CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (CSGS): what the price requires
At today's price, CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (CSGS) is priced for +6.5% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CSGS
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CSGS |
| Company | CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
| Current price | $80.70/sh |
| Composition | SaaS and related solutions 90% / Software and services 6% / Maintenance 4% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 6.0% |
| Operating margin today | 10.3% |
| Margin compression implied | -4.3pp |
| Implied growth | 6.5% |
| Multiple paid | 22x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~7.8pp.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~19.2%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.08σ |
| cohort percentile (of 178 peers) | 40 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 3.39x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 3.33x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.83x | 3 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.17x | 4 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=16)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $78.19 | 1.03x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 3% (input: historical growth), terminal g 3.0%, WACC 8.2%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $81.73 | 0.99x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 19.4x / 21.4x / 23.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $88.07 | 0.92x | yes | P/E 35x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 29.4x / 35.0x / 40.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 25x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $26.89 | 3.00x | yes | Stage 1: -8% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $23.82 | 3.39x | yes | BV/sh $10.18, ROE (TTM) 21.7%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $36.21 | 2.23x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $61.69 | 1.31x | yes | Rev $1.2B, growth 3% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.6x / 1.9x / 2.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $24.32 | 3.32x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.12B × (1−26%) / WACC 8.2% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $34.17 | 2.36x | yes | BV $10.18 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 21.7% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $22.65 | 3.56x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.24 × BVPS $10.18) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $96.68 | 0.83x | yes | EBITDA $0.13B × sector EV/EBITDA 25.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $34.70 | 2.33x | yes | FCF $131.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $18.36 | 4.40x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.09B (FCF $0.13B − SBC $0.04B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $1.88 | 42.93x | yes | EPS $2.24 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $4.54 | 17.78x | yes | BV $10.18 × (ROIC 3.6% / WACC 8.2%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $342.75 | 0.24x | yes | Revenue $1.24B × sector P/S 8.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $24.22 | 3.33x | yes | EPS $2.24 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $404.6m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 4.38x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 3.24x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -2.4% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- CSG runs the unglamorous but essential plumbing of the communications industry, the billing and customer-management software that cable and telecom operators use to invoice and service their subscribers, anchored by long-tenured relationships with operators like Charter and Comcast.
- The stock no longer trades on its own fundamentals: CSG agreed to be acquired by Japan's NEC Corporation, shareholders approved the deal in January 2026, and the price sits at the agreed consideration while the transaction works toward an expected close by the end of 2026.
- The business underneath the deal is a steady cash generator, growing revenue 4.8% in the first quarter of 2026 on its SaaS platform and having raised its dividend for thirteen straight years, with the main open question now being whether the acquisition closes on schedule.
Bull Case
CSG sells something its customers cannot easily switch off. Its software sits at the center of how communications operators bill and manage their subscribers, the system that generates the invoice, processes the payment, and tracks the account, and once it is embedded in an operator's operations it tends to stay there for decades. The 10-K describes a customer roster of "leading CSPs like Charter, Comcast, MTN, Airtel Africa, DISH, Mobily, Verizon, AT&T, American Movil, and Telstra," the kind of mission-critical relationships that produce recurring, predictable revenue. A substantial share of that revenue runs through the company's private cloud billing platform, which the filing identifies as its Advanced Convergent Platform, exactly the recurring SaaS base that the market prizes.
The company has spent years reducing its dependence on cable and telecom, and it is working. Revenue grew 4.8% in the first quarter of 2026, with the growth attributed to its SaaS and related solutions, and management has steadily diversified the customer base into financial services, retail, and other industries, working outside the communications space with customers it names including "JP Morgan Chase, Walgreens, and Formula 1, and approximately 163,000 active merchants." A billing-and-payments platform that started in cable is becoming a broader transaction-management business, which is the more durable version of the company.
