CROCS, INC. (CROX): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $117.53, CROCS, INC. (CROX) is priced for +1.7% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CROX

Headline

FieldValue
TickerCROX
CompanyCROCS, INC.
Sector / IndustryConsumer Cyclical
Current price$117.53/sh
CompositionCrocs Brand - Wholesale 40% / Crocs Brand - Direct-to-consumer 43% / HEYDUDE Brand - Wholesale 8% / HEYDUDE Brand - Direct-to-consumer 9%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)4.2%
Operating margin today20.7%
Margin compression (value-band)-16.5pp
Implied growth1.7%
Multiple paid9x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 11: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 11.8% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.42σ
cohort percentile (of 212 peers)13

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.88x5justifies
Earnings0.92x5justifies
Relative0.67x2justifies
Growth0.89x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$151.600.78xyesFCF base $0.7B, growth -2% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.3%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$131.470.89xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 5.8x / 7.8x / 9.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.2x / 18.0x / 20.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$133.810.88xyesBV/sh $28.88, ROE (TTM) 42.9%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$328.270.36xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$63.941.84xyesRev $4.1B, growth -2% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.2x / 1.4x / 1.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$146.110.80xyesEPS $11.33, growth 13% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.74 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$160.140.73xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.93B × (1−22%) / WACC 7.3% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$213.420.55xyesBV $28.88 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 42.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$85.801.37xyes√(22.5 × EPS $11.33 × BVPS $28.88) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.92B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$127.200.92xyesFCF $704.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$117.841.00xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.66B (FCF $0.70B − SBC $0.04B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$325.620.36xyesEPS $11.33 × (8.5 + 2×12.9%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$30.103.90xyesBV $28.88 × (ROIC 7.6% / WACC 7.3%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $4.05B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$219.160.54xyesEPS $11.33 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 12.9% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 19.3x
Earnings YieldEarnings$122.490.96xyesEPS $11.33 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Crocs Brandoperatingenterprise$3.3bwithheldunresolved no unit value
HEYDUDE Brandoperatingenterprise$714.8mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$1.1b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)1.75x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)1.36x
Interest coverage10.1x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-5.5%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

A 430.0 million dollar write-down of the HEYDUDE trademark in the middle of last year is the single most damning fact available about this company. Management had told the market it could revive an acquired brand; the accountants eventually made them mark it down. Reported profit for 2025 fell to 149.5 million dollars from 1,021.9 million in 2024, and the year ended in a net loss. If you stop reading there, the story is a failed acquisition and a fashion brand past its moment.

Keep reading and the picture changes. That impairment was a non-cash adjustment to a carrying value, not a change in what the business earns. In the March 2026 quarter Crocs produced income from operations of 200.8 million dollars on 921.5 million of revenue, a 21.8% operating margin, and diluted earnings of $2.71 a share. Gross margin was 56.8%. Those are the economics of a company selling a moulded resin clog for many times what it costs to make, and they have not gone away.

The reason they persist is the product itself. A Crocs clog is not a fashion item that has to be reinvented every season; it is a platform that gets decorated. The company sells the shoe, then sells the charms that go in the holes, then sells a collaboration that makes the whole thing collectible again. That structure gives the brand something most footwear does not have: a way to refresh demand without redesigning the shoe or discounting it. Direct-to-consumer revenue grew 12.1% in the quarter, or 10.2% in constant currency, while the company was pulling back on wholesale. Selling more of your own product yourself, at higher prices, is a deliberate trade of volume for margin.

International is doing the same work geographically. Crocs Brand revenue outside North America grew 7.2% to 421 million dollars in the quarter while North America declined 6.1% to 346 million. A brand at a mature stage in its home market and still expanding abroad has a longer runway than the domestic numbers alone suggest.

Even HEYDUDE, the source of the write-down, is deteriorating more slowly than feared. Its direct-to-consumer revenue rose 8.6% in the quarter, and the full-year outlook for the brand was revised upward, to a decline of roughly 7% to 5% from a previously guided 9% to 7%. Guiding a shrinking brand less badly is a low bar. Clearing it while the parent raises its full-year outlook on both revenue and earnings is not.

Then there is what the company is doing with the cash. Adjusted diluted earnings guidance for 2026 is 13.20 to 13.75 dollars a share, and that guidance assumes no further buybacks, while the diluted share count has already fallen from 56.5 million to 50.7 million in a year. Against a share price near 135 dollars, an owner is buying earnings at a low multiple from a company steadily reducing the number of claims on them.

Bear Case

The advantage that is eroding here is not manufacturing or design. It is distribution power, and the wholesale line is where it shows. Wholesale revenue fell 9.9% in the March 2026 quarter, and 12.5% in constant currency, against direct-to-consumer up 12.1%. Some of that is a deliberate choice to sell more through the company's own channels. Some of it is retailers ordering less of a shoe whose sell-through they have watched slow. From outside, those two look identical for several quarters, and only the second one matters.

HEYDUDE is the demonstration of what happens when the second explanation is the right one. The brand's wholesale revenue fell 24.7% in the quarter, and the company recorded a 430.0 million dollar impairment against the HEYDUDE trademark in the second quarter of last year after downward revisions during the second quarter of the fiscal year ended 2025, to our internal HEYDUDE Brand forecast as a result of the extended time we believed it would take us to stabilize the HEYDUDE Brand and return it to growth. That is management, in a filed document, saying the turnaround is taking longer than they told anyone it would.

