CROCS, INC. (CROX): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $117.53, CROCS, INC. (CROX) is priced for +1.7% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CROX
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CROX |
| Company | CROCS, INC. |
| Sector / Industry | Consumer Cyclical |
| Current price | $117.53/sh |
| Composition | Crocs Brand - Wholesale 40% / Crocs Brand - Direct-to-consumer 43% / HEYDUDE Brand - Wholesale 8% / HEYDUDE Brand - Direct-to-consumer 9% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 4.2% |
| Operating margin today | 20.7% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -16.5pp |
| Implied growth | 1.7% |
| Multiple paid | 9x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 11: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11.8% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.42σ |
| cohort percentile (of 212 peers) | 13 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.88x | 5 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.92x | 5 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.67x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.89x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=15)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $151.60 | 0.78x | yes | FCF base $0.7B, growth -2% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.3%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $131.47 | 0.89x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 5.8x / 7.8x / 9.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.2x / 18.0x / 20.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $133.81 | 0.88x | yes | BV/sh $28.88, ROE (TTM) 42.9%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $328.27 | 0.36x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $63.94 | 1.84x | yes | Rev $4.1B, growth -2% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.2x / 1.4x / 1.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $146.11 | 0.80x | yes | EPS $11.33, growth 13% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.74 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $160.14 | 0.73x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.93B × (1−22%) / WACC 7.3% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $213.42 | 0.55x | yes | BV $28.88 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 42.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $85.80 | 1.37x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $11.33 × BVPS $28.88) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $0.92B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $127.20 | 0.92x | yes | FCF $704.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $117.84 | 1.00x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.66B (FCF $0.70B − SBC $0.04B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $325.62 | 0.36x | yes | EPS $11.33 × (8.5 + 2×12.9%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $30.10 | 3.90x | yes | BV $28.88 × (ROIC 7.6% / WACC 7.3%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $4.05B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $219.16 | 0.54x | yes | EPS $11.33 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 12.9% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 19.3x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $122.49 | 0.96x | yes | EPS $11.33 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crocs Brand | operating | enterprise | $3.3b | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| HEYDUDE Brand | operating | enterprise | $714.8m | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $1.1b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 1.75x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 1.36x |
| Interest coverage | 10.1x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -5.5% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Two brands, two very different trajectories: Crocs Brand revenue edged up 0.8% to 767 million dollars in the March 2026 quarter while HEYDUDE fell 12.3% to 154 million, and the gap between them is the whole investment question.
- Profitability is not the problem: the quarter produced income from operations of 200.8 million dollars on 921.5 million of revenue, a 21.8% operating margin, with gross margin at 56.8%.
- The number to watch is the wholesale channel, down 9.9% in the quarter against direct-to-consumer up 12.1%, because wholesale is where a footwear brand's popularity is repriced first.
Bull Case
A 430.0 million dollar write-down of the HEYDUDE trademark in the middle of last year is the single most damning fact available about this company. Management had told the market it could revive an acquired brand; the accountants eventually made them mark it down. Reported profit for 2025 fell to 149.5 million dollars from 1,021.9 million in 2024, and the year ended in a net loss. If you stop reading there, the story is a failed acquisition and a fashion brand past its moment.
Keep reading and the picture changes. That impairment was a non-cash adjustment to a carrying value, not a change in what the business earns. In the March 2026 quarter Crocs produced income from operations of 200.8 million dollars on 921.5 million of revenue, a 21.8% operating margin, and diluted earnings of $2.71 a share. Gross margin was 56.8%. Those are the economics of a company selling a moulded resin clog for many times what it costs to make, and they have not gone away.
The reason they persist is the product itself. A Crocs clog is not a fashion item that has to be reinvented every season; it is a platform that gets decorated. The company sells the shoe, then sells the charms that go in the holes, then sells a collaboration that makes the whole thing collectible again. That structure gives the brand something most footwear does not have: a way to refresh demand without redesigning the shoe or discounting it. Direct-to-consumer revenue grew 12.1% in the quarter, or 10.2% in constant currency, while the company was pulling back on wholesale. Selling more of your own product yourself, at higher prices, is a deliberate trade of volume for margin.
International is doing the same work geographically. Crocs Brand revenue outside North America grew 7.2% to 421 million dollars in the quarter while North America declined 6.1% to 346 million. A brand at a mature stage in its home market and still expanding abroad has a longer runway than the domestic numbers alone suggest.
