CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC. (CLF): what the price requires
The current priced-in claim for CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC. (CLF) is temporarily suppressed because the live engine record is unavailable. The dated report remains a snapshot, not a current market read.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CLF
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CLF |
| Company | CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC. |
| Current price | $9.68/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 3.3% |
| Operating margin (mid-cycle) | 10.1% |
| Margin compression implied | -6.8pp |
| Trailing margin (depressed year) | -7.6% |
| Multiple paid | 7x mid-cycle operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 5, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 7% sits below it).
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.03σ |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and relative-multiple value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.00x | 2 | justifies |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | 0.19x | 1 | justifies |
| Growth | — | 0 | — |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=3)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF — equity value floored at $0 |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $49.74 | 0.19x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 1.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $10.21 | 0.95x | yes | Reference only (book value floor): BV/sh $10.21, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $9.19 | 1.05x | yes | Reference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $10.21, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $4.10 | 2.36x | no | Rev $18.9B, growth 2% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.2x / 0.3x / 0.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $3.89 | 2.49x | no | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.88B × (1−21%) / WACC 6.2% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $0.01 | 968.00x | yes | EBITDA $0.08B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x (excluded from median) |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $49.74 | 0.19x | no | Revenue $18.90B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $8.1b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 5.31x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 4.19x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 1.7% |
| Burning cash | yes |
Leverage and coverage are computed on normalized mid-cycle operating income (mid-cycle margin 10.1%); the trailing year was depressed.
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- The number that decides Cleveland-Cliffs is the mid-cycle margin near 10%, not the current loss. At a normal point in the steel cycle the business earns money; trailing results show a loss because the cycle is near a trough.
- The company is distressed on the standard screens: three distress signals (sustained losses, negative retained earnings, and an Altman distress reading) shut down most valuation methods, and net debt of about $8.1 billion runs roughly 4.3x normalized operating income.
- The bet is cyclical and policy-driven. Q1 2026 revenue rose to $4.92 billion and the loss narrowed, with management guiding to improving pricing and a return to positive free cash flow as tariffs support domestic steel.
Bull Case
The one metric that decides Cleveland-Cliffs is its mid-cycle margin, estimated near 10%, because everything else flows from where you are in the steel cycle. Trailing results show an operating loss, but that is a cyclical trough reading, not the earning power of the business. Steel is a commodity that swings violently, and the way to value an integrated producer is on what it earns across a full cycle, not at the bottom. At a 10% mid-cycle operating margin on a revenue base running near $20 billion, Cleveland-Cliffs is a materially profitable business; the current loss is the cycle, not the franchise. The reverse-DCF, working off normalized economics, reads the price as below its floor and justified by relative multiples.
The cycle is turning the right way, and policy is helping. Q1 2026 revenue rose to $4.92 billion from $4.63 billion a year earlier, the adjusted loss of $0.40 beat estimates, and management guided to improving pricing and EBITDA in the second and third quarters with a return to positive free cash flow. The tailwind is tariffs: the company expects steel demand to grow as tariffs support domestic production (FY2025 10-K, accession 0000764065-26-000025), and as the largest flat-rolled steelmaker in North America and a leading supplier to the automotive industry, Cleveland-Cliffs is positioned to capture that protected domestic pricing. Its value-added work with automakers, including a 2025 production trial stamping its steel for a major automotive customer (FY2025 10-K, accession 0000764065-26-000025), shows the technical relationships that underpin its volume.
The asset value provides a reference under the price. The book-value floor sits at $10.21 per share against a $12.27 price (June 27, 2026), so a buyer is paying only a modest premium to tangible book for a vertically integrated steelmaker with iron-ore mining, steelmaking, and downstream finishing. If steel prices firm and the energy and cost spikes that hit Q1, including an $80 million one-time cold-weather energy impact, normalize, the operating leverage in an integrated producer is enormous: incremental tons drop a high share of revenue to EBITDA. A buyer at $12.27 is making a cyclical bet near book value on a domestic steel recovery that tariffs and an aging-infrastructure replacement cycle could drive.
