FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. (FFBC): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $32.84, FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. (FFBC) is priced for 10.8% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/FFBC
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | FFBC |
| Company | FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. |
| Sector / Industry | Financial Services |
| Current price | $32.84/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | financials |
| Return on equity needed | 10.8% |
| Return on equity now | 9.2% |
| ROE gap | +1.6pp |
| Price-to-book | 1.15x |
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.9% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 10-year stage, on common book equity (FY2026).
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +1.48σ |
| cohort percentile (of 122 peers) | 28 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 74% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.10x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.07x | 1 | expensive |
| Relative | — | 0 | — |
| Growth | 1.08x | 1 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=5)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Bank Fair Value (P/TBV) | — | $16.81 | 1.95x | yes | TBVPS $16.64 × 1.01x (ROE (TTM) 9.5% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), credit 1.40% allowance/loans → ×0.95, NPL 0.71% → ×0.99) |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.2x / 10.0x / 11.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $30.44 | 1.08x | yes | Stage 1: 15% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $29.37 | 1.12x | yes | BV/sh $28.46, ROE (TTM) 9.5%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $29.83 | 1.10x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | — | — | no | Rev $0.7B, growth 16% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.0x / 4.8x / 5.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | EPS $2.83, growth 15% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.78 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | $42.57 | 0.77x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.83 × BVPS $28.46) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | EPS $2.83 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | EPS $2.83 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 15.5% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 23.2x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $30.59 | 1.07x | yes | EPS $2.83 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
The issuer is a funded financial business. Debt, interest, and cash flows are operating inputs, so industrial EV, net-debt, WACC, and free-cash-flow lenses do not apply; value the common-equity claim with book, earnings, capital, and payout economics.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Financial Bancorp (single operating segment) | financial | equity | 0.9B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved standalone equity facts required |
No unit-level total common-equity value is stated. Each financial unit requires supported standalone common equity, normalized earnings, capital adequacy, and payout capacity. Consolidated debt, interest, and cash are operating balances, not an enterprise-to-equity bridge; company-level book, earnings, capital, and payout lenses remain the coherent cross-checks.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 2.7% |
Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).
Bullet Takeaways
- Roughly two fifths of First Financial's stated book value per share is goodwill and other intangibles, the accumulated price of a decade of deals, which is why the ordinary book-value lens and the tangible-book lens disagree about this bank by nearly a factor of two.
- Fee income is unusually large for a bank of this size and unusually lumpy: foreign exchange contributed 13.1 million dollars in the June quarter, against "Foreign exchange income increased by $6.0 million, or 36.2% from the third quarter to $22.7 million, due to increased product demand" in the fourth quarter of 2025.
- The next event is the agreed all-stock purchase of Finward Bancorp at 1.35 First Financial shares per Finward share, announced 21 July 2026 and expected to close in the fourth quarter.
Bull Case
Valuing a bank is, in the end, one question asked twice. What return does it earn on the capital it holds, and is that return above what the capital costs? Everything else is detail. First Financial complicates the question in an interesting way, because a large slice of its stated capital was not earned or raised but bought: roughly two fifths of book value per share is goodwill and intangibles from acquisitions. Read on stated book, the bank looks priced a little above its equity. Read on tangible book, it looks priced at roughly twice. The gap is not an accounting curiosity. It is the entire bull case, and whether it is justified depends on what those acquisitions actually bought.
What they bought is fee income that does not need a balance sheet. The 10-K describes the structure directly: "First Financial also has certain specialty lending platforms that extend beyond the geographic banking center footprint. These specialty finance businesses provide insurance premium financing, equipment lease financing, and financing to franchise owners and clients within the financial services industry." Add a foreign exchange desk serving middle-market importers and exporters, and a wealth business, and the result is a revenue mix a conventional Ohio deposit franchise does not have. In the June quarter, noninterest income reached 73.8 million dollars against net interest income of 190.4 million, with leasing at 22.8 million and foreign exchange at 13.1 million. Close to a third of the top line comes from places where the constraint is expertise rather than capital.
