Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT): what the price requires
At today's price, Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) is priced for +12.7% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ECVT
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | ECVT |
| Company | Ecovyst Inc. |
| Current price | $11.88/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 9.0% |
| Operating margin today | 9.9% |
| Margin compression implied | -0.9pp |
| Implied growth | 12.7% |
| Multiple paid | 16x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.8% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~6.2pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.03σ |
| cohort percentile (of 74 peers) | 38 |
| sustained it ~5 years at this level | 55% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.56x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.39x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.08x | 3 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.51x | 4 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $60.08 | 0.20x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 23% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.1%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $22.06 | 0.54x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 11.1x / 13.1x / 15.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $10.99 | 1.08x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 1.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $5.15 | 2.31x | yes | Book value floor: BV/sh $5.15, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $4.63 | 2.56x | yes | Book value with convergence: BV/sh $5.15, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $14.29 | 0.83x | yes | Rev $0.8B, growth 23% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.3x / 1.6x / 1.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | $24.52 | 0.48x | yes | Margin ramp: -8% → 12% over 7yr, rev growth 23% (input: historical growth; tapered) |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $4.22 | 2.81x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.09B × (1−38%) / WACC 7.1% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $6.30 | 1.88x | yes | EBITDA $0.12B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $5.94 | 2.00x | yes | FCF $86.7M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $4.96 | 2.39x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.08B (FCF $0.09B − SBC $0.01B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $0.66 | 17.99x | yes | BV $5.15 × (ROIC 0.9% / WACC 7.1%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $10.99 | 1.08x | yes | Revenue $0.82B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $230.2m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 4.77x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 2.94x |
| Interest coverage | 2.5x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -5.3% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
Ecovyst is in a strong upcycle: first-quarter 2026 adjusted EBITDA surged 87% to $39.8 million, revenue jumped about 50% to $215 million and beat by 13%, virgin sulfuric acid volumes rose more than 30% with the Waggaman assets, and management raised 2026 guidance to sales of $890 million to $970 million and EBITDA of $180 million to $195 million.
The valuation models disagree sharply: growth and margin-ramp frames mark from $19 to $63, but the conservative book-value and earnings-power frames land between about $4 and $5 (the price is $12.81), reflecting a sub-10% operating margin and a return on invested capital under 1%.
The price embeds roughly 15.7% annual operating growth for five years (about 17x company-wide operating income), within the recent upcycle pace but cyclically dependent; net debt near 3x operating income, interest coverage of about 2.7x, and a consolidating refinery customer base are the structural risks if the cycle turns.
Bull Case
Specialty chemicals are hard to value because the business looks like a commodity producer on the income statement but often behaves like a service company underneath, and Ecovyst is the case where that distinction matters. Its largest line is sulfuric acid regeneration: refineries send spent acid back, Ecovyst reprocesses it and returns it, and the relationship is sticky because the company sits inside the refinery's operating loop through a strategically located network of facilities serving customers with sulfuric acid products and services (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001708035-26-000053). That recurring, contractual service revenue is more durable than the chemical-sector label suggests, and it is precisely what is driving the current results.
The operating leverage in this model is what the first quarter put on display. Adjusted EBITDA surged 87% to $39.8 million from $21.3 million, revenue jumped about 50% to $215 million and beat expectations by nearly 13%, regeneration-services sales grew double digits on high refinery utilization and favorable alkylate economics, and virgin sulfuric acid volumes rose more than 30% with the contribution of the Waggaman assets. When a business with high fixed costs adds volume, the incremental margin is large, which is why EBITDA grew far faster than revenue. The company responded by raising 2026 guidance to sales of $890 million to $970 million and adjusted EBITDA of $180 million to $195 million, and guided second-quarter EBITDA to $50 million to $55 million.
The capital story compounds the operating one. The inversion reads the price as implying roughly 15.7% annual operating growth for five years, which is within what the business has recently delivered during this upcycle, and only the rate's duration, not its plausibility, is the question. For a name where the growth-DCF and exit-multiple frames mark well above the price (the perpetual-growth DCF near $63, the margin-trajectory model near $33), the upside case is that the regeneration franchise and the sulfuric-acid volume hold long enough to validate the operating leverage already showing up in the numbers.