Bear Case
The disconnect a holder must confront is qualitative and stark: this is a company losing money with a balance sheet that magnifies every downturn. The trailing operating income is negative, the company carries three distress signals, sustained net-income losses, negative retained earnings, and an Altman distress reading, and those flags exist for a reason. Steel is brutally cyclical and capital-intensive, and Cleveland-Cliffs layered a debt-funded acquisition strategy on top of that cyclicality. Net debt of about $8.1 billion against normalized operating income puts leverage near 4.3x, and at a cycle trough with negative current earnings, the interest bill is a fixed claim that the equity must service whether or not the mills are profitable.
The mid-cycle margin that anchors the bull case is an assumption, not a fact, and steel cycles can stay depressed longer than a levered balance sheet can comfortably wait. The company's own filing warns that if it cannot sell the same volume to other customers and markets, lower production leads to lower sales, shipments, pricing, and margins as competitors compete vigorously (FY2025 10-K, accession 0000764065-26-000025). Demand is tied heavily to automotive and construction, both rate- and economy-sensitive, and a downturn in either, or a reversal of the tariff support, would push the trough deeper. The Q1 results showed the fragility: an $80 million one-time energy spike and rising per-ton production costs from diesel, scrap, and outages, with management guiding to a $15 per ton cost increase before relief.
The valuation has no firm earnings anchor at this price. The standard projection methods are all shut off by the distress gate, the EV/EBITDA method collapses because EBITDA is near zero, and what remains is a book-value floor at $10.21, only modestly below the price. The relative method's $49.74 is a sales-multiple artifact that the distress gate explicitly excludes from consensus, so it is not a real anchor. Share count has been rising, adding dilution to the leverage. The bear read is that Cleveland-Cliffs is a highly levered, currently unprofitable cyclical priced near book, where the bull case depends on a steel-price and tariff recovery arriving before the debt load forces harder choices.
Valuation
Cleveland-Cliffs is valued as a distressed cyclical, and the model set reflects it: three distress signals, sustained losses, negative retained earnings, and an Altman distress reading, gate off the DCF, earnings, and sales-multiple methods as unreliable for a distressed firm. The EV/EBITDA method collapses to near zero because trailing EBITDA is minimal at the cycle trough. What remains is a book-value floor near $10.21 per share, modestly below the $12.27 price, and a relative-valuation reading of $49.74 that is a P/S artifact explicitly excluded from consensus because the company is loss-making.
The meaningful anchor is the normalized, mid-cycle view. The reverse-DCF runs on a normalized basis, with a mid-cycle margin near 10%, and reads the price as below its floor and justified by relative multiples, with a blended multiple around 8x on normalized earnings. That is the right frame for a commodity producer: not the trough loss the income statement shows, but the through-cycle earning power the assets can generate when steel prices are normal.
The honest synthesis is that Cleveland-Cliffs is a cyclical trading near book value, where the static methods cannot value it because it is currently unprofitable, and the normalized view depends on a steel-price recovery. The price sitting just above the $10.21 book floor says the market is paying a small premium to asset value for the option on a cyclical and tariff-driven upturn. The bet a buyer makes at $12.27 is that the mid-cycle margin assumption holds, that tariffs sustain domestic pricing, and that the roughly $8.1 billion debt load stays serviceable through the trough. If steel firms, the operating leverage is large and the normalized earnings justify a higher price. If the trough persists, the book floor and the leverage define a fragile downside.
Catalysts
The Q1 2026 report on April 20 was the most recent catalyst: revenue up to $4.92 billion, an adjusted loss of $0.40 that beat estimates, but only $95 million of adjusted EBITDA after an $80 million one-time cold-weather energy hit, and the stock fell on cost-pressure concerns. Management maintained full-year guidance of 16.5 to 17.0 million net tons of steel shipments and roughly $700 million of capital spending, and guided to improving pricing and a return to positive free cash flow in the second and third quarters. The next print tests whether that recovery materializes.
