CLARIVATE PLC (CLVT): what the price requires
At today's price, CLARIVATE PLC (CLVT) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~9.0 years. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CLVT
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CLVT |
| Company | CLARIVATE PLC |
| Current price | $2.24/sh |
| Composition | Subscription 65% / Re-occurring 18% / Transactional 17% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 11.4% |
| Operating margin today | 2.5% |
| Margin expansion implied | +8.9pp |
| Must persist for | 9.0y |
| Multiple paid | 94x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~2.7 years (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 7% sits below it).
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~14.5 years; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: elevated
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.56σ |
| sustained it ~9 years at this level | 17% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and relative-multiple value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.33x | 3 | justifies |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | 0.08x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | — | 0 | — |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=5)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $3.27 | 0.68x | no | FCF base $0.3B, growth -3% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 5.3%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $3.13 | 0.71x | no | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.3x / 6.3x / 8.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $30.55 | 0.07x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 8.0x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $7.47 | 0.30x | yes | Reference only (book value floor): BV/sh $7.47, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $6.73 | 0.33x | yes | Reference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $7.47, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $1.28 | 1.75x | no | Rev $2.4B, growth -3% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.5x / 0.6x / 0.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $27.89 | 0.08x | yes | EBITDA $0.88B × sector EV/EBITDA 25.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 223.50x | yes | FCF $333.9M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 223.50x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.27B (FCF $0.33B − SBC $0.07B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $0.38 | 5.88x | yes | BV $7.47 × (ROIC 0.3% / WACC 5.3%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $30.55 | 0.07x | no | Revenue $2.45B × sector P/S 8.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $4.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 87.76x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 69.33x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -1.8% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Clarivate sells subscription access to scientific, academic, and intellectual-property data, and the distinctive fact is the mix: roughly two-thirds of revenue is subscription and most of the rest recurs, the kind of revenue base that should be sticky even when growth is slow.
- The defining risk is the debt: about $4.2 billion of net debt against roughly $242 million of liquid assets sits on a business whose GAAP results carry distress signals, so the equity is a thin sliver on top of a large, leveraged enterprise.
- What to watch is the turnaround under the Value Creation Plan, now five quarters into improving renewal rates and margins, and the open question of whether the Life Sciences and Health business gets sold, which would change the guidance and the balance sheet.
Bull Case
The bull case rests on the balance sheet being managed toward the equity rather than away from it, and the recent record supports that. Clarivate generates real free cash flow, guided to grow about 10% to roughly $400 million for the full year, and it is pointing that cash at its debt: management completed the redemption of its remaining 2026 secured notes and projects retiring its secured notes ahead of the 2028 maturity using free cash flow. A leveraged business that throws off cash and is actually paying down debt is doing the one thing that transfers value from creditors to shareholders. The share count has even edged lower rather than higher, the opposite of the dilution that defines distressed names.
The asset underneath is a recurring-revenue franchise that the price is treating as if it were broken. Roughly 65% of revenue is subscription and another 18% recurs, and the turnaround is showing up in the leading indicators: renewal rates improved about 100 basis points and organic subscription revenue grew 1.7% in the first quarter, the fifth consecutive quarter of improved performance under the Value Creation Plan, with adjusted EBITDA margin reaching 41% and guided toward nearly 43% for the year. High-margin, renewing data subscriptions are a genuinely good business model; FactSet, a peer in the same data-and-analytics cohort, describes its own Annual Subscription Value as the metric that "reflects our ability to grow recurring revenues and generate positive cash flows", and Verisk notes that roughly "83%" of its revenue is subscription. Clarivate has the same shape, just at a depressed valuation.
That depressed valuation is the bull's clearest point. Every asset-based and sales-based method lands well above the price. Book value is around $7.47 a share against a price near $2, and on a sector sales multiple the business prices many times higher than where it trades. When the asset and relative-multiple frames both say the price is low, this is not a growth bet that needs everything to go right; it is a value situation where the market is pricing continued decline, and the turnaround only has to keep grinding renewal rates and margins higher to close the gap. If the potential Life Sciences and Health divestiture lands at a fair price, the proceeds go straight at the debt, and the equity sliver gets thicker fast.
