Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN): what the price requires
At today's price, Clearway Energy, Inc. (CWEN) is priced for +16.6% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CWEN
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CWEN |
| Company | Clearway Energy, Inc. |
| Current price | $33.44/sh |
| Composition | Flexible Generation 20% / Renewables & Storage 80% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin today | 14.7% |
| Implied growth | 16.6% |
| Multiple paid | 76x operating income |
Solve inputs: computed at a 5.6% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~17.5pp.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~13 years; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.27σ |
| cohort percentile (of 72 peers) | 100 |
| sustained it ~5 years at this level | 46% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | — | 0 | — |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | 1.85x | 3 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.06x | 4 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 4.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=7)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $62.74 | 0.53x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 16.7x / 18.7x / 20.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $18.09 | 1.85x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 2.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $20.29 | 1.65x | yes | DPS $1.85, g=0.1% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $35.56 | 0.94x | yes | Stage 1: 5% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $0.11 | 304.00x | yes | BV/sh $8.59, ROE (TTM) 0.1%, ke 9.3% (excluded from median) |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $0.05 | 668.80x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% (excluded from median) |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $28.50 | 1.17x | yes | Rev $1.5B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.9x / 4.6x / 5.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $0.01 | 3344.00x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.45B × (1−21%) / WACC 4.3% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $0.04 | 836.00x | yes | BV $8.59 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 0.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 0.1%/yr (excluded from median) |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $8.95 | 3.74x | yes | EBITDA $0.88B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 3344.00x | yes | FCF $656.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $0.28 | 119.43x | yes | BV $8.59 × (ROIC 0.1% / WACC 4.3%) (excluded from median) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $18.09 | 1.85x | yes | Revenue $1.49B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $9.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 53.79x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 42.50x |
| Interest coverage | 0.5x |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Clearway Energy owns long-term contracted renewable and flexible power plants and pays out the cash they generate, so the right lens is cash available for distribution and the dividend, not GAAP earnings, which carry heavy depreciation on the asset base.
- The central risk is the balance sheet: about $9.2 billion of debt sits against the contracted cash flows, and the company itself warns that its financing covenants can "prevent the Company from paying cash dividends" if breached.
- Watch the dividend and the CAFD path: the company reaffirmed 2026 cash available for distribution guidance of $470 million to $510 million and targets the high end of 5% to 8% annual dividend-per-share growth toward a 2030 goal.
Bull Case
Valuing a company like Clearway calls for a different lens than a normal industrial, and that is where the bull case starts. This is a yieldco: it owns operating wind, solar, battery, and flexible gas plants, most of them under long-term contracts, and its job is to convert the contracted cash those plants produce into a growing dividend. Reported earnings are the wrong gauge because the depreciation on a large fleet of capital-intensive assets swamps the net-income line. The figure that matters is cash available for distribution, and the company reaffirmed full-year 2026 CAFD guidance of $470 million to $510 million, supporting a quarterly dividend of about $0.4676 a share, an annualized yield above 5%. For an income-oriented holder, the question is the durability and growth of that distribution, and Clearway has a visible path to grow it.
The contracts are the moat. Clearway's revenue comes largely from long-dated power-purchase agreements with utilities and corporate buyers, which fixes the price of the electricity for years and insulates the cash flows from spot-market swings. The company keeps lengthening and upgrading that book: in the most recent period it completed the $324 million Cardinal solar acquisition, reached substantial completion on the 320 megawatt Honeycomb battery portfolio, and restructured a contract alongside a new 15-year agreement with an investment-grade hyperscaler. A 15-year contract with a creditworthy data-center buyer is exactly the kind of long, indexed cash flow a yieldco is built to own, and it lands as electricity demand from data centers is rising.
The growth pipeline is funded and accelerating. Management now expects to deploy 20% more corporate cash between 2026 and 2029 than its prior plan, and is guiding toward the top end of a 2030 CAFD-per-share target range of $2.90 to $3.10, with a 2027 target of $2.70 per share or better. The supply of drop-down projects from its developer affiliate gives it a pipeline of assets to acquire at known economics. A vehicle with contracted cash flows, a rising dividend, and a funded acquisition runway into a power-hungry decade is the substance behind the price.
Bear Case
The bear case is that the moat, long contracts on clean-power assets, is being slowly chipped by the cost of capital it takes to grow them, and the data shows the strain on the equity. Clearway grows by buying more plants, and it funds those purchases with a mix of debt and equity. Gross debt stands near $9.5 billion against trailing operating profit of only about $180 million, and the share count has been climbing fast as the company issues equity to fund the pipeline. That combination, heavy debt plus steady share issuance, is the yieldco's structural vulnerability: each new project has to earn more than the blended cost of the debt and the freshly issued shares used to buy it, or the per-share cash flow that backs the dividend stops growing. When rates are high, that spread narrows, and the growth engine that justifies the premium runs slower.
