DOORDASH, INC. (DASH): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers DOORDASH, INC. (DASH) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/DASH
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | DASH |
| Company | DOORDASH, INC. |
| Sector / Industry | Consumer Cyclical |
| Current price | $236.83/sh |
| Composition | United States 84% / International 16% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Multiple paid | 144x operating income |
How unusual the bet is: n/a
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 10.51x | 4 | expensive |
| Earnings | 6.10x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 3.21x | 5 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.86x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=16)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $209.84 | 1.13x | yes | FCF base $2.4B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.1%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $274.06 | 0.86x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 62.4x / 65.4x / 68.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $109.30 | 2.17x | yes | P/E 44x (blended: static sector reference 20x + trailing (TTM) 113x), scenarios: 35.2x / 44.0x / 52.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 29.41x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $22.63 | 10.47x | yes | BV/sh $23.06, ROE (TTM) 9.1%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $22.43 | 10.56x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $343.64 | 0.69x | yes | Rev $14.7B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 5.7x / 7.1x / 8.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $73.85 | 3.21x | yes | EPS $2.11, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=3.23 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | $22.39 | 10.58x | yes | BV $23.06 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 9.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 5.9%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $33.08 | 7.16x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.11 × BVPS $23.06) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $53.02 | 4.47x | yes | EBITDA $1.58B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $55.46 | 4.27x | yes | FCF $2150.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $29.87 | 7.93x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $1.10B (FCF $2.15B − SBC $1.05B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $68.08 | 3.48x | yes | EPS $2.11 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $4.11 | 57.62x | yes | BV $23.06 × (ROIC 1.6% / WACC 9.1%) (excluded from median) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $49.92 | 4.74x | yes | Revenue $14.72B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $79.13 | 2.99x | yes | EPS $2.11 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $22.81 | 10.38x | yes | EPS $2.11 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local commerce platform (single reportable segment) | operating | enterprise | 13.7B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $2.8b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -4.08x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -3.91x (net cash) |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 6.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Orders through the Marketplaces reached 933 million in the first quarter of 2026, up 27% on the year, and the first-quarter filing attributes the increase to volume across a footprint the 10-K puts at over 40 countries rather than to higher prices per delivery.
- Today's price works out to roughly 103 times company-wide operating income while the share count has risen about 6% a year over the last four years, so holders are paying a very full multiple into a slowly widening base.
- The next report lands August 5, 2026, and the figure that decides the year is whether the country exits booked in the first quarter of 2026 pull consolidated operating margin out of the low single digits.
Bull Case
Only one way of looking at DoorDash reaches today's price, and it is the one that credits the future. Asset-value methods land near an eighth of the price, the earnings-power methods near a quarter of it, and peer multiples land at roughly 43% of it. The forward cash-flow methods sit above the price. That is not a contradiction so much as a description: this is a business whose demonstrated profit is small and whose demonstrated volume is enormous, and static frames are built to price the first.
What they miss is that the volume is the asset. The 10-K describes the structure plainly: "Our Marketplaces operate in over 40 countries, including the United States, and account for the vast majority of our revenue today." Three groups meet inside that network, and each one makes the network more useful to the other two. More merchants give consumers more reason to open the app; more consumers give couriers denser routes; denser routes cut the cost of each delivery. The company put the mechanism on the record in its most recent annual report, noting that "In 2025, revenue grew at a faster rate than Marketplace GOV primarily due to improved logistics efficiency, increasing contribution from advertising revenue, and a reduction in credits and refunds as a percentage of Marketplace GOV." Revenue growing faster than the dollar value flowing through the platform is the single most important sentence in the filing. It means the take is rising for reasons that have nothing to do with charging customers more.
The first quarter of 2026 shows the same shape at the profit line. Gross profit came in at 1,944 million dollars against 1,478 million dollars a year earlier, a 32% increase on 27% order growth. Stock compensation over the same quarter was 231 million dollars, marginally below the 235 million dollars booked in the first quarter of 2025. A company holding equity issuance flat while volume grows a quarter is beginning to show the operating leverage the model has always promised and rarely delivered.
Advertising is the quiet part. The filing describes it as a value-added service offered "through our Marketplaces to help merchants and consumer packaged goods companies increase consumer engagement and drive incremental revenue." Ad dollars arrive with almost no incremental delivery cost attached, which is why the annual report lists advertising among the reasons revenue outran platform volume. The same fleet carries it.
International is where the next decade of the argument lives. The Deliveroo purchase closed in October 2025, and the company recorded 1,981 million dollars of goodwill on it, attributing that goodwill to "the assembled workforce and anticipated synergies from the potential future growth of the Company's and Deliveroo's platforms". Wolt and Deliveroo together turn a domestic operator into one with a European map, and the United States still accounts for 84% of revenue against 16% abroad. If the density mechanic that works in American suburbs travels, the international line is the growth the price is paying for, and the acquisitions bought the routes rather than building them one city at a time.
