COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC. (COKE): what the price requires
The current priced-in claim for COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC. (COKE) is temporarily suppressed because the live engine record is unavailable. The dated report remains a snapshot, not a current market read.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/COKE
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | COKE |
| Company | COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC. |
| Current price | $178.63/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin today | 13.2% |
| Multiple paid | 4x operating income |
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 6% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 6% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 3.3% sits below it).
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.80σ |
| cohort percentile (of 69 peers) | 0 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple value, while growth-DCF lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | — | 0 | — |
| Earnings | 0.37x | 1 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.12x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.83x | 2 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative Families that call it expensive: Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=5)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $642.27 | 0.28x | no | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 3.6x / 5.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $1591.75 | 0.11x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 2.0x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $76.42 | 2.34x | yes | DPS $7.07, g=0.0% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $135.76 | 1.32x | yes | Stage 1: 5% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $153.18 | 1.17x | no | Rev $7.5B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.2x / 0.2x / 0.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $792.14 | 0.23x | no | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.79B × (1−26%) / WACC 5.8% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $1501.46 | 0.12x | yes | EBITDA $1.20B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $481.30 | 0.37x | yes | FCF $661.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $1591.75 | 0.11x | no | Revenue $7.49B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $2.4b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 3.45x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 2.54x |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
Coca-Cola Consolidated screens with negative book equity, which looks alarming until you see the cause: a large share buyback, including purchasing all 18.8 million shares held by a Coca-Cola Company subsidiary at $127 in November 2025, drove retained earnings into deficit. This is capital return, not distress.
The operating business is solid and growing. First-quarter 2026 revenue rose 17% to $1.85 billion, EPS climbed to $1.68 from $1.19 (post a 10-for-1 split), and net income rose to $111.6 million. Free cash flow is robust at about $661 million.
The stock at $181.63 is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple value rather than a growth story. Net debt of about $2.4 billion is roughly 2.4x operating income. The risks are concentrate-price dependence on its franchisor parent, commodity and tariff cost pressure, and customer concentration in Walmart and Kroger.
Bull Case
The biggest red flag a screen throws on Coca-Cola Consolidated is negative book equity, the kind of distress signal that normally means a company has destroyed its balance sheet. Here it means the opposite. The deficit was created by aggressive capital return: the company retired treasury stock from buybacks and recorded the excess of carrying value over par as a deduction from retained earnings, pushing retained earnings into a deficit (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-26-009057). The capstone was buying all 18.8 million shares held by a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company on November 7, 2025 at $127 per share, a roughly $2.4 billion transaction that simplified the ownership structure and concentrated value in the remaining shareholders. A business that can return that much capital while still funding its operations is not distressed; it is a cash machine returning more than it retains. Once you see that, the alarm flips into the bull case.
The operating business behind the buyback is large, durable, and growing. Coca-Cola Consolidated is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States, with an exclusive territorial franchise to distribute Coca-Cola products plus post-mix fountain sales, transportation revenue, and equipment maintenance (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-26-009057). First-quarter 2026 revenue rose 17% to $1.85 billion, diluted EPS climbed to $1.68 from $1.19 on a post-split basis, and net income rose 7.7% to $111.6 million. The territorial bottling model is a genuine moat: within its franchised geography, Coca-Cola Consolidated is the sole distributor of the world's most recognized beverage brand, a position no competitor can replicate and that throws off consistent, defensive cash flow through economic cycles.
The valuation reflects a defensive cash generator rather than a growth bet. The engine reads the price as supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple value, with growth-DCF the only family calling it expensive. The two-stage dividend model lands near $136 and the discounted-future-market-cap read near $156, while the company generates about $661 million of free cash flow and carries manageable net debt of about $2.4 billion, roughly 2.4x operating income. The dividend is real and the buyback shrinks the share base. For an investor who wants a defensive consumer-staples cash flow with a structural local monopoly on Coca-Cola distribution, the negative-equity headline is a feature, not a bug: it is the visible result of management returning capital aggressively to owners. The operating margin near 13% and the steady volume base are what underwrite that return.
