ENERSYS (ENS): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $185.46, ENERSYS (ENS) is priced for +11.4% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ENS
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | ENS |
| Company | ENERSYS |
| Sector / Industry | Industrials |
| Current price | $185.46/sh |
| Composition | Energy Systems 44% / Motive Power 38% / Specialty 18% / Corporate and other 0% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 8.9% |
| Operating margin today | 13.0% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -4.1pp |
| Implied growth | 11.4% |
| Multiple paid | 15x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.17σ |
| cohort percentile (of 225 peers) | 25 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value, while asset-based lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.73x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 0.96x | 5 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.95x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.84x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=15)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $428.37 | 0.43x | yes | FCF base $0.7B, growth 4% (input: historical growth), terminal g 3.8%, WACC 8.1%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $219.91 | 0.84x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 11.2x / 13.2x / 15.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.1x / 18.0x / 20.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $105.68 | 1.75x | yes | BV/sh $54.62, ROE (TTM) 17.9%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $145.13 | 1.28x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $132.15 | 1.40x | yes | Rev $3.8B, growth 4% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.5x / 1.8x / 2.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $163.01 | 1.14x | yes | EPS $9.33, growth 17% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.09 (Fair) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $97.71 | 1.90x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.39B × (1−14%) / WACC 8.1% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $144.42 | 1.28x | yes | BV $54.62 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $107.08 | 1.73x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $9.33 × BVPS $54.62) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $0.54B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $200.93 | 0.92x | yes | FCF $717.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $192.60 | 0.96x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.69B (FCF $0.72B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $301.05 | 0.62x | yes | EPS $9.33 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $35.43 | 5.23x | yes | BV $54.62 × (ROIC 5.3% / WACC 8.1%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $3.79B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $244.51 | 0.76x | yes | EPS $9.33 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 17.5% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 26.2x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $100.86 | 1.84x | yes | EPS $9.33 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Systems | operating | enterprise | $1.6t | $0 operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Motive Power | operating | enterprise | $1.5t | $0 operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Specialty | operating | enterprise | $535.7b | $0 operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $549.1m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 1.30x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 1.12x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -2.3% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Three businesses with different cycles sit under one roof: Energy Systems grew net sales 7.8% in fiscal 2026, Specialty grew 12.1%, and Motive Power fell 3.6%.
- A federal manufacturing tax credit lands inside gross profit rather than below the tax line, and it is doing a lot of work: gross margin was 29.3% for fiscal 2026 but 25.1% excluding that credit.
- Capital return has become the main use of cash, with 370.7 million dollars of stock repurchased during fiscal 2026 and the share count down from 39,192,061 to 36,462,211 over the year.
Bull Case
Industrial batteries look like one business and behave like three. Forklift batteries are a replacement cycle tied to installed fleets, so demand tracks warehouse activity and lags it. Backup power for telecom and data centers is a capital-spending cycle, which turns on somebody else's build plan. Aerospace, defense and transportation batteries are a specification business, where getting designed into a platform is slow and getting removed from one is slower. Anyone valuing EnerSys on a single company-wide growth rate is averaging three clocks that do not tick together, and in fiscal 2026 they visibly did not: Energy Systems net sales rose 7.8%, Specialty rose 12.1%, and Motive Power fell 3.6%.
The segment that is growing is the one attached to the strongest demand signal in the industrial economy. The 10-K puts it plainly: "The data center market is in the midst of a growth cycle driven by AI and increasing digitization." And the company describes the effect on its own order book in the same document, attributing the Energy Systems increase to "a continuing robust demand from data center and industrial customers and stronger product mix in communications." There is a second, less obvious advantage in that exposure. The filing notes that the "data center and communications markets tend to be less sensitive to tariff policy, with budget and spending plans based on their unique capital spending needs." A customer whose spending is set by capacity commitments rather than by input cost is a customer who does not pause when trade policy moves.
Where the company stands against the electrical-equipment names it competes near is instructive. HUBB earns a 20.6% operating margin on $6.0 billion of trailing revenue and POWL 19.8% on $1.13 billion, both above where EnerSys sits; GNRC runs 7.5% on a comparable revenue base to NVT's $4.33 billion, and NVT itself reaches 15.8%. That places this company in the middle of a spread that runs wide, with the segment mix shifting toward the higher-margin end. Operating earnings of $426.4 million on net sales of $3,751.4 million in fiscal 2026 is the starting point, not a ceiling.