Even HEYDUDE, the source of the write-down, is deteriorating more slowly than feared. Its direct-to-consumer revenue rose 8.6% in the quarter, and the full-year outlook for the brand was revised upward, to a decline of roughly 7% to 5% from a previously guided 9% to 7%. Guiding a shrinking brand less badly is a low bar. Clearing it while the parent raises its full-year outlook on both revenue and earnings is not.
Then there is what the company is doing with the cash. Adjusted diluted earnings guidance for 2026 is 13.20 to 13.75 dollars a share, and that guidance assumes no further buybacks, while the diluted share count has already fallen from 56.5 million to 50.7 million in a year. Against a share price near 135 dollars, an owner is buying earnings at a low multiple from a company steadily reducing the number of claims on them.
Bear Case
The advantage that is eroding here is not manufacturing or design. It is distribution power, and the wholesale line is where it shows. Wholesale revenue fell 9.9% in the March 2026 quarter, and 12.5% in constant currency, against direct-to-consumer up 12.1%. Some of that is a deliberate choice to sell more through the company's own channels. Some of it is retailers ordering less of a shoe whose sell-through they have watched slow. From outside, those two look identical for several quarters, and only the second one matters.
HEYDUDE is the demonstration of what happens when the second explanation is the right one. The brand's wholesale revenue fell 24.7% in the quarter, and the company recorded a 430.0 million dollar impairment against the HEYDUDE trademark in the second quarter of last year after downward revisions during the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025, to our internal HEYDUDE Brand forecast as a result of the extended time we believed it would take us to stabilize the HEYDUDE Brand and return it to growth. That is management, in a filed document, saying the turnaround is taking longer than they told anyone it would.
The concern is that the Crocs Brand rhymes with it in a slower key. North American revenue for the core brand fell 6.1% in the quarter. The clog is a fashion product whatever else it is, and fashion products in their home market do not usually decline for a while and then resume. The company's guidance for the full year, revenue down approximately 1% to up 1%, describes a business that is not growing. All the earnings growth on offer comes from margin discipline and a shrinking share count, and neither of those compounds forever.
Compare that to the cohort and the ranking is uncomfortable. DECK reported a 23.1% operating margin on 9.8% revenue growth in its own filings, and Crocs earns a similar margin with revenue going the other way. WWW at 8.6% and SHOO at 4.8% show what happens to footwear margins when a brand loses pricing power. The distance from where Crocs sits now to where those two sit is not a gap in capability. It is a gap in desirability, and desirability is the asset that just got written down at HEYDUDE.
The balance sheet limits the room to be patient. Total borrowings were 1.34 billion dollars at the end of the March quarter against cash of 131 million, with interest expense of 20.5 million for the quarter. Comfortable while operating margins are in the low twenties. Considerably less so if the core brand follows HEYDUDE's path, because the same buyback that flatters earnings per share today is funded from cash that would then be needed elsewhere.
Valuation
The market is not paying for growth here. It is paying, cautiously, for durability. The enterprise carries a value near 8.3 billion dollars, and against adjusted diluted earnings guidance of 13.20 to 13.75 dollars a share the equity trades around ten times what management expects to earn this year. That is a multiple that assumes the current level of profitability is temporary.
The methods used to triangulate the business divide along exactly that question. The peer-multiple lenses, which apply sector ratios to current revenue, land above today's price. The forward cash-flow approaches land close to it, essentially crediting the business with holding what it has. The lenses anchored on book value sit far below the price, which is what happens to any brand-driven company whose value is in a trademark rather than in a factory. Those book-value references are floors rather than valuations, and treating a business that keeps more than half of every sales dollar as gross profit as worth its accounting equity would be a category error.
The concrete question the price is asking is about persistence rather than expansion. Full-year guidance calls for revenue down approximately 1% to up 1%, with adjusted operating margin expanding modestly from 22.3%. Nothing in that requires a new product line or a new market. It requires the existing brands to hold their price and their shelf position for several more years, and the record's own reference set puts the odds of a company sustaining that kind of level for that long at roughly one in three.
Peer economics frame what is being valued. DECK earns a 23.1% operating margin with revenue growing 9.8%, COLM 6.0% with 0.6% growth, WWW 8.6% and SHOO 4.8%, all on their own filed numbers. Crocs earns near the top of that group and grows near the bottom. The multiple sits closer to the bottom of the group than the margin does, which is the market's way of saying it expects convergence.