That mix is why the return on tangible equity looks the way it does. Return on average tangible common equity ran 17.95% in the June quarter, and return on average assets 1.37%. For a bank with 22.4 billion dollars of assets in the industrial Midwest, that is a strong result, and it is generated on a funding base where noninterest-bearing accounts still make up 20.5% of average deposits. Cheap funding plus fee businesses is the combination that separates a bank earning its cost of capital from one that merely holds capital.
The margin itself has been holding up better than the headline suggests. Net interest margin came in at 3.96% for the quarter on the reported basis, down a single basis point from the prior quarter, and the company noted that excluding purchase accounting accretion and loan fees the underlying margin actually rose five basis points, with the cost of funds falling six. Loans grew about 7.1% annualised in the quarter, led by commercial and industrial lending and the specialty platforms. Growth that comes from lending rather than from securities is the kind that pays for itself.
Credit, meanwhile, is behaving. Net charge-offs ran 6.7 million dollars, twenty basis points of loans on an annualised basis and fifteen basis points better than the prior quarter, with nonperforming assets at 0.43% of total assets. The allowance sits at 1.38% of loans. The bank's own description of how it watches this is unglamorous and, for a lender, exactly right: "Management considers classified loans to be the leading indicator of credit losses, and these loans are typically managed by the Special Assets Department." The June quarter was the 143rd consecutive quarter of profitability, which spans two recessions and a banking panic.
Bear Case
Look at what has to keep going right, and the list is longer than the results suggest. The price assumes this bank sustains a return on equity around 11.4%. It has recently been earning about 9.2%, and across seventeen years of its own record the average is roughly 9.3%. So the requirement is not a small extrapolation of the present. It is a level the bank has reached rarely and held less often, and the historical base rate for holding a return like that across a decade is around 72%. If the assumed return drifts back toward the record, the multiple of book the price supports compresses with it, and there is no growth story underneath to catch the fall.
The most fragile assumption inside that requirement is the fee engine, because it is the part with the least gravity. Foreign exchange income was 13.1 million dollars in the June quarter. Two quarters earlier the annual report recorded a very different figure: "Foreign exchange income increased by $6.0 million, or 36.2% from the third quarter to $22.7 million, due to increased product demand". A line that can move by two thirds in six months is not an annuity, and the market pays annuity-like multiples for fee income precisely because it assumes stability. The same volatility applies to the leasing book and the wealth fees, which respond to rates and to markets rather than to anything management controls.
Then there is what the acquisitions have done to the balance sheet's honesty. Book value per share includes roughly twelve dollars of goodwill and intangibles that would not survive a liquidation and do not absorb a single dollar of credit loss. The mechanics of how that pile grows are worth watching. On the Westfield deal the bank recorded "a corresponding increase to Goodwill to account for the expected losses on loans acquired from Westfield", which is the standard treatment and also a reminder that expected losses on purchased loans land on the balance sheet rather than on the income statement. Reported earnings look cleaner than the economics because of it. And the share count has been climbing about 2.6% a year since early 2022, since deals get paid for in stock. The Finward agreement announced in July is another all-stock transaction. Growth per share depends entirely on those deals earning more than they dilute, and that verdict arrives years after the announcement.
The securities book carries a quieter problem. Tangible common equity stood at 8.24% of assets in the June quarter, or 9.30% if you exclude 223.7 million dollars of accumulated other comprehensive loss. That exclusion is standard practice and it is also a choice. The loss is real, it reflects bonds bought at lower yields, and it only stays theoretical for as long as the bank never has to sell them. Deposits fell in the retail time and brokered categories during the quarter, offset by public funds that are seasonal by nature. A funding base that leans on seasonal public money is a funding base with a calendar.
Finally, the margin has a running component. Management noted that lower-than-expected prepayment rates on acquired mortgage loans reduced accretion and diluted the quarter's net interest margin by five basis points. Purchase accounting accretion is finite by construction; it winds down as the acquired books run off. A margin near four percent that depends in part on that accretion is a margin with an expiry date attached to each deal, and replacing it requires the next deal. That is a workable strategy. It is not the same thing as an earnings stream.