Bear Case
The most fragile assumption baked into the price is that margins hold, and the first-quarter print already showed them slipping. Profit margin fell to 6.0% from 6.6% a year earlier, driven by higher expenses, even as revenue grew 17%. That matters because a bottler is a thin-margin, high-volume business whose profitability swings with input costs it does not fully control. The company warns that rising costs to produce its products, to the extent not passed along to consumers, could make its products less affordable and hurt net sales and profitability, and it flags that across-the-board tariffs could substantially raise costs (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-26-009057). Aluminum cans, PET resin, and sweeteners are the swing inputs, and pricing power has limits in a category where consumers are increasingly value-conscious. A valuation that relies on margin recovery or stability is exposed to exactly the cost pressure that just compressed the margin.
The structural dependence on the franchisor is the narrative under the moat. Coca-Cola Consolidated does not own the brand; it bottles and distributes it under agreements with The Coca-Cola Company, which sets concentrate prices. The same relationship that gives it an exclusive territory also means its largest cost input and its growth ceiling are partly controlled by its franchisor. If The Coca-Cola Company raises concentrate prices faster than the bottler can pass through, margins compress; the bottler is a price-taker on its single most important input. This is the part of the model the bull case treats as a moat but which is equally a dependency, and it is structurally outside the company's control.
The customer side adds concentration risk, and the capital structure removes the cushion. The company states plainly that the loss of Walmart or Kroger as a customer could have a material adverse effect on its operating and financial results, and that no other customer represented more than 10% of revenue (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-26-009057). Two retailers therefore hold meaningful leverage over a low-margin distributor. Meanwhile the aggressive buyback that flatters per-share metrics has left the company with negative book equity, which means there is no equity cushion on the balance sheet if a bad year, a margin squeeze, and the $2.4 billion of net debt coincide. The capital return was shareholder-friendly in good times; it also leaves less room for error. A buyer here is paying for a stable, defensive bottler whose margins are under cost pressure, whose key input is controlled by its parent, and whose customer base is concentrated, with little balance-sheet slack behind it.
Valuation
Coca-Cola Consolidated is genuinely hard to value with the standard toolkit, because the large buyback has driven book equity and retained earnings negative, which trips the engine's distress filters and disables most of the asset-, earnings-, and projection-based methods even though the business is not distressed. The methods that survive are the dividend and cash-flow reads: the simple dividend model lands near $76, the two-stage dividend model near $136, the discounted-future-market-cap read near $156, and the FCF-yield read far higher. The honest takeaway is that no clean intrinsic anchor exists here; the business has to be valued on its cash flow and dividend, not its (negative) book.
On cash flow, the picture is reasonable. The company generates about $661 million of free cash flow, and the territorial bottling franchise produces steady, defensive earnings with an operating margin near 13%. At $181.63 (June 27, 2026) the stock trades at a mid-teens multiple of post-split earnings (EPS of $1.68 in the first quarter alone, annualizing toward the high single digits), which is a fair-to-modest multiple for a defensive consumer-staples cash generator with a local monopoly. The two-stage dividend value near $136 and the discounted-future-market-cap value near $156 suggest the price is somewhat ahead of the most conservative reads but within reach of the growth-leaning ones. The right way to think about it: this is a stable cash flow returning capital aggressively, priced like a defensive staple, with the negative equity a distraction from the underlying cash generation rather than a sign of trouble. The valuation hinges on margins stabilizing and the dividend and buyback continuing, both of which depend on input costs and the relationship with the franchisor.
Catalysts
First-quarter 2026 was the recent set-piece: revenue rose 17% to $1.85 billion, diluted EPS climbed to $1.68 from $1.19 on a post-split basis, and net income rose 7.7% to $111.6 million. Profit margin slipped to 6.0% from 6.6% a year earlier on higher expenses, the one soft spot in an otherwise strong top line. (Sources: Coca-Cola Consolidated Q1 2026 results via the company 8-K and StockTitan; Q1 2026 earnings report via MarketBeat.)
