FTI CONSULTING, INC (FCN): what the price requires

The current priced-in claim for FTI CONSULTING, INC (FCN) is temporarily suppressed because the live engine record is unavailable. The dated report remains a snapshot, not a current market read.

Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/FCN

Headline

FieldValue
TickerFCN
CompanyFTI CONSULTING, INC
Current price$161.36/sh
CompositionCorporate Finance 41% / Forensic and Litigation Consulting 20% / Economic Consulting 19% / Technology 10% / Strategic Communications 10%

What The Price Requires (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin needed1.8%
Operating margin today10.0%
Margin compression implied-8.2pp
Multiple paid14x operating income

The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 6.6% sits below it).

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~5.9%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.56σ
cohort percentile (of 225 peers)19
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.59x5expensive
Earnings1.78x5expensive
Relative1.07x5expensive
Growth0.80x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=18)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$254.090.64xyesFCF base $0.3B, growth 6% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.8%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$201.910.80xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 12.0x / 14.0x / 16.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$150.801.07xyesP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.1x / 18.0x / 20.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$95.061.70xyesBV/sh $54.79, ROE (TTM) 16.0%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$123.611.31xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$149.331.08xyesRev $3.9B, growth 6% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.1x / 1.3x / 1.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$143.011.13xyesEPS $8.40, growth 17% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.08 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$98.631.64xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.35B × (1−27%) / WACC 7.8% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$125.611.28xyesBV $54.79 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 16.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$101.761.59xyes√(22.5 × EPS $8.40 × BVPS $54.79) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$134.201.20xyesEBITDA $0.41B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$64.582.50xyesFCF $256.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$48.993.29xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.21B (FCF $0.26B − SBC $0.04B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$271.040.60xyesEPS $8.40 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$17.629.16xyesBV $54.79 × (ROIC 2.5% / WACC 7.8%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$319.320.51xyesRevenue $3.87B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$214.510.75xyesEPS $8.40 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 17.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 25.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$90.811.78xyesEPS $8.40 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$556.0m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)2.00x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)1.46x
Interest coverage18.7x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-4.0%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

The franchise is counter-cyclical and expert-led, with demand for its restructuring, litigation, and economic-consulting practices rising when conditions worsen; Q1 2026 revenue grew 9.5% to $983.3 million, EPS rose to $1.90, and management reaffirmed full-year guidance of $8.90 to $9.60 EPS.

The catch is margin: the Economic Consulting segment posted an EBITDA loss amid demand headwinds and rising compensation, SG&A is guided materially higher, and the talent war is permanent, which is why the earnings-power family flags the stock as expensive even at a low headline multiple.

Bull Case

FTI Consulting's structural advantage is counter-cyclicality, and it is visible in the margin and return data. Its biggest practices make money when other businesses are in trouble: restructuring, litigation, forensic, and economic consulting all see demand rise precisely when markets and industries turn unfavorable. The company's own filing makes the point that these services experience their highest demand during periods when conditions are less favorable for many businesses, including periods of limited credit availability, reduced M&A activity, and declining spending (accession 0000887936-25-000014). A firm whose revenue grows when the economy hurts has a natural hedge most service companies lack, and that durability is the foundation of the bull case.

The moat is reinforced by the firm's bench of senior experts and its reputation across five practice areas (Corporate Finance, Forensic and Litigation, Economic Consulting, Technology, and Strategic Communications). Consulting of this kind is a people business, and FTI's ability to attract and retain marquee professionals is the asset; the recent hiring has focused on senior professionals in key growth geographies and services, which is the behavior of a firm investing to extend its lead rather than cutting to survive. Diversification across five practices also means a soft patch in one (currently Economic Consulting) can be offset by strength in another.

The valuation is the unusual part: this quality is on sale. At $145.38 (June 27, 2026) the price is about 13x company-wide operating income, a multiple so low the inversion notes the price sits below what even a 5% annual operating-profit decline would warrant. In other words, the market is pricing FTI as if its profits will shrink, while the business just grew first-quarter 2026 revenue 9.5% to $983.3 million and EPS 9.2% to $1.90, and management reaffirmed full-year guidance of $8.90 to $9.60 EPS on $3.9 to $4.1 billion of revenue. Corporate Finance set record profitability and Strategic Communications hit new highs. The bull wager is that a durable, counter-cyclical, expert-led franchise priced for decline is mispriced.

