EZCORP, INC. (EZPW): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers EZCORP, INC. (EZPW) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.

Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/EZPW

Headline

FieldValue
TickerEZPW
CompanyEZCORP, INC.
Sector / IndustryConsumer Cyclical
Current price$32.62/sh
CompositionMerchandise sales 55% / Jewelry scrap sales 8% / Pawn service charges 37% / Other revenues 0%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)2.1%
Operating margin today13.9%
Margin compression (value-band)-11.8pp
Multiple paid15x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.09σ
cohort percentile (of 212 peers)35

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.32x5expensive
Earnings2.73x5expensive
Relative0.45x2justifies
Growth0.59x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$136.830.24xyesFCF base $0.2B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.3%, 7yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$55.670.59xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 12.1x / 14.1x / 16.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.0x / 20.0x / 24.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$20.531.59xyesBV/sh $13.97, ROE (TTM) 13.6%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$24.651.32xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$45.660.71xyesRev $1.6B, growth 29% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$69.650.47xyesEPS $1.99, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.49 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$9.083.59xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.12B × (1−26%) / WACC 7.3% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$25.511.28xyesBV $13.97 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 13.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$25.011.30xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.99 × BVPS $13.97) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.23B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$11.942.73xyesFCF $138.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$9.883.30xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.12B (FCF $0.14B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$64.210.51xyesEPS $1.99 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$4.667.00xyesBV $13.97 × (ROIC 2.4% / WACC 7.3%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $1.58B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$74.620.44xyesEPS $1.99 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$21.511.52xyesEPS $1.99 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
U.S. Pawnoperatingenterprise$836.1mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Latin America Pawnoperatingenterprise$325.5mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Other Investmentsoperatingenterprise$35kwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$209.6m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)1.29x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.95x
Interest coverage6.7x
Share count CAGR (dilution)11.0%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

At a pawn business the balance sheet is the business, so start there. The annual report records that "As of September 30, 2025, consolidated pawn loans outstanding was $307.5 million", against $274.1 million a year earlier. That one line is the engine. Money goes out as a loan secured by a watch or a ring; while it is out it earns a service charge; if the customer does not come back for the item, the collateral becomes inventory the store sells at a retail margin. A pawn loan book is not credit risk in the way a bank's book is. It is inventory that has not been claimed yet.

The rate on that inventory is the part most readers underestimate. The latest quarterly filing reports a "Monthly average yield on pawn loans outstanding 14 %". Monthly. A pawn loan usually runs a month or two, so the book turns several times in a year and each turn earns that charge again. This is why a modest-looking loan balance supports a revenue line many times its size, and why growing the balance is the single highest-return use of a dollar this company has.

The goods side has been working too. In fiscal 2025 the U.S. business ran merchandise gross margin at 37.1% while Latin America ran 30.6%, and store expenses in the U.S. grew only 4% on a same-store basis, which the filing attributes to wage inflation rather than any expansion of the cost base. Segment contribution in that business rose by $34.9 million on the year. Latin America has since improved further: in the March 2026 quarter its merchandise gross margin "increased 400 bps to 34% from 30%".

Then there is gold, which is a smaller line and a much larger lever than it looks. Jewelry scrap is roughly 8% of revenue. In fiscal 2025 the filing records that "Jewelry scrap sales increased 58%, and jewelry scrap sales gross margin increased to 26.7% due to increase in gold price" in the U.S. business, with Latin America up 96% on the same line. A pawn shop is long gold twice over. A rising gold price lets it lend more against the same chain, and it widens the margin when the chain is eventually melted down. Very few retailers have an input whose price increase helps them on both sides of the transaction.

Capital allocation reads consistently with all of that. The company refinanced its long-dated borrowings in March 2025, retired the older notes that May, and put a fresh authorization in place under which "we are authorized to repurchase up to $50 million of our Class A Non-Voting" common stock. The fair objection is that the share count has still grown roughly 11% a year since spring 2022, because the convertible financing behind this expansion settles in shares rather than cash. The bull's answer is what those shares bought: a loan book compounding at a double-digit rate, a Latin American footprint growing faster than the domestic one, and a store network whose unit economics have improved every year through the build.

Bear Case

The threat to a pawn lender is not another pawn lender. It is everyone willing to advance a customer a few hundred dollars without asking for the ring. EZCORP's own risk disclosure lists the field it operates in: "We compete with other pawn stores, banks, alternative lenders and loan brokers, credit unions and other financial institutions, such as consumer finance companies". The alternative lenders in that sentence have been the growth story of small-dollar consumer credit for most of a decade. Point-of-sale installment credit, app-based advances against a paycheck, and fintech instalment products all do the job a pawn loan does, and none of them requires the customer to carry something valuable into a store and leave it behind. That is a convenience gap, and convenience gaps in consumer finance tend to close in one direction.

Inside the industry, scale sits elsewhere. FCFS carries revenue of about 3.88 billion dollars growing 14.4% a year, against a revenue base here closer to 1.48 billion dollars. Scale in pawn is not a vanity metric: it buys purchasing leverage on the retail side, better store locations, and a cheaper cost of funds against the same collateral.

