CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (CRS): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $476.43, CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (CRS) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~13.8 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CRS

Headline

FieldValue
TickerCRS
CompanyCARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Sector / IndustryBasic Materials
Current price$476.43/sh
CompositionSpecialty Alloys Operations 90% / Performance Engineered Products 10%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)31.1%
Operating margin today22.5%
Margin expansion (value-band)+8.6pp
Must persist for13.8y
Multiple paid34x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 12.6% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling.

How unusual the bet is: elevated (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.01σ
cohort percentile (of 78 peers)86

Valuation X-Ray

Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset4.12x5expensive
Earnings6.59x5expensive
Relative1.25x2expensive
Growth1.52x3expensive

Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$154.613.08xyesFCF base $0.4B, growth 9% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.0%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$432.361.10xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 23.2x / 28.2x / 33.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 23.17x (blended: static sector reference 14x + trailing (TTM) 45x), scenarios: 17.4x / 23.2x / 27.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14.06x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$115.574.12xyesBV/sh $44.95, ROE (TTM) 23.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$185.392.57xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$313.701.52xyesRev $3.1B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.5x / 6.0x / 7.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$368.201.29xyesEPS $10.52, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.27 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$51.739.21xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.33B × (1−21%) / WACC 9.0% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$169.162.82xyesBV $44.95 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 23.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$103.154.62xyes√(22.5 × EPS $10.52 × BVPS $44.95) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.85B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$72.296.59xyesFCF $362.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$66.537.16xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.34B (FCF $0.36B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$339.451.40xyesEPS $10.52 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$32.0114.88xyesBV $44.95 × (ROIC 6.4% / WACC 9.0%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $3.12B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$394.501.21xyesEPS $10.52 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$113.734.19xyesEPS $10.52 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Specialty Alloys Operationsoperatingenterprise$2.8b$782.9m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Performance Engineered Productsoperatingenterprise$312.5m$30.1m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$297.4m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)0.53x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.42x
Interest coverage18.6x
Share count CAGR (dilution)0.8%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Specialty metals sits in the cyclical drawer, and that label carries instructions: distrust the current margin, assume it was borrowed from the cycle, value the business on a bad year rather than a good one. Carpenter has spent three fiscal years making those instructions harder to follow. In the quarter ended March 31, 2026 the company reported "operating income of $186.5 million compared to $137.8 million in the prior year same quarter", and it did so with gross margin at 31.0 percent against 27.6 percent a year earlier. Higher volume alone does not move gross margin four points. Something in what the company sells, and at what price, has changed.

The mechanism is visible in the segment that carries the business. Carpenter's Specialty Alloys Operations unit runs the premium alloy and stainless mills, and the FY2025 10-K reports its operating income at "$588.6 million, or 23.0 percent of net sales (28.6 percent of net sales excluding surcharge revenue), compared to operating income of $408.5 million, or 16.7 percent of net sales" the year before. Management attributes the move to "improved productivity, product mix optimization and pricing actions". Read that in order. Productivity is a cost story, mix is a customer story, and pricing is a scarcity story, and the third one is the one that matters here: a jet engine part qualified on Carpenter's alloy cannot be switched to another mill's alloy without requalifying the part.

That scarcity is why the surcharge exists at all. The company buys nickel, cobalt and chromium and passes much of the raw-material cost through to customers, which is why the filing reports margins twice, once on net sales and once excluding surcharge revenue. The economically honest figure is the second one, and on that basis the March quarter came in at 28.4 percent against 23.1 percent a year earlier. A commodity converter does not get to widen that spread while its input costs move around.

Against the two domestic peers that actually compete on the same shelf, the position reads well. ATI carries a 14.3% operating margin on $4.59 billion of trailing revenue, growing 2.9%. KALU converts aluminum at a 6.6% operating margin, and its 20.8% revenue growth mostly reflects metal prices moving through the top line rather than value captured. Carpenter's 21.1% trailing operating margin sits between those and HWM, which earns 26.7% on $8.62 billion, and HWM does it by selling finished engine components rather than the metal they are machined from. Carpenter is the only one of the four whose margin expansion is coming from what the metal is rather than how much of it moves.

The balance sheet lets management keep pressing. Interest coverage runs near 15 times, net debt sits at 0.63 times operating profit, and interest expense fell to $8.7 million in the March quarter from $12.0 million a year earlier as the borrowings behind it came down. This is a company that can fund a brownfield mill expansion out of operating cash while still paying a dividend, and that combination is rare in an industry where capacity additions have historically been financed at the top of a cycle with somebody else's money.

None of that answers the price. Every standard family of method lands under it, and the bull has to accept that the case is not that the shares are cheap on any trailing arithmetic. The case is that a qualified-alloy franchise in a supply-constrained aerospace build cycle earns a duration of pricing power the static methods have no field for.

Bear Case

Watch where the cash goes. Capital expenditures ran $157.6 million in the nine months to March 31, 2026 against $96.3 million in the same span a year earlier, and the FY2025 10-K guided that in fiscal "2026, we expect capital expenditures, including the brownfield expansion, to be in the range of $280.0 million to $300.0 million". Dividends were $40.3 million in fiscal 2025. Meanwhile the share count has crept upward at roughly 0.9% a year over the four years to March 2026. So the pattern is: build capacity, pay a token dividend, and let the count drift. That is a defensible allocation if the aerospace build cycle runs long. It is the worst possible allocation if it does not, because steel-making capacity added into a downturn does not sit idle cheaply.

