Chord Energy Corp (CHRD): what the price requires
At today's price, Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) is priced for +4.6% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CHRD
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CHRD |
| Company | Chord Energy Corp |
| Current price | $122.47/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 2.0% |
| Operating margin today | 8.2% |
| Margin compression implied | -6.2pp |
| Implied growth | 4.6% |
| Multiple paid | 13x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 7, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~5.8pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.04σ |
| cohort percentile (of 45 peers) | 40 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple value, while growth-DCF lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.96x | 3 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.73x | 2 | justifies |
| Relative | 1.09x | 3 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.63x | 4 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative Families that call it expensive: Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=12)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $266.22 | 0.46x | yes | FCF base $1.9B, growth 0% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.9%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $139.22 | 0.88x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 4.8x / 9.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $112.61 | 1.09x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 1.2x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $51.42 | 2.38x | yes | DPS $5.23, g=-0.8% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $0.01 | 12246.50x | yes | Stage 1: -100% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual (excluded from median) |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $141.73 | 0.86x | yes | Reference only (book value floor): BV/sh $141.73, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $127.55 | 0.96x | yes | Reference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $141.73, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $49.58 | 2.47x | yes | Rev $5.3B, growth 0% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.0x / 1.3x / 1.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $111.11 | 1.10x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.14B × (1−21%) / WACC 7.9% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $156.90 | 0.78x | yes | EBITDA $1.70B × sector EV/EBITDA 6.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $337.66 | 0.36x | yes | FCF $1891.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $50.95 | 2.40x | yes | BV $141.73 × (ROIC 2.8% / WACC 7.9%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $112.61 | 1.09x | yes | Revenue $5.33B × sector P/S 1.2x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $1.3b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 3.64x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 2.87x |
| Interest coverage | 5.5x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 10.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- The number that decides this name is free cash flow, not reported earnings. Chord guides to roughly $1.4 billion of adjusted free cash flow in 2026 at $80 WTI, and the zero-growth FCF-yield method lands at $337.66 against a $123.03 price.
- Trailing GAAP earnings are negative because of a $241.5 million derivative loss in Q1 2026, which masks the underlying cash engine. Operating cash flow was $507.5 million in the quarter, funding capital spending, the dividend, and buybacks.
- This is a commodity name. The asset, earnings-power, and peer methods cluster near or above the price, but everything depends on oil prices holding near the $80 assumption that the guidance is built on.
Bull Case
The single metric that decides Chord Energy is free cash flow, and it is large. The company guides to approximately $1.4 billion of adjusted free cash flow for 2026 at $80 WTI, and the zero-growth FCF-yield method capitalizes that stream at $337.66 per share against a $123.03 price. Even after discounting for the cyclicality of oil, that is the number that, if it holds, makes the current price look low. The reported GAAP loss is misleading: Q1 2026 net income of $108.6 million was cut by a $241.5 million derivative loss, while operating cash flow stayed strong at $507.5 million. The cash engine is running well below what the income statement suggests.
The business strategy is built around exactly this. The filing states the operational and financial strategy is focused on rigorous capital discipline and generating significant, sustainable free cash flow, with a priority on maximizing returns through efficient execution of the development program (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001486159-26-000005). The Q1 results bear that out: production averaged 275,615 Boepd at 57% oil, the company raised full-year oil guidance to 161,000 barrels per day while keeping capital flat, and it cited drilling-and-completion cost per foot down 37% over four years. Cheaper wells on flat capital mean more free cash per dollar invested, and the four-mile-lateral program is the mechanism scaling that efficiency.
The capital return is where shareholders see it. In Q1 alone the company paid a $1.30 per share base dividend and repurchased $70.7 million of stock under a $1.0 billion buyback authorization, funded entirely from operating cash flow after capital spending. The asset and earnings-power methods support the price from below, with two-stage excess return at $127.55, earnings power value at $112.16, and the DCF perpetual-growth read at $266.02. A buyer at $123.03 is paying roughly book value for a low-cost Williston operator throwing off enough cash to fund a growing return program, with upside if oil cooperates.
