Chevron Corp (CVX): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers Chevron Corp (CVX) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CVX
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CVX |
| Company | Chevron Corp |
| Sector / Industry | Energy |
| Current price | $204.68/sh |
| Composition | Upstream U.S. 11% / Upstream International 18% / Downstream U.S. 35% / Downstream International 36% / All Other 0% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 5.8% |
| Operating margin today | 14.2% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -8.4pp |
| Multiple paid | 13x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
How unusual the bet is: n/a
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.67x | 4 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.39x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.54x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.81x | 4 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $315.01 | 0.65x | yes | FCF base $27.0B, growth 12% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.2%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $254.48 | 0.80x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 12.2x / 17.2x / 22.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 12.89x (blended: static sector reference 10x + trailing (TTM) 20x), scenarios: 9.7x / 12.9x / 15.5x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 9.36x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $251.57 | 0.81x | yes | Stage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $112.67 | 1.82x | yes | BV/sh $96.11, ROE (TTM) 10.8%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $121.63 | 1.68x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $187.02 | 1.09x | yes | Rev $215.3B, growth 12% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.4x / 1.9x / 2.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $364.00 | 0.56x | yes | EPS $10.40, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.56 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | $123.34 | 1.66x | yes | BV $96.11 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 7.0%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $149.96 | 1.36x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $10.40 × BVPS $96.11) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $23.55B × sector EV/EBITDA 6.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $147.60 | 1.39x | yes | FCF $27012.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $335.57 | 0.61x | yes | EPS $10.40 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $215.26B × sector P/S 1.2x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $390.00 | 0.52x | yes | EPS $10.40 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $112.43 | 1.82x | yes | EPS $10.40 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream | operating | enterprise | $257.0b | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Downstream | operating | enterprise | $55.2b | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $27.3b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 1.13x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.89x |
| Interest coverage | 21.5x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.2% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Worldwide production averaged 3.86 million barrels of oil equivalent a day in the March quarter, up 15%, with the U.S. figure up 388,000 barrels a day or 24% on the strength of an acquisition.
- Volume growth did not reach the bottom line: quarterly profit came to $2.2 billion, or $1.11 a share, against $3.5 billion and $2.00 a year earlier, with international refining earnings alone down $1.2 billion on "lower margins on refined product sales".
- The declared quarterly dividend of $1.78 annualizes above the $5.74 of trailing earnings per share, and total debt and finance lease liabilities rose to 45.4 billion dollars at the end of March from 40.8 billion three months earlier.
Bull Case
A company reveals what it believes by what it does with the balance sheet in a bad quarter. In the three months to March, borrowings and finance lease obligations went up to 45.4 billion dollars from 40.8 billion, cash came down to 5.3 billion from 6.3 billion, and the board declared a dividend of $1.78 a share payable in June. Read that sequence in order. Prices were poor, refining margins were worse, and the response was to keep paying and keep spending. The filing frames the capacity to do so plainly: "Based on its high-quality debt ratings, the company believes that it has substantial borrowing capacity to meet unanticipated cash requirements". Against a market value near 386.7 billion, borrowings of that size are not a constraint. They are a decision.
What the borrowing bought is barrels. Worldwide production averaged 3.86 million barrels of oil equivalent a day in the first three months of 2026, up 15% on the year. The U.S. upstream business supplied most of that: 2,024 thousand barrels a day against 1,636, an increase of 388,000 barrels a day or 24%, which the filing attributes primarily to an acquisition. Barrels acquired at the bottom of a price cycle are the cheapest barrels available, and they do not expire.
The earnings are already showing up where the barrels are. U.S. upstream earnings rose to $2,112 million in the quarter from $1,858 million, and the upstream business as a whole earned $3.9 billion against $3.8 billion a year earlier. That is worth pausing on, because the whole company earned $2.2 billion in the same quarter. The producing business is not the problem. Everything downstream of it is, and refining margins are the most reliably mean-reverting quantity in this industry.