Solvency is adequate rather than protective. Borrowings of 1.34 billion dollars against 131 million of cash and quarterly interest expense of 20.5 million leave a company that can service its debt easily at current margins and would find it uncomfortable at half of them. Meanwhile the diluted share count has fallen from 56.5 million to 50.7 million in a year, with 673.2 million dollars of repurchase authorization still outstanding. The buyer at today's price is not paying for a recovery. They are being paid to wait for one, and the risk is that the waiting is what erodes the asset.
Catalysts
First-quarter results on April 30, 2026 came in ahead of the company's own plan and prompted a raised outlook. Revenue was 921 million dollars, down 1.7% and 4.0% in constant currency. Direct-to-consumer revenue rose 12.1% while wholesale fell 9.9%. Income from operations was 201 million dollars, or 21.8% of revenue, and diluted earnings were $2.71 a share. Crocs Brand revenue rose 0.8% to 767 million; HEYDUDE fell 12.3% to 154 million.
The revised full-year outlook is the thing to hold management to. Revenue is now expected to be down approximately 1% to up 1%, with the Crocs Brand flat to up roughly 2% and HEYDUDE down approximately 7% to 5%, an improvement from the previous guidance of down 9% to 7%. Adjusted diluted earnings per share are now guided to land between 13.20 and 13.75 dollars, up from a previous range of 12.88 to 13.35, with capital expenditures of 70 to 80 million dollars. For the second quarter the company guided to adjusted diluted earnings of 4.15 to 4.35 dollars a share, and it expects the adjusted operating margin to expand modestly across the year.
Capital return continues alongside. Between the end of March and April 23, 2026 the company repurchased 0.8 million shares for 73.6 million dollars, leaving 673.2 million of authorization available, and the earnings guidance above excludes any benefit from further repurchases. That combination, a flat top line with earnings guidance raised and shares being retired, means the next two quarterly reports will be read for one thing: whether the Crocs Brand wholesale decline is a channel strategy or a demand signal.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Crocs Brand (reported)
- DECK (DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …into new categories. • Thoughtful expansion of our apparel and accessories businesses. HOKA Brand . The HOKA brand is an authentic premium line of year-round performance footwear, which offers enhanced cushioning and inherent stability with minimal weight. Originally designed for ultra-runners, the brand now appeals…
- FY2025 10-K: …prior period, were as follows: • Net sales of the HOKA brand increased due to higher global demand for an assortment of performance products across all channels. HOKA brand wholesale channel growth was driven primarily by global market share gains and benefits from new points of distribution with key partners. HOKA…
- ONON (On Holding AG)
- FY2025 20-F: …Industry and Economic Environment i. Brand reputation and resilience ii. Business strategy iii. Innovation iv. Competitors v. Economic, political and market conditions II. Risks Related to Our Operations, Distribution Network and Suppliers i. Business operations ii. Supply chain and distribution iii. Third-party…
- FY2025 20-F: …the "Speedboard") and our premium performance brand image are integral to our business, and to the implementation of our strategies for expanding our business. We believe that the strong reputation and brand image we have cultivated has significantly contributed to the success of our business and is critical to…
- NKE (NIKE, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and clinics. • Effective sourcing and distribution of products, with attractive merchandising and presentation at retail, both in-store and on digital platforms. We believe that we are competitive in all of these areas. See Item 1A. Risk Factors, including the risk factor titled "Our products, services and…
- FY2025 10-K: …strategic, operating and logistics-related factors. Because NIKE is a consumer products company, the relative popularity and availability of various sports and fitness activities, as well as changing design trends and consumer preferences, affect the demand for our products. We must, therefore, respond to trends and…
- WWW (WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: 17 to license the Stride Rite ® brand. Sourcing Division: The sourcing division earns third-party commission revenue by providing consulting services related to product development, production control, quality assurance, materials procurement, compliance and other services. Multi-brand Direct-to-Consumer Division: The…
- FY2025 10-K: …sourcing, marketing, licensing and distributing branded footwear, apparel and accessories. Revenue for the reportable segments includes revenue from the sale of branded footwear, apparel and accessories to third-party customers; revenue from third-party distributors, licensees and joint ventures; and revenue from the…
- COLM (COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …patterns. Our products are marketed on a seasonal basis, and our sales are weighted substantially toward the third and fourth quarters, while our operating costs are more equally distributed throughout the year. ACCELERATE Growth Strategy In 2024, we announced the Columbia brand (the "Brand") ACCELERATE Growth…
- FY2025 10-K: …for our products, identify our company and differentiate our products from competitors' products. We own many trademarks, including Columbia Sportswear Company®, Columbia®, SOREL®, Mountain Hardwear®, prAna®, the Columbia diamond shaped logo, the Mountain Hardwear nut logo, the SOREL polar bear logo, and the prAna…
- SHOO (STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.)
