DNOW INC. (DNOW): what the price requires
At today's price, DNOW INC. (DNOW) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~13.2 years. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/DNOW
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | DNOW |
| Company | DNOW INC. |
| Current price | $13.11/sh |
| Composition | Upstream 62% / Midstream 21% / Gas Utilities 7% / Downstream and Industrial 10% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin today | 1.4% |
| Must persist for | 13.2y |
| Multiple paid | 69x operating income |
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.7% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~2.3 years.
How unusual the bet is: high
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.27σ |
| cohort percentile (of 225 peers) | 96 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 14% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.20x | 2 | expensive |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | 0.29x | 3 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.09x | 4 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=9)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $8.59 | 1.53x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.0%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $11.24 | 1.17x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 35.8x / 38.8x / 41.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $45.81 | 0.29x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 2.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $11.51 | 1.14x | yes | Book value floor: BV/sh $11.51, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $10.36 | 1.26x | yes | Book value with convergence: BV/sh $11.51, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $12.86 | 1.02x | yes | Rev $3.4B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.6x / 0.7x / 0.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | $59.29 | 0.22x | yes | Margin ramp: -5% → 12% over 7yr, rev growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered) |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $0.01 | 1310.50x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.06B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.0% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $1.74 | 7.53x | yes | EBITDA $0.08B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 1310.50x | yes | FCF $53.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 1310.50x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.02B (FCF $0.05B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $45.81 | 0.29x | yes | Revenue $3.40B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $484.0m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 13.92x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 11.00x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 13.8% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
DNOW just doubled in size by acquiring MRC Global, which closed in November 2025, so the trailing numbers describe a company mid-integration rather than its steady state. First-quarter revenue nearly doubled to $1.18 billion, but a GAAP loss reflected merger charges, not operating decline.
The trailing operating loss of about $172 million is distorted by merger-related inventory step-up and integration costs; free cash flow is still positive at about $53 million and book value is about $11.51 a share, just below the $13.50 price.
The stock is a value-and-asset-supported name in transition. Full-year 2026 revenue is guided near $5 billion with EBITDA margin approaching 4.5%, and synergies are running ahead of plan. The main risk is that demand tracks oil and gas capital spending.
Bull Case
The right frame for DNOW today is that it is a company mid-transformation, and reading its trailing financials as a steady state badly understates it. DNOW distributes pipe, valves, fittings, and related energy products, and in November 2025 it closed the acquisition of MRC Global, a deal that effectively doubled its size. So the first-quarter 2026 numbers are not the picture of a struggling business; they are the picture of two companies being stitched together. Revenue nearly doubled year over year to $1.18 billion, up about 97%, almost entirely from the merger. The reported loss was driven by integration mechanics, including roughly $41 million of inventory step-up amortization, not by the underlying distribution operation, which generated positive adjusted income and positive free cash flow of about $53 million.
Once you see it as a scaled-up distributor in integration, the value case comes into focus. The combined company has stronger purchasing power, a broader product range, and improved competitive positioning in attractive end markets. Management raised first-year cost synergies to about $30 million from an initial $17 million target while keeping the three-year goal at $70 million, so the integration is delivering ahead of plan. Full-year 2026 revenue is guided toward $5 billion with EBITDA margins expected near 4.5% as temporary stabilization costs moderate. The balance sheet is workable, with about $600 million of gross debt against a larger combined cash-generating base.
The growth angle is where the bull case gets interesting. DNOW is leaning into the parts of energy that are growing structurally rather than cyclically: midstream, gas utilities, and increasingly data centers. Natural-gas infrastructure spending driven by rising power demand and LNG exports plays directly to its product set, and management expects data-center-related orders to exceed $30 million this year. At about $13.50, just above a roughly $11.51 book value, the price is supported by asset, relative-multiple, and growth-DCF frames, which is why the priced-in read is value-and-asset supported rather than a growth gamble. Analysts carry a Strong Buy consensus with targets around $16 to $17. The thesis is a larger, more diversified distributor whose normalized earnings, once the merger noise clears, justify a higher price.