The revenue mix disguises this rather than revealing it. Refining and marketing account for the large majority of the revenue line, because product sales run through the accounts at their full sale value while the barrels behind them were already counted once. The profit sits in the other half of the business. An investor reading the sales split alone would conclude this is mostly a refiner. The earnings split says otherwise.
Compare the pieces to their own peer groups rather than to each other. Among producers, EOG runs a 29.8% operating margin on $23.9 billion of revenue and APA a 35.5% margin on $9.2 billion; among refiners, MPC runs 6.7% on $135.4 billion and VLO 4.7% on $124.8 billion. Blending those two economics into one company-wide figure produces a number that describes neither business, and today it is being dragged by the half that is cyclically depressed. Take the producing half at anything like its peers' economics and the current consolidated result looks like an artifact of timing rather than a description of the assets.
Bear Case
Volumes rose fifteen percent. Profit fell by more than a third. That is the cycle doing its work, and it is the entire bear case in two sentences. Quarterly profit came to $2.2 billion, or $1.11 a share, against $3.5 billion and $2.00 a share a year earlier, with pre-tax income down to $3.9 billion from $5.6 billion. The filing is unsentimental about why: "Earnings for the upstream segment are closely aligned with industry prices for crude oil" and natural gas, and downstream earnings are "closely tied to margins on the refining, manufacturing and marketing" of products. International downstream earnings alone fell $1.2 billion in the quarter, driven by $1.1 billion of "lower margins on refined product sales". Adding barrels into a falling price does not fix a falling price.
The exposure is not only to price but to other people's supply decisions. "About 15 percent of the company's net oil-equivalent production in the first three months of 2026 occurred in the OPEC+ member countries", which means a meaningful slice of the volume is produced under arrangements set outside the company. The 10-K adds the longer list of things that move the outcome and are not management's to move: "the pace of energy transition; customer and consumer preferences and the use of substitutes; and governmental regulations, policies and other actions regarding the development of oil and gas reserves". The 10-K also acknowledges that pressure over climate and sustainability "have resulted and may continue to result in changes to the portfolio and company activities, increased costs, reduced demand for our products". That is the company's own description of a demand curve it does not control.
Now the awkward part, which is the price. Every standard way of valuing this business, without exception, lands below the current quote. Book value, capitalized earnings, peer multiples, discounted cash flow: not one of the four reaches it. For the price to be right, the operating line has to compound at roughly 11.2% a year for five years starting from a trailing base that already includes a full year of weak refining. That is not an absurd requirement for a cyclical at a low point. It is, though, a requirement, and the price offers no discount for the possibility that it isn't met.
The financing of the shortfall is the detail that connects the two halves. The declared dividend of $1.78 a quarter annualizes above trailing earnings of $5.74 a share, meaning reported profit no longer covers the payout. Free cash flow of $13.781 billion over the trailing year is what actually funds it, and there is very little to spare once the acquisition spending is counted. Meanwhile borrowings and finance lease obligations rose to 45.4 billion dollars from 40.8 billion in a single quarter, and the share count has risen about 0.5% a year over four years rather than fallen. A supermajor funding its distribution out of the balance sheet through a trough is doing a normal thing. It is also drawing down the exact resource it would need if the trough runs long.
The floor under all of this is real but modest against the price. Beyond the operating businesses, the company holds roughly 43.9 billion dollars of equity stakes in other entities, close to a ninth of its market value. In a genuine downturn those stakes retain separate recoverable value while the operating thesis compresses. They bound the downside; they do not come close to filling the gap between that quote and where the valuation methods actually land.
Valuation
Of all the ways to put a number on an integrated oil company, exactly one reaches today's quote, and it is the one that ignores the oil. Value the dividend stream on its own terms, growing steadily and discounted at a shareholder's required return, and the arithmetic supports $194.72. Every other approach lands beneath it. Book value per share is $92.51. Trailing earnings of $5.74 a share, capitalized with no growth, land far lower still. Peer multiples applied to the 21.82 billion of EBITDA this business produced put the price well above where the sector's own enterprise-value-to-EBITDA reference sits. Not one family of method reaches the price. That is unusual, and it is worth saying plainly rather than averaging away.