The honest concession is that free cash flow of about 2.15 billion dollars falls to roughly 1.10 billion once stock compensation is charged against it. The bull answer is not to wave that away but to note the direction: equity issuance is flat in absolute dollars while orders compound at 27%, which is exactly the arithmetic that turns a diluting company into a self-funding one, given time.
Bear Case
Start with what the balance sheet remembers. The most recent quarterly filing states that "We have generated significant operating losses from our operations as reflected in our accumulated deficit of $4.3 billion as of March 31, 2026." That is the cumulative record of a business that has been operating at scale for years. Profitability arrived recently and it arrived thin: company-wide operating margin runs 5.3%, against 11.7% at UBER on 53.7 billion dollars of revenue growing 18.3%, and 14.8% at CART. The comparison matters because UBER runs the same three-sided logistics problem at four times the revenue and converts twice as much of it.
Now put the price against that. Roughly 103 times company-wide operating income requires operating profit to grow at its self-funding ceiling for about 23 years. Not a burst, not a cycle, but a quarter century of compounding at the fastest rate the balance sheet can finance without outside money. The near-term pace is inside what the company has recently delivered, so the demand is not the speed. The demand is the persistence. Of comparable fast-growers, only about 14% held that pace even ten years, and the multiple sits at the very top of the peer distribution, well past the upper quartile. Shorten the runway from 23 years to ten and the arithmetic does not bend gently; the multiple has to come down to meet the profit.
The cash flow is smaller than it looks. About 2.15 billion dollars of free cash flow becomes roughly 1.10 billion once the stock compensation funding it is charged as the expense it is, and the share count has risen about 6.1% a year over the four years to March 2026. The dilution is not hypothetical and it is not slowing enough to ignore. The quarterly filing also lists, among the consequences of the 2030 convertible notes, dilution to stockholders from issuing Class A shares on conversion, and the revolving credit facility carries its own constraint: "We are also required to comply with a maximum senior net leverage ratio, measured quarterly, determined in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement."
Competition is the reason the margin may not get where the price needs it. The 10-K is direct: "In particular, local food delivery logistics, the largest category of our business today, is fragmented and intensely competitive." It goes on to name Amazon, Uber Eats, Prosus and Delivery Hero, alongside merchants running their own ordering channels. Fragmented and intensely competitive is not a market where a thin operating margin expands to the low teens by sitting still, and every dollar of the fee increases that would get it there is a dollar a rival can undercut.
Then there is the cost base that could be repriced by a court. The company's position is that its couriers are contractors, and the filing states it while naming the exposure: "While we maintain that Dashers that utilize our platform as independent contractors are properly classified as independent contractors, such Dashers may be reclassified as employees due to changes in the law or its interpretation." The largest variable cost in the business is priced on the assumption that it stays variable. A ruling that converts it to a fixed cost does not shave the margin; it resets the model that produced it, in a business where the margin has five points of room and the price is asking for twelve.
Valuation
The bet here is duration, not speed. At today's price the market is paying about 103 times company-wide operating income, which works out to operating profit compounding at its self-funding ceiling for roughly 23 years. The rate itself is unremarkable against what DoorDash has recently produced. It is the length of the runway that is doing the work, and each extra percentage point of growth buys back only about three years of it.
The methods split cleanly on whether to credit that. The asset-value family lands at roughly an eighth of the price and the earnings-power family at roughly a quarter, with the peer-multiple family landing at about 43% of it. Only the forward cash-flow family reaches the price at all, and it reaches by projecting free cash flow of about 2.4 billion dollars forward at 25% growth over seven years, then fading to 4% in perpetuity against a 9.1% cost of capital. A second forward model arrives at nearly the same place through a different door, with its exit EV/EBITDA held flat at today's 47.5x across the whole projection. Look at that input rather than at what it produces. The price is reached only if a multiple set by today's enthusiasm is still standing seven years from now.
Run the same cash flow without the growth and the distance appears. Capitalizing free cash flow of about 2.15 billion dollars at a 9.3% required return puts the price roughly three times above where that earnings-power method lands; charge the roughly 1.05 billion dollars of annual stock compensation against the cash flow first, and the price sits closer to six times above it. Half of the reported free cash flow is paid in shares, and the two versions of the same calculation are separated by nothing but whether you count that as a cost.
The concrete requirement is a margin. Company-wide operating margin runs 5.3% today; the price needs it in the neighborhood of 12.7%. That is roughly a doubling of profit conversion on a revenue base already above 14 billion dollars. The first quarter of 2026 supplies evidence for and against: gross profit of 1,944 million dollars against 1,478 million dollars a year earlier says conversion is improving, while total stock compensation of 231 million dollars in the quarter says a meaningful share of the improvement is still being paid for in equity rather than cash.
Against the cohort, the gap is in conversion rather than scale. UBER turns 11.7% of revenue into operating profit and EBAY turns 19.6%, both growing more slowly than DoorDash and neither carrying anything close to this multiple per dollar of operating income. The balance sheet, at least, is not the constraint. Cash and investments comfortably exceed the funded borrowings, the business is not consuming cash, and interest earned on the investment portfolio is a real line in the quarterly filing rather than a rounding item. What the balance sheet does not do is fix the dilution: a share count rising about 6.1% a year is the standing cost of the growth, and it is charged to the holder every year the runway does not shorten.