Bear Case
The disconnect a buyer has to sit with is qualitative first: this is a price-taker in a commodity it cannot control. Chord's own filing is explicit that it is exposed to commodity price risk, interest rate risk, counterparty risk, and inflation risk, and that it manages these through derivatives (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001486159-26-000005). The headline FCF that anchors the bull case is built on an $80 WTI assumption; at materially lower oil prices, the $1.4 billion of free cash flow compresses fast, and the same hedges that produced a $241.5 million derivative loss this quarter are a reminder that the protection cuts both ways. The whole thesis rests on a price the company does not set.
The balance sheet adds leverage to that cyclicality. Net debt is about $1.26 billion, roughly 6.5 times trailing operating income, and interest coverage sits near 2.1x, which is thin for a business whose revenue swings with the oil price. The trailing return on equity is slightly negative, residual income is skipped because the math implies capital destruction at the current return level, and the ROIC-justified book value lands at just $50.91, well below the price. In a down-cycle, a levered E&P with coverage near 2x has far less room than its FCF-at-$80 headline implies.
The numbers also show the share count has been growing, up about 10% on a trailing basis, reflecting the acquisitions that built the current Williston footprint, including the 2023 Williston Basin acquisition the filing records at $361.6 million of fair value (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001486159-26-000005). Growth by acquisition in oil and gas is a bet on entry timing as much as on execution. The methods most tied to current cyclical earnings, the discounted-future-market-cap read at $49.81 and the simple DDM at $51.42, sit far below the price, a reminder that if you value Chord on a normalized through-cycle basis rather than on peak-price free cash flow, the support thins considerably.
Valuation
Chord Energy's valuation X-ray is shaped by the commodity cycle, and the methods split on which part of the cycle you anchor to. The cash-based and asset frames support the price: the zero-growth FCF-yield method lands at $337.66, the DCF perpetual-growth read at $266.02, earnings power value at $112.16, and the two-stage excess-return book floor at $127.55, essentially at the $123.03 price. The peer multiples sit nearby, relative valuation and P/Sales-sector both at $112.61 and EV/EBITDA relative at $156.90. The reverse-DCF reads the price as asset-and-earnings supported, a value name rather than a growth bet, with an implied operating-income growth requirement of only about 4.8%.
The methods that look cheap and the ones that look expensive disagree because of the oil-price assumption embedded in each. The FCF-yield number is enormous because it capitalizes a free-cash-flow stream generated at favorable prices; the discounted-future-market-cap method at $49.81 and the simple DDM at $51.42 are far lower because they apply through-cycle multiples and a near-zero growth assumption. The truth is somewhere between, and it moves with WTI.
The honest synthesis is that Chord trades at roughly book value and a blended multiple around 13.5x, which is a reasonable price for a low-cost Williston operator if oil holds near the level its guidance assumes. The risk is not that the methods are wrong but that the oil price feeding them changes. At $123.03 a buyer is paying a modest multiple for cyclical cash flow plus a real capital-return program, with the downside governed by how far oil can fall and how the roughly 6.5x net-debt leverage behaves if it does.
Catalysts
The Q1 2026 report was the most recent catalyst and a constructive one despite a soft stock reaction: EPS of $4.56 beat the $3.30 estimate, operating cash flow was $507.5 million, and the company raised full-year oil guidance to 161,000 barrels per day while holding capital flat, adding more than $40 million of incremental free cash flow at $80 oil. The next quarterly print is the key data point on whether the cost and lateral-length efficiencies keep widening the free-cash margin.