The forward watch items are the cyclical and policy drivers. First, steel prices, the single largest determinant of the outcome, where the tariff backdrop supporting domestic pricing is the key tailwind and any reversal is the key risk. Second, production costs, since Q1 flagged a roughly $15 per ton increase from diesel, scrap, and outages before expected third-quarter relief; cost normalization is needed for margins to recover. Third, free cash flow and debt, the central solvency question, where management's guided return to positive free cash flow is what would begin reducing the roughly $8.1 billion net-debt load. Fourth, automotive and construction demand, the end markets that drive volume and are sensitive to the economy and rates. Each quarter is a read on whether the cycle is turning up fast enough for a levered producer.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- NUE (NUCOR CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …and salary, which helps to offset lower selling prices. Our pay-for-performance system that is closely tied to our levels of production also allows us to keep our highly experienced workforce intact and to continue operating our facilities when some of our competitors with greater fixed costs are compelled to shut…
- FY2025 10-K: …duration of current economic conditions or the magnitude or timing of changes in economic activity. Future economic downturns, prolonged slow growth or stagnation in the economy, a sector-specific slowdown in one of our key end-use markets, such as nonresidential construction, or changes in inflation could materially…
- STLD (Steel Dynamics, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …(including $ 44.0 million related to New Process Steel additions), $ 12.8 million, and $ 38.8 million, respectively. 80 Table of Contents Note 12. Segment Information The company's chief operating decision maker (CODM), who is the Chief Executive Officer, analyzes the results of the business through the following…
- FY2025 10-K: …or production ramp-up of new products; (16) our aluminum operations depend on a core group of significant customers; (17) governmental agencies may refuse to grant or renew some of our licenses and permits; (18) our existing debt agreements contain, and any future financing agreements may contain, restrictive…
- CMC (COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …This is a strategic advantage when imports increase as our steel mills can continue to supply our fabricators. Contract pricing that is utilized for these operations helps to stabilize short-term volatility. The construction-related solutions and value-added products within our Emerging Businesses Group segment…
- FY2025 10-K: …in metal margin compression compared to 2024. The impact of the decrease in steel and downstream products metal margins per ton was partially offset by improved steel products shipment volumes year-over-year. Emerging Businesses Group Year Ended August 31, (in thousands) 2025 2024 Net sales to external customers $…
- ATI (ATI INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …alloys and improved sales mix on higher demand for nickel-based alloys and titanium mill products. Results in fiscal year 2025 included $2.8 million of benefits related to the recognition of previously deferred employee retention tax credits. Fiscal year 2024 also included $7.7 million of benefits related to the…
- FY2025 10-K: …as the ATI Europe distribution operations thru 2024. Approximately 92 % of its revenue is derived from the aerospace & defense markets including nearly 68 % of its revenue from products for commercial jet engines and 11 % from defense products. HPMC produces a wide range of high performance materials, components, and…
- CRS (CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …particularly as raw material prices have been volatile. Firm price sales arrangements generally include certain annual purchasing commitments and consumption schedules agreed to by the customers at selling prices based on raw material prices at the time the arrangements are established. As discussed in Note 17 to the…
- FY2025 10-K: …Products. The SAO segment is comprised of the Company's major premium alloy and stainless steel manufacturing operations. This includes operations performed at mills primarily in Reading and Latrobe, Pennsylvania and surrounding areas as well as South Carolina and Alabama. The combined assets of the SAO operations…
- WS (WORTHINGTON STEEL, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …earnings, margins, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures; • pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes; • the ability to improve or maintain margins; • expected demand or demand trends; • additions to product lines and opportunities…
- FY2025 10-K: 1,200 customers during fiscal 2025 in many end markets including automotive, construction, machinery and equipment, agriculture, and heavy trucks, among others. The automotive industry is one of the largest consumers of flat-rolled steel, and the largest end market for us. During fiscal 2025, our top three customers…
- WOR (WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …performance, competitive position, sales, volumes, cash flows, earnings, margins, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures; • pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes; • the ability to improve or maintain margins; • expected demand or…
- FY2025 10-K: ,778 , and 90,570 common shares for fiscal 2025, fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Note O - Segment Data Our operations are organized under two operating segments: Consumer Products and…
- TS (Tenaris SA)
- FY2025 20-F: …in local and global markets and expand our range of products and services; expanding our comprehensive range of products and developing new products designed to meet the needs of customers operating in challenging environments, including low-carbon energy applications, such as hydrogen and CCS; enhancing our offering…
- FY2025 20-F: …stated C Segment information The Company is organized in one major business segment, Tubes, which is also the reportable operating segment. All other business activities and operating segments that are not required to be separately reported are disclosed in the Other segment. The Tubes segment includes the production…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.