ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $21.23, ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) is priced for +1.1% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ENR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerENR
CompanyENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.
Sector / IndustryIndustrials
Current price$21.23/sh
CompositionNorth America 56% / Modern Markets 17% / Developing Markets 11% / Distributor Markets 7% / Global Professional 10%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)3.9%
Operating margin today7.9%
Margin compression (value-band)-4.0pp
Implied growth1.1%
Multiple paid21x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 5.1% sits below it).

How unusual the bet is: n/a

ReferenceValue
cohort percentile (of 225 peers)56

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.55x4justifies
Earnings0.48x2justifies
Relative0.22x2justifies
Growth0.75x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 3.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=11)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$28.360.75xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 47.0x / 49.0x / 51.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 13.78x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 7x), scenarios: 11.7x / 13.8x / 15.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 23.11x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$42.680.50xyesStage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$30.800.69xyesBV/sh $2.53, ROE (TTM) 112.6%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$262.690.08xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$14.961.42xyesRev $3.0B, growth 3% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.4x / 0.5x / 0.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$95.200.22xyesEPS $2.72, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.21 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAsset$52.260.41xyesBV $2.53 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 112.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$12.441.71xyes√(22.5 × EPS $2.72 × BVPS $2.53) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.10B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$0.012123.00xyesFCF $159.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median)
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$0.012123.00xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.13B (FCF $0.16B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median)
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$87.770.24xyesEPS $2.72 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $2.98B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$102.000.21xyesEPS $2.72 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$29.410.72xyesEPS $2.72 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Batteries & Lightsoperatingenterprise$2.3bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Auto Careoperatingenterprise$620.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$3.3b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)30.58x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)14.23x
Interest coverage1.5x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.9%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

One number decides this stock, and it is not a growth rate. The whole business, lenders included, carries a price near 4.9 billion dollars. Shareholders own what is left after borrowings of roughly 3.5 billion, which is the 1.4 billion of market value the ticker quotes. Put another way: every dollar of debt retired becomes a dollar of equity, and a business whose enterprise value moves ten percent moves the shares about thirty-five. That gearing runs both directions, and the bull case is simply that the machine underneath it produces enough cash to keep running the trade in the shareholder's favor.

It does produce the cash. Operating cash flow in the first half of fiscal 2026 came to $147.8 million, with free cash flow of $105.9 million, or 7.4% of net sales. Out of that, dividends of $20.6 million went out in the March quarter at 30 cents a share. A company carrying this much debt that still funds a dividend of that size out of current cash flow is telling you the cash flow is not in question; only its size relative to the debt is.

The margin line has turned, and the turn is broader than the headline benefit that dominates it. Reported gross margin was 40.2% in the second fiscal quarter against 39.1% a year earlier, and on the company's adjusted basis 44.4% against 40.8%. Underneath, the restructuring program contributed about $4 million of savings in the quarter and carry-over pricing added six tenths of a point to organic sales. Compare where that leaves the gross margin against the shelf it competes on: NWL runs a 34.0% gross margin and SPB 36.6%, while CHD reaches 45.1%. Energizer sits closer to the branded end of that range than to the private-label end, which is the practical measure of whether a brand still commands anything.

The smaller segment is where the operating improvement is clearest. Auto Care segment profit reached $105.6 million in fiscal 2025 against $94.1 million the year before, while the batteries side slipped from $554.8 million to $542.2 million. That is a business with two engines running at different speeds rather than one engine slowing, and Auto Care is a category where private label has made far less progress than it has in batteries.

Then there is what the price is actually asking. Today's level embeds profit growth of roughly 2.9% a year over the next five years, which is a pace the company has delivered before and not far from the low single digit sales growth it has guided to for the fiscal year. Unusually, every family of valuation method lands above today's price rather than below it. That is not a signal that the market has made a mistake, and a careful reader should not take it as one. It is what happens when a modest enterprise is financed with a large amount of debt: the equity becomes the geared claim on the difference. But the corollary is real. If the borrowings come down while the cash flow holds, the arithmetic works on the owner's side without the business having to do anything remarkable.

Bear Case

The most dangerous competitor Energizer faces is the customer. Retailers and online marketplaces that stock its packs also sell their own, and the 10-K describes the squeeze in a single sentence: "Because of the highly competitive environment in which we operate, our customers, including online retailers, frequently seek to obtain pricing concessions or better trade terms and are increasingly offering private label brands, resulting in either a reduction of our margins or the loss of distribution to lower-cost competitors." A rival brand can be out-marketed. A customer who becomes a rival controls the shelf, the search results and the terms, all at once. The filing also flags the slower structural problem underneath: as devices in developed markets stop taking replaceable cells, the volume trend in batteries and lights points down regardless of who wins the shelf.

The recent numbers show the pressure rather than contradicting it. Organic net sales fell 5.5% in the fiscal second quarter, with volume down 6.1% and carry-over pricing recovering only six tenths of a point. On the segment lines, Batteries and Lights profit slipped to $542.2 million in fiscal 2025 from $554.8 million the year before. The peer group tells the same story in different handwriting: SPB shrank about 3.8% over its trailing year and NWL about 4.1%, while the household names with genuine pricing power grew, CHD up 2.2% and CL up 4.3%. This is a shelf where the branded incumbents in the shrinking categories are losing ground and the ones in growing categories are not.

