DANAOS CORPORATION (DAC): what the price requires
The current priced-in claim for DANAOS CORPORATION (DAC) is temporarily suppressed because the live engine record is unavailable. The dated report remains a snapshot, not a current market read.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/DAC
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | DAC |
| Company | DANAOS CORPORATION |
| Current price | $129.95/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 19.8% |
| Operating margin today | 56.9% |
| Margin compression implied | -37.1pp |
| Multiple paid | 6x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 4.7% sits below it).
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.16σ |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.38x | 5 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.44x | 5 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.35x | 3 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.72x | 4 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $1326.48 | 0.10x | yes | FCF base $0.7B, growth 12% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.5%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $365.25 | 0.36x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 3.8x / 5.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $373.23 | 0.35x | yes | P/E 13.94x (blended: static sector reference 20x + trailing (TTM) 5x), scenarios: 11.6x / 13.9x / 16.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 9.32x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $30.46 | 4.27x | yes | Stage 1: -12% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $289.34 | 0.45x | yes | BV/sh $205.39, ROE (TTM) 13.0%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $340.55 | 0.38x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $120.67 | 1.08x | yes | Rev $1.0B, growth 12% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.9x / 2.3x / 2.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $292.52 | 0.44x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.53B × (1−21%) / WACC 7.5% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $351.43 | 0.37x | yes | BV $205.39 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 13.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.5%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $351.66 | 0.37x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $26.76 × BVPS $205.39) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $459.40 | 0.28x | yes | EBITDA $0.66B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $370.80 | 0.35x | yes | FCF $644.8M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $361.00 | 0.36x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.63B (FCF $0.64B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $22.43 | 5.79x | yes | EPS $26.76 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $274.68 | 0.47x | yes | BV $205.39 × (ROIC 10.1% / WACC 7.5%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $112.82 | 1.15x | yes | Revenue $1.04B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $289.30 | 0.45x | yes | EPS $26.76 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $2.4m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.01x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.00x |
| Interest coverage | 15.5x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -2.7% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Danaos leases containerships (and increasingly drybulk vessels) to liner operators on multi-year charters, so its cash flow is contracted and visible: it reported about $4.06 billion of contracted charter revenue as of the end of the first quarter.
- The defining feature is the discount: the stock trades well below its stated book value per share of about $205, even as it earns double-digit returns on each vessel and holds a net cash position.
- Watch charter rates and the newbuild program; container charter rates softened while drybulk earnings jumped to roughly $24,825 per day, and the company has new vessels delivering in 2027 and 2028 against three-year charters.
Bull Case
The most striking thing about Danaos is how far the price sits below where the methods value it, which is the opposite of most stocks. The asset-value methods, anchored on a stated book value of about $205 per share, place the equity at well above the current price near $125 (June 27, 2026). The earnings-power methods, capitalizing current profit, land above the price too. Even on a simple operating-income basis the price works out to roughly six times, a multiple so low it sits below what a steady annual decline in profit would justify. This is a business priced as if its cash flows are about to fall sharply, while the cash flows are in fact contracted years out. The market is applying a deep cyclical discount to a company whose near-term earnings are largely locked in.
The earnings are real and the cash flow is visible. First-quarter 2026 net income rose to $140.4 million, or $7.70 per diluted share, from $115.1 million a year earlier, on operating revenue of $253.7 million. The drybulk diversification is paying off: drybulk revenue jumped about 41% to $24.1 million on a time-charter-equivalent rate of $24,825 per day, more than double the prior year, offsetting softer container charter rates. And the backlog is the ballast: roughly $4.06 billion of contracted charter revenue as of the end of the quarter, including about $734.9 million for the rest of 2026 and $934.7 million for 2027, underpins the cash flow regardless of where spot rates go in the near term.
Capital allocation is aggressively shareholder-friendly, which is what a manager does when the stock is this cheap. Danaos has repurchased 3.25 million shares for $235.1 million under its buyback program and pays a quarterly dividend, most recently $0.90 a share. Retiring shares well below book value is directly accretive: each dollar spent buys back more than a dollar of net asset value. The company is also growing the fleet selectively, ordering Newcastlemax drybulk vessels and 5,000-TEU container ships, each backed by multi-year charters before delivery. A net-cash balance sheet, a multi-billion-dollar contracted backlog, double-digit per-vessel returns, and a buyback retiring shares below book describe a deeply discounted compounder, not a value trap.
