not currently covered by results. At recent charter rates the $0.75 quarterly payout runs well ahead of earnings and operating cash flow, with payout ratios reported above 200% on earnings and above 140% on cash flow. The company itself frames the payout as sustainable for up to three years in weaker rate scenarios because of its liquidity, which is honest but also an admission: the dividend is being funded partly from the balance sheet, not purely from profit, until rates recover. Current charter rates below roughly $80,000 a day are described as insufficient to fully cover the payout. A patient holder is being paid out of a cushion that is finite.
The balance sheet adds interest-rate sensitivity on top of the charter-rate sensitivity. FLEX LNG carries substantial debt against its fleet, and a large share of it floats. The 20-F discloses that about $1,729.5 million of indebtedness as of the end of 2025 "referenced variable interest rates based on SOFR" [FY2025 20-F, accession 0001628280-26-012574], and the company runs net debt near two times operating profit with interest coverage close to two. If rates stay high while charter rates soften, the squeeze comes from both ends, higher financing costs and lower charter income, narrowing the margin that funds both the debt and the dividend. The valuation embeds a benign cycle; the cycle is the thing most likely to disappoint.
Valuation
FLEX LNG is valued as a whole company off its operating income, and the implied bet is undemanding. At about $29.70 the price works out to roughly 18 times company-wide operating profit, which inverts to an assumption that operating profit grows at about -2.8% a year over five years. That is a single solve under a 7% cost of capital and a 4% terminal rate, so it is approximate, but the message is plain: the price does not require growth, only that the fleet keeps earning roughly what it earns now while the long charters run.
The X-ray shows a name where the relative and earnings-power methods bracket the price while the asset and pure-DCF methods sit below it. Relative valuation on a sector P/E lands almost exactly at the price, and the earnings-power and DCF-exit-multiple frames land just under it, which is why the priced-in assumption reads as within range. The asset-based methods, anchored to book value near $13.30 a share with a trailing return on equity around 10%, land lower, in the mid-teens, because they do not give full credit to the long contracted backlog. The honest reading is that the market is paying a premium to book for the contracted charter stream, and whether that premium is justified depends on the durability of the charters and the cycle behind them.
There is one caveat the methods cannot resolve. The dividend that anchors the stock is not currently covered by earnings or cash flow at recent charter rates, so part of the yield is funded from liquidity. The exit-multiple and earnings-power frames assume rates roughly hold; if they do, the price is fair and the yield is real. If the newbuild supply wave pushes charter rates down as contracts roll, the methods that currently support the price would migrate toward the lower asset-based anchors, and the dividend cushion would be tested.
Catalysts
The most recent catalyst was the first-quarter 2026 result, where FLEX LNG reported revenue of $80.5 million, net income of $19.5 million or $0.36 a share, a fleet-wide time-charter-equivalent rate of $65,729 a day, and a $0.75 quarterly dividend, its nineteenth consecutive declaration at that level. The more important move was the raised full-year 2026 guidance, lifted to revenue of $345 million to $370 million, TCE rates of $73,000 to $78,000 a day, and adjusted EBITDA of $255 million to $280 million, reflecting a tighter LNG shipping market after disruptions earlier in the year. Each quarterly print is effectively a dividend-coverage update.
The contract book is where the durable catalysts sit. New and extended charters, including a long-term deal for Flex Constellation and multi-year extensions for Flex Aurora and Flex Resolute, have built a firm backlog of roughly 54 years, potentially 81 years if all options are exercised, and lifted 2026 coverage to about 91%. Any further long-term charter signed at strong rates extends the visibility that supports the payout; conversely, a charter rolling off into a weaker spot market is the negative version of the same event.
The swing factors are external and worth watching closely: the pace of LNG newbuild deliveries across the industry, which threatens future charter rates; the level of global LNG demand, particularly in Europe; and the interest-rate path, given the company's largely floating-rate debt. The single most-watched number is the spot and term charter rate, since current rates below roughly $80,000 a day are described as insufficient to fully cover the dividend from profit alone.
Sources: Flex LNG Q1 2026 6-K, SEC; Higher 2026 guidance, steady dividend, StockTitan; Flex LNG Q1 2026 earnings, Grafa; Flex LNG lifts 2026 guidance, TipRanks; FLNG dividend coverage, Simply Wall St.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- GLNG (Golar LNG Limited)
- FY2025 20-F: …rises in colder weather and declines in warmer weather. Seasonal demand during the summer months has increased in certain markets due to energy requirements for air conditioning and, in some regions, reduced availability of hydropower generation. Certain of our tolling arrangements include both fixed capacity…
- FY2025 20-F: …condition. ◦ Risks related to our industry ■ Our results of operations and financial condition depend on demand for natural gas, LNG and FLNGs; ■ Our operations face several industry risks and events which could cause damage or loss of a vessel, loss of life or environmental consequences that could harm our…
- NVGS (NAVIGATOR HOLDINGS LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- LPG (DORIAN LPG LTD.)
- FY2025 10-K: …as well, and include: ● location of the vessel; ● attractiveness of the contractual terms of the voyage charter agreement; and ● competitiveness of the charter rate offered. 33 Table of Contents VLGCs operate in a highly competitive market and we expect substantial competition for providing transportation…
- FY2025 10-K: …the demand for LPG, LPG shipping or LPG vessels including an increase in available tonnage due to Very Large Ethane Carriers transporting LPG; ● business disruptions, including supply chain issues, due to damage to storage or receiving facilities, or natural disasters; ● greater than anticipated levels of LPG…
- FRO (Frontline plc)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- INSW (International Seaways, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and dynamics that have an impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations. ● Results from Vessel Operations. This section provides an analysis of our results of operations presented on a business segment basis. In addition, a brief description of significant transactions and other items that…
- FY2025 10-K: "Business and Segment Reporting," to the Company's consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," for additional information on the Company's segments, including reconciliations of (i) time charter equivalent revenues to shipping revenues and (ii) adjusted…
- TNK (TEEKAY TANKERS LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- TDW (TIDEWATER INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …a material adverse effect on our current and future business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Our customer base has undergone consolidation and additional consolidation is possible. Consolidation is common in the oil and gas industry and likely to continue in the future. Consolidation…
- FY2025 10-K: …by global and/or regional conflicts, such as the current conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, competition to find and retain qualified offshore employees becomes more challenging, particularly with respect to certain technical and engineering positions, including marine officers, which in turn increases our costs…
- SFL (SFL Corporation Ltd.)
- FY2025 20-F: …are self-propelled, and can therefore easily move between geographic areas. Jack-up drilling rigs are not self-propelled, but it is common to move these assets over long distances on heavy-lift vessels. Therefore, the markets and competition for these rigs are effectively world-wide. Competition for charters in all…
- FY2025 20-F: …the international shipping and offshore drilling industries, types, sizes, sophistication and ages of vessels and drilling rigs, supply and demand for vessels and drilling rigs, availability of or developments in other modes of transportation, competition from other shipping companies, cost of newbuildings,…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.