Bear Case
The structural truth a holder has to face is that Clarivate is cheap for a reason: the underlying business has been shrinking, and the debt magnifies every wobble. Strip away the turnaround narrative and the GAAP picture carries distress signals, sustained net losses, negative retained earnings, and a balance sheet read that flags financial stress. Full-year revenue is guided to fall by roughly $100 million to about $2.36 billion, and while management attributes the decline to disposals, the organic growth that remains is slow: subscription revenue grew 1.7% and the Intellectual Property segment's organic trends are still near flat. A data business whose recurring revenue grows in the low single digits is not compounding; it is treading water, and treading water under leverage is a precarious place to stand.
The leverage is the bear's core. Net debt of about $4.2 billion sits against only roughly $242 million of liquid assets, and interest expense is not even separately broken out cleanly in the filings, which makes coverage hard to verify. The equity at today's price is a thin claim on top of a large pile of debt; in a leveraged capital structure, the equity is the most volatile piece, gaining disproportionately if the turnaround works and getting crushed if it stalls. The market's own valuation reflects exactly this: the price sits well below book value, which is the market saying it does not believe the assets are worth their carrying value to equity holders after the debt is served.
The competitive context makes the slow growth more worrying, not less. Clarivate's best-in-class peers are growing the same kind of recurring revenue far faster: FactSet reported organic Annual Subscription Value up 5.7%, several times Clarivate's subscription pace, and the gap is the tell. In subscription data, share and renewal momentum compound, so a franchise growing at a third of its peers' rate is slowly losing relative ground even as it stabilizes in absolute terms. The bull's turnaround needs renewal rates and margins to keep improving for years against that backdrop. If the Value Creation Plan plateaus, or if a Life Sciences sale comes at a disappointing price, the equity behind $4.2 billion of net debt is where the disappointment lands first.
Valuation
Clarivate is the rare name where the methods split cleanly, and the split is the whole story. On its assets and on its sales, the business looks cheap: book value sits around $7.47 a share against a price near $2, and a sector sales multiple applied to its revenue prices the enterprise many times above where the equity trades. The asset-based and relative-multiple frames both place value well above the price, which is why this reads as a value or asset-supported situation rather than a growth bet. The same methods that flag overvaluation in most reports are pointing the other way here.
What complicates the value read is the leverage and the GAAP distress. The standard cash-flow and earnings projection methods fall away because the company carries distress signals, sustained losses and negative retained earnings, so the projection-based frames cannot run honestly. That leaves the asset and sales lenses doing the work, and they say the same thing: the enterprise is worth more than the market assigns to the equity, but a heavily indebted enterprise hands most of that value to creditors first. Worked backward, the price embeds company-wide operating growth held near its ceiling for roughly nine years, and the company's recent pace is within that rate; the stretch is the duration, not the speed. For a turnaround that is five quarters into grinding renewal rates higher, that is a less heroic assumption than it sounds.
Solvency is therefore the binding question, and it cuts both ways. Net debt of about $4.2 billion against roughly $242 million of liquid assets is the weight; free cash flow guided toward $400 million pointed at debt reduction is the lever working against it. There is no dilution amplifier here, the share count is flat to slightly lower, which matters because it means the cash flow accrues to a stable equity base. The decisive variable is whether the recurring-revenue base stabilizes and the potential Life Sciences and Health divestiture lands at a price that meaningfully cuts the debt. The asset and sales methods say the value is there; the balance sheet decides how much of it reaches the equity.
Catalysts
The turnaround cadence is the recurring catalyst. The first quarter of 2026 marked the fifth consecutive quarter of improved performance under the Value Creation Plan, with revenue of $586 million, adjusted EBITDA of $241 million at a 41% margin, organic subscription revenue up 1.7%, and renewal rates improving about 100 basis points. Each quarter that extends the streak builds the case that the recurring base has stabilized; a single quarter that breaks it would reopen the decline thesis.
The capital-structure catalysts are concrete and value-relevant. Clarivate redeemed the remaining $100 million of its 4.50% senior secured notes due 2026 in February 2026 and guides full-year free cash flow to grow about 10% to roughly $400 million, with management projecting full retirement of its secured notes ahead of the 2028 maturity from internal cash. For a leveraged equity, debt reduction is the most direct catalyst there is.
