DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $129.53, DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) is priced for +12.7% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/DTM

Headline

FieldValue
TickerDTM
CompanyDT Midstream, Inc.
Sector / IndustryUtilities
Current price$129.53/sh
CompositionPipeline 55% / Gathering 45%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)12.5%
Operating margin today49.6%
Margin compression (value-band)-37.1pp
Implied growth12.7%
Multiple paid23x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 10: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 8.1% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.11σ
cohort percentile (of 70 peers)74

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.54x5expensive
Earnings6.65x5expensive
Relative0.98x2justifies
Growth0.78x4justifies

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=16)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$307.560.42xyesFCF base $0.8B, growth 19% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.5%, 7yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$203.010.64xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 15.9x / 17.9x / 19.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.2x / 20.0x / 23.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$123.751.05xyesStage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$49.602.61xyesBV/sh $46.85, ROE (TTM) 9.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$50.992.54xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$141.790.91xyesRev $1.3B, growth 19% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 8.2x / 10.1x / 12.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$110.291.17xyesEPS $4.56, growth 24% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.17 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$15.138.56xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.52B × (1−31%) / WACC 7.5% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$51.252.53xyesBV $46.85 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 9.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 6.4%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$69.331.87xyes√(22.5 × EPS $4.56 × BVPS $46.85) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.92B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$19.496.65xyesFCF $480.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$16.737.74xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.45B (FCF $0.48B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$147.140.88xyesEPS $4.56 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$9.2414.02xyesBV $46.85 × (ROIC 1.5% / WACC 7.5%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $1.31B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$165.440.78xyesEPS $4.56 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 24.2% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 36.3x
Earnings YieldEarnings$49.302.63xyesEPS $4.56 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Pipelineoperatingenterprise$687.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Gatheringoperatingenterprise$556.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$3.2b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)7.12x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)4.89x
Interest coverage4.0x
Share count CAGR (dilution)1.4%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Valuing a midstream company is a different exercise from valuing almost anything else in energy, and the reason is contractual rather than geological. A producer's earnings track the commodity. A pipeline's earnings track a signed agreement. DT Midstream describes the arrangement plainly in its annual filing: firm service contracts are typically long-term and structured using fixed demand charges or MVCs with fixed deficiency fee rates, which provides for fixed revenue commitments regardless of actual volumes of natural gas that flow. Roughly 92% of pipeline revenue arrived that way last year, and about 99% of revenue at the unconsolidated joint ventures did. Gathering, which is closer to the wellhead and therefore closer to the drill bit, ran about 57% firm with another 36% from gas already flowing off proved developed reserves. The right question for this business is not where gas prices go. It is how long the contracts run and who signed them.

There is a structural quirk here that a screening tool will get wrong. The company owns half of NEXUS, 40% of Vector and 52.5% of Millennium, carried at $1,253 million between them at the end of 2025, and the filing is explicit that Our operating revenues do not include revenues of unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for as equity method investments. Those pipelines contributed $138 million of earnings in 2025 against $1,243 million of reported revenue. So a meaningful slice of the earnings power sits below the revenue line entirely, and any ratio built on sales understates the business by construction. The margin looks unusually high for the same reason it is genuinely high: about 49 cents of every reported revenue dollar became operating profit last year, against WMB at 28.7% and KMI at 28.7%, and in the same band as the gathering specialists AM at 54.2% and WES at 41.0%.

What has actually been growing is the interstate pipeline side. Segment operating income went from $242 million in 2023 to $279 million in 2024 to $415 million in 2025, helped substantially by the Midwest Pipeline Acquisition, which contributed $212 million of the segment's $244 million revenue increase last year. The company placed the fourth LEAP expansion phase into service, taking that system to 2.1 billion cubic feet a day, and reached a final investment decision on the Guardian G3 expansion, which raises Guardian's capacity by roughly 40% and is supported by long-term negotiated rate precedent agreements with investment-grade utility customers. The first quarter of 2026 carried the momentum forward: operating income of $166 million against $148 million, and earnings from the joint ventures of $43 million against $37 million.

Capital discipline is the quieter part of the case. The company reached investment grade with all three major rating agencies during 2025. Net debt runs near 5 times operating profit and operating income covered the interest bill close to four times, which for an asset base with contracted revenue is comfortable rather than tight. Dividends declared came to $3.28 per share in 2025, and the board lifted the quarterly rate to $0.88 alongside the first-quarter 2026 results. The contract book pays for that raise, not the balance sheet.

The honest objection is that gathering has been shrinking while everything else grew. That is true, and the bull answer is not that it will stop. It is that gathering is the part of the portfolio where contract structure does the least work, and it is the smaller half. The pipeline segment plus the joint ventures now carry the earnings, and both run on paper signed years in advance by utilities and investment-grade shippers.

Bear Case

Look at gathering on its own and the picture is a business past its best point in this cycle. Revenue went $545 million, $538 million, $556 million across 2023, 2024 and 2025, essentially flat. Operating income over the same three years went $229 million, $210 million, $199 million. Flat revenue with falling profit is cost inflation arriving faster than the contracts can reprice, and gathering is 45% of the company's revenue. Throughput did rise, to 3.1 billion cubic feet a day from 2.9, so this is not a volume problem. It is a margin problem, and margin problems in gathering tend to persist until contracts are renegotiated, which happens on the customer's schedule as much as the operator's.

The joint ventures have been sliding too, more quietly. Earnings from equity method investees came in at $177 million in 2023, $162 million in 2024 and $138 million in 2025. So two of the three earnings streams shrank while the headline number grew, and the growth came from buying assets rather than from the assets already owned: the Midwest Pipeline Acquisition supplied $212 million of the pipeline segment's $244 million revenue increase in 2025, and diluted share count went from 98.4 million to 102.5 million to help pay for it. Bought growth is real growth. It is just harder to repeat, and it arrives with a purchase price attached.