Bear Case
The bear case is competitive and structural, and it is the reason the discount exists: containership leasing is a cyclical business where the supply of ships is set by the entire industry, not by Danaos. When charter rates are high, every owner, the large liner operators that own their own fleets, lessors like Costamare and SFL, and new entrants, orders new vessels. Those ships take two to three years to deliver, and they arrive in waves that depress rates precisely when the new capacity hits the water. Container charter rates already softened year over year in the first quarter, and the long shipbuilding cycle means a glut ordered today can pressure rates for years. Danaos cannot control the order book of its competitors, and an industry-wide newbuilding surge would weigh on the rates it can charge when its current charters expire.
The contracted backlog protects the near term but not the long term. The roughly $4.06 billion of contracted revenue is a powerful buffer, but charters roll off, and each vessel eventually returns to the market to be re-chartered at whatever rate prevails then. If rates are low when a ship comes off charter, the cash flow that vessel produces falls, and the stated book value that makes the stock look cheap is itself a function of vessel values that move with the cycle. A book value of $205 per share assumes ship values hold; in a deep containership downturn, both the charter income and the asset value compress together, which is exactly why the market refuses to pay book value for a shipping company at what may be a cyclical high.
The diversification into drybulk cuts both ways. Adding Newcastlemax bulkers spreads the company across two shipping markets, which smooths results, but it also means Danaos now carries exposure to a second cyclical freight market with its own oversupply dynamics. The drybulk strength that flattered the first quarter, with rates more than doubling, is itself cyclical and can reverse. What the price implies is essentially a bet that earnings decline from here, and the bear case is simply that the bet may be right: the contracted revenue runs out, the newbuilds across the industry arrive, and the rates on re-chartered vessels normalize lower. The deep discount is not a free lunch; it is the market pricing the next downturn.
Valuation
This report assigns no fair value and no target. It works backward from the $124.68 price to the assumption embedded in it, then measures the distance to each way of valuing the business.
The unusual feature is that the price sits below where most methods land, which marks a deep value read rather than a premium. Using the company's operating profit, the price works out to roughly six times, a multiple so low it sits below what even a 5% annual decline in operating profit would warrant. This is a bound, not a growth solve: the market is pricing in contraction, not expansion. The asset-value methods, against a stated book value of about $205 per share, say the equity is worth far more than the price; the earnings-power methods say the same. Only when you assume a sharp cyclical decline does the price make sense. That is the shape of a cyclical priced near a feared peak, where the market discounts the assets and the earnings because it expects both to fall.
The right frame for a shipping company is that peak charter rates are not sustainable charter rates, and the book value embeds vessel values that move with the cycle. The contracted backlog of about $4.06 billion is the thing that makes the near-term cash flow more certain than the multiple suggests, but it does not extend forever; the long-term value depends on the rates at which vessels re-charter as their current contracts expire. The trailing return on equity near 3% on a large book reflects how the methods read a high book value against a cyclical earnings stream. The bet a buyer makes at this price is that the cycle does not roll over as fast or as far as the discount implies.
Solvency is a genuine strength and bounds the downside hard. Danaos holds essentially no net debt, with liquid assets roughly matching gross debt, and interest coverage near sixteen times. For a cyclical, asset-heavy business, a net-cash balance sheet is the most valuable possible position: it means a downturn is something to be exploited, buying ships and shares cheaply, rather than survived. The contracted backlog plus the net-cash sheet give the equity a real floor well above zero. The price is paying for a discounted, asset-backed, contracted cash-flow machine; the downside is bounded by the cash, the backlog, and the vessel values, and the upside is the discount to book closing if the cycle holds.
Catalysts
The clearest catalysts are charter rates and the contracted backlog. Container charter rates softened in the first quarter while drybulk earnings jumped to about $24,825 per day, more than double a year earlier, lifting drybulk revenue roughly 41%. Because the company reports a contracted backlog of about $4.06 billion, including $734.9 million for the rest of 2026 and $934.7 million for 2027, each new charter signing and each rate print is a direct read on how the cash flow extends past the current book.