Capital return has been the steady reward for owning it. CSG has raised its dividend for thirteen consecutive years and buys back its stock, repurchasing shares under a publicly announced program. But the bull case now has a simpler and harder floor under it: NEC Corporation agreed to acquire the company, shareholders approved the transaction, and the share price reflects the agreed deal terms. For a current holder, the upside is no longer about how fast the SaaS business compounds; it is that a signed, shareholder-approved acquisition is carrying the stock toward a defined value, with the operating business performing well underneath it.
Bear Case
The central risk now is the deal itself. With the share price sitting at the agreed acquisition consideration, the dominant question for a holder is binary: does the NEC transaction close as planned, or does it slip or break. A cross-border acquisition of a U.S. software company that holds the billing data of major American communications carriers can draw regulatory and national-security review, and any deal carries timing risk and conditions that must be satisfied before it closes. If the transaction were to fall through, the stock would no longer have the deal price holding it up and would re-rate to whatever the standalone business is worth, which the standard methods place across a wide range, some of them well below the current price.
Underneath the deal, the standalone business has real concentration risk. CSG states plainly that "A large percentage of our revenue is generated from a limited number of customers in the global communications" industry, and its two largest, Charter and Comcast, are cable operators in a maturing, slow-growth end market that is itself losing video subscribers. When a handful of customers in a shrinking industry drive much of the revenue, a single contract renegotiation or loss is material, and the diversification into non-telecom industries, while real, is still the minority of the business rather than the majority.
The growth profile is modest, which is the tension that made an acquisition the logical outcome. Single-digit revenue growth and operating margins around 11% describe a healthy, mature software-services company, not a fast compounder, and the methods that capitalize its trailing earnings or value it on its asset base land well below the price. The balance sheet is sound rather than fortress-like, with roughly $359 million more debt than cash, a manageable load against the company's cash generation but not the net-cash cushion of a richer software name. The bear case is straightforward: if the deal closes, the operating risks are NEC's problem; if it does not, a holder is left owning a slow-growth, customer-concentrated billing company at a price the standalone fundamentals do not fully support.
Valuation
The honest way to read CSG's price is that the market is not valuing the business right now; it is pricing a pending acquisition. NEC agreed to buy the company, shareholders approved the deal, and the share price sits at the agreed consideration while the transaction proceeds toward an expected close by the end of 2026. Whatever the underlying business is worth, the quote is anchored to the deal terms, and the usual question of what growth the price assumes is largely replaced by the question of whether the deal closes.
Set against the standalone business, the methods are unusually consistent with a mature, cash-generative software-services company. The forward cash-flow methods and the peer-multiple lens land at or above the current price, which is to say the deal price is broadly in the range those frames support for a steady compounder; the methods that value the company on its book value or capitalize its trailing earnings land below, which is what one expects for a business whose worth is in its recurring cash generation rather than its balance sheet. The pattern is not the stretched premium of a richly valued growth stock; it is a price that the cash-flow and relative methods can reach, which is part of why a strategic acquirer was willing to pay it.
What a current holder is underwriting, then, is deal completion more than business performance. The solvency picture supports the standalone company comfortably either way: CSG generates around $250 million of free cash flow, carries about $359 million of net debt against that cash generation, is not burning cash, and has been retiring its own shares while raising its dividend for over a decade. None of that is the binding constraint here. The single assumption the price rests on is the one the merger introduced: that the NEC acquisition closes on the agreed terms. If it does, the standalone valuation debate is moot; if it does not, the methods that sit below the current price describe where a standalone CSG would likely trade.
Catalysts
The defining event is the acquisition. CSG entered a merger agreement with NEC Corporation in late October 2025, stockholders approved the transaction at the end of January 2026, and the deal is expected to close by the end of 2026. That timeline, and the regulatory clearances along the way, is the single most important thing for the stock, because the price already reflects the agreed terms.