The leverage is not a side issue, it is the spine of the risk, and Clearway is explicit about it. The company warns that its financing covenants could "prevent the Company from paying cash dividends, and the Company's failure to comply with those and other covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, may entitle the related lenders to demand repay"ment. Most of that debt is non-recourse at the project level, which protects the parent, but it also means the cash from a given plant first serves that plant's lenders before it can flow up to the dividend. The 10-K describes managing "the variability of expected future cash interest payments that may arise in connection with its non-recourse facility level debt or any potential refinancing of its Senior Notes." Refinancing maturing project debt at higher rates is a direct claim on the CAFD that pays the distribution.
The price already assumes the growth holds. Inverted, today's level pays roughly 80 times company-wide operating profit, a figure that only makes sense for a vehicle expected to keep compounding its distribution. Only the dividend-discount and growth-cash-flow methods reach the price; the asset-value and earnings-power lenses break down on a business whose GAAP returns are near zero. History is a caution: only about a quarter of comparable fast-growers sustained this pace for the roughly eight years the price requires. The first quarter underlined the sensitivity, with a $68 million net loss and CAFD of $70 million against $257 million of adjusted EBITDA. The dividend is covered today, but it is covered by a machine that has to keep acquiring, refinancing, and issuing to stay ahead, and any of those getting more expensive narrows the cushion.
Valuation
This report sets no fair value and no target. It starts from the $37.47 price (June 27, 2026) and asks what that price assumes, then measures how far it sits from each way of valuing the business, using the lens a yieldco actually requires.
The conventional methods do not apply cleanly here, and that itself is the first read. Clearway's GAAP return on equity is near zero because depreciation on a large contracted asset base consumes the earnings line, so the asset-value and earnings-power methods produce figures that are not meaningful for this kind of company. The methods that do apply are the dividend-discount models and the growth-cash-flow models, which value the distribution and its growth directly. Those are the lenses that reach the price, and they reach it by assuming the dividend keeps growing toward management's 2030 target. The right question is not whether the assets are cheap on book value; it is whether the contracted cash will fund a rising distribution.
Inverting the price quantifies the bet. At today's level the market is paying roughly 80 times company-wide operating profit, which implies growth held near the self-funding ceiling for about eight years. The pace is within what Clearway has recently delivered through acquisitions; the stretch is the duration. Only about a quarter of comparable fast-growers sustained that for the roughly eight years required. For a yieldco, sustaining it means continuing to buy accretive projects and refinance project debt without the cost of capital eroding the per-share cash flow, which is precisely the thing high rates threaten.
Solvency is the dominant fact and must be read on yieldco terms. About $9.2 billion of net debt sits against the contracted cash flows, most of it non-recourse at the project level, so it is serviced by the specific plants before cash flows up to the dividend. Standard interest-coverage and years-to-repay math against consolidated GAAP operating profit overstates the fragility, because the debt is matched to long-dated contracted revenue. But the covenant language is real, and the company states plainly that a breach could halt the dividend. The price is paying for a growing distribution; the balance sheet is the constraint on how fast and how safely that distribution can grow.
Catalysts
The clearest catalyst is the dividend-growth trajectory and the CAFD that funds it. Clearway reaffirmed 2026 cash-available-for-distribution guidance of $470 million to $510 million, set a 2027 target of $2.70 per share or better, and said it is increasingly focused on the top end or better of its 2030 CAFD-per-share range of $2.90 to $3.10. Each quarterly dividend declaration and each CAFD update is a direct read on whether that path is holding.
Capital deployment is the growth engine to watch. The company now plans to deploy 20% more corporate cash between 2026 and 2029 than before, and recently closed the $324 million Cardinal solar acquisition, completed the Honeycomb battery portfolio, and signed a new 15-year power agreement with an investment-grade hyperscaler. New drop-downs and corporate-buyer contracts, especially data-center offtake, are the events that extend and grow the contracted cash flows.