Bear Case
The models disagree sharply on Ecovyst, and when they do, the conservative ones usually tell the more honest story. The book-value and earnings-power frames mark the stock near the floor: simple excess return at about $5.15 (which is just book value per share, because trailing return on equity is negative), two-stage excess return near $4.63, earnings power value near $3.81, and the ROIC-justified book model near $0.65 on a return on invested capital of less than 1%. Against a $12.81 (June 27, 2026) quote, those frames say the business as currently capitalized earns too little on its assets to justify the price. The optimistic models that reach far above the price all lean on extrapolating the current upcycle growth forward, which is exactly the assumption a cyclical chemical company should be most skeptical of.
The earnings quality question is real. The current operating margin is only about 9.9%, and the strength in the latest quarter rests on conditions that are explicitly cyclical: high refinery utilization, favorable alkylate economics, and lower customer downtime than the prior year. Those are good conditions, not permanent ones. When refinery utilization softens or alkylate spreads compress, the regeneration volume and pricing that drove the 87% EBITDA jump can reverse, and a business with a sub-10% operating margin has little room to absorb that.
The balance sheet and customer base add structural fragility. Net debt sits near $230 million against trailing operating income of about $78 million, a net-debt-to-operating-income ratio near 3x with interest coverage of only about 2.7x, which is manageable in an upcycle but tight in a downturn. The customer concentration is a genuine exposure: the 10-K notes that refineries, a sizable subset of the customer base, have undergone significant consolidation with more possible, and that customers may experience financial difficulties including bankruptcies and restructurings (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001708035-26-000053). Fewer, larger refining customers means more pricing power on their side and more revenue at risk if one is lost. The bear case is not that the quarter was bad; it is that the price extrapolates a peak the conservative models refuse to underwrite.
Valuation
Ecovyst is a study in model disagreement, and that disagreement is the valuation. The growth and margin-ramp frames mark far above the price: the perpetual-growth DCF near $63 (on roughly 25% growth carried forward), the margin-trajectory model near $33, the exit-multiple DCF near $23, and the discounted-future-market-cap model near $19. The relative and book-value frames cluster much lower: the sector price-to-sales read near $11, but the asset-based excess-return and earnings-power models land between about $3.81 and $5.15, and the ROIC-justified book model near $0.65. The price is justified by the relative-multiple and growth families; the asset and earnings-power families say expensive.
The split exists because the optimistic models extrapolate the current upcycle while the conservative ones value the business on its normalized, sub-10% margin and its near-zero return on invested capital. For a cyclical specialty chemical name, the conservative frames deserve real weight: a business that earns less than 1% on its full invested base is not creating value at the margin, however strong a given quarter looks.
Inverting the price gives the cleanest single read. At $12.81 the market pays about 17x company-wide operating income, which implies roughly 15.7% annual operating growth for five years at a 9.9% cost of capital. That near-term pace is within what the company has recently delivered during the upcycle, and only about 49% of comparable fast-growers sustained it over a five-year horizon. The honest read: at $12.81 the stock prices in a continuation of the upcycle, and the wide model spread is the market's way of saying the durability of that upcycle is the whole debate.
Catalysts
The most recent print was the first-quarter 2026 report, and it was a clear beat that lifted guidance. Adjusted EBITDA rose 87% to $39.8 million from $21.3 million, revenue grew about 50% to $215 million and surpassed expectations by nearly 13%. Regeneration-services sales grew double digits on high refinery utilization, favorable alkylate economics, and lower customer downtime, while virgin sulfuric acid volumes rose more than 30%, helped by the Waggaman assets.
Management revised 2026 guidance higher: sales of $890 million to $970 million and adjusted EBITDA of $180 million to $195 million, both raised at the low end, with second-quarter adjusted EBITDA guided to $50 million to $55 million on continued regeneration strength and sulfuric acid volume tied to mining demand and the Waggaman contribution. The raised outlook and the strong sequential EBITDA cadence are the near-term catalysts.
The forward thesis tracks the refining and chemical cycle. The supportive drivers are sustained high refinery utilization, favorable alkylate economics, and the ramp of the Waggaman virgin sulfuric acid assets into mining demand. The risks are the cyclicality of all three: refinery utilization and alkylate spreads can soften, and the customer base is concentrated and consolidating, which the company flags as a risk. Watch the quarterly EBITDA cadence against the guided ramp, the durability of regeneration pricing, and virgin sulfuric acid volumes, since those are what separate a real structural step-up from a peak-cycle quarter.
