COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION (CTSH): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION (CTSH) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Exported: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CTSH
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CTSH |
| Company | COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION |
| Sector / Industry | Technology |
| Current price | $64.06/sh |
| Composition | Consulting and technology services 64% / Outsourcing services 36% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 6.4% |
| Operating margin today | 15.8% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -9.4pp |
| Multiple paid | 9x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -1.33σ |
| cohort percentile (of 188 peers) | 2 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.12x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.21x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | — | 0 | — |
| Growth | 0.70x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $136.96 | 0.47x | yes | FCF base $2.6B, growth 7% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.9%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $91.64 | 0.70x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 5.6x / 7.6x / 9.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 26.45x (blended: static sector reference 35x + trailing (TTM) 14x), scenarios: 22.1x / 26.4x / 30.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 18.04x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $50.85 | 1.26x | yes | BV/sh $31.80, ROE (TTM) 14.8%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $63.57 | 1.01x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $59.70 | 1.07x | yes | Rev $21.4B, growth 7% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.2x / 1.4x / 1.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $67.43 | 0.95x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $3.06B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.9% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $65.31 | 0.98x | yes | BV $31.80 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 14.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $57.43 | 1.12x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $4.61 × BVPS $31.80) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $3.93B × sector EV/EBITDA 25.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $57.22 | 1.12x | yes | FCF $2470.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $53.00 | 1.21x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $2.29B (FCF $2.47B − SBC $0.18B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $12.04 | 5.32x | yes | EPS $4.61 × (8.5 + 2×-2.7%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $16.15 | 3.97x | yes | BV $31.80 × (ROIC 4.5% / WACC 8.9%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $21.41B × sector P/S 8.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $49.84 | 1.29x | yes | EPS $4.61 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Sciences | operating | enterprise | $6.3b | $1.2b operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Financial Services | operating | enterprise | $6.2b | $1.0b operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Products and Resources | operating | enterprise | $5.3b | $787.0m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Communications, Media and Technology | operating | enterprise | $3.3b | $436.0m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $927.0m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.35x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -0.27x (net cash) |
| Interest coverage | 105.6x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -2.4% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- An IT services business of roughly $21.4 billion in revenue earning about 15.9% operating margins, which is ahead of ACN at 14.5% and roughly double what DXC manages at 7.7%.
- The market is pricing the profit stream to shrink: the whole enterprise costs a little over six years of current operating profit, less than a business shedding 5% of operating profit a year would warrant.
- Second-quarter results are due July 29, 2026, arriving days after two brokers cut their targets by wide margins.
Bull Case
Follow the buybacks. The board's repurchase authorization, first adopted in 2017 and most recently amended in March 2025, now permits the company to buy back up to $13.5 billion of its Class A shares. Over the four years to March 2026 the share count fell at about 2.4% a year, which is buyback deployment showing up where it cannot be dressed up. A dividend runs alongside it. The balance sheet carries more cash than borrowings, and operating profit covers interest roughly 94 times over. Management is treating its own equity as the best available use of capital, and that judgment has now been expressed in real money for several years running.
What funds all that is a services business with better economics than its reputation suggests. Revenue of about $21.4 billion converts to an operating margin near 15.9%. For context on what that means in this industry, ACN earns 14.5% on $73.1 billion of revenue, EPAM earns 9.7%, and DXC earns 7.7% on revenue that shrank 1.8% over the trailing year. Cognizant is not the discount operator in that group. It is at the profitable end of it, on revenue that grew in the mid single digits.
The AI question, which dominates every conversation about this sector, is being answered by the company in the form of demand rather than defence. Its own 10-K describes client need in these terms: "Demand in this segment is driven by our clients' need for services related to AI adoption, modernization of business and technology operations, development of agentic ecosystems for the generation of new revenue streams, enhancing user experiences and driving operational efficiency". Someone has to do the integration work. Enterprises do not rewrite two decades of claims systems, core banking platforms and supply chain software because a model became available; they hire people who have done it before, which is the business Cognizant is in.
