Chord Energy Corp (CHRD): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CHRD
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CHRD |
| Company | Chord Energy Corp |
| Sector / Industry | Energy |
| Current price | $146.39/sh |
| Composition | Crude oil revenues 73% / NGL revenues 3% / Natural gas revenues 4% / Purchased oil and gas sales 20% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 5.9% |
| Operating margin today | 19.0% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -13.1pp |
| Multiple paid | 7x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 7: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.08σ |
| cohort percentile (of 48 peers) | 15 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.83x | 5 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.53x | 4 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.52x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.57x | 4 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=18)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $1815.93 | 0.08x | yes | FCF base $2.6B, growth 23% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.0%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $399.47 | 0.37x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 3.3x / 8.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $234.93 | 0.62x | yes | P/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 7.5x / 10.0x / 12.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 6x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $190.61 | 0.77x | yes | Stage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $167.67 | 0.87x | yes | BV/sh $152.79, ROE (TTM) 10.2%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $175.40 | 0.83x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $173.58 | 0.84x | yes | Rev $6.3B, growth 23% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.0x / 1.3x / 1.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $364.41 | 0.40x | yes | EPS $15.03, growth 24% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.39 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $195.61 | 0.75x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.20B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.0% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $176.82 | 0.83x | yes | BV $152.79 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.2% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 6.6%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $227.31 | 0.64x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $15.03 × BVPS $152.79) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $283.76 | 0.52x | yes | EBITDA $2.74B × sector EV/EBITDA 6.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $495.13 | 0.30x | yes | FCF $2587.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $484.97 | 0.30x | yes | EPS $15.03 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $98.21 | 1.49x | yes | BV $152.79 × (ROIC 5.1% / WACC 8.0%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $138.65 | 1.06x | yes | Revenue $6.32B × sector P/S 1.2x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $546.62 | 0.27x | yes | EPS $15.03 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 24.2% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 36.4x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $162.49 | 0.90x | yes | EPS $15.03 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration & Production | operating | enterprise | 4.9B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $875.5m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 0.92x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.73x |
| Interest coverage | 12.1x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 7.8% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- This is a single-commodity, single-basin bet wearing a corporate structure: crude oil is 73% of revenue, and the 10-K reports "1,302,921 net leasehold acres in the Williston Basin, which is the largest acreage position of any operator" there.
- The reported profit and the cash generation point in opposite directions, with trailing operating income of $438.8 million alongside a trailing net loss of $66.8 million, while depreciation, depletion and amortization alone ran $384.2 million in the March 2026 quarter.
- Dilution came from a deal rather than a drip: the share count has grown about 10.1% a year over four years, and the 10-K records that "On May 31, 2024, we acquired Enerplus Corporation", with the offsetting buyback still largely unused at 952.2 million dollars remaining at the end of 2025.
Bull Case
Here is the fact that does not fit the story people tell about oil equities. Chord's balance sheet carries about 141.73 dollars of shareholders' equity behind every share outstanding, which is a little more than the market is currently willing to pay for one. An investor buying today is therefore paying roughly what the company's own accounts say the assets are worth, and in effect assigning very little value to everything the company intends to do with them. That is an unusual starting point for a business sitting on "1,302,921 net leasehold acres in the Williston Basin, which is the largest acreage position of any operator" in the play, per its own 10-K, against a total net leasehold position of 1,334,679 acres.
Scale in a single basin is not a consolation prize. It is the whole cost advantage. One operator working contiguous acreage drills longer laterals, shares water and gathering infrastructure across pads, keeps rigs moving without relocating crews, and negotiates with a small number of midstream counterparties rather than many. The 10-K frames the position as "a premier position in a top oil basin in the United" States and names capital discipline as the strategy, with the stated priority to "efficiently execute our development program and optimize capital allocation". That is a company saying it intends to harvest rather than to expand, which is what a mature basin position should say.
The cash the position generates is the second surprise. Free cash flow over the trailing year ran near 1.89 billion dollars, against a market value of 7.9 billion dollars. Chord has been handing it back through a defined route: the 10-K says it plans "to return capital through the base dividend payout, supplemented by opportunistic share repurchases and variable dividends", and it declared base cash dividends of $5.20 per share during 2025, aggregating $302.5 million. In February 2026 it declared a further "base cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share of common stock".
The repurchase authorization is where the optionality sits, and it is almost entirely unspent. The board approved a program in August 2025 of up to 1.0 billion dollars, and at the end of December "we had $952.2 million remaining under this share repurchase program". A company trading a shade under the book value of its own assets, holding an unused authorization worth more than a tenth of its market value, has a straightforward use for surplus cash. Retiring stock on those terms adds to the acreage behind every remaining share, which for a depleting asset is the one form of growth that does not require drilling anything.
The reserve base has been replacing itself, too. Proved undeveloped reserves ended 2025 at 287,963 thousand barrels of oil equivalent, up 24.0 MMBoe on the year, with the 10-K attributing the increase to new wells and "proved undeveloped (\"PUD\") locations added as a result of offset drilling". None of that makes oil prices behave. It does mean the bull case rests on inventory and cost position rather than on a commodity forecast, which is a sturdier place for it to rest.
Bear Case
Chord does not set the price of what it sells. Everything else in the analysis ranks below that. Management can drill faster or slower, cut a dollar a barrel out of lifting costs, buy back stock or pay it out, and none of those decisions moves the number that determines whether a year is good or bad. Crude oil is 73% of revenue. The company's own 10-K lists the drivers it is exposed to and they are almost entirely external: inventories, "events that impact global market demand, including impacts from wars, conflicts and global health epidemics and concerns", and regional supply and demand. An investor here is holding an operating team wrapped around a commodity position.