The price makes that timing question the whole argument. At today's level the market pays about 48 times company-wide operating income, and getting there requires operating growth held at its self-funding ceiling of about 25% for roughly 18 years. The rate is not the stretch; Carpenter has recently delivered near it, with consolidated operating income up to $495.1 million in the nine months to March 2026 from $370.4 million. The duration is the stretch. Only about 15% of comparable fast-growers sustained that pace even ten years, and each percentage point of growth the company gives up adds roughly 2.7 years to the required horizon. Give up five points and the price is asking for a stretch of execution longer than most industrial franchises survive intact.

The company's own risk disclosure names the mechanism that ends such runs. The 10-K states that demand in its end markets "can be cyclical in nature and sensitive to general economic conditions, competitive influences and fluctuations in inventory levels throughout the supply chain", and separately warns that "continued availability of lower cost, substitute materials may cause significant fluctuations in future results as our customers opt for a lower cost alternative". Substitution is the quiet one. The qualification barrier that protects Carpenter's pricing also means the substitution decision, once a customer makes it, is equally hard to reverse in Carpenter's favour.

There is an operational tail as well. The filing notes that operations "could be disrupted due to other unforeseen circumstances such as power outages, explosions, fires, floods, accidents and severe weather conditions", and a business running its mills near capacity has no slack to absorb one. A single extended outage at Reading or Latrobe is not a rounding error at these margins; it is a quarter.

Then the arithmetic of mean reversion. The price also embeds an operating margin near 28.5% about a decade out, against 21.1% on trailing results. If margins settle back toward the mid-teens where ATI operates rather than climbing toward the high twenties, the multiple that supports today's price has nothing left to stand on: every family of method already lands well under the price, with the earnings-power methods reading the price at roughly 7.6 times where they land and the asset-value methods at roughly 4.9 times. A cyclical business priced at the very top of its peer distribution, well past the upper quartile, has to be right about the length of the cycle, not just its direction.

Valuation

Start with what the price asks for. At $603.51 the market is paying about 48 times company-wide operating income, and inverting that into an assumption gives one specific bet: operating growth running at the company's self-funding ceiling, near 25%, sustained for roughly 18 years. The near-term pace is not the improbable part. Carpenter has recently grown into that range. Eighteen years of it is the improbable part, and the sensitivity is steep, with each percentage point of growth foregone lengthening the required horizon by about 2.7 years.

The methods used to triangulate the business all land under the price, and they do not disagree about direction. The peer-multiple methods put the price at roughly 2.2 times where they land, the forward-growth methods at roughly 2.5 times, the asset-value methods at roughly 4.9 times, and the earnings-power methods at roughly 7.6 times. That is not a spread with a defensible edge in it; it is four different frames failing to reach the same number from four directions. The closest approach comes from a discounted cash-flow method built on an exit multiple, and it gets close only by assuming the market never re-rates the cash profits it is currently paying up for: the terminal multiple in its base case is today's, held flat, compressing in the bear scenario and expanding in the bull. The growth-adjusted earnings method reaches part of the way by crediting a historical earnings growth rate near 25% into a forward multiple. Both are, in effect, extrapolations of the present. The methods that refuse to extrapolate, the earnings-power and asset-value frames, land furthest away.

The filed inputs underneath are real and worth naming, because the gap is not an artifact of bad data. The FY2025 10-K reports Specialty Alloys Operations operating income of "$588.6 million, or 23.0 percent of net sales (28.6 percent of net sales excluding surcharge revenue)", and the same filing records fiscal 2025 dividends of "$40.3" million against a capital plan of "$280.0 million to $300.0 million" for fiscal 2026. Those are the economics the price is extrapolating. The company earns a trailing 21.1% operating margin; the price implies something closer to 28.5% about a decade out.

Against the cohort, the position is defensible on operations and stretched on price. HWM earns a 26.7% operating margin on $8.62 billion of revenue and ATI a 14.3% margin on $4.59 billion, which brackets Carpenter's 21.1% neatly. The multiple does not bracket. It sits at the very top of the peer distribution, well past the upper quartile, on a business whose end markets its own filing describes as cyclical.

The balance sheet is the one place the picture is unambiguous. Net debt runs 0.63 times operating profit, interest coverage near 15 times, and the company is not burning cash. The share count has risen only about 0.9% a year since 2022, so dilution is a drift rather than a leak. Nothing in the capital structure forces a bad decision at a bad moment, which is a genuine floor under the downside. What it does not do is shorten the eighteen years.

Catalysts

The next dated event is close. Carpenter reports fiscal fourth-quarter results on July 30, 2026, with a conference call the same morning at 10:00 a.m. Eastern. That print closes the fiscal year that began with the capital plan the 10-K laid out, so it carries both the year's final margin figure and the first credible read on whether the brownfield expansion stays on its stated spending range.

Sell-side positioning moved sharply into that date. In mid-July 2026 three firms raised their targets: TD Cowen to $650 from $470, Susquehanna to $680 from $495, and JPMorgan to $705 from $470 while keeping an Overweight rating. JPMorgan paired its raise with a Negative Catalyst Watch, which is a more interesting signal than the target itself: it says the analyst expects the long-run earnings power to be higher and the next print to be a risk to the shares. Those targets sit above where the frames used here land, and the difference is that the street is crediting forward earnings power that trailing-based methods structurally cannot see.

The March quarter, reported April 29, 2026, is the base the market is extrapolating from: consolidated operating income of $186.5 million on net sales excluding surcharge of $655.6 million. Nine-month capital spending of $157.6 million against $96.3 million a year earlier is the other number to carry into the July print, because it is the clearest available evidence of how much of the current earnings stream management intends to reinvest rather than return.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Specialty Alloys Operations (reported)

Performance Engineered Products (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

company conference call announcement, GlobeNewswire, early July 2026 · TheFly analyst-action reports, July 2026 · TheFly, July 2026 · Q3 FY2026 Form 10-Q, filed April 29, 2026

View the full interactive CRS report on boothcheck