Operationally, the business kept performing into the deal. First-quarter 2026 revenue rose 4.8% to $313.7 million, with GAAP earnings per share climbing to $0.83 from $0.57 a year earlier and the GAAP operating margin widening to 11.2% from 9.8%, the improvement driven by growth in the SaaS platform. The company also continued to broaden its base, extending a decades-long partnership with Mediacom and signing multi-year contracts with operators including Liberty Latin America and PLDT.
Capital return continued on its established cadence. CSG declared its dividend for what is now a thirteen-year streak of annual increases and kept repurchasing shares under its buyback program. For a stock trading on deal-close mechanics, these are confirmations that the underlying business remains healthy while the acquisition proceeds, rather than independent catalysts likely to move the price away from the agreed consideration.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
CSG Systems (single reportable segment) (reported)
- OTEX (OPEN TEXT CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …on its relative SSP. However, in certain bundled arrangements, the SSP may not always be directly observable. For instance, in bundled arrangements with license and customer support, we allocate the transaction price between the license and customer support performance obligations using the residual approach because…
- FY2025 10-K: …on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer; and • our promise to transfer the product or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract. If these criteria are not met, we determine an appropriate measure of progress based on the…
- PEGA (PEGASYSTEMS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Restated Bylaws of Pegasystems Inc 8-K 3.2 6/15/20 4.1 Specimen Certificate Representing the Common Stock S-1 4.1 6/19/96 4.2 Description of Common Stock X 10.1 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated) ++ DEF 14A Appendix A to 2025 Proxy Statement 4/25/25 10.2 Restricted Stock Unit Sub-Plan of the…
- FY2025 10-K: …services in similar geographies multiplied by estimated hours for the project Based on hours incurred as a percentage of total estimated hours (over time) As contract milestones are achieved Consulting (1) Technical support and software updates are considered distinct services but accounted for as a single…
- JKHY (JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: 4, and 2023, equals the Company's net income. 43 Table of Contents REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company's operations are classified as four reportable segments: Core, Payments, Complementary, and Corporate and Other (see Note 14). Substantially all the Company's revenues are derived…
- FY2025 10-K: …15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. NOTE 2. REVENUE AND DEFERRED COSTS Revenue Recognition The Company generates revenue from data processing, transaction processing, software licensing and…
- NTCT (NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …price the performance obligation was recently sold for, whether sold alone or sold as part of a bundle transaction. The Company reviews sales of the product performance obligations on a quarterly basis and updates, when appropriate, its SSP for such performance obligations to ensure that it reflects recent pricing…
- FY2025 10-K: …The Company has determined it operates as a single operating segment and has one reportable segment which includes product and service revenue related to the sale of enterprise performance management, carrier service assurance, cybersecurity, and DDoS protection solutions. The Company's results for the one reportable…
- EVTC (EVERTEC, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and the transaction price, including an estimate of any variable consideration, the Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation in the contract using a standalone selling price ("SSP"). The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control of a…
- FY2025 10-K: By: /s/ Morgan M. Schuessler, Jr. Morgan M. Schuessler, Jr. Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.…
- RAMP (LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: 5 Lauren Dillard (principal financial and accounting officer) *By: /s/ Jerry C. Jones Jerry C. Jones Attorney-in-Fact 46 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report: 1. Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements of the…
- FY2025 10-K: …The Company also offers a supplemental non-qualified deferred compensation plan ("SNQDC Plan") for certain highly compensated employees. The Company matches 100 % of the first 6 % of each participating employee's annual aggregate contributions. The Company may also contribute additional amounts to the plans at the…
- GDDY (GoDaddy Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …solution, in which we include promises to transfer multiple performance obligations in a single coterminous product offering. We have determined that generally each of our other products constitutes an individual product offering to our customers, and therefore have concluded that each is a single performance…
- FY2025 10-K: …entity to develop its own assumptions. We hold certain assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These include time deposits and notice deposits, which we classify within Level 1 because we use quoted market prices to determine their fair value. Level 2 assets and liabilities…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.