Read backwards, the price embeds a specific requirement: operating profit compounding at roughly 11.2% a year for five years, measured off a trailing base that is pre-tax income of about 19.1 billion rather than a clean operating line. Take that figure with its basis attached and the requirement is still legible. Roughly 58% of comparable fast-growers have historically sustained a pace like that for five years, which is a high enough proportion that the demand reads as plausible rather than heroic. The assumption is also unusually sensitive: each percentage point of cost of capital moves the required growth rate by around seven points, so the answer moves a long way on inputs nobody observes directly.
The reason the static methods land so low is visible in their own construction. The cash-flow model that reaches furthest below the price projects the historical revenue trend forward, and that trend is negative six percent; run a decline rate through a discounted cash flow and the output declines with it. The closer of the two cash-flow approaches holds the exit multiple flat at today's 18.0 in its base case, compressing to 13.0 in the bear scenario and expanding to 23.0 in the bull, and lands nearer the quote. The difference between those two is not analytical rigour. It is whether the last few years are treated as the trend or as a phase of the cycle.
Where the earnings actually sit matters more here than any multiple. Refining and marketing supply the large majority of the revenue line, since product sales pass through the accounts at full value. The producing business supplied $3.9 billion of earnings in the March quarter while the whole company earned $2.2 billion. Reading this as one blended enterprise therefore mixes two very different economics: among producers EOG runs a 29.8% operating margin on $23.9 billion of revenue and APA 35.5% on $9.2 billion, while among refiners MPC runs 6.7% on $135.4 billion and VLO 4.7% on $124.8 billion. A single company-wide margin describes neither.
The balance sheet is best read from the filing rather than from any ratio. Borrowings and finance lease obligations stood at 45.4 billion dollars at the end of March against cash and equivalents of 5.3 billion, both figures moving the wrong way over the quarter, and separately the company carries about 43.9 billion dollars of equity stakes outside the operating businesses. Against a market value near 386.7 billion, none of that is a solvency question. It is a capacity question, and the capacity is being spent: the quarterly dividend of $1.78 a share now annualizes above trailing earnings per share, which is the single clearest statement of where this business currently sits in its own cycle.
Catalysts
Second quarter results arrive on July 31, 2026. The number that matters is not the headline but the split between the two halves. Upstream earned $3.9 billion in the March quarter while the whole company earned $2.2 billion, so the question the July print answers is whether refining margins stopped falling or kept going. International refining was the single largest drag last quarter, down $1.2 billion, and it is the line where a turn would show up first.
Geopolitics is doing more work than usual this month. Ukrainian strikes on tankers in the Black Sea have put the company's Kazakh production in the path of a conflict it has no part in, and management has been working to keep those assets out of it. Separately, the company is preparing memoranda of understanding with Iraq covering the West Qurna 2 and Nassiriya fields, alongside study of a pipeline route that would bypass the Strait of Hormuz. Both items point the same direction: the company is adding barrels in places where the barrels are cheap and the politics are not. That trade has worked before and it has also gone badly before, which is why the filing lists governmental action on reserve development among the things it cannot control.