The forward watch items are dominated by the oil price, since the entire $1.4 billion adjusted-FCF guide hinges on WTI near $80; a sustained move below that is the primary downside trigger, and a move above it is the upside. On execution, watch the four-mile-lateral program, which the company says will account for roughly 40% of wells turned in line and 60% of spuds this year, the scalable driver of lower drilling-and-completion costs. On capital return, the cadence of the base dividend and the $1.0 billion buyback signals how management balances shareholder returns against debt reduction; with net debt near $1.26 billion and coverage around 2.1x, the pace of deleveraging versus repurchase is the lever to watch through the rest of 2026.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Exploration & Production (reported)
- FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to recruit and retain employees and customers. 25 Table of Contents Our success depends on developing our existing leasehold acreage and finding, developing or acquiring additional reserves. A significant portion of our net leasehold acreage is undeveloped, or acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed…
- FY2025 10-K: …Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risks emerge from time to time. We cannot predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from…
- PR (PERMIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and natural gas or related substances to market and all permits and…
- FY2025 10-K: …of which have investment-grade credit ratings. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The Company's oil and natural gas producing activities are accounted for using the successful efforts method of accounting. Under the successful efforts method, the costs incurred to acquire, drill, and complete development wells are…
- MTDR (Matador Resources Company)
- FY2025 10-K: …(including computational methods) that have been field tested and have been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation. In order to establish reasonable certainty with respect to our estimated proved reserves, we…
- FY2025 10-K: …with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. Producing well, or productive well . A well that is found to be capable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that proceeds from the sale of the well's production exceed production-related expenses and taxes. Production costs . Costs…
- MGY (Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …in the United States. Capitalized Costs The aggregate amounts of costs capitalized for oil and natural gas exploration and development activities and the related amounts of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization are shown below: (In thousands) December 31, 2025 December 31, 2024 Proved properties $…
- FY2025 10-K: …interest billings. The Company's existing historical credit losses have been de minimis and are expected to remain so in the future assuming no substantial changes to the business or creditworthiness of Magnolia's business partners. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The Company follows the successful efforts method of…
- EOG (EOG RESOURCES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …rates from other producing areas. We also analyze available geological, geophysical, production and engineering data, and the extent, quality and reliability of this data can vary. The process also involves economic assumptions relating to commodity prices, production costs, gathering, processing, compression,…
- FY2025 10-K: …activism, governmental inquiries and enforcement actions and litigation (including, but not limited to, litigation brought by governmental entities and shareholder litigation) and resulting expenses and potential disruption to our day-to-day operations. Regulatory, legislative and policy changes may materially and…
- CTRA (COTERRA ENERGY INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …14 percent of our total sales. During the year ended December 31, 2024, two customers accounted for approximately 21 percent and 19 percent of our total sales. If any one of our major customers were to stop purchasing our production, we believe there are other purchasers to whom we could sell our production. If…
- FY2025 10-K: …DD&A expense is dependent upon the estimate of proved reserves, which are utilized in the unit-of-production calculation. In estimating proved oil and natural gas reserves, management relies on interpretations and judgment of available geological, geophysical, engineering and production data, as well as the use of…
- APA (APA Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …technology establishes the reasonable certainty for the engineering analysis on which the project or program is based. Economically producible means a resource that generates revenue that exceeds, or is reasonably expected to exceed, the costs of the operation. Reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence…
- FY2025 10-K: …set to expire. The Company held approximately six million net undeveloped acres as of December 31, 2025, in other international locations. Exploration interests include Block 53 and Block 58 offshore Suriname and Block 4 and Block 6 offshore Uruguay. The Company continues to actively evaluate and analyze several…
- AR (ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …Corporation's consolidated financial statements. 55 Table of Contents Exploration and Production Segment The following table sets forth selected operating data of the exploration and production segment: Year Ended Amount of December 31, Increase Percent …
- FY2025 10-K: …for in advance of having sufficient production and infrastructure to fully utilize this excess capacity as marketing expenses, because we market this excess capacity to third parties. We enter into long-term firm transportation agreements for a significant portion of our current and expected future production in…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.