Capital return is a steady, observable catalyst. Danaos has repurchased 3.25 million shares for $235.1 million and declared a $0.90 quarterly dividend payable in June. With the stock trading below book value, continued buybacks are accretive, so the pace of repurchases is a signal of both management's conviction and the per-share value being created.
The fleet program is the forward growth event. Danaos has ordered Newcastlemax drybulk vessels for 2028 delivery and 5,000-TEU container ships for 2027, each backed by three-year charters before delivery. Each delivery adds contracted revenue, but the broader industry order book is the variable with the most leverage: the pace of newbuilding across all owners sets future charter rates, which makes the global supply cycle the catalyst that matters most over the long run.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- CMRE (COSTAMARE INC.)
- FY2025 20-F: …can be more difficult to employ them on profitable time charters, particularly during periods of decreased demand in the charter market. Accordingly, we may find it difficult to continue to find profitable employment for our vessels as they age. 15 Table of Contents We face substantial competition from a number of…
- FY2025 20-F: …competition in both sectors. Participants in the container shipping industry include "liner" shipping companies, which operate container shipping services and own containerships, containership owners, often known as "charter owners", who own containerships and charter them out to liner companies, and shippers who…
- GSL (Global Ship Lease, Inc.)
- FY2025 20-F: …presented for each category of participating common shares under the two-class method. (w) Risks Associated with Concentration The Company is exposed to certain concentration risks that may adversely affect the Company's financial position in the near term: (i) The Company derives its revenue from liner companies…
- FY2025 20-F: 4 Table of Contents We will face substantial competition in expanding our business from a number of companies. Many of these competitors may have greater financial resources and a lower cost of capital than us, may operate larger fleets, may have been established for longer, and may be able to offer better charter…
- SFL (SFL Corporation Ltd.)
- FY2025 20-F: …are self-propelled, and can therefore easily move between geographic areas. Jack-up drilling rigs are not self-propelled, but it is common to move these assets over long distances on heavy-lift vessels. Therefore, the markets and competition for these rigs are effectively world-wide. Competition for charters in all…
- FY2025 20-F: …the international shipping and offshore drilling industries, types, sizes, sophistication and ages of vessels and drilling rigs, supply and demand for vessels and drilling rigs, availability of or developments in other modes of transportation, competition from other shipping companies, cost of newbuildings,…
- SBLK (STAR BULK CARRIERS CORP.)
- FY2025 20-F: · management of our accounting system and records and financial reporting; · administration of the legal and regulatory requirements affecting our business and assets; and · management of the relationships with our service providers and customers. The principal factors that affect our profitability, cash flows and…
- FY2025 20-F: …and varies according to their supply and demand. We compete with other owners of dry bulk carriers in the Newcastlemax, Capesize, Post Panamax, Kamsarmax, Panamax, Ultramax and Supramax size sectors. Ownership of dry bulk carriers is highly fragmented. We compete for charters on the basis of price, vessel location,…
- FRO (Frontline plc)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- TNK (TEEKAY TANKERS LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- INSW (International Seaways, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and dynamics that have an impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations. ● Results from Vessel Operations. This section provides an analysis of our results of operations presented on a business segment basis. In addition, a brief description of significant transactions and other items that…
- FY2025 10-K: "Business and Segment Reporting," to the Company's consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," for additional information on the Company's segments, including reconciliations of (i) time charter equivalent revenues to shipping revenues and (ii) adjusted…
- FLNG (FLEX LNG Ltd.)
- FY2025 20-F: …and depressed freight rates, may severely affect the financial condition of charterers, and their ability to make charter payments, which could result in a material increase in the credit and counterparty risks to which we are exposed to and our ability to re-charter our vessels at competitive rates. If any of our…
- FY2025 20-F: …segment: vessel operations. The vessel operations segment relates to revenue generated from chartering of vessels to customers. Although separate vessel financial information is available, the CODM internally evaluates the performance of the Company as a whole and not on the basis of each vessel or charters. In…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Danaos Q1 2026 results release