Here is what makes the setup unusual. Every family of standard valuation method lands at or above today's quote. Book value plus profitability reaches above it, on shareholders' equity of $31.59 a share and a return on equity near 14.8%. The methods that capitalize current cash generation with no growth credited reach above it. So do the cash-flow methods. That combination is rare, and it means the bull case does not require the business to grow at all. It requires it not to shrink faster than the market already assumes.
Bear Case
The competitor that matters here is not a company. It is the possibility that the thing being sold, skilled hours applied to enterprise software problems, becomes less of what clients need to buy. Cognizant says so itself, in a risk factor about its own AI investment: those efforts "can be complex and resource intensive, could potentially impact our profit margins, may not sufficiently address risks and may cause decreased demand for our services". That is the company acknowledging that the technology it sells help with can reduce the amount of help required. Against that backdrop, ACN and EPAM are competing for the same work with the same tools, and the India-headquartered majors are doing it from a lower cost base. Nobody in this group has a structural answer to a client who needs fewer billable hours to get the same outcome.
The demand softness is already visible in places. The company notes that its Communications, Media and Technology segment "has seen and may continue to see weakness among communications and media customers, partially offset by growth in technology customers". Partial offsets are how a business that is shrinking in one place and growing in another describes a mix that is not net positive yet.
Costs are moving in the wrong direction in ways that are not discretionary. India implemented labor law reforms effective November 21, 2025, and the company recorded a one-time increase of $147 million to its defined benefit liability for past service in the fourth quarter of 2025. Beyond that, part of recent profitability is currency rather than operations: the depreciation of the Indian rupee, net of hedges, helped the operating margin in the first quarter of 2026 by roughly 50 basis points against the prior-year quarter. Currency tailwinds reverse. Working capital has drifted too, with days sales outstanding at 84 days as of March 31, 2026 against 81 days at the end of 2025.
The valuation is the one thing the bear cannot lean on, and that is worth stating directly rather than pretending otherwise. Every standard method already sits at or above today's quote. The whole enterprise changes hands for a little over six years of current operating profit, a level below what even a business losing 5% of its operating profit annually would warrant. So the bear is not an argument that the shares are expensive. It is an argument that the market is right to price a decline: that AI compresses the billable hour faster than headcount can be redeployed, that the offshore cost advantage this industry was built on matters less when the leverage is software, and that a 15.9% operating margin earned on human effort is not the margin structure of the business that comes next. If that view is correct, cheap is where the shares belong.
Valuation
Six years. That is roughly how much of the company's current operating profit the entire enterprise costs, and it is the single most informative number in the file. At that level the arithmetic no longer produces a growth requirement at all. It produces a bound in the other direction: the quote sits below what a business shedding 5% of its operating profit every year would warrant. The market is not asking how long growth persists. It has priced contraction and is asking how steep.
That framing changes what the buyer is deciding. Revenue is about $21.4 billion, the trailing operating margin is near 15.9%, and neither of those is a distressed number. Compare the cohort: ACN earns 14.5% on $73.1 billion of revenue growing 6.7%, EPAM earns 9.7% on $5.56 billion growing 14.2%, DXC earns 7.7% on $12.64 billion that declined 1.8%, and KD is roughly flat. On profitability Cognizant reads like ACN. On the multiple it reads like the shrinking end of the group. Reconciling those two observations is the whole exercise.
The methods, unusually, all point the same way. Book value plus profitability reaches above today's quote, working from shareholders' equity of $31.59 a share against a return on equity near 14.8%. Measured against those asset-value methods the quote sits at about 0.79 times what they reach. The earnings-power methods, which capitalize current cash generation and credit no growth, put the quote at about 0.86 times what they reach. The cash-flow methods land at roughly 0.84 times. One family stands apart and deserves less weight rather than more: the peer-multiple read is built by applying technology-sector price-to-sales and enterprise-value-to-EBITDA references to this company's figures, and the market plainly no longer classes a services firm alongside software. Take the asset and earnings reads as the sturdier pair.