The largest discrete catalyst is the potential divestiture of the Life Sciences and Health business. Company guidance currently assumes continued ownership, with management noting that a sale agreement would require a guidance revision later in the year. A sale at a fair price would convert a slower-growth segment into proceeds aimed at the debt, reshaping both the growth profile and the balance sheet. Analyst sentiment remains cautious, a Hold consensus with a price target near $3.22 as of mid-2026, which sits above the current price and reflects the market crediting the stabilization without yet underwriting the full turnaround.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Academia & Government (reported)
- RELX (RELX PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …provided in the deposit agreement) Converting foreign currency to US dollars Taxes and other governmental charges the depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes As necessary Any charges…
- FY2025 20-F: University of Science and Technology, Islamic Azad University, Shahid Beheshti University, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and University of Zanjan; and 15 Table of Contents ● our Exhibitions business provided exhibitions-related services to a number of exhibitors. Iranian nationals attended conferences…
- WLY (JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …titles, and discontinue the sale of others in the normal course of our business. We also create adaptations of original content for specific markets based on customer demand. Our general practice is to revise our textbooks every 3 to 5 years, as warranted, and to revise other titles as appropriate. Subscription-based…
- FY2025 10-K: …from contracts with customers includes platform and workflow solutions for societies and publishers, which includes production and content hosting, submissions and peer review support, editorial, and copy editing services. Included within platforms is our Atypon® publishing platform for societies and publishers which…
- PSO (PEARSON PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …in our Higher Education courseware were four times as likely to remain or become more active, efficient studiers compared to those who did not use the AI study tools. We have also seen evidence of positive student outcomes through the Pearson AI study tool embedded in Biology and World History learning materials for…
- FY2025 20-F: …universities and the business sector, helping people and organisations to achieve economic and educational goals. Our assessments are a reliable currency of competence and achievement, and we often operate in highly regulated environments. We support governments on topics such as the impact of technological…
- FDS (FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …competitive position and business results may be negatively impacted. If our competitors or other third parties incorporate AI technologies, such as emerging generative and agentic AI, into their products and processes more quickly or more successfully than us, this could impair our ability to compete effectively.…
- FY2025 10-K: …or governmental investigations We are party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business, including a purported class action relating to our acquisition, and operation of, the CGS business ( Dinosaur Financial Group LLC et al. v. S&P Global, Inc. et al ). Litigation and governmental investigations can be…
- SPGI (S&P Global Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Nonetheless, in the interest of managing customer relationships, the Company from time to time engages in dialogue with such customers in an effort to resolve such complaints, and if such complaints cannot be resolved through dialogue, may face litigation regarding such complaints. The Company does not expect to…
- FY2025 10-K: …loss of public confidence, or a material reduction to the marketability or competitiveness of our products and services. In addition, our failure to continue development and adoption of ethical and transparent policies and procedures related to AI could negatively impact our reputation and customer confidence. Any of…
- VRSK (Verisk Analytics, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …against larger competitors. We may also invest further to upgrade our systems in order to compete. If we fail to successfully compete, our business, financial position and results of operations may be adversely affected. We could lose our access to data from external sources, which could prevent us from providing our…
- FY2025 10-K: …Subscription is a single performance obligation that represents a series of distinct services (daily access to our online portal and related content) that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to our customer. We recognize revenue for Hosted Subscriptions ratably over the performance…
Intellectual Property (reported)
- RELX (RELX PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: Our products and services include and utilise intellectual property and we rely on our commercial agreements as well as trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret and other intellectual property laws to establish and protect our proprietary rights in this intellectual property. Such intellectual property laws are…
- FY2025 20-F: ) (square feet) Owned properties Alpharetta, Georgia Office and data centre 406,000 Leased properties Miamisburg, Ohio Office and data centre 137,249 Raleigh, North Carolina Office 120,000 Amsterdam, Netherlands Office 114,537 All of the above properties are substantially occupied by RELX. No property…
- WLY (JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …sale, there is a written agreement between us and our customer that covers multiple years. However, we typically account for these agreements as one-year contracts because our enforceable rights under the agreements are subject to an annual confirmation and negotiation process with the customer. 70 I ndex In Journal…