Sources: Ecovyst Q1 2026 results and revised outlook (investor.ecovyst.com, stocktitan.net); Ecovyst Q1 2026 slides (Investing.com); Ecovyst Q1 2026 earnings transcript (AOL, Yahoo Finance).
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Ecoservices (consolidated) (reported)
- NGVT (INGEVITY CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …our reportable segment results. Refer to Note 5 for more information. (6) For the year ended December 31, 2025, charge relates to the Performance Chemicals reportable segment. Refer to Note 7 and Note 8 for more information. 40 (7) Charges represent legal and other professional service fees as well as incremental…
- FY2025 10-K: Exchange Commission on February 19, 2025). 10. 80 + Service-Based Interim CEO Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.81 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2025). 10.8 1 + Offer Letter…
- CBT (Cabot Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …activities, interest and dividend income, the profit or loss related to the corporate adjustment for unearned revenue, and unrealized holding gains (losses) for investments. This does not include items of income or expense that are separately treated as Certain items. (4) Equity in earnings of affiliated companies,…
- FY2025 10-K: …costs that are reasonably possible to be in excess of amounts already recorded would be immaterial to the Company's consolidated financial statements. Charges for environmental expenses were $ 1 million in each of fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, and are included in Cost of sal es in the Consolidated Statements of…
- ESI (Element Solutions Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current laws and existing technologies. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and cleanup are charged to expense. The accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and…
- FY2025 10-K: …and sells specialty chemicals and material process technologies that enhance surfaces or improve industrial processes in diverse industrial sectors from automotive trim to transcontinental infrastructure to high-design faucets. Its products include chemical systems that protect and decorate metal and plastic surfaces…
- IOSP (INNOSPEC INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …demand from certain customers, together with lower provisions for performance-related remuneration accruals. Other Income Statement Captions Corporate costs: the year over year increase of $2.6 million was due to the prior year including the recovery of $8.4 million of historical pension costs, increased provisions…
- FY2025 10-K: …with developing customer needs. In addition, the business has developed further formulations in emollients, silicones and surfactants for the personal care, home care, agrochemical, construction, mining and other industrial markets. Fuel Specialties has continued to innovate, focused on bringing new technologies to…
- CSW (CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of operations and results for each of our segments. The operations of PF WaterWorks have been included in our consolidated results of operations and in the operating results of our Contractor Solutions segment since the November 4, 2024 date of acquisition. The operations of PSP Products ("PSP") have been included in…
- FY2025 10-K: …our customers prefer, and we remain focused on the products and subcategories that are growing faster than the overall industry. We believe we have the strategy and the team to deliver strong performance in fiscal 2026. We expect to maintain a strong balance sheet in fiscal year 2026, which provides us with access to…
- AVNT (AVIENT CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: NT CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Description of Business We are an innovator of materials solutions to help our customers succeed, while enabling a sustainable world. Our products include specialty engineered…
- FY2025 10-K: Corporation, the subsidiaries of Avient Corporation party thereto, the existing lenders under the Term Loan Agreement, Citibank, N.A, as administrative agent, and Truist Bank, as the Amendment No. 10 Additional Term Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed…
- SXT (Sensient Technologies Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …The Company uses advanced technologies at facilities around the world to develop specialty food and beverage systems; personal care, essential oils, pharmaceutical, and nutraceutical systems; specialty colors; and other specialty and fine chemicals. The Company's three reportable segments are the Flavors & Extracts…
- FY2025 10-K: …and Board of Directors of Sensient Technologies Corporation Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sensient Technologies Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income,…
- MTX (MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to arrive at operating profit do not include several items, such as net interest or income tax expense. Depreciation expense related to corporate assets is allocated to the business segments and is included in their income from operations. However, such corporate depreciable assets are not included in the segment…
- FY2025 10-K: …products. Continue to develop innovative applications for our bleaching earth products for edible oil and renewable fuel industries. Develop natural and mineral-based solutions for personal care applications. Increase our presence and market share globally for retinol delivery technology for personal care…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.