Solvency removes the tail from the bear case without adding anything to the bull. There is more cash than borrowing on the balance sheet, operating profit covers interest about 94 times over, and the company is not consuming cash. A business priced for decline with a net cash balance sheet has the one thing a declining business usually lacks, which is time. That does not make the decline thesis wrong. It does mean the outcome gets settled by how demand for enterprise integration work evolves, and not by a refinancing.
Catalysts
The most consequential recent news was not from the company. On July 24, 2026 RBC Capital cut its target to 47 dollars from 88, and JPMorgan cut its own to 55 dollars from 74. Cuts of that magnitude are a repricing of the sector thesis rather than a reaction to a quarter, and both revised figures still sit above where the shares trade, which tells you the street has moved toward the market's view rather than away from it.
The company's own announcements ran a different direction. Also on July 24 it announced a partnership with Gulf Edge aimed at enterprise AI adoption in Southeast Asia. Separately, a notice of pendency and proposed settlement of a stockholder derivative action was issued on July 10, 2026. The partnership matters for the argument that AI is a demand driver rather than a substitute; the derivative settlement is housekeeping and unlikely to move the operating picture.
Second-quarter results arrive July 29, 2026. Three lines carry more information than the headline. Whether weakness among communications and media customers has stabilized, since that segment is where the demand question shows up first. Whether the operating margin holds without the roughly 50 basis points the rupee contributed in the first quarter. And whether days sales outstanding come back down from 84 days, because a services business collecting more slowly is often a services business negotiating from a weaker position.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Health Sciences / Products and Resources / Communications, Media and Technology (reported)
- LDOS (Leidos Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …rules and regulations; u governmental reviews, audits and investigations of our company; u our ability to effectively compete and win contracts with the U.S. government and other customers; u our ability to respond rapidly to emerging technology trends, including the use of artificial intelligence; u our reliance on…
- FY2025 10-K: …or networks or those of our customers, impair our ability to provide services to our customers and may jeopardize the security of data collected, stored, transmitted or otherwise processed through our information technology infrastructure, systems and networks. As a result, we could be exposed to claims, fines,…
- PSN (Parsons Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …in which we operate because of our proven track record, long-term customer relationships, technology innovation, scalable and agile business offerings and world class talent. Our ability to effectively deliver on project engagements and successfully assist our customers affects our ability to win new contracts and…
- FY2025 10-K: …year for employee retention. Demonstrated Ability to Identify and Execute Acquisitions to Transform our Business Strategic acquisitions that augment our technology offerings and capabilities are a key tenet of our growth strategy. From the beginning of 2017 through the end of 2025, we have completed sixteen strategic…
- CACI (CACI International Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and is considered non-compensatory for financial reporting purposes. The MSPP allows eligible employees with stock holding requirements a mechanism to receive RSUs at a discount in lieu of up to 100 % of their annual bonus compensation. The discount is recognized as stock…
- FY2025 10-K: …needs. Our proven Expertise and Technology and strong record of program delivery have enabled us to compete for and secure new customers and contracts, win repeat business, and build and maintain long-term customer relationships. We seek competitive business opportunities and have built our operations to support…
- SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 45 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 46 Item 14. Principal Account ant Fees and Services 46 Part IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 47 Item 16. Form 10-K Summary 51…
- FY2025 10-K: …F- 25 Note 5-Restructuring and Impairment F- 26 Note 6-Goodwill and Intangible Assets F- 26 Note 7-Property, Plant, and Equipment F- 28 Note 8-Stock-Based Compensation F- 28 Note 9-Retirement Plans F- 32 Note 10-Income Taxes F- 36 Note 11-Debt Obligations F- 38 Note 12-Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow…
- EPAM (EPAM SYSTEMS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …for modern platforms including web media streaming, mobile information delivery, print to digital transformations and information discovery and search. Our solutions aid our clients in developing new revenue sources, accelerating content management, delivery and monetization, and reaching broader audiences. We serve…