Bear Case
The external variable with the most leverage on DNOW is energy capital spending, and the current price does not obviously discount a downturn in it. DNOW sells the pipe, valves, and fittings that producers, midstream operators, and utilities buy when they build and maintain infrastructure. That demand is downstream of the oil and gas capital budget, which swings with commodity prices and with drilling activity. The composition is roughly 62% upstream, the most cyclical slice, so a fall in oil prices or a pullback in drilling would hit the largest part of the business directly. A distributor with thin margins, guided near 4.5% EBITDA, has little cushion when volumes soften, and the macro backdrop for upstream activity is not within the company's control.
The second pressure is the integration itself, which is proving harder than hoped. The most significant near-term overhang is the harmonization of MRC Global's U.S. ERP systems onto SAP, which management described as a heavier lift than anticipated, and MRC Global's U.S. revenues declined most in upstream and downstream precisely because of those ERP-related disruptions. A botched or prolonged systems migration in a distribution business, where inventory and order accuracy are everything, can cost real revenue and customer trust, and the first-quarter adjusted EPS miss already prompted a share-price drop. Mergers that double a company's size carry execution risk that does not fully resolve for years.
The valuation reflects a business whose normalized earnings are still uncertain. The price rests on a roughly $11.51 book-value floor plus an assumption that post-integration margins reach the guided level. The composite read is elevated, with the inversion implying a long duration of sustained cash flow to justify the price. The bet at $13.50 (June 27, 2026) is that the merger delivers its synergies, the ERP migration finishes cleanly, and energy capital spending holds up, three conditions that all have to go right, and any one slipping would expose how little earnings currently sit beneath the price.
Valuation
DNOW is hard to value cleanly right now because the MRC Global merger distorts the trailing financials. The composite read is elevated on that basis.
The model X-ray leans on the methods that survive a negative-earnings year. The asset-based book-value floors land near $11.51, just below the $13.50 price, and the convergence variant near $10. The growth methods that credit a recovery land above the price: the perpetual-growth DCF near $8.51 but the future-market-cap projection near $13.25 and a margin-ramp model that assumes normalization much higher. The relative methods split, with the price-to-sales fallback high because it values a large revenue line with no margin, and EV/EBITDA low on depressed trailing EBITDA. The honest center is the book-value floor plus a judgment about normalized margins.
The pattern is a value-and-asset-supported distributor in transition. The price sits modestly above book value, so the downside cushion is the asset base, and the upside depends on the combined company reaching its guided 4.5% EBITDA margin once the integration noise clears. The bet at $13.50 is that normalized post-merger earnings justify a price above book, not that the current trailing financials, which are distorted by one-time merger charges, do. Analysts at a Strong Buy with targets near $16 are underwriting the normalization; the methods say the floor is the book value and the rest is execution.
Catalysts
The defining recent event is the MRC Global merger, completed in November 2025, with each MRC Global share converted into 0.9489 DNOW shares, roughly doubling the company. First-quarter 2026 results, reported in the spring, showed revenue up about 97% to $1.18 billion but a GAAP net loss of about $44 million driven by roughly $41 million of merger-related inventory step-up amortization and integration costs; adjusted net income was about $3 million. Shares fell on the adjusted EPS miss. Management raised first-year cost synergies to about $30 million from an initial target while keeping the three-year goal at $70 million.