- FY2025 10-K: …under the Steve Madden brand. The Steve Madden brand is a leader in the fashion footwear industry with permission from the customer to sell products across most footwear categories including dress shoes, boots, booties, fashion sneakers, and casuals. While the brand appeals to a wide demographic, the core target…
- FY2025 10-K: …our cybersecurity risk management and strategy, as well as our cybersecurity governance. TRADEMARKS Our strategy for the continued growth of our business includes expanding our presence beyond footwear, accessories, and apparel through the selective licensing of our brands. We consider our company-owned trademarks to…
- BIRK (BIRK)
- FY2025 20-F: …As we ramp up our production capacity, we seek to unlock the large growth potential of our white spaces, which have generated significant latent demand that we have been unable to fulfill in recent years given more limited supply. Educate Fans on Our Brand Purpose and Grow the BIRKENSTOCK Fan Base We will continue to…
- FY2025 20-F: …we typically build inventory between October and January through a rigorous planning process designed to optimize product availability and mitigate any possible supply and demand mismatch. Competition We are one of the leading brands in the global footwear market. The global footwear industry is a large and…
HEYDUDE Brand (reported)
- DECK (DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …into new categories. • Thoughtful expansion of our apparel and accessories businesses. HOKA Brand . The HOKA brand is an authentic premium line of year-round performance footwear, which offers enhanced cushioning and inherent stability with minimal weight. Originally designed for ultra-runners, the brand now appeals…
- FY2025 10-K: …consisting of the Teva brand, AHNU brand, and Koolaburra brand) (collectively, the Company's reportable operating segments). The various brands within Other brands are aggregated within one reportable operating segment as each brand shares similar economic and qualitative characteristics. Refer to Note 12,…
- WWW (WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: TEST ® footwear is distributed primarily through a distributor network with Shoemobile ® mobile trucks and retail outlets providing direct sales of the Company's occupational and work footwear brands to workers at industrial facilities and through direct sales arrangements with large industrial customers. 6 Other…
- FY2025 10-K: 17 to license the Stride Rite ® brand. Sourcing Division: The sourcing division earns third-party commission revenue by providing consulting services related to product development, production control, quality assurance, materials procurement, compliance and other services. Multi-brand Direct-to-Consumer Division: The…
- SHOO (STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.)
- FY2025 10-K: …under the Steve Madden brand. The Steve Madden brand is a leader in the fashion footwear industry with permission from the customer to sell products across most footwear categories including dress shoes, boots, booties, fashion sneakers, and casuals. While the brand appeals to a wide demographic, the core target…
- FY2025 10-K: …our cybersecurity risk management and strategy, as well as our cybersecurity governance. TRADEMARKS Our strategy for the continued growth of our business includes expanding our presence beyond footwear, accessories, and apparel through the selective licensing of our brands. We consider our company-owned trademarks to…
- COLM (COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …for our products, identify our company and differentiate our products from competitors' products. We own many trademarks, including Columbia Sportswear Company®, Columbia®, SOREL®, Mountain Hardwear®, prAna®, the Columbia diamond shaped logo, the Mountain Hardwear nut logo, the SOREL polar bear logo, and the prAna…
- FY2025 10-K: …in 2003, our Mountain Hardwear brand's mission is to encourage and equip people to seek wilder paths. With over 30 years of wild wisdom, our Mountain Hardwear brand continues to offer premium technical apparel, accessories and equipment products for climbers, mountaineers, skiers, snowboarders, and trail athletes.…
- ONON (On Holding AG)
- FY2025 20-F: …consumer preferences or industry changes, or if we are unable to modify our products on a timely basis, we may lose customers or become subject to greater pricing pressures. Our operating results would also suffer if our innovations and designs do not respond to the needs and demands of our customers, are not…
- FY2025 20-F: …the "Speedboard") and our premium performance brand image are integral to our business, and to the implementation of our strategies for expanding our business. We believe that the strong reputation and brand image we have cultivated has significantly contributed to the success of our business and is critical to…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30, 2026 · Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · FY2025 Form 10-K · FY2025 Form 10-K; Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30, 2026; Q1 2026 Form 10-Q