The sharper problem is what has been producing the recent improvement. In the March 2026 quarter the Latin America business recorded that "Jewelry scrap sales increased 109% (87% constant currency basis), and jewelry scrap sales gross margin increased from 23% to 36% due to increase in" the gold price. Scrap is a small share of revenue and a much larger share of the recent gain. Nothing about that is improper, and management did not engineer it. But it means a meaningful part of the current earnings base is a commodity windfall, and commodity windfalls do not need to reverse to stop helping. Gold only has to stop rising.

That is where the priced-in read becomes less comforting than it first appears. Read backwards, today's quote implies operating profit staying roughly flat across the next five-year stage rather than compounding, which sounds like a generous cushion. It is a cushion only if the current profit base is durable. Measured against a year lifted by scrap margins, flat is not conservatism; it is the assumption that a peak holds. And the calculation itself is unusually sensitive to the discount rate applied, so the comfort it appears to offer should be held loosely.

Then there is the dilution, which is the quietest of the risks and the most arithmetically certain. The share count has grown roughly 11% a year since spring 2022. Whatever the stores earn, each share's slice of it has been shrinking at that pace throughout the expansion, and a $50 million repurchase authorization is not remotely the size of that arithmetic. The convertible structure let management build out without asking holders for money directly. The bill arrives later, in shares.

The genuine floor here is thinner than the story suggests. Holdings outside the operating stores amount to roughly 26.1 million dollars, which bounds the downside a little and no more. None of this makes the business fragile: the loan book is collateralized, it is growing, and the collateral is liquid. The bear case is narrower than that. It is that a peak-margin trailing year, a share count rising at a double-digit rate, and a competitive set moving online are three things the current quote is not paid to absorb simultaneously.

Valuation

A pawn company is valued on two questions: how large the loan book is, and what the goods standing behind it are worth. Both have been moving the right way, which is why most of the frames applied here already reach today's quote rather than straining to justify it.

Peer multiples and the cash-flow methods both land above the current price. The asset-based methods sit close to it, about 32% under. Only the earnings-power methods land a long way off, with the price sitting roughly 153% above where that family settles, and the reason is mechanical rather than mysterious: those methods capitalize a normalized profit with no growth credited at all, which is a harsh frame for a business that has been opening stores and growing its loan book every year. Taken together the pattern is value-shaped, not premium-shaped.

What the price is betting is correspondingly modest. Read backwards, today's quote implies operating profit staying roughly where it is across the next five-year stage rather than compounding. For a business whose loan book grew from $274.1 million to $307.5 million over fiscal 2025, that is not a demanding requirement on its face. The caution belongs on the inputs rather than the output: the calculation is unusually sensitive to the assumed cost of capital, where a single point of difference moves the implied growth figure by something like eight points. Read the direction, not the decimal.

The concrete version of the question is whether the current margin structure is the normal one. Fiscal 2025 merchandise gross margin reached 37.1% domestically and 30.6% across Latin America, and the scrap line carried margins that the filing attributes directly to a rising gold price. Those are the filing's own numbers and they are good ones. They are also the numbers a flat-forever assumption is anchored on. If the goods-side margin normalizes toward its pre-gold level while the loan book keeps growing, the two effects partly cancel and the flat assumption holds. If gold retreats while store growth slows, they compound instead.

The obligation stack is manageable and worth naming precisely. Gross borrowings run about 520.2 million dollars against liquid assets near 354.2 million dollars, leaving a net funded position around 166.1 million dollars; counted on the lease-inclusive basis the total obligation is closer to 800.2 million dollars. For a business whose assets are cash, collateralized loans and inventory that turns several times a year, that is a workable structure. It is also not the variable that decides this one. The share count, growing roughly 11% a year since spring 2022, has been quietly doing more to the per-share outcome than the borrowings ever have.

Catalysts

Third-quarter fiscal 2026 results are scheduled for August 5, 2026, a date the company confirmed on July 23, 2026. Two lines in it carry most of the information: the pawn loan balance, which sets the following quarter's service charges, and the jewelry scrap margin, which is where the gold move shows up first.

The quarter before it, reported May 7, 2026, set a high bar. Revenue reached $446.9 million and the company described both revenue and its pawn loan balance as records for the period. The filed detail behind that release is where the composition shows: total revenues and gross profit both increased 27%, pawn service charges increased 13% on a higher average loan balance, and the Latin America scrap line more than doubled.

The sell side has moved with the prints rather than ahead of them. Jefferies raised its target to $45 from $40 on July 9, 2026, following a cluster of increases on May 23, 2026 from Citizens to $39, Canaccord to $44 and Roth Capital to $40. All of those sit above the current quote, and the reason is worth stating plainly rather than treating as independent confirmation: they credit the recent scrap-margin and loan-book trajectory continuing, which is precisely the assumption the methods used here leave open.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

U.S. Pawn / Latin America Pawn / Other Investments (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

company earnings announcement, July 23, 2026 · Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings release, May 7, 2026 · Jefferies research note, July 9, 2026 · broker research notes, May 23, 2026

View the full interactive EZPW report on boothcheck