Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR): what the price requires
At today's price, Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~23.8 years. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CIFR
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CIFR |
| Company | Cipher Digital Inc. |
| Current price | $20.04/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | revenue-multiple |
| EV / sales paid | 62.8x |
| Steady-state operating margin assumed | 25.5% |
| Must persist for | 23.8y |
The company earns no operating profit yet; the inversion runs on the revenue multiple and an assumed steady-state margin.
Solve inputs: computed at a 10% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~3 years.
How unusual the bet is: elevated (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 14% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore requires assumptions beyond what those standard frames encode.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 12.00x | 2 | expensive |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | — | 0 | — |
| Growth | — | 0 | — |
Families that call it expensive: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=2)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF — equity value floored at $0 |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $0.78 | 25.69x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 1.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus (excluded from median) |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $1.76 | 11.39x | yes | Reference only (book value floor): BV/sh $1.76, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $1.59 | 12.60x | yes | Reference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $1.76, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $2.80 | 7.16x | no | Rev $0.2B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.5x / 6.0x / 7.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $0.78 | 25.69x | no | Revenue $0.21B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $4.4b |
| Interest coverage | -3.8x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 12.8% |
| Burning cash | yes |
Operating profit is negative or near zero and the company has no demonstrated through-cycle (mid-cycle) operating margin to normalize against, so years-to-repay cannot be computed honestly.
Bullet Takeaways
- The decisive number is the contracted backlog, not the income statement. The company cites roughly $11.4 billion of contracted HPC revenue and about $787 million of average annualized contracted net operating income from long-term hyperscaler leases, against a business that today still loses money on bitcoin mining.
- The standard valuation models are mostly unavailable: four distress signals shut down the projection methods, the operating margin is deeply negative, and what survives is a book-value floor near $1.76 per share against a $29.20 price.
- This is a high-stakes pivot. Cipher rebranded to Cipher Digital and is converting from bitcoin mining to AI data-center development, funded by about $3.7 billion of new bond debt. The bet is execution on the leases before the debt and cash burn force the issue.
Bull Case
The one metric that decides Cipher is the contracted backlog, because it is the bridge from a money-losing miner to a contracted-cash-flow data-center business. Management cites approximately $11.4 billion in contracted HPC revenue and roughly $787 million of average annualized contracted net operating income across operating and contracted capacity. That backlog is anchored by long-term leases with creditworthy tenants: a 15-year 300 megawatt lease with AWS, a 10-year 300 megawatt lease with Fluidstack and Google, and a third campus lease with an investment-grade hyperscale tenant signed in Q1. The income statement shows a loss today; the backlog shows contracted revenue for a decade-plus. The whole bull case is that the second number becomes the first.
The strategic logic is grounded in the filing. The company states its strategy increasingly emphasizes developing industrial-scale data centers leased to hyperscalers and other HPC customers under long-term contracts, while retaining the flexibility to deploy bitcoin mining as an interim use (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001819989-26-000009). That is a real asset-conversion story: the power infrastructure and sites Cipher built for mining are exactly what AI data centers need, and the company is monetizing them at far higher and more stable economics than bitcoin. The rebrand to Cipher Digital formalizes the shift. Construction is progressing, with the Barber Lake building topped out and Black Pearl Phase I retrofitting underway.
The financing to execute is largely in place. Cipher completed three bond offerings for aggregate proceeds of about $3.73 billion to fund the buildouts and secured a first corporate revolving credit facility of up to $200 million from leading financial institutions. With the leases signed and the capital raised, the bet narrows to construction and ramp execution. If Cipher delivers the contracted capacity on schedule, the $787 million annualized NOI figure transforms the company's economics, and at a $29.20 price the equity is a leveraged claim on that conversion completing. The plan to expand portfolio capacity to 4.2 gigawatts by 2030 frames the longer runway beyond the current leases.