Two operational items are smaller but concrete. A Gulf of Mexico platform was shut on July 20, 2026 ahead of a developing tropical storm, a routine seasonal interruption that costs volume for days rather than quarters. And on July 13, 2026 a contract was signed for three hybrid drilling rigs. Rig contracting is the least glamorous forward indicator available and one of the more honest ones, because it commits capital months before any barrel is produced and it is hard to reverse quietly.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Upstream (reported)
- XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: PERATIONS BUSINESS RESULTS Upstream ExxonMobil has a diverse growth portfolio of exploration and development opportunities, which allows the Corporation to be selective in our investments, maximizing shareholder value, and mitigating political and technical risks. ExxonMobil's competitive strengths enable the…
- FY2025 10-K: …4 offshore gas resources. Mechanical completion was achieved for the Golden Pass LNG project, with expected first LNG production in the first quarter of 2026. 44 Table of Contents Financial Table of Contents MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Upstream Financial…
- COP (ConocoPhillips)
- FY2025 10-K: …the Ursa and Europa fields and Ursa Oil Pipeline Company LLC for net proceeds of $0.7 billion, the Anadarko Basin for net proceeds of $1.2 billion and other noncore Lower 48 and Corporate assets for approximately $1.3 billion. See Note 3 . As part of our LNG strategy to build a dynamic portfolio and expand our…
- FY2025 10-K: …in Queensland, Australia, to supply the domestic gas market and convert the CBM into LNG for export. Origin operates APLNG's upstream production and pipeline system, and we operate the downstream LNG facility, located on Curtis Island near Gladstone, Queensland, as well as the LNG export sales business. We operate…
- EOG (EOG RESOURCES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: :NaturalGasProductionMember eog:OtherInternationalMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000821189 eog:GainsLossesOnMarkToMarketCommodityDerivativeContractsAndOtherDerivativeContractsNetMember eog:UnitedStatesOfAmericaSegmentMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000821189…
- FY2025 10-K: …2025-12-31 0000821189 us-gaap:CommodityContractMember us-gaap:BasisSwapMember srt:NaturalGasReservesMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member 2024-12-31 0000821189 us-gaap:CommodityContractMember us-gaap:BasisSwapMember srt:NaturalGasReservesMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member 2024-12-31 0000821189…
- OXY (OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …of its gathering, processing, transportation, storage and terminal commitments and by providing the oil and gas segment access to domestic and international markets. To generate returns, the segment evaluates opportunities across the value chain and uses its assets to provide services to Occidental's subsidiaries, as…
- FY2025 10-K: …locking in pricing on longer-term contracts and working closely with vendors to secure the supply of critical materials. Seasonality is not a primary driver of changes in the Company's consolidated quarterly earnings. STRATEGY The Company is focused on delivering a unique shareholder value proposition with its…
- DVN (DEVON ENERGY CORP/DE)
- FY2025 10-K: …2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001090012 dvn:UpstreamRevenuesMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001090012 us-gaap:OtherPostretirementBenefitPlansDefinedBenefitMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001090012 2023-10-01 2023-12-31 0001090012 us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001090012…
- FY2025 10-K: GasMember dvn:MarketingAndMidstreamRevenuesMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001090012 dvn:O2023Q4FixedDividendsMember 2023-10-01 2023-12-31 0001090012 srt:NaturalGasReservesMember 2022-12-31 0001090012 us-gaap:NoncontrollingInterestMember 2025-12-31 0001090012…
- FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: LLCMember fang:DiamondbackEnergyInc.Member 2024-07-15 2024-07-15 0001539838 fang:WTGJointVentureMember 2025-07-01 2025-09-30 0001539838 us-gaap:DisposalGroupDisposedOfBySaleNotDiscontinuedOperationsMember fang:WTGMidstreamLLCMember fang:RemudaMidstreamHoldingsLLCMember 2025-07-01 2025-09-30 0001539838…
- FY2025 10-K: …of the oil volumes purchased and the responsibility to deliver the oil volumes sold. Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations The Company's upstream product sales contracts do not originate until production occurs and, therefore, are not considered to exist beyond each day's production.…
- APA (APA Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …program against a volatile price environment and the effects of global inflation and rising interest rates. Despite these uncertainties, the Company is focused on its longer-term objectives: (1) to remain committed to providing affordable, reliable, and responsibly produced energy; (2) to deliver top operational…