Bear Case

The disruption threat to FTI Consulting comes from the people business itself: its competitors are the other expert-services firms, and they recruit the same senior professionals FTI depends on. AlixPartners, Alvarez and Marsal, the big four advisory arms, and a long tail of boutiques compete for the same restructuring mandates, the same litigation experts, and the same economic-consulting stars. In a firm whose entire value is its bench, a rival poaching a marquee group can take a revenue stream and its clients with it overnight. The recent need to hire heavily into senior ranks cuts both ways: it shows investment, but it also shows that retaining and replacing top talent is a constant, costly fight, and compensation inflation in that fight directly compresses margin.

The current results show where the pressure is biting. The Economic Consulting segment posted an EBITDA loss amid demand headwinds and elevated compensation costs, and management said it requires multiple quarters of operational improvement. That is one of FTI's five practices already underperforming, and the firm warned that SG&A expenses are projected to rise materially over the year. A people business with rising compensation and an underperforming segment is exactly the setup where revenue can grow while profit stalls, which is why the earnings-power valuation family flags the stock as expensive even though the headline multiple looks low.

The cheapness, then, may be a signal rather than a gift. The market is pricing FTI below what even a 5% profit decline would warrant, and the bear's interpretation is that the market is anticipating margin erosion from compensation pressure and the lumpy, mandate-driven nature of the business. Counter-cyclical demand is a genuine strength, but it also means earnings are episodic: a wave of large restructuring or litigation mandates can lift a year, and their absence can flatten the next, so a single trailing multiple understates the volatility. Net debt near $556 million is modest with interest coverage around 15x, so leverage is not the worry; the worry is that consulting profitability is fragile, the talent war is permanent, and one underperforming segment plus rising costs can keep the multiple low for longer than the bull expects.

Valuation

FTI Consulting is priced at about 13x company-wide operating income, a low multiple for a profitable, growing services franchise. The inversion notes the multiple is so low that the price sits below what even a 5% annual operating-profit decline would warrant, which is a bound rather than a solved point: the market is effectively pricing in shrinkage.

The method families split in an informative way. The relative-multiple and growth-DCF families reach the price, while the earnings-power family says expensive. That earnings-power flag is the bear's foothold: it reflects the risk that compensation costs and an underperforming Economic Consulting segment compress margin, so that current operating profit is not fully durable. The bull leans on the peer-multiple and forward-growth frames, which credit the firm's growth and counter-cyclical demand.

The honest read: this is a high-quality, counter-cyclical consulting franchise trading at a multiple that implies decline, against fundamentals that are still growing. First-quarter 2026 revenue rose 9.5% to $983.3 million and EPS rose to $1.90, and management reaffirmed full-year guidance of $8.90 to $9.60 EPS on $3.9 to $4.1 billion of revenue. The gap between a decline-priced multiple and growing guidance is the opportunity; the catch is that consulting earnings are episodic and margin is under compensation pressure, with SG&A guided materially higher. The cleaner way to weigh the price is against the reaffirmed EPS guidance and the trajectory of the weak Economic Consulting segment, recognizing that the low multiple already embeds a pessimistic view the current results do not support.

Catalysts

The key recent catalyst was the first-quarter 2026 report (early May 2026). FTI Consulting posted revenue of $983.3 million, up 9.5% from $898.3 million a year earlier, and EPS of $1.90, up 9.2% from $1.74. Alongside the result, management reaffirmed full-year 2026 guidance of $8.90 to $9.60 EPS on revenue of $3.9 to $4.1 billion (FTI 8-K, MarketBeat, StockTitan).

Segment performance was mixed and is the live story. Corporate Finance achieved record profitability and notable margin expansion, and Strategic Communications set new highs for revenue and EBITDA. Economic Consulting, however, posted a segment EBITDA loss amid demand headwinds and elevated compensation costs, with management saying it needs multiple quarters of operational improvement. The firm also flagged that SG&A expenses are projected to rise materially over the year, and hiring has focused on senior professionals in key growth areas (Motley Fool, Simply Wall St).

The forward catalysts are the recovery in Economic Consulting and the demand backdrop for the counter-cyclical practices. The thesis turns on whether the weak segment turns over the coming quarters and whether restructuring and litigation demand stays firm; a continued drag from Economic Consulting or compensation-driven margin compression would be the clearest near-term risks, while a return to broad-based segment growth would support the reaffirmed guidance. The next quarterly print is the test (Motley Fool, FTI 8-K).

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Corporate Finance (reported)

Forensic and Litigation Consulting (reported)

Economic Consulting (reported)

Technology (reported)

Strategic Communications (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive FCN report on boothcheck