What management is doing with the cash is the strongest part of the case. Operating cash flow reached $548 million in fiscal 2026, and 408.8 million dollars went back to shareholders through repurchases and dividends. Shares outstanding fell from 39,192,061 at the end of fiscal 2025 to 36,462,211 at the end of fiscal 2026, with 3,457,688 shares bought for 370.7 million dollars during the year. That is a seven percent reduction in the ownership base in twelve months, from a balance sheet where borrowings sit at roughly 1.5 times operating profit and profit covers the interest bill more than eight times over. A company retiring that much stock at that leverage is not managing a fragile situation. It is compounding the per-share claim of whoever stays.
Bear Case
The most fragile assumption in this price is not about demand. It is about a line in the tax code. EnerSys books the Section 45X advanced manufacturing production credit inside gross profit, which means the credit shows up as margin rather than as a tax benefit. Fiscal 2026 gross margin was 29.3%; excluding that credit it was 25.1%. On the company's own adjusted earnings basis the gap is larger still: adjusted diluted earnings per share of $10.56 for fiscal 2026 becomes $6.41 with the credit stripped out. Roughly two fifths of the adjusted earnings power depends on a statute, and the 10-K itself flags that implementing regulations remain in process, creating uncertainty about the extent of the impact. That is not an operating risk that management can execute its way past.
The second dependency is the mix shift. Today's price embeds operating profit growing about 16.7% a year for five years. Reported operating earnings did not grow in fiscal 2026; they fell to $426.4 million from $464.7 million a year earlier, and reported diluted earnings per share fell 14%, to $7.70 from $8.99. To get from a declining reported profit line to sixteen percent compounding for half a decade, the growing segments have to accelerate while the shrinking one stops shrinking. Motive Power is 38% of revenue, it fell 3.6% in fiscal 2026, and the 10-K attributes that to customer buying behaviour market-wide and continued weakness in the EMEA automotive market. Nothing in the filing suggests that reverses quickly.
The third is the discount rate, and it deserves more attention than it usually gets. Of the ways to value this company, the cash-flow methods are the only ones that reach the price; book value, earnings power and peer multiples all land well below it. Those cash-flow methods reach it by capitalizing a substantial free cash flow stream at a modest required return. Move the required return up by one percentage point and the growth the price needs rises by roughly six and a half points. For a cyclical industrial with a policy-dependent margin, a percentage point of extra required return is not a remote scenario. It is what the market charges when a cycle turns.
There is also a restructuring cost the reader should count rather than adjust away. In March 2026 the company announced the closure of its Tijuana lead acid battery plant, expecting a pre-tax charge of about $37 million, roughly $23 million of it in cash for severance, environmental costs and decommissioning. Then in July it cut the planned Greenville lithium cell factory from four to five gigawatt-hours down to one, refocusing it on defense and specialized industrial work. Both decisions are probably correct. Both are also evidence that the earlier plan, which is the kind of plan a durable-compounding premium is built on, did not survive contact with the market it was built for.
Valuation
Sixteen percent a year is what the price is asking for, and fiscal 2026 delivered the opposite direction. Today's level embeds operating profit compounding at roughly 16.7% annually over a five-year stage, valued at about 17 times the current operating profit at a 10% cost of capital. That pace is not unprecedented for this company across its better stretches. It is well above what the most recent fiscal year produced, when reported operating earnings fell to $426.4 million from $464.7 million. Of the companies that have grown at such a pace, roughly 48% held it for five years, which is close to a coin flip and worth naming as such.
The methods disagree in a specific and readable way. Book-value approaches, earnings-power approaches and peer multiples all land below the price, several of them far below. The cash-flow methods are the only family that gets there. That pattern has a name in plain English: the price is a premium for durability, for the belief that this business compounds in a way the static frames cannot capture because they only measure what it earns today. There is nothing wrong with paying such a premium. The reader should simply know that is what they are paying, and that the static frames are not being pessimistic; they are structurally unable to price a moat.
