EZCORP, INC. (EZPW): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers EZCORP, INC. (EZPW) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.
Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/EZPW
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | EZPW |
| Company | EZCORP, INC. |
| Sector / Industry | Consumer Cyclical |
| Current price | $32.62/sh |
| Composition | Merchandise sales 55% / Jewelry scrap sales 8% / Pawn service charges 37% / Other revenues 0% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 2.1% |
| Operating margin today | 13.9% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -11.8pp |
| Multiple paid | 15x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.09σ |
| cohort percentile (of 212 peers) | 35 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.32x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.73x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.45x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.59x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=15)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $136.83 | 0.24x | yes | FCF base $0.2B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.3%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $55.67 | 0.59x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 12.1x / 14.1x / 16.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.0x / 20.0x / 24.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $20.53 | 1.59x | yes | BV/sh $13.97, ROE (TTM) 13.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $24.65 | 1.32x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $45.66 | 0.71x | yes | Rev $1.6B, growth 29% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $69.65 | 0.47x | yes | EPS $1.99, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.49 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $9.08 | 3.59x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.12B × (1−26%) / WACC 7.3% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $25.51 | 1.28x | yes | BV $13.97 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 13.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $25.01 | 1.30x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $1.99 × BVPS $13.97) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $0.23B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $11.94 | 2.73x | yes | FCF $138.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $9.88 | 3.30x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.12B (FCF $0.14B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $64.21 | 0.51x | yes | EPS $1.99 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $4.66 | 7.00x | yes | BV $13.97 × (ROIC 2.4% / WACC 7.3%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $1.58B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $74.62 | 0.44x | yes | EPS $1.99 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $21.51 | 1.52x | yes | EPS $1.99 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Pawn | operating | enterprise | $836.1m | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Latin America Pawn | operating | enterprise | $325.5m | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Other Investments | operating | enterprise | $35k | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $209.6m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 1.29x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.95x |
| Interest coverage | 6.7x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 11.0% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- EZCORP lends against watches, tools and gold chains across the United States and Latin America, and the annual report records that "As of September 30, 2025, consolidated pawn loans outstanding was $307.5 million", up from $274.1 million a year earlier.
- Gold is the swing factor hiding inside a small line: jewelry scrap is roughly 8% of revenue, but the fiscal 2025 filing attributes a scrap sales increase of 58% in the U.S. business and 96% in Latin America to the gold price, with the margin on those sales rising in both.
- The offsetting cost sits below the profit line: the share count has grown roughly 11% a year since spring 2022, so each share's claim on a bigger business has been getting thinner; third-quarter results on August 5, 2026 are the next checkpoint.
Bull Case
At a pawn business the balance sheet is the business, so start there. The annual report records that "As of September 30, 2025, consolidated pawn loans outstanding was $307.5 million", against $274.1 million a year earlier. That one line is the engine. Money goes out as a loan secured by a watch or a ring; while it is out it earns a service charge; if the customer does not come back for the item, the collateral becomes inventory the store sells at a retail margin. A pawn loan book is not credit risk in the way a bank's book is. It is inventory that has not been claimed yet.
The rate on that inventory is the part most readers underestimate. The latest quarterly filing reports a "Monthly average yield on pawn loans outstanding 14 %". Monthly. A pawn loan usually runs a month or two, so the book turns several times in a year and each turn earns that charge again. This is why a modest-looking loan balance supports a revenue line many times its size, and why growing the balance is the single highest-return use of a dollar this company has.
The goods side has been working too. In fiscal 2025 the U.S. business ran merchandise gross margin at 37.1% while Latin America ran 30.6%, and store expenses in the U.S. grew only 4% on a same-store basis, which the filing attributes to wage inflation rather than any expansion of the cost base. Segment contribution in that business rose by $34.9 million on the year. Latin America has since improved further: in the March 2026 quarter its merchandise gross margin "increased 400 bps to 34% from 30%".
Then there is gold, which is a smaller line and a much larger lever than it looks. Jewelry scrap is roughly 8% of revenue. In fiscal 2025 the filing records that "Jewelry scrap sales increased 58%, and jewelry scrap sales gross margin increased to 26.7% due to increase in gold price" in the U.S. business, with Latin America up 96% on the same line. A pawn shop is long gold twice over. A rising gold price lets it lend more against the same chain, and it widens the margin when the chain is eventually melted down. Very few retailers have an input whose price increase helps them on both sides of the transaction.