Which makes the balance sheet the sharp edge. Borrowings run to roughly 3.51 billion dollars against liquid assets of about 172.5 million. Interest expense was 154.3 million dollars in fiscal 2025, set against earnings before income taxes of $284.1 million for the same year, so the lenders take a substantial share of the profit before the owners see any of it. As of September 30, 2025 the term loan stood at 857.9 million dollars with quarterly principal payments of 0.25% of the original balance, a schedule that retires the principal slowly and reprices the rest at whatever rates prevail. The company noted that interest expense rose in the March 2026 quarter on a higher average debt balance. Deleveraging is not currently happening; it is currently being discussed.

The margin recovery needs the same scrutiny. Of the improvement in the second fiscal quarter, a $47.6 million benefit came from an anticipated refund of tariffs previously enacted under the International Emergency Powers Act, alongside $11.7 million of production tax credits. An anticipated refund is a legal outcome recorded as a margin, and it does not recur. Strip it and the underlying gross margin improvement is a good deal more ordinary than 360 basis points suggests, which matters because the full-year adjusted gross margin outlook was raised specifically on that benefit.

Finally, a caution about how undemanding the price looks. The market is asking for roughly 2.9% annual profit growth over five years, which reads as a low bar. It is a low bar only at the return an owner is assumed to want. For an equity that sits on top of this much borrowing, a single percentage point of additional required return moves the growth the price needs by something on the order of eight points. That is not a rounding error in the analysis. It is the definition of a geared claim, and it means the apparent margin of comfort in the priced-in assumption is far thinner than the headline growth rate suggests.

Valuation

Most of what this business is worth belongs to its lenders. The enterprise carries a price near 4.9 billion dollars, and after borrowings of roughly 3.5 billion the shareholders' portion is about 1.4 billion. Every valuation question that follows is shaped by that fact, so it belongs at the front rather than in a closing paragraph about the balance sheet.

What the price assumes is modest on its face. It embeds profit growth of about 2.9% a year for five years, a pace consistent with what the company has recently delivered and with the low single digit sales growth it has guided to for fiscal 2026. Measured against its own record the assumption is unremarkable. The reader should hold one caveat alongside it: for a claim as geared as this one, the required growth is extremely sensitive to the return an owner demands, moving by something like eight points for each point of required return. The 2.9% is a direction, not a measurement.

The methods produce an unusual pattern here. Every family lands above today's price rather than below it, whether the lens is book value, earnings power, peer multiples or discounted cash flow. That looks like a unanimous verdict of cheapness, and it is worth explaining rather than repeating. Two mechanics are doing the work. The methods that capitalize an earnings or cash flow stream value the entire business and then hand shareholders the residual after debt, so a modest difference of opinion about the whole becomes a large difference per share when the residual is under a third of the total. And the methods anchored on book equity produce large numbers because book equity has been ground down to a few dollars a share by years of distributions and write-downs, which makes the return earned on that book look extraordinary. Neither mechanic is an error. Neither is evidence of a mispricing. Both are descriptions of leverage.

The trailing multiple says the same thing more plainly: the stock changes hands at somewhere around seven times its trailing earnings, which is roughly half what a stable branded consumer business normally fetches, and the discount is compensation for the debt sitting in front of the equity rather than a comment on the brands.

So the close belongs on the debt schedule. Interest expense of 154.3 million dollars in fiscal 2025 sat against earnings before income taxes of $284.1 million, liquid assets are about 172.5 million dollars, and the term loan retires at a quarter of a percent of its original balance each quarter. The share count has drifted down at roughly 0.9% a year and the dividend has held at 30 cents a quarter. What a buyer at $20.95 is underwriting, precisely, is that the cash flow keeps covering the interest while the principal grinds down, and that the categories do not shrink faster than the debt does.

Catalysts

Fiscal second-quarter results, reported May 5, 2026 for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, showed the two forces in this business pulling against each other. Net sales came to $643.3 million, down 3.0% from $662.9 million, with organic sales off 5.5% on a 6.1% volume decline that management attributed to the timing of battery orders during a plastic-free packaging conversion, a slow start to the auto care selling season, and a modest effect from the conflict in the Middle East. Currency added 2.4 points. Reported gross margin improved to 40.2% from 39.1%.

The margin improvement had two identifiable, dated sources. A benefit of $47.6 million was recorded for an anticipated refund of tariffs previously enacted under the International Emergency Powers Act, and production tax credits contributed $11.7 million in the quarter. Working the other way, the company recorded a non-cash settlement charge of $26.1 million on the termination of its United Kingdom pension plan, and restructuring and related costs of $27.1 million against $8.7 million a year earlier. Reported diluted earnings per share came to $0.15 against $0.39 a year earlier.

Guidance moved in the same direction the margins did. For fiscal 2026 the company now expects net sales up low single digits with organic sales roughly flat. It raised the full-year adjusted gross margin range to 40% to 41%, attributing that move primarily to the tariff refund. Adjusted earnings per share are now expected at the high end of a previously provided $3.30 to $3.60 range, and for the fiscal third quarter the company guided to low single digit organic sales growth with adjusted earnings per share of $0.75 to $0.85. That third-quarter print is the next real test, because it is the first period in which the guided return to organic growth has to appear in the actual sales line rather than in the outlook.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Batteries & Lights (reported)

Auto Care (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

fiscal Q2 2026 earnings release, May 5, 2026 · FY2025 10-K, filed November 18, 2025

View the full interactive ENR report on boothcheck