- FY2025 10-K: …apa:OilAndGasExcludingPurchasedMember srt:OilReservesMember apa:SegmentNorthSeaMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001841666 us-gaap:IntersegmentEliminationMember apa:OilAndGasExcludingPurchasedMember srt:OilReservesMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001841666 apa:OilAndGasExcludingPurchasedMember srt:OilReservesMember…
Downstream (reported)
- MPC (MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …fundamentals, as well as the U.S. refining industry's current structural advantages over the rest of the world, will support a constructive environment for U.S. refiners. Our Midstream segment contributed strong results and continued growth in 2025, benefitting from the expansion of its Permian to Gulf Coast natural…
- FY2025 10-K: …declines during the fall and winter months. As with crude oil, other transportation alternatives and system maintenance levels influence refined product movements. Our Midstream segment also gathers, treats, processes and transports natural gas and transports, fractionates, stores and markets NGLs. NGL and natural…
- PSX (Phillips 66)
- FY2025 10-K: …obligations for these contracts as the expected duration is one year or less or because the variable consideration has been allocated entirely to an unsatisfied performance obligation. We also have certain contracts in our Midstream segment that include minimum volume commitments with fixed pricing. At December 31,…
- FY2025 10-K: …corporate activities. Corporate assets include all cash, cash equivalents, income tax-related assets and enterprise information technology assets. Effective in the first quarter of 2026, activities associated with decommissioning and redeveloping at our idled Los Angeles Refinery will be included in Corporate and…
- VLO (VALERO ENERGY CORP/TX)
- FY2025 10-K: …vlo:FutureMaturityNextFiscalYearMember us-gaap:PublicUtilitiesInventoryPetroleumProductsMember us-gaap:CashFlowHedgingMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001035002 vlo:FutureMaturityNextFiscalYearMember us-gaap:NotDesignatedAsHedgingInstrumentEconomicHedgeMember vlo:CrudeOilAndRefinedPetroleumProductsMember…
- FY2025 10-K: …including ransom-related incidents, which could result in increased costs to detect, prevent, respond to, and mitigate these threats. Such efforts include, among others, deploying additional personnel and protection technologies, training employees, and engaging third-party experts and consultants. These attacks…
- DINO (HF SINCLAIR CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: 2025, our midstream assets included: Pipelines • approximately 660 miles of refined product pipelines, including 340 miles of leased pipelines, used to transport gasoline, diesel and jet fuel principally from our Navajo Refineries in New Mexico to our customers in the metropolitan and rural areas of Texas, New Mexico,…
- FY2025 10-K: 5 Midstream 30 Corporate 9 Turnarounds and catalyst 325 Total sustaining $ 650 Growth capital 125 Total $ 775 Cash Flows - Financing Activities Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024 For the year ended December 31, 2025 , our Net cash flows used for financing activities were $631 million…
- PBF (PBF ENERGY INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of the downstream sector is the upstream sector, which refers to exploration and production companies that search for and/or produce crude oil and natural gas underground or through drilling or exploratory wells. "Eni" refers to Eni Sustainable Mobility US Inc., a subsidiary of Eni SpA. "EPA" refers to the United…
- FY2025 10-K: …being used to develop new hacking tools, exploit vulnerabilities, using phishing to trick employees into making payments or granting access to internal systems, obscure malicious activities, and increase the difficulty of detecting threats, which may result in new or expanded risks and liabilities. While, to date, we…
- PARR (Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …transferred between the Hawaii refinery and the IES Downstream, LLC ("IES") storage facility located approximately 2 miles away. From the Hawaii refinery, we distribute refined products through our logistics network of pipelines, trucks, leased barges, terminals, and storage facilities throughout the islands of Oahu,…
- FY2025 10-K: …2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000821483 us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMember parr:RefiningIntercompanyLogisticCostMember parr:LogisticsMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000821483 us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMember parr:RefiningIntercompanyLogisticCostMember parr:RetailSegmentMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000821483…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
company earnings calendar, July 2026 · Wall Street Journal, July 24, 2026 · press reports, July 16, 2026 · Reuters, July 20, 2026 · contractor announcement, July 13, 2026