Capital allocation reads consistently with all of that. The company refinanced its long-dated borrowings in March 2025, retired the older notes that May, and put a fresh authorization in place under which "we are authorized to repurchase up to $50 million of our Class A Non-Voting" common stock. The fair objection is that the share count has still grown roughly 11% a year since spring 2022, because the convertible financing behind this expansion settles in shares rather than cash. The bull's answer is what those shares bought: a loan book compounding at a double-digit rate, a Latin American footprint growing faster than the domestic one, and a store network whose unit economics have improved every year through the build.
Bear Case
The threat to a pawn lender is not another pawn lender. It is everyone willing to advance a customer a few hundred dollars without asking for the ring. EZCORP's own risk disclosure lists the field it operates in: "We compete with other pawn stores, banks, alternative lenders and loan brokers, credit unions and other financial institutions, such as consumer finance companies". The alternative lenders in that sentence have been the growth story of small-dollar consumer credit for most of a decade. Point-of-sale installment credit, app-based advances against a paycheck, and fintech instalment products all do the job a pawn loan does, and none of them requires the customer to carry something valuable into a store and leave it behind. That is a convenience gap, and convenience gaps in consumer finance tend to close in one direction.
Inside the industry, scale sits elsewhere. FCFS carries revenue of about 3.88 billion dollars growing 14.4% a year, against a revenue base here closer to 1.48 billion dollars. Scale in pawn is not a vanity metric: it buys purchasing leverage on the retail side, better store locations, and a cheaper cost of funds against the same collateral.
The sharper problem is what has been producing the recent improvement. In the March 2026 quarter the Latin America business recorded that "Jewelry scrap sales increased 109% (87% constant currency basis), and jewelry scrap sales gross margin increased from 23% to 36% due to increase in" the gold price. Scrap is a small share of revenue and a much larger share of the recent gain. Nothing about that is improper, and management did not engineer it. But it means a meaningful part of the current earnings base is a commodity windfall, and commodity windfalls do not need to reverse to stop helping. Gold only has to stop rising.
That is where the priced-in read becomes less comforting than it first appears. Read backwards, today's quote implies operating profit staying roughly flat across the next five-year stage rather than compounding, which sounds like a generous cushion. It is a cushion only if the current profit base is durable. Measured against a year lifted by scrap margins, flat is not conservatism; it is the assumption that a peak holds. And the calculation itself is unusually sensitive to the discount rate applied, so the comfort it appears to offer should be held loosely.
Then there is the dilution, which is the quietest of the risks and the most arithmetically certain. The share count has grown roughly 11% a year since spring 2022. Whatever the stores earn, each share's slice of it has been shrinking at that pace throughout the expansion, and a $50 million repurchase authorization is not remotely the size of that arithmetic. The convertible structure let management build out without asking holders for money directly. The bill arrives later, in shares.
The genuine floor here is thinner than the story suggests. Holdings outside the operating stores amount to roughly 26.1 million dollars, which bounds the downside a little and no more. None of this makes the business fragile: the loan book is collateralized, it is growing, and the collateral is liquid. The bear case is narrower than that. It is that a peak-margin trailing year, a share count rising at a double-digit rate, and a competitive set moving online are three things the current quote is not paid to absorb simultaneously.
Valuation
A pawn company is valued on two questions: how large the loan book is, and what the goods standing behind it are worth. Both have been moving the right way, which is why most of the frames applied here already reach today's quote rather than straining to justify it.
Peer multiples and the cash-flow methods both land above the current price. The asset-based methods sit close to it, about 32% under. Only the earnings-power methods land a long way off, with the price sitting roughly 153% above where that family settles, and the reason is mechanical rather than mysterious: those methods capitalize a normalized profit with no growth credited at all, which is a harsh frame for a business that has been opening stores and growing its loan book every year. Taken together the pattern is value-shaped, not premium-shaped.
What the price is betting is correspondingly modest. Read backwards, today's quote implies operating profit staying roughly where it is across the next five-year stage rather than compounding. For a business whose loan book grew from $274.1 million to $307.5 million over fiscal 2025, that is not a demanding requirement on its face. The caution belongs on the inputs rather than the output: the calculation is unusually sensitive to the assumed cost of capital, where a single point of difference moves the implied growth figure by something like eight points. Read the direction, not the decimal.
The concrete version of the question is whether the current margin structure is the normal one. Fiscal 2025 merchandise gross margin reached 37.1% domestically and 30.6% across Latin America, and the scrap line carried margins that the filing attributes directly to a rising gold price. Those are the filing's own numbers and they are good ones. They are also the numbers a flat-forever assumption is anchored on. If the goods-side margin normalizes toward its pre-gold level while the loan book keeps growing, the two effects partly cancel and the flat assumption holds. If gold retreats while store growth slows, they compound instead.