The concern is that the Crocs Brand rhymes with it in a slower key. North American revenue for the core brand fell 6.1% in the quarter. The clog is a fashion product whatever else it is, and fashion products in their home market do not usually decline for a while and then resume. The company's guidance for the full year, revenue down approximately 1% to up 1%, describes a business that is not growing. All the earnings growth on offer comes from margin discipline and a shrinking share count, and neither of those compounds forever.

Compare that to the cohort and the ranking is uncomfortable. DECK reported a 23.1% operating margin on 9.8% revenue growth in its own filings, and Crocs earns a similar margin with revenue going the other way. WWW at 8.6% and SHOO at 4.8% show what happens to footwear margins when a brand loses pricing power. The distance from where Crocs sits now to where those two sit is not a gap in capability. It is a gap in desirability, and desirability is the asset that just got written down at HEYDUDE.

The balance sheet limits the room to be patient. Total borrowings were 1.34 billion dollars at the end of the March quarter against cash of 131 million, with interest expense of 20.5 million for the quarter. Comfortable while operating margins are in the low twenties. Considerably less so if the core brand follows HEYDUDE's path, because the same buyback that flatters earnings per share today is funded from cash that would then be needed elsewhere.

Valuation

The market is not paying for growth here. It is paying, cautiously, for durability. The enterprise carries a value near 8.3 billion dollars, and against adjusted diluted earnings guidance of 13.20 to 13.75 dollars a share the equity trades around ten times what management expects to earn this year. That is a multiple that assumes the current level of profitability is temporary.

The methods used to triangulate the business divide along exactly that question. The peer-multiple lenses, which apply sector ratios to current revenue, land above today's price. The forward cash-flow approaches land close to it, essentially crediting the business with holding what it has. The lenses anchored on book value sit far below the price, which is what happens to any brand-driven company whose value is in a trademark rather than in a factory. Those book-value references are floors rather than valuations, and treating a business that keeps more than half of every sales dollar as gross profit as worth its accounting equity would be a category error.

The concrete question the price is asking is about persistence rather than expansion. Full-year guidance calls for revenue down approximately 1% to up 1%, with adjusted operating margin expanding modestly from 22.3%. Nothing in that requires a new product line or a new market. It requires the existing brands to hold their price and their shelf position for several more years, and the record's own reference set puts the odds of a company sustaining that kind of level for that long at roughly one in three.

Peer economics frame what is being valued. DECK earns a 23.1% operating margin with revenue growing 9.8%, COLM 6.0% with 0.6% growth, WWW 8.6% and SHOO 4.8%, all on their own filed numbers. Crocs earns near the top of that group and grows near the bottom. The multiple sits closer to the bottom of the group than the margin does, which is the market's way of saying it expects convergence.

Solvency is adequate rather than protective. Borrowings of 1.34 billion dollars against 131 million of cash and quarterly interest expense of 20.5 million leave a company that can service its debt easily at current margins and would find it uncomfortable at half of them. Meanwhile the diluted share count has fallen from 56.5 million to 50.7 million in a year, with 673.2 million dollars of repurchase authorization still outstanding. The buyer at today's price is not paying for a recovery. They are being paid to wait for one, and the risk is that the waiting is what erodes the asset.

Catalysts

First-quarter results on April 30, 2026 came in ahead of the company's own plan and prompted a raised outlook. Revenue was 921 million dollars, down 1.7% and 4.0% in constant currency. Direct-to-consumer revenue rose 12.1% while wholesale fell 9.9%. Income from operations was 201 million dollars, or 21.8% of revenue, and diluted earnings were $2.71 a share. Crocs Brand revenue rose 0.8% to 767 million; HEYDUDE fell 12.3% to 154 million.

The revised full-year outlook is the thing to hold management to. Revenue is now expected to be down approximately 1% to up 1%, with the Crocs Brand flat to up roughly 2% and HEYDUDE down approximately 7% to 5%, an improvement from the previous guidance of down 9% to 7%. Adjusted diluted earnings per share are now guided to land between 13.20 and 13.75 dollars, up from a previous range of 12.88 to 13.35, with capital expenditures of 70 to 80 million dollars. For the second quarter the company guided to adjusted diluted earnings of 4.15 to 4.35 dollars a share, and it expects the adjusted operating margin to expand modestly across the year.

Capital return continues alongside. Between the end of March and April 23, 2026 the company repurchased 0.8 million shares for 73.6 million dollars, leaving 673.2 million of authorization available, and the earnings guidance above excludes any benefit from further repurchases. That combination, a flat top line with earnings guidance raised and shares being retired, means the next two quarterly reports will be read for one thing: whether the Crocs Brand wholesale decline is a channel strategy or a demand signal.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Crocs Brand (reported)

HEYDUDE Brand (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30, 2026 · Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · FY2025 Form 10-K · FY2025 Form 10-K; Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30, 2026; Q1 2026 Form 10-Q

View the full interactive CROX report on boothcheck