One caution about how the cash-flow methods get there. They reach the price by capitalizing a large free cash flow stream at a modest required return, and the arithmetic is unusually sensitive to that return: each additional percentage point moves the required growth by roughly six and a half points. This is a cyclical industrial whose gross margin carries a policy component, and required returns on those move around. Treat the growth figure as a direction rather than a measurement.
Against peers the multiple sits toward the cheaper end of the group, which reflects the segment mix rather than a market oversight. HUBB earns a 20.6% operating margin and POWL 19.8%, both well above the roughly eleven percent EnerSys reported for fiscal 2026 on net sales of $3,751.4 million. A company earning half the margin of the premium names in its neighbourhood trades at a discount for a reason, and the bull and bear cases are both arguments about whether the mix shift closes that gap.
The balance sheet is the least contentious part of the picture and it bounds the downside cleanly. Borrowings run at about 1.5 times operating profit, profit covers the interest bill more than eight times over, and liquid assets stand near 438.7 million dollars. Operating cash flow of $548 million in fiscal 2026 funded 408.8 million dollars of buybacks and dividends with room left over. Whatever happens to the growth assumption, the company is not being forced into anything.
Catalysts
Three dated decisions in the last four months tell more about strategy than any single quarter's results. On March 25, 2026 the company announced it would close its lead acid battery plant in Tijuana, Mexico, with an expected pre-tax charge of about $37 million, of which roughly $14 million is non-cash equipment write-offs and $23 million is cash for severance, environmental costs and decommissioning, most of it landing by the second half of fiscal 2027. On May 28, 2026 it announced a segment realignment, reorganizing into Network Infrastructure Solutions, Industrial Mobility Solutions and Precision Power Solutions, with presidents named for each. Reporting under the new structure will change how the next several quarters compare to the old segment lines.
The third decision is the largest. On July 23, 2026 EnerSys revised the scope of its planned lithium-ion cell factory in Greenville, South Carolina, cutting initial capacity to about one gigawatt-hour from the four to five gigawatt-hours originally planned and shrinking the physical footprint, refocusing the plant on aerospace, defense and specialized industrial applications where secure supply matters. Total net investment is now estimated near $500 million, supported by a revised Department of Energy grant of approximately $150 million subject to final documentation, plus up to $200 million of state and local incentives. The board has approved the plan, with construction expected to begin in the first half of fiscal 2028.
On the operating side, fiscal 2026 closed on May 20, 2026 with full-year net sales of $3,751.4 million, up 3.7%, and fourth-quarter net sales of $988.0 million, up 1.3%. Fourth-quarter gross margin was 29.4%, and 24.7% excluding the manufacturing tax credit. The company named two new products in customer commissioning, a battery energy storage system for warehouse operators and a lithium solution for data centers, and it held an investor day at the New York Stock Exchange on June 11, 2026 to lay out the strategy behind them. The quarterly dividend was declared at $0.2625 per share, payable July 2, 2026.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Energy Systems (reported)
- POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …support increased schedule flexibility and multiple ship lanes for the varied needs and project timelines of our customers. The incremental capacity is initially expected to support the Company's oil and gas customers but can be utilized to support each of our market sectors. Construction is expected to begin during…
- FY2025 10-K: …in the market. In the commercial and other industrial markets, our customers operate in commercial construction, data centers, metals and mining, pulp and paper, as well as other industrial applications. Beyond these major markets, we also provide products and services to the light rail traction power market and…
- FLNC (Fluence Energy Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …well suited to be deployed at scale in this timeline. According to a publication from the U.S. Department of Energy in April 2024, electricity demand is forecasted to grow substantially in the United States over the next decade. This is being driven to some extent by data centers and AI, in another report by the U.S.…
- FY2025 10-K: …better designed to support specific customer types, improving logistics, and enhancing market focus. Our Customers We sell our energy storage solutions, services, and digital offerings to a wide range of customers around the world, including utilities and load-serving entities, IPPs, developers, conglomerates, and…
- NVT (nVent Electric plc)
- FY2025 10-K: …liquid and air, control buildings, switchgear systems and power distribution solutions help manage protect operating environments for mission critical applications in infrastructure, industrial and commercial verticals. • Electrical Connections -The Electrical Connections segment provides innovative solutions that…