- FY2025 10-K: …updates during the subscription period, which is generally an annual period, revenue for the minimum guarantee is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement. For our sales- or usage-based royalty agreements, we recognize revenue in the period of usage based on the amounts earned. We record…
- FDS (FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …existing intellectual property laws may afford only limited protection. Research and Product Development Costs A key aspect of our growth strategy is to offer new solutions and enhance our existing products by making them faster and more robust with deeper data and insights. We continue to invest in AI solutions that…
- FY2025 10-K: …that we have infringed upon their intellectual property rights. Responding to these claims may require us to enter into royalty and licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, incur litigation costs, enter into settlements, stop selling or redesign affected products, or pay damages and satisfy indemnification…
- SPGI (S&P Global Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …compete with other AI products or services, to improve efficiency of existing products or services through the effective use of AI to remain competitive, or to incorporate AI in our internal operations, or could materially increase our burden and cost of research, development and regulatory compliance. • We do not…
- FY2025 10-K: …developing product or service offerings that are substantially equivalent or superior to our offerings. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete…
- VRSK (Verisk Analytics, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …for future growth. We could face claims for intellectual property infringement, which if successful could restrict us from using and providing our technologies and solutions to our customers. There has been substantial litigation and other proceedings, particularly in the U.S., regarding patent and other intellectual…
- FY2025 10-K: …lines, many of which are registered. We believe many of our trademarks, trade names, service marks, and logos to be of material importance to our business, as they assist our customers in identifying our solutions and services and the quality that stands behind them. We consider our intellectual property to be…
Life Sciences & Healthcare (reported)
- IQV (IQVIA HOLDINGS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of the size of the various markets described above, we review third-party sources, which include estimates and forecasts of spending in various segments, in combination with internal IQVIA research and analysis informed by our experience serving these segments, as well as projected growth rates for each of these…
- FY2025 10-K: …evidence studies demonstrate practical and clinical effectiveness, which can require the aggregation and integration of large clinical data sets across multiple care settings, types of therapies and patient cohorts. Longitudinal studies require analysis of non-identified patient diagnoses, treatments, procedures and…
- VEEV (Veeva Systems Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …larger customers occurs, the combined company may represent a larger percentage of business for us and, as a result, we are likely to rely more significantly on revenue from the combined company to continue to achieve growth. In addition, if large life sciences companies merge, it would have the potential to reduce…
- FY2025 10-K: …content management, field optimization, and commercial insights and analytics. R&D Business Consulting enables continuous and sustainable innovation across the drug development value chain, including process efficiency, time-to-market acceleration, and optimized operating model and governance. Our Customers As of…
- DOCS (Doximity, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to articles about scientific congresses or professional meetings. We take a rigorous approach to launching new modules, including internal and customer pilots. Our goal is to make sponsored content useful, relevant, and informative for our members. Our newer integrated programs allow our clients to leverage the power…
- FY2025 10-K: …could require a costly response from us. Our solutions address heavily regulated functions within the life sciences industry, and failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could lessen the demand for our solutions or subject us to significant claims and losses. Our customers use our solutions for…
- RELX (RELX PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …by providing tools that combine legal, regulatory and business information with powerful analytics. ● Exhibitions combines industry expertise, digital tools, and data to help customers connect in-person and online, discover new markets, source products, generate leads, and transact. Business area reporting changes …
- FY2025 20-F: We continue to expand our extensive, differentiated data assets, build out our global fraud infrastructure, and more deeply integrate advanced authentication and behavioural intelligence, to address the increasing complexity of risk decisioning for customers worldwide. In Insurance, strong growth continues to be…
- FDS (FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: Growth Officer from 2022 to 2024 and Chief Administrative Officer of the Corporate and Investment Bank. Earlier in his career, he was a Managing Director and Head of Corporate Strategy for JPMorgan and a Partner and Co-Head of Global Corporate and Investment Banking for McKinsey & Company. Mr. Viswanathan holds a…
- FY2025 10-K: …and digital reporting workflows. We are also working to introduce next-generation automation in research, financial modeling, and pitch creation. • Innovating with AI: Our AI roadmap, driven by our FactSet AI Blueprint, is resonating with our clients, and FactSet's AI solutions are generating usage, demand and…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
company FY2026 guidance and refinancing disclosures · Q1 2026 earnings release · FDS FY2025 10-K · company refinancing and FY2026 guidance disclosures · company FY2026 guidance commentary · analyst notes, 2026