Valuation
A bank's price is a statement about return on capital, so the arithmetic starts there. At today's quote the market is assuming this bank sustains a return on equity of roughly 11.4% while paying about 1.2 times its stated book. Recently it has been earning about 9.2%. That gap of a little over two percentage points is the whole bet, and it is a larger bet than it looks. Stretch the window back across seventeen years of the bank's own history and the same figure has averaged a little over nine percent, so what is being asked for is a level rarely held rather than an extension of the present. Base rates offer partial comfort. Of firms earning at this level, roughly 72% sustained it for about a decade.
Where the methods land depends almost entirely on which book value they read. Against the asset-value methods, which use stated book including goodwill, the price carries a premium of roughly 16 percent, and against the forward-growth methods roughly 24 percent. The earnings-power and peer-multiple methods both land above the price, which is to say they read the bank as inexpensive on what it earns. The purpose-built bank lens is the sharpest of the set and the most demanding: it values the tangible book of 16.20 dollars a share, adjusts for a return on equity only marginally above the cost of equity, then trims a little further for the allowance carried against loans and for nonperforming balances sitting well under one percent of the book. On that reading the price sits at more than twice what the tangible equity supports. The disagreement between the stated-book methods and the tangible-book method is not noise. It is a question about whether a decade of acquisitions bought durable earning power or a large intangible asset.
The evidence for the former is in the fee lines. Noninterest income of 73.8 million dollars in the June quarter against net interest income of 190.4 million puts close to a third of revenue outside the balance sheet, and return on average tangible common equity of 17.95% in the quarter is what happens when the denominator excludes what the acquisitions cost. Both figures are true. They simply answer different questions, and a reader who divides one into the other will get a different bank each time.
Cohort position adds a little. Set against its peer group the bank sits in the lower half on price to book, which is consistent with a market that discounts intangible-heavy capital rather than one that has overlooked the fee businesses. The peer set here is a group of similarly sized regional lenders and reads as a comparability check rather than as a verdict.
The capital position bounds the downside. As filed at the end of 2025, the common equity tier 1 ratio stood at about 11.3%, and the June quarter put it at 12.33% with total capital at 15.75%. About 37% of the latest fiscal year's earnings went out as dividends, which leaves roughly two thirds retained and available to fund loan growth or the next acquisition. That is a comfortable position by any regulatory measure. It is also the reason the acquisition cadence continues, and the reason the share count keeps rising while tangible book per share grows more slowly than earnings would suggest.
Catalysts
The dominant near-term item is a deal. On 21 July 2026 First Financial entered into a merger agreement with Finward Bancorp, an Indiana holding company whose banking subsidiary is Peoples Bank, with Finward merging into First Financial and Peoples Bank into First Financial Bank. Each Finward share converts into 1.35 First Financial shares, making this an all-stock transaction and therefore dilutive to share count before it is accretive to anything. Both boards approved unanimously. Closing is expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to regulatory approval and a vote of Finward shareholders, and a registration statement on Form S-4 will follow. The disclosed risk list includes the possibility that regulators impose conditions that erode the expected benefits, which for a bank deal is the condition that usually bites.
The June quarter, reported the same day, gave the acquirer a strong hand to play. Net income was 76.5 million dollars, or 0.73 dollars per diluted share, on net interest income of 190.4 million and a net interest margin of 3.96%. Loans at period end grew 240.1 million dollars, about 7.1% annualised, led by commercial and industrial lending and the premium finance and leasing platforms. Average deposits rose 41.2 million dollars, or 168.6 million excluding brokered certificates. Tangible book value per share reached 16.64 dollars, up 3.0% in three months. The reported efficiency ratio was 61.2%, carrying 11.6 million dollars of acquisition-related expense within it, which is a reminder that the deal cadence has a running cost.