- FY2025 10-K: …impose fines, penalties, and other civil or criminal consequences for real or suspected security breaches and perceived inadequate information security or disclosures. Our clients, particularly those in the Financial Services and Life Sciences & Healthcare industry verticals, may have enhanced or particular security…
- WIT (WIPRO LIMITED)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- KD (Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to their growth and their progression over their career by providing access to resources specifically designed to advance market-valued skills and competencies ● Retaining: Fostering employee engagement by communicating our strategy and building our Kyndryl culture; establishing programs that are focused on rewarding…
- FY2025 10-K: …is generated from healthcare companies and the public sector. ● 13 percent of our revenue is generated from technology, media and telecom companies. ● 15 percent of our revenue is from retail, travel and other companies. Within these sectors, our revenues are diversified across a broad set of customers. In fiscal…
- DXC (DXC Technology Co)
- FY2025 10-K: …that modernize operations and drive innovation across our customers' entire IT estate. DXC was formed on April 1, 2017 by the merger of CSC and HPES (the "HPES Merger"). Segments and Services Global Business Services GBS provides innovative technology solutions that help our customers address key business challenges…
- FY2025 10-K: …in understanding the changes to our business model by equity research or industry analysts or our failure to meet our publicly announced financial guidance; • public health crises; • our indebtedness and potential material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations; • our inability to…
Financial Services (reported)
- ACN (Accenture plc)
- FY2025 10-K: …and industry organizations and associations Human and social services agencies; defense departments and military forces; public safety authorities, including justice departments; educational institutions; non-profit organizations; cities; transportation agencies; and postal, customs, revenue and tax agencies Our work…
- FY2025 10-K: …entertainment, sports, content producers (including studios), content aggregators and streaming live events (sports) and media infrastructure providers, integrated advertising agencies and creative Enterprise technology, hardware, and associated manufacturing; semiconductor including silicon design and development,…
- DXC (DXC Technology Co)
- FY2025 10-K: 25 was $12.9 billion, a decline of $796 million or 5.8%, compared to the prior fiscal year, primarily driven by a 4.6% decline in organic revenue and a 1.0% unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate impact. Organic revenue is a non-GAAP measure, as discussed in our "Non-GAAP Financial Measures." In addition, for a…
- FY2025 10-K: …us-gaap:FixedIncomeFundsMember 2024-03-31 0001688568 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member us-gaap:FixedIncomeFundsMember 2024-03-31 0001688568 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member us-gaap:FixedIncomeFundsMember 2024-03-31 0001688568 us-gaap:FixedIncomeFundsMember 2024-03-31 0001688568…
- EPAM (EPAM SYSTEMS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …31, 2025, Financial Services was the largest industry vertical in the Americas segment and grew 16.1% in 2025 compared to the prior year, benefiting from new revenues from clients gained through our 2024 acquisitions and increased demand from insurance and payment processing clients. Software & Hi-Tech grew 6.7%…
- FY2025 10-K: …general and administrative expenses 418,715 369,055 Depreciation and amortization expense 35,957 40,009 Americas segment operating profit $ 522,115 $ 541,424 During 2025, Americas segment revenues increased $299.8 million, or 10.5%, from the previous year. Revenues from our Americas segment represented 58.0% of total…
- IT (Gartner, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …clients. The majority of our GBS practices achieved mid single-digit rates or faster growth rates, with all commercial enterprise sizes and the majority of sectors also growing mid single-digit rates or faster year-over-year. Public sector contract value decreased by double digits and high single digits for GTS and…
- FY2025 10-K: …with certain of its employees. Amounts payable with known payment dates have been classified in the above table based on those scheduled payment dates. Amounts payable whose payment dates are unknown have been included in the Due In More Than 5 Years category because the Company cannot determine when the amounts will…
- INFY (INFY)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
broker notes, July 24, 2026 · company announcement, July 24, 2026 · company notice, July 10, 2026