Catalysts
The next scheduled report is August 5, 2026. The line to read first is not revenue but consolidated operating margin, because the first quarter of 2026 carried restructuring charges tied to the closure of operations in certain countries, and that decision only pays if the exits show up as margin rather than as a one-off charge. Order growth is the other half: 933 million orders in the first quarter, up 27% year on year, sets a bar that gets harder to clear as the base grows.
The international integration is the largest moving part. Deliveroo joined on October 2, 2025, bringing 1,981 million dollars of goodwill and a schedule of acquired intangibles that includes restaurant merchant relationships amortized over eleven years and developed technology over two. Short amortization lives on technology mean the accounting recognizes the cost of that platform quickly, so reported profit carries a drag over the next several quarters that says nothing about how the business is trading.
Two dated items outside the filings frame the near term. DoorDash changed its consumer fee structure in late July 2026, moving to charges that vary with order size and delivery distance. Pricing changes of that kind are the most direct lever on take rate available to the company, and also the most visible to consumers, which is why the effect usually shows up in order frequency before it shows up in revenue. Separately, Wedbush began coverage on July 15, 2026 with a Neutral rating and a $205 price target. A neutral call carrying a target above the current price is the same disagreement the methods show: the argument is about how long the growth lasts, not about which direction it runs.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Local commerce platform (single reportable segment) (reported)
- UBER (UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Executive Officer, manages the business, allocates resources, makes operating decisions and evaluates operating performance. As of December 31, 2025, our three operating and reportable segments are as follows: Segment Description Mobility Mobility products connect consumers with Drivers who provide rides in a variety…
- FY2025 10-K: Consolidated Financial Statements" included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The mobility, delivery, and logistics industries are highly competitive, with well-established and low-cost alternatives that have been available for decades, low barriers to entry, low switching costs, and…
- GRAB (GRAB HOLDINGS LIMITED)
- FY2025 20-F: …based on the interest income we receive from the loans we extend to borrowers and from the factoring fee or discount when we purchase the receivables, as the case may be. For other financial services, we generate revenue through commissions received from the sale of products and services. We also maintain a rewards…
- FY2025 20-F: …It also includes vehicle rental for driver-partners; and advertising revenue arising from online and offline advertising solutions which include in-car product placements and mobile billboards. Financial services Digital solutions offered by and with business partners to address the financial needs of driver and…
- CART (MAPLEBEAR INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …platform. For each transaction, the Company processes the entire amount of the transaction (i.e., total purchase value of the goods, delivery fees, service fees, applicable sales taxes, and tips) received from the end user and recognizes revenue on a net basis after settling the purchase value of the goods to the…
- FY2025 10-K: …with payment card issuers whereby shoppers use cards issued by the payment card issuers to pay for goods at the retailers' point-of-sale. The Company earns a revenue share from the payment card issuers for transactions processed through these payment cards and records these amounts in the same period the underlying…
- LYFT (Lyft, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …periods and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the consolidated financial statements. 82 In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software…
- FY2025 10-K: …the foreign subsidiary where the local currency is the functional currency, translation adjustments of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are recorded to a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). For foreign subsidiaries where the U.S. dollar is the functional…
- MELI (MercadoLibre Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …is the main performance indicator of our Commerce revenue line. Management believes that monitoring the Commerce business growth through a standalone metric enables us to better understand user behavior over each period and make strategic decisions to improve the Commerce business. Unique active buyers is defined as…
- FY2025 10-K: …located internationally and are settled through customer credit cards, debit cards and Mercado Pago accounts, with the majority of accounts receivable collected upon processing of credit card transactions. Due to the relatively small dollar amount of individual accounts receivable and loans receivable, except for…
- EBAY (eBay Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to the $5.0 billion previously authorized in 2024. In February 2026, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Depop, Inc., a leading C2C fashion marketplace focused on recommerce with a highly-engaged Gen Z and Millennial customer base, for approximately $1.2 billion in cash, subject to certain purchase…
- FY2025 10-K: …efficiently within these communities without disruption to buyers and sellers outside of those communities. Additionally, our growth strategy has increasingly emphasized our Focus Categories, such as motor parts and accessories, collectibles, refurbished goods, and authenticated luxury items. Our Focus Category…
- ETSY (ETSY, INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …and Services Revenue As described in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company's revenue was $2,884 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, of which a significant portion relates to revenue for Etsy marketplace and services. The Company generates revenue primarily from marketplace…
- FY2025 10-K: …labels. Each service represents an individual obligation that the Company must perform when a seller chooses to use the service. On-site advertising services consist of cost-per-click fees an Etsy marketplace seller pays for prominent placement of her listings. These fees are nonrefundable and are charged to a…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
DoorDash next scheduled earnings report, August 5, 2026 · DoorDash Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · reported change to DoorDash consumer fee structure, July 24, 2026 · Wedbush initiation, July 15, 2026