Underneath sits a concentration the filing does not soften: We depend on a key customer, Expand Energy, in the Haynesville formation in the Gulf Coast and in the Marcellus formation in the Northeastern U.S. for a significant portion of our revenues. That customer is investment grade, which helps, but the same disclosure adds that We engage with other customers that are sub-investment grade. Gathering economics are downstream of somebody else's drilling decision, and drilling decisions in the Haynesville respond to a gas price this company has deliberately insulated its revenue from. Insulation cuts both ways. It protects the near-term revenue and it does nothing for the volumes that renew the contracts.

Which brings the price into it. The market values the enterprise at roughly 27 times trailing operating profit, beyond the upper quartile of its midstream peer group, and what that multiple asks for is specific: operating profit compounding at about 18.5% a year for five years. The company has run at that kind of pace recently, so the rate is not fantastical. The duration is the stretch. Of comparable fast-growing companies, only around 42% held that pace for five years. Operating income in the opening quarter of 2026 came in at $166 million against $148 million, a pace in the low teens rather than the high teens. The methods reflect the same tension: only the forward cash-flow approaches reach today's price, and they do it by projecting a terminal multiple no lower than today's. The price sits about 32% above where the peer-multiple methods land, near three times the asset-value methods, and more than seven times the earnings-power methods, which credit no growth at all. If the compounding assumption softens, there is no second method waiting anywhere near here.

The balance sheet is the least of it and still worth naming. Net debt runs about 5 times operating profit against an asset base that takes years to build and decades to depreciate, and quarterly interest expense held at $40 million into 2026. Against that, the three joint-venture stakes carried at $1,253 million are separately saleable assets whose value does not depend on the gathering thesis working, which puts a real, if modest, floor under a bad outcome. It is a floor, not a cushion: it amounts to a small fraction of what the equity trades for today.

Valuation

The revenue line on this income statement is misleading, and the filing says so directly: Our operating revenues do not include revenues of unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for as equity method investments. Three pipelines, half of NEXUS, 40% of Vector and 52.5% of Millennium, delivered $138 million of earnings in 2025 that never touched the $1,243 million of reported revenue. Any comparison built on sales therefore reads the company as far more expensive than it is, which is worth knowing before looking at any multiple at all.

On profit the picture is cleaner and still demanding. The price puts the enterprise at roughly 27 times trailing operating profit, which lands beyond the upper quartile of the midstream peer set. Invert that and the assumption becomes explicit: operating profit growing about 18.5% a year for five years, computed at a cost of capital near 8.3% with a long-run rate of 4% after that. The rate itself is inside what the business has recently produced. The persistence is the demanding part, and the reference base rate is not encouraging, with roughly 42% of comparable fast-growing companies sustaining that pace over five years.

Four families of method look at the same facts and split. Only the forward cash-flow approaches reach today's price, and the way they get there matters: the exit multiple in the leading one is held flat at today's level across a seven-year projection, so the model assumes the market pays the same for these assets in 2033 as it does now. Peer multiples leave the price about 32% above where they settle. The asset-value methods, which start from a book value of $46.28 a share and the return earned on it, sit near a third of the price. The earnings-power methods, which capitalize current profit with no growth credited, sit far lower still. That spread is the premium being paid for durability, and it is large.

Cohort position sharpens rather than softens it. Operating margin ran about 49% last year on the reported revenue base, which beats WMB at 28.7% and KMI at 28.7% and sits alongside HESM at 61.9% and AM at 54.2%. The gathering-focused names carry margins in that range and trade nothing like this multiple, which locates the premium precisely: it is being paid for the interstate pipeline franchise and the contract book behind it, not for the gathering systems.

Solvency does not constrain the story here, which is unusual for an asset-heavy business. Net debt sits near 5 times operating profit, interest was covered close to four times, the company reached investment grade with all three agencies during 2025, and share count has grown about 1.4% a year over four years, most of it to fund an acquisition rather than to fund operations. Underneath the operating case, the joint venture stakes carried at about 1.25 billion dollars are assets with their own market. The downside is bounded by contracts and by saleable infrastructure. What is not bounded is the multiple.

Catalysts

The first quarter of 2026 landed on April 30 and read well: net income attributable of $130 million, or $1.27 per diluted share, against $108 million and $1.06 a year earlier. Operating cash flow was $280 million against $247 million, and plant and equipment spending stayed modest at $78 million for the quarter. The board declared a dividend of $0.88 per share payable July 15, 2026 to holders of record on June 15.

Growth announcements came with that release rather than separately. The company approved investment in the Vector Pipeline 2028 expansion and the Millennium Pipeline R2R project, placed a new power plant lateral off Midwestern Gas Transmission into service, and reported that non-binding open seasons for an expansion of Midwestern Gas Transmission and a further Vector expansion each drew customer interest exceeding the capacity offered. Oversubscribed open seasons are not contracts, but they are the step immediately before contracts, and they say something about demand for takeaway capacity from power generation in the Midwest.

Two items sit on the near calendar. Second quarter results are scheduled for July 30, 2026, announced in a July 15 release. And the Bluestone Extended Supply Transportation agreement between Bluestone and Millennium received FERC approval during 2025, subject to a filed appeal, which would create a new transportation path between Millennium and the Tennessee pipeline if it survives. The appeal is the kind of item that produces no headline until it resolves and then changes a supply route.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Pipeline (reported)

Gathering (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

DT Midstream first quarter 2026 news release, April 30, 2026 · DT Midstream news release, July 15, 2026 · FY2025 Form 10-K, filed February 19, 2026

View the full interactive DTM report on boothcheck