- FY2025 10-K: …solutions help protect operating environments for mission critical applications in infrastructure, industrial and commercial verticals. 22 • Electrical Connections -The Electrical Connections segment provides innovative solutions that connect power and data infrastructure. Our offerings enhance end-user safety,…
- GNRC (GENERAC HOLDINGS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …operations. Enterprise Strategy The mega-trends and strategic growth themes that we have identified support our enterprise strategy, "Powering A Smarter World," and our purpose statement, "To lead the evolution to more resilient, efficient, and innovative energy solutions." As we continue to execute our strategic…
- FY2025 10-K: …aging and under-invested legacy infrastructure systems, such as energy production, telecommunications, transportation, and data centers. o Expanding investment for increasingly critical technology infrastructure as we transition to a more "connected" society. ● Home as a Sanctuary, driving increased demand for…
- HUBB (HUBBELL INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …below. Refer to Note 1 for further information. The Utility Solutions segment consists of businesses that enable the grid to conduct, communicate and control energy across utility applications. The Utility Solutions segment provides critical components that allow the grid to reliably transmit and distribute energy,…
- FY2025 10-K: …data center, and heavy industrial markets. Electrical Solutions segment products are typically used in and around industrial, commercial and institutional facilities by electrical contractors, maintenance personnel, electricians, utilities, and telecommunications companies. In addition, certain of our businesses…
Motive Power / Specialty (reported)
- FLNC (Fluence Energy Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …to build a more robust domestic supply chain than us and may be able to offer customers U.S. domestic content products in greater quantity, with better pricing, and on a faster timeline than we may be able to if our production of our battery components in the U.S. (e.g., modules, cells, enclosures, and thermal…
- FY2025 10-K: …of our offerings the growth of our industry and our business. Such government incentives and/or regulations may expire on a particular date, end when the allocated funding is exhausted or be reduced or terminated as renewable energy adoption rates increase or as a result of legal challenges, changing policies or…
- SPB (Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …be adversely affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following: • We compete against many well-established companies that may have substantially greater financial and other resources, including personnel and research and development, and greater overall market share than us. • In some key…
- FY2025 10-K: "Be Accountable," "Take Action," and "Grow Talent," all in the efforts to promote innovation, trust, accountability and collaboration. The result is a work environment that encourages the well-being of our employees and the development of our future leaders. Employee Health and Safety We are committed to the…
- ENR (ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and objective hiring practices. Engaged, driven and productive colleagues are essential to achieving growth. All Energizer colleagues participate in annual training focused on topics related to ethics, compliance and belonging. For salaried colleagues, we offer a platform featuring over 25,000 online courses from…
- FY2025 10-K: …to currency fluctuations and price fluctuations due to supply and demand, transportation, government regulations, price controls, tariffs, economic climate, or other unforeseen circumstances like force majeure. We believe that adequate supplies of most raw materials and component parts required for all of our…
- ATKR (Atkore Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …sales agents and internal sales teams that drive customer acquisition and retention. Our comprehensive portfolio of products and solutions is continually enhanced by driving innovation into our markets with new product introductions, such as the digital tools that support project design and selection. Prompted by…
- FY2025 10-K: …facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this Annual Report and include, without limitation, statements regarding our intentions, beliefs, assumptions or current expectations concerning, among other things, financial position; results of operations; cash flows; prospects; growth strategies or expectations;…
- NOVT (NOVANTA INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and objectives for future operations, expenditures and product development, and investments in research and development; business prospects; potential of future product releases and expansion of our product and service offerings; anticipated revenue performance; industry trends; market conditions; our competitive…
- FY2025 10-K: …we do not believe that any individual patent is material to our business as a whole. We also protect our proprietary rights by controlling access to our proprietary information and by maintaining confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, and certain customers and suppliers. For a further discussion…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
FY2026 10-K, filed May 20, 2026 · fiscal Q4 2026 earnings release, May 20, 2026 · company 8-K, March 25, 2026 · company 8-K, July 23, 2026 · company 8-K, May 28, 2026 · company 8-K, May 20, 2026