Bear Case
The disconnect is stark and the qualitative truth is simple: Cipher is being priced on a future it has contracted but not yet built, while the present is a distressed, cash-burning balance sheet. The valuation engine flags four distress signals, sustained net-income losses, negative retained earnings, an Altman distress reading, and working-capital bloat, and shuts down every projection method as a result. The trailing operating margin is roughly negative 237%, the company is burning cash, and the methods that survive anchor to a book value of about $1.76 per share, a fraction of the $29.20 price (June 27, 2026). The market is paying more than sixteen times book for a business whose current operations lose money; that gap is the entire bet, and it rests on execution that has not happened yet.
The leverage makes the execution risk acute. Cipher raised about $3.73 billion of bond debt to fund the HPC buildouts, pushing gross debt above $5 billion against a business that does not yet generate positive operating cash flow. Long-dated leases are valuable only if the data centers come online on time and on budget; construction delays, cost overruns, power-availability problems, or tenant disputes would leave the company servicing billions in debt before the contracted NOI arrives. The share count has also been growing, up nearly 13% on a trailing basis, so equity holders face dilution on top of the debt. A pivot funded by debt and equity issuance is a race between the cash burn and the lease ramp.
The legacy business adds its own fragility during the transition. Bitcoin mining is power-intensive and competitive, with cost efficiency on power critical to staying competitive (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001819989-26-000009), and mining revenue is already falling, down to $34.8 million in Q1 2026 from $59.7 million the prior quarter. So the bridge income shrinks while the new income is still under construction. The only valuation frames available are a book-value floor near $1.76 and a sector revenue multiple that the distress gate excludes from consensus, which tells you the market has no reliable standard anchor for this price. The bear read is that CIFR is a binary execution bet at a price far above any grounded measure of current value, where the downside is defined by the debt and the book floor if the buildout stumbles.
Valuation
Cipher Digital is a case where the standard valuation toolkit largely refuses to produce a number, and that refusal is the signal. Four distress signals, sustained losses, negative retained earnings, an Altman distress reading, and working-capital bloat, shut down every projection-based method: the DCF variants, discounted future market cap, Peter Lynch, and even the P/Sales-sector method are all gated off as unreliable for a distressed firm. The earnings-based methods fail on non-positive inputs. What remains is a reference book-value floor near $1.76 per share, against a $29.20 price.
That leaves the price standing on the contracted backlog rather than on any model the engine trusts. The reverse-DCF reads the price on a revenue-multiple, duration basis with a blended multiple above 300x and an implied duration near 30 years, a reflection of how far the price sits beyond current economics rather than a precise estimate. The book-value floor at $1.76 and the negative trailing margin are the only grounded anchors, and they sit far below the price. The market is valuing the contracted leases, not the trailing financials.
The honest synthesis is that conventional valuation does not apply to CIFR; it is an event-and-execution bet. The relevant numbers are the roughly $11.4 billion contracted revenue and $787 million annualized contracted NOI on one side, and the roughly $5 billion of gross debt, the cash burn, and the $1.76 book floor on the other. A buyer at $29.20 is paying for the contracted NOI to materialize on schedule and the company to deleverage into stable data-center cash flows. If that happens, the backlog justifies a price the static methods cannot. If construction or financing falters, the distress signals and the book floor define how far the equity can fall.
Catalysts
The strategic pivot drove the recent action. Cipher rebranded to Cipher Digital, and on May 5 the Q1 2026 report showed mining revenue down to $34.8 million from $59.7 million in Q4 2025, but a sharply smaller net loss of $114.3 million versus $734.2 million prior, with the stock surging on the AI data-center shift. The company secured 600 megawatts of contracted HPC capacity across leases with AWS and Fluidstack/Google, signed a third hyperscale campus lease, and completed about $3.73 billion of bond financing plus a $200 million revolving credit facility.