Credit metrics are the thing to watch between now and the close. Provision expense was 8.2 million dollars, net charge-offs 6.7 million or twenty basis points of loans annualised, classified assets 1.01% of total assets and nonperforming assets 0.43%. Those are benign numbers, and the integration of an acquired loan book is exactly the moment when benign numbers get retested. The other date worth marking is the Form S-4 and the associated proxy, which will carry the transaction economics in detail, including the tangible book value earn-back period that management has flagged as a metric for the deal.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
First Financial Bancorp (single operating segment) (reported)
- CBSH (COMMERCE BANCSHARES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: 31, 2024 (In thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Financial Assets Loans: Business $ 6,053,820 $ - $ - $ 5,943,565 $ 5,943,565 Real estate - construction and land 1,409,901 - - 1,384,029 1,384,029 Real estate - business 3,661,218 - - 3,558,862 3,558,862 Real estate - personal 3,058,195 - - 2,738,880 2,738,880…
- FY2025 10-K: …operating activities: Provision for credit losses 56,138 32,903 35,451 Depreciation and amortization 56,501 54,076 49,513 Amortization of investment security premiums, net ( 18,308 ) ( 839 ) 17,666 Deferred income tax (benefit) expense 11,555 ( 591 ) ( 7,399 ) Investment securities (gains) losses, net (A) ( 3,660 ) (…
- WTFC (WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …credit facility are classified in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. As of December 31, 2025, there was no outstanding principal balance under the term loan facility and no outstanding principal balance under the revolving credit facility. Secured Borrowings Secured borrowings primarily…
- FY2025 10-K: …banking locations in southwest Florida. Excess space in certain properties is leased to third parties. Wintrust Mortgage, also of our banking segment, is headquartered in our corporate headquarters in Rosemont, Illinois and has 28 locations in 12 states, all of which are leased, as well as office locations at several…
- ABCB (Ameris Bancorp)
- FY2025 10-K: …activities. As a result of our financial holding company election, we may engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activities, including insurance underwriting, securities underwriting and dealing, and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial…
- FY2025 10-K: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Business Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries (the "Company" or "Ameris") is a financial holding company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, and whose primary business is presently conducted by Ameris Bank, its wholly owned…
- FHB (FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: ) $ 880,788 153 Table of Contents Year Ended December 31, 2024 Retail Commercial Corporate/ Consolidated (dollars in thousands) Banking Banking Other Total Net interest income (expense) (1) $ 492,408 $ 200,038 $ ( 69,708 ) $ 622,738 …
- FY2025 10-K: ( 5,834 ) Originations of loans held for sale ( 16,619 ) ( 38,242 ) ( 21,324 ) Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale 15,084 37,933 22,240 Net (gains) losses on investment securities ( 37 ) 26,171 ( 792 ) Premiums paid on cash flow hedges ( 2,914 ) - - …
- BANR (Banner Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …has concluded that there was no impairment of the FHLB stock investment as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. Loans Receivable : The Bank originates one- to four-family residential loans for both portfolio investment and sale in the secondary market. The Bank also originates construction and land development, multifamily…
- FY2025 10-K: …The Trusts are not consolidated in the Company's consolidated financial statements. Operating Segments: The Company's operations are managed, and financial performance is evaluated, by our chief operating decision maker on a Company-wide basis. The Bank's primary business is that of a traditional banking institution,…
- ZION (ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …derived from operations within the United States. In late March 2025, we purchased four FirstBank Coachella Valley, California branches and their associated deposit and loan accounts. In addition to the four branches, the purchase included approximately $ 630 million in deposits and $ 420 million in consumer and…
- FY2025 10-K: CMC Capital Management Committee OCC Office of the Comptroller of the Currency CODM Chief Operating Decision Maker OCI Other Comprehensive Income COSO Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission OREO Other Real Estate Owned CRA Community Reinvestment Act PCAOB Public Company Accounting Oversight…
- HWC (HANCOCK WHITNEY CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …cash flows using current market rates at which debt with similar terms could be obtained. Derivative Financial Instruments - The fair value measurement for derivative financial instruments is described earlier in this note. The following tables present the estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments…
- FY2025 10-K: BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 147 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 147 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 147 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 148 ITEM 16 FORM 10-K SUMMARY 151 Table of Contents…
- HOMB (HOME BANCSHARES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Director Independence 150 Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 150 PART IV: Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 151 -153 Item 16. Form 10-K Summary 153 Signatures 154 Consent and Certifications After page 154 Table of Contents CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Some of our…
- FY2025 10-K: …not disclose consumer account numbers to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing to consumers. We and our subsidiary have established policies and procedures to assure our compliance with all privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. We are also subject…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
merger agreement 8-K, July 2026 · Q2 2026 earnings presentation, July 2026