The macro variable with the most leverage is the cost of capital. A yieldco's accretion depends on buying projects at returns above its blended financing cost, and refinancing maturing non-recourse debt at acceptable rates. Moves in interest rates therefore swing the growth case more than any single project, which makes the financing terms on each new deal the detail to track.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Flexible Generation (reported)
- NRG (NRG Energy, Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …amount of the Convertible Senior Notes and a total of 3,986,335 shares for the conversion premium. See Item 15 - Note 12, Long-term Debt and Finance Leases. 61 Capped Call Options During the second quarter of 2024, the Company entered into privately negotiated capped call transactions with certain counterparties (the…
- FY2025 10-K: …to ensure that such Incremental Term Loan B Facility is fungible for U.S. federal tax purposes with the Company's Existing Term Loan B Facility). If an event of default occurs under the Incremental Term Loan B Facility, the entire principal amount outstanding thereunder, together with all accrued unpaid interest and…
- VST (Vistra Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …increasing renewable (wind and solar) generation capacity generally depresses Market Heat Rates, particularly during periods when total demand is relatively low. However, increasing penetration of renewable generation capacity may also contribute to greater volatility of wholesale market prices independent of changes…
- FY2025 10-K: …ends May 31, 2028. We also enter into bilateral capacity transactions, with other PJM market participants, including load-serving entities and generation owners, to manage capacity obligations, pricing exposure, and portfolio risk. In December 2025, FERC determined that PJM needs to update its market rules to…
- TLN (Talen Energy Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …record to grow and diversify our generation fleet in a capital-efficient manner through a disciplined mix of value-uplift initiatives that expand scale, improve flexibility and reliability, and provide durable economics. We intend to maintain flexibility to pursue both organic and inorganic growth opportunities and…
- FY2025 10-K: …has been able to capture high realized pricing through both reliable generation and strategic risk management. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations." We now also benefit from long-term, stable cash flows from both contractual…
- CEG (CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …in the U.S., we benefit from significant economies of scale, that allow us to provide our customers with competitively priced energy and to structure highly tailored solutions targeted to a customer's unique power needs and clean energy goals. Our CORe+ product serves C&I customers' sustainability needs by matching…
- FY2025 10-K: …can significantly impact the demand and market pricing of our generation portfolio. This includes the demand and perceived value of certain attributes of our generation, such as reliability or clean energy, as well as the overall demand for energy in the markets in which we operate. Recently, we have benefited from…
- AES (AES CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …Revenue from generation businesses is classified as non-regulated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Energy performance obligations are recognized using an output method, as energy delivered best depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer. Performance obligations to deliver energy are…
- FY2025 10-K: …net basis. Generation - Most of our generation fleet sells electricity under contracts to customers such as utilities, industrial users, and corporate clients. Our generation contracts, based on specific facts and circumstances, can have one or more performance obligations as the promise to transfer energy, capacity,…
Renewables & Storage (reported)
- BEPC (BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE CORPORATION)
- FY2025 20-F: …Our group has also made investments in sustainable solutions, comprised of assets and businesses that enable the transition to net-zero where we can leverage our access to capital and partnerships to accelerate growth, and emerging transition asset classes where our group's initial investment positions us for…
- FY2025 20-F: …Drivers We believe that strong continuing growth in renewable power generation and other decarbonization investment opportunities will be driven by the following: Accelerating demand from digitalization, AI and electrification. With the continued proliferation of artificial intelligence and growth in cloud computing,…
- ORA (ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of geothermal, energy storage, and solar PV while strengthening our leadership in geothermal energy to become a leading global renewable energy provider. In this evolving market, our strategy is to build on our existing capabilities and core competencies while expanding our ability to compete in next-generation…
- FY2025 10-K: SS projects in the U.S. with an aggregate capacity of 415MW/1,038MWh. The following table summarizes key information regarding these projects as of February 25, 2026: 16 Project Name Customer Location Size (MW) MWh Type of contract ACUA PJM NJ 1 1 Merchant Plumsted PJM NJ 20 20 Merchant Stryker PJM NJ 20 20 Merchant…
- AES (AES CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …and other initiatives face considerable uncertainties. Wind, solar, and energy storage projects are subject to substantial risks. In particular, in the U.S., AES' renewable energy generation growth strategy has depended in part on federal, state, and local government policies and incentives that support the…
- FY2025 10-K: …on cutting-edge technologies that are designed to accelerate customers' time to power, while delivering green attributes. The generation capacity of the systems owned and/or operated under AES Clean Energy is 10,961 MW across the U.S., with another 3,031 MW under construction, including 1,542 MW of wind, 939 MW of…
- NEE (NextEra Energy Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …generation facilities and builds and owns regulated electric and gas transmission assets. NEER also provides gas and power solutions through its customer supply business. NEER's strategy focuses on providing cost-effective differentiated solutions to its customers, including emerging large-load opportunities, and on…
- FY2025 10-K: …and/or energy output through long-term power sales and battery storage tolling agreements with utilities, retail electricity providers, power cooperatives, municipal electric providers and commercial and industrial customers. The NEER segment also owns, develops, constructs and operates rate-regulated electric…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Clearway Energy Q1 2026 results, May 2026 · Clearway Energy Q1 2026 earnings call, May 2026