The forward watch items are all execution. First, construction milestones at Barber Lake and Black Pearl, since the contracted NOI only arrives when the data centers come online; on-schedule delivery is the central catalyst. Second, additional lease signings against the plan to reach 4.2 gigawatts by 2030, which would extend the backlog beyond the current 600 megawatts. Third, the balance sheet, where the roughly $5 billion of debt and the ongoing cash burn make financing capacity and any further capital raises a live risk to equity holders through dilution. Fourth, the wind-down or repurposing of bitcoin mining, the bridge revenue that is shrinking as the HPC business builds. This is a name where each construction and financing update moves the thesis materially.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- MARA (MARA Holdings Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …purchased 860 bitcoin at an average price of $116,117 per bitcoin TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES IMPACTING OUR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY Bitcoin Mining Operations In response to an increased demand for bitcoin, we anticipate additional mining operators entering the market and existing competitors scaling their operations,…
- FY2025 10-K: …of $80.9 million or approximately 82%. The increase was primarily driven by the expansion of our owned mining sites through acquisitions, higher overall energy consumption and the growth in our total hashrate to 66.4 EH/s. Our Cost per Petahash per day improved approximately 16%, from $35.6 to $29.8, compared to the…
- RIOT (Riot Platforms Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …at the option of the lessee. We believe that these foundational investments reflect a proactive, strategic approach to maximizing our energy portfolio and accessing additional revenue opportunities, and position us for durable, long-term leadership and value creation in the data center sector. As used throughout this…
- FY2025 10-K: …the data center infrastructure sector. Competition in this segment centers on securing critical resources and capabilities, including access to strategically located land with proximity to transmission infrastructure, reliable and cost-effective power capacity, specialized engineering and technical talent, and…
- CLSK (CleanSpark Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …now represents the largest distributed computing network on Earth due to demand for bitcoin, the commodity, and the revenues associated with securing it. Factors such as access to specialized mining servers, energy, electricity cost, environmental factors (such as cooling capacity) and location play important roles…
- FY2025 10-K: …the most recent fiscal year end were 0.16% of the total daily bitcoin mined. This amount represents consideration paid to the Customer and is thus reported as a reduction in revenue as the Company does not receive a distinct good or service from the mining pool operator in exchange. Step 4 : There is a single…
- WULF (TeraWulf Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …miners owned by the Company. The earned bitcoin are routinely sold for U.S. dollars. The Company also previously earned revenue by providing bitcoin miner hosting services to third parties. In July 2025, the Company commenced its HPC leasing operations. HPC lease revenue is generated by leasing datacenter space and…
- FY2025 10-K: …to such scrutiny and reassuring our employees. In addition, the physical risks of climate change may impact the availability and cost of materials and natural resources, sources and supply of energy, demand for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and could increase our insurance and other operating costs, including,…
- CORZ (Core Scientific Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …location, reputation and perceived skill with respect to performance. We believe that our experienced data center and engineering leadership team, our proven ability to rapidly deliver scalable, purpose-built data centers, combined with cutting-edge, energy-efficient technologies, will enable us to compete favorably…
- FY2025 10-K: …to mine bitcoin in a profitable manner which we may not be able to do if: • there is a reduction in the demand for bitcoin causing the price of bitcoin to fall reducing revenue from our self-mining operations; • high energy costs, supply chain disruptions or government regulation compliance costs increase mining…
- IREN (IREN Ltd)
- FY2025 10-K: …in which we operate (for example, through potential participation in demand response, ancillary services provision and load management in deregulated markets such as Texas). We have secured sites with access to land and power supply, which we believe positions us to take advantage of any growth in power demand for…
- FY2025 10-K: …through 16 Table of Contents research and development efforts to further optimize the operational environment and efficiencies, including targeting stable performance during high and low temperature periods, as well as the life of our hardware and our strategy to expand and diversify our revenue sources into new…
- BITF (Bitfarms Ltd)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- HUT (Hut 8 Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …and operation of facilities designed to support next-generation, energy-intensive technology applications. This segment represents a downstream pathway through which certain Power assets within our platform are commercialized by developing and leasing data centers. We seek to monetize our Digital Infrastructure…
- FY2025 10-K: …generated primarily by American Bitcoin. Revenue is derived from Bitcoin mining rewards earned based on the computing power contributed to mining pools through the operation of owned mining infrastructure. 2. Traditional Cloud. This segment reflects revenue generated by Hut 8 Canada. Revenue is generated through…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.