The obligation stack is manageable and worth naming precisely. Gross borrowings run about 520.2 million dollars against liquid assets near 354.2 million dollars, leaving a net funded position around 166.1 million dollars; counted on the lease-inclusive basis the total obligation is closer to 800.2 million dollars. For a business whose assets are cash, collateralized loans and inventory that turns several times a year, that is a workable structure. It is also not the variable that decides this one. The share count, growing roughly 11% a year since spring 2022, has been quietly doing more to the per-share outcome than the borrowings ever have.
Catalysts
Third-quarter fiscal 2026 results are scheduled for August 5, 2026, a date the company confirmed on July 23, 2026. Two lines in it carry most of the information: the pawn loan balance, which sets the following quarter's service charges, and the jewelry scrap margin, which is where the gold move shows up first.
The quarter before it, reported May 7, 2026, set a high bar. Revenue reached $446.9 million and the company described both revenue and its pawn loan balance as records for the period. The filed detail behind that release is where the composition shows: total revenues and gross profit both increased 27%, pawn service charges increased 13% on a higher average loan balance, and the Latin America scrap line more than doubled.
The sell side has moved with the prints rather than ahead of them. Jefferies raised its target to $45 from $40 on July 9, 2026, following a cluster of increases on May 23, 2026 from Citizens to $39, Canaccord to $44 and Roth Capital to $40. All of those sit above the current quote, and the reason is worth stating plainly rather than treating as independent confirmation: they credit the recent scrap-margin and loan-book trajectory continuing, which is precisely the assumption the methods used here leave open.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
U.S. Pawn / Latin America Pawn / Other Investments (reported)
- FCFS (FirstCash Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …incurred by AFF. Administrative expenses and amortization expense of acquired intangible assets are not included in the segment pre-tax operating income. Year Ended December 31, 2025 U.S. Pawn Latin America Pawn U.K. Pawn (1) Retail POS Payment Solutions Corporate/ Intersegment Eliminations Consolidated Revenue:…
- FY2025 10-K: As part of the settlement, the Company agreed to offer a new pawn lending product for covered members of the U.S. military and their covered dependents. Additionally, the Company will pay consumer redress in fees or principal returned to affected customers, which is estimated by the Company to be no more than $ 7.0…
- WINA (WINMARK CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: 25-09-28 2025-12-27 0000908315 2025-06-28 0000908315 2026-02-23 0000908315 2024-12-29 2025-12-27 xbrli:shares iso4217:USD iso4217:USD xbrli:shares xbrli:pure wina:item wina:customer wina:segment wina:store UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark one) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT…
- FY2025 10-K: …exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2009. (5) Incorporated by reference to the specified exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2008. (6) Incorporated by reference to the specified exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended…
- SVV (Savers Value Village, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to support their community-focused missions. We strive to positively impact our team members, customers and the communities in which we live and do business. Our leading "people" metric across our organization is team member engagement, which is scored across various areas, including overall job satisfaction, whether…
- FY2025 10-K: …and an exciting, engaging treasure hunt experience in a contemporary in-store atmosphere, which underpins strong customer loyalty. Our most engaged customers are members of our Super Savers Club ® loyalty program. As of January 3, 2026, we have 6.1 million active members enrolled in our U.S. and Canadian loyalty…
- REAL (TheRealReal, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Security Agreement dated as of July 18, 2016 by and between The RealReal, Inc. and Pacific Western Bank. S-1 333-231891 10.8 May 31, 2019 10.8# Sixth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 16, 2016 by and between The RealReal, Inc. and Pacific Western Bank. S-1 333-231891 10.9 May 31, 2019…
- FY2025 10-K: …in Arizona and New Jersey. The lease to our Arizona facility expires in 2031, and leases to our three New Jersey facilities each expire in 2029, all with a right of renewal. We lease additional offices located in Los Angeles and New York City, and we have leased several retail spaces and luxury consignment offices in…
- GME (GameStop Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and pedestrian areas. These locations provide easy access and high frequency of visits and, in the case of strip centers and high-traffic pedestrian stores, high visibility. We target strip centers that are conveniently located, have a mass merchant or supermarket anchor tenant and have a high volume of customers. As…
- FY2025 10-K: …pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Furnished herewith. 97.1 GameStop Corp. Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2024 March 26, 2024…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
company earnings announcement, July 23, 2026 · Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings release, May 7, 2026 · Jefferies research note, July 9, 2026 · broker research notes, May 23, 2026