The forward catalysts center on integration and end-market mix. The largest near-term item is the ERP harmonization of MRC Global's U.S. operations onto SAP, which has run slower than planned and is the main swing factor for revenue and margin recovery. Full-year 2026 revenue is guided near $5 billion with EBITDA margin approaching 4.5%. On the growth side, the company is prioritizing midstream, gas utilities, and data centers, with natural-gas infrastructure demand and data-center orders expected to exceed $30 million this year. The watch items are the pace and completion of the ERP migration, synergy capture against the $70 million target, post-integration EBITDA margin progression, and the direction of oil and gas capital spending that drives distribution volumes.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- DXPE (DXP Enterprises, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …be the successor to SEPCO Industries, Inc. Since our predecessor company was founded, we have primarily been engaged in the business of distributing maintenance, repair and operating ("MRO") products, equipment and service to customers in a variety of end markets including the general industrial, energy, food &…
- FY2025 10-K: …representing firm orders for our IPS segment products that have been received and entered into our production systems, was $325.0 million and $292.2 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Supply Chain Services Our Supply Chain Services ("SCS") segment manages all or part of our customers' supply chains…
- AIT (APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." This information is incorporated here by reference. INDUSTRY POSITION AND VALUE PROPOSITION We serve a segment of the industrial market that requires technical expertise and service as our products and solutions are directly tied to companies' production…
- FY2025 10-K: …production equipment and processes, a greater focus on plant floor optimization, and compliance and regulatory requirements. INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION We primarily compete within North America which we believe offers significant growth potential given our industry position, established distribution and sales network,…
- WCC (WESCO International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …condition could be adversely affected. We may consider outsourcing additional functions in the future, further heightening these risks. An increase in competition could decrease sales, profit margins, and earnings. We operate in a highly competitive industry and compete directly with global, national, regional and…
- FY2025 10-K: …the reportable segment information for the year ended December 31, 2024 for the EES and CSS reportable segments has been recast to conform to the current year presentation. (2) The reportable segments do not incur income taxes and interest expense as these costs are centrally controlled through the Corporate tax and…
- GWW (W.W. GRAINGER, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …market price competitiveness. Historically, the Company's broad and diverse customer base and the generally nondiscretionary nature of its products have provided a degree of resilience during periods of economic contraction in the industrial MRO market. The full extent and impact of ongoing macroeconomic conditions,…
- FY2025 10-K: …and market-specific factors. The Company's revenue is primarily comprised of MRO product sales and related activities. The Company's presentation of revenue by reportable segment and customer industry most reasonably depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of the Company's revenue and cash flows are…
- MSM (MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …such as vending and in-plant programs, and the rate of new customer implementations. Our strategy is to position ourselves as a mission-critical partner to our customers. We intend to selectively pursue strategic acquisitions that expand or complement our business in new and existing markets or further enhance the…
- FY2025 10-K: …over time, which may make MRO supply distribution more competitive. Some of our competitors challenge us with a greater variety of product offerings, greater financial resources, additional services, or a combination of these factors. In the industrial products market, customer purchasing decisions are based…
- CNM (Core & Main, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: -Risks Related to Our Indebtedness." Our industry and the markets in which we operate are fragmented and highly competitive, and increased competitive pressures, including the pressure to consolidate, could adversely affect our business. The markets in which we operate are fragmented and highly competitive.…
- FY2025 10-K: …mately 19% of our $39 billion addressable market in fiscal 2024. The principal competitive factors in our industry include the breadth, availability, access and pricing of products and services, technical knowledge and project planning capabilities, local expertise, as well as delivery capability and reliability. We…
- FERG (Ferguson Enterprises Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …some cases, have larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and greater resources than we do. Furthermore, this competitor consolidation could cause the industries in which we operate to become more competitive as greater economies of scale are achieved. Additionally, we have experienced and may continue to…
- FY2025 10-K: …changes in demand may heighten the risks described in the risk factor titled "We may not rapidly identify or effectively respond to direct and/or end customers' wants, expectations or trends, which could adversely affect our relationship with customers, our reputation, the demand for our products and our market…
- INVX (INNOVEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …mergers and acquisitions among oil and natural gas companies or other events that have the effect of reducing the number of available customers. If competition remains the same or increases as a result of future industry downturns, we may be required to lower our prices, which would adversely affect our results of…
- FY2025 10-K: …service companies. Once a new product has been commercialized or acquired, our global sales and distribution infrastructure enables us to scale and drive customer adoption quickly. 29 Our business has produced strong returns on invested capital. Refer to " Non-GAAP Financial Measures " within this section for Return…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.