Two capital-structure events defined the recent period. The board executed a 10-for-1 forward stock split during the second quarter of 2025, with all prior per-share figures retroactively adjusted. And on November 7, 2025 the company purchased all 18.8 million shares held by a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company at $127 per share, a roughly $2.4 billion buyback that simplified the ownership structure and is the proximate cause of the negative book equity. (Sources: Coca-Cola Consolidated stock-split and share-repurchase disclosures via StockTitan and the company 8-K filings; Coca-Cola Consolidated FY2025 10-K.)
The forward watch items are margin- and cost-driven: whether the operating margin stabilizes against commodity and tariff pressure on aluminum, PET, and sweeteners; the trajectory of concentrate prices set by The Coca-Cola Company; volume and pricing trends with key customers Walmart and Kroger; and the continued pace of dividends and buybacks now that the balance sheet carries negative equity and about $2.4 billion of net debt. Each quarterly print is the key check on whether the margin pressure was a one-quarter expense issue or a trend. (Sources: Coca-Cola Consolidated FY2025 10-K cost, customer-concentration, and franchise disclosures; Q1 2026 results via the company 8-K.)
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Nonalcoholic Beverages (reported)
- CCEP (COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …volume, comparable and FX neutral revenue and revenue per unit case, comparable and FX neutral operating profit, comparable diluted EPS, comparable free cash flow, ROIC and comparable ROIC are non-IFRS performance measures. Non-IFRS adjusted comparable financial information as if the acquisition of Coca-Cola…
- FY2025 20-F: , and does not include plain water or juice. This definition aligns to the UNESDA commitment definition. Reduction in average sugar per litre in NARTD portfolio since 2015 Methodologies and boundaries Calculation = Percentage reduction in total portfolio wide weighted volume average sugar content (measured in grams…
- FIZZ (National Beverage Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and our competitive position may vary by market area. Our products compete with many varieties of liquid refreshment, including water products, soft drinks, juices, fruit drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks, as well as powdered drinks, coffees, teas, dairy- based drinks, functional beverages and various other…
- FY2025 10-K: …135 years. Our strategy seeks the profitable growth of our products by (i) developing healthier beverages in response to the global shift in consumer buying habits and tailoring our beverage portfolio to the preferences of a diverse mix of ‘crossover consumers' - a growing group desiring a healthier alternative to…
- CELH (CELSIUS HOLDINGS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …with the highest volumes typically occurring during the second and third calendar quarters, aligning with the warmer months in our key markets. However, over the course of a full year, these seasonal fluctuations have not had a material impact on our financial results. Competition Our products compete broadly with…
- FY2025 10-K: …Our products compete with all liquid refreshments and with products of certain competitors that are much larger, some of which have significantly greater financial resources, such as Monster Beverage Corporation, Red Bull GmbH, The Coca-Cola Company, Pepsi, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Nestlé S.A., BlueTriton Brands,…
- COCO (The Vita Coco Company, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Our coconut water Private Label offering increases the scale and efficiency of our coconut water supply chain, and also provides us with a share of the value segment, without diluting our own brand. We also supply retailers with Private Label coconut oil. PWR LIFT In 2021, we launched PWR LIFT, a beverage targeted at…
- FY2025 10-K: …beverage companies such as The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo, Inc., and Nestlé S.A. that may have substantially greater financial resources and stronger brand recognition than we have. Our flagship brand, Vita Coco , is the market leader in the coconut water category in the U.S. where we compete with other key coconut…
All Other (reported)
- CCEP (COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …development and execution experience ■ Vision, customer focus and transformational leadership ■ Developing people and teams and promoting sustainability ■ Over 25 years of leadership experience and in-depth understanding of the non-alcoholic ready to drink industry and within the Coca-Cola system Key external…
- FY2025 20-F: …Appointed May 2019 Committees Key strengths/experience ■ Extensive experience in the retail industry ■ A deep understanding of international trade ■ Strong strategic and sustainable development skills ■ Digital global business experience Key external commitments Member of the House of Lords and founder of WorkL and…
- KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We have also identified certain other legal matters where we believe an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and/or for which no estimate of possible losses can be made. We do not believe that the outcome of these, or any other, pending legal matters, individually or…
- FY2025 10-K: …in escrow in connection with the acquisition of GHOST as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, as well as Kalil Acquisition as of December 31, 2024, with a corresponding holdback liability recorded in Other current liabilities. Refer to Note 4 for additional information. (2) Non-current restricted cash and restricted cash…
- PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: 's, Mountain Dew, Mountain Dew Code Red, Mountain Dew Game Fuel, Mountain Dew Kickstart, Mountain Dew Zero Sugar, Mug, Munchies, Muscle Milk, Near East, Obela, Off the Eaten Path, Paso de los Toros, Pasta Roni, Pearl Milling Company, Pepsi, Pepsi Black, Pepsi Max, Pepsi Wild Cherry, Pepsi Zero Sugar, PopCorners,…
- FY2025 10-K: InterestRateContractMember us-gaap:CashFlowHedgingMember 2024-12-29 2025-12-27 0000077476 us-gaap:CrossCurrencyInterestRateContractMember us-gaap:CashFlowHedgingMember 2023-12-31 2024-12-28 0000077476 us-gaap:CommodityContractMember us-gaap:CashFlowHedgingMember 2024-12-29 2025-12-27 0000077476…
- MNST (Monster Beverage Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …a definitive agreement to acquire GHOST Lifestyle LLC and GHOST Beverages LLC. In addition, Celsius Holdings, Inc. ("CELSIUS") acquired Alani Nutrition LLC ("Alani Nu"). We also compete with companies that are smaller or primarily local in operation. Our products also compete with private-label brands such as those…
- FY2025 10-K: …control of the Company involving certain TCCC competitors, or if the Company terminated following a change in control of the Company involving any third-party. 20 Table of Contents The interests of TCCC may be different from or conflict with the interests of the Company's other stockholders and, as a result, TCCC's…
- CELH (CELSIUS HOLDINGS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …with the highest volumes typically occurring during the second and third calendar quarters, aligning with the warmer months in our key markets. However, over the course of a full year, these seasonal fluctuations have not had a material impact on our financial results. Competition Our products compete broadly with…
- FY2025 10-K: …and future operations globally; the successful development, commercialization and timing of new products; business prospects; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; market conditions; the current and future market size for existing or new products; the impact of macroeconomic conditions, tariff policies and supply chain…
- FIZZ (National Beverage Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and our competitive position may vary by market area. Our products compete with many varieties of liquid refreshment, including water products, soft drinks, juices, fruit drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks, as well as powdered drinks, coffees, teas, dairy- based drinks, functional beverages and various other…
- FY2025 10-K: …that may require customer performance or achievement of certain sales volume targets. Sales incentives are accrued over the period of benefit or expected sales. When an incentive is paid in advance, the aggregate incentive is recorded as a prepaid asset and amortized over the period of benefit. The recognition of…
- PRMB (Primo Brands Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …and intercompany arrangements. The taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for pricing intercompany transactions pursuant to our intercompany arrangements or disagree with our determinations as to the income and expenses attributable to specific jurisdictions. If…
- FY2025 10-K: …prmb:AccumulatedGainLossNetFairValueHedgeParentMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0002042694 us-gaap:ForeignExchangeContractMember us-gaap:ReclassificationOutOfAccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember prmb:AccumulatedGainLossNetFairValueHedgeParentMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0002042694…
- KO (COCA COLA CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …us-gaap:OtherIncomeMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000021344 us-gaap:InterestRateContractMember us-gaap:CashFlowHedgingMember us-gaap:InterestExpenseMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000021344 us-gaap:CommodityContractMember us-gaap:CashFlowHedgingMember us-gaap:CostOfSalesMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0000021344…
- FY2025 10-K: …Company trademarks in certain territories. We also grant licenses to third parties from time to time to use certain of our trademarks in conjunction with certain merchandise and food products. Governmental Regulation Our Company is required to comply, and it is our policy to comply, with all applicable laws in the…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.