That matters because of what the current price assumes. At roughly 15x company-wide operating income, the market is embedding company-wide operating growth near 9.1% a year for five years. Read that against a business whose operating profit is a function of a price nobody forecasts reliably, and the assumption stops looking modest. The trailing figure it grows from is itself a point on a cycle, not a run rate. Trailing operating income was $438.8 million on revenue of about 5.33 billion dollars, an operating margin of 8.2%, and the trailing bottom line was a net loss of $66.8 million. A cyclical business priced off a single year's operating profit inherits whatever that year happened to be.
The asset consumes itself, and the accounts say so in plain numbers. Depreciation, depletion and amortization ran $384.2 million in the March 2026 quarter, and the 10-Q reports the depletion rate rising to 15.20 dollars per barrel of oil equivalent, up 1.11 dollars period over period. Every barrel sold is a barrel that must be replaced by capital spending or by acquisition, and a rising depletion rate means the replacement is getting more expensive per unit. Proved undeveloped reserves are not an inventory that sits still; they convert, deplete and get revised, with revisions of previous estimates taking 16,388 thousand barrels of oil equivalent off the 2025 ledger.
Growth by acquisition is how the gap gets filled, and holders have paid for it. The share count has risen about 10.1% a year over the four years to March 2026, principally because "On May 31, 2024, we acquired Enerplus Corporation" in a stock-and-cash transaction. The dividends and the repurchase program are real, but so is the arithmetic that the count is materially larger than it was, and the repurchase authorization approved in August 2025 was almost untouched at year end, with "$952.2 million remaining". Capital-return frameworks that flex with cash flow are honest and also mean the payout falls exactly when the commodity does.
The balance sheet is the one part that does not argue. Net debt is about 2.9 times operating profit, operating income covers interest 5.5 times over, and the company is not burning cash. Below even that, roughly 140.1 million dollars of equity interests sit outside the operating business as a separate recoverable claim, though against a market value near 7.9 billion dollars that is a boundary rather than a meaningful cushion. The bear case is not insolvency. It is that a price already assuming five years of high single-digit growth in operating profit leaves no room for the ordinary behaviour of the thing being sold.
Valuation
Trailing operating income for an oil producer is a photograph, not a trend, and it is worth saying so before any multiple gets quoted. With that caveat in place: at $138.51 the market pays roughly 15x company-wide operating income, and inverting that gives a requirement of company-wide operating growth near 9.1% a year over five years. Against the company's own record that pace is inside what it has recently delivered, and against its peer group the multiple sits in the lower half of the range. The assumption is not extreme. It is simply a growth assumption applied to a business whose profit is a derivative of a commodity price.
The methods land close together, which itself is information. The balance-sheet lenses sit essentially on top of the shares. Shareholders' equity works out near 141.73 dollars for each share outstanding, fractionally more than the market is paying, so the accounts and the market currently agree about what the assets are worth. Peer-multiple methods land modestly above, one of them applying a sector cash-flow multiple to trailing EBITDA of about 1.70 billion dollars. The two discounted cash-flow methods both land above the price as well, the exit-multiple version reaching its answer with its terminal multiple held flat rather than expanded. What lands below the price are the approaches that project the dividend forward as a fixed growing perpetuity and the one that carries revenue out and applies a sales multiple, neither of which describes how a variable-payout oil company actually distributes cash.
The gap between reported profit and generated cash is the number a reader should carry away. Trailing operating income was $438.8 million on revenue near 5.33 billion dollars, an 8.2% operating margin, and the trailing bottom line was a net loss of $66.8 million. Free cash flow over the same period ran close to 1.89 billion dollars. Those figures are not in conflict; they describe the same business seen through two accounting conventions. Depreciation, depletion and amortization of $384.2 million in the March quarter, at 15.20 dollars per barrel of oil equivalent, is a charge for reserves already consumed rather than a bill arriving in the post. Roughly 20% of the revenue line is purchased oil and gas resold, which flows through at little margin and makes the headline margin look thinner than the produced barrels earn.
Capital return is where the cash has gone and where the argument gets tested. The 10-K states the plan is "to return capital through the base dividend payout, supplemented by opportunistic share repurchases and variable dividends", with base dividends of $5.20 per share declared during 2025 and 952.2 million dollars still available under the repurchase authorization at year end. A share count that has grown about 10.1% a year over four years is the other half of that ledger, and the buyback has so far been an option rather than an action.
Solvency does not constrain any of it. Net debt runs about 2.9 times operating profit, interest is covered 5.5 times, and cash is not burning. Roughly 140.1 million dollars of equity interests sit outside the operating business. The constraint that matters here is not the balance sheet at all: it is that the price embeds five years of growth in a profit line the company does not control, while paying roughly the accounting value of the assets that produce it.
Catalysts
First-quarter 2026 results landed on May 6, 2026, alongside an updated outlook for the year and a declared base dividend, with 145 million dollars returned to shareholders in the quarter. Second-quarter results are scheduled for August 5, 2026. The line worth watching is not production. It is whether the repurchase authorization starts getting spent, because with the shares near the company's own book value the choice between buying back stock and paying a variable dividend is the clearest signal management can send about where it thinks the value is.
One item in May points at the equity interests Chord holds outside its producing assets: on May 20, 2026 the company made a strategic investment in MaverickX to advance its PetroX Boost technology. Investments of that kind are small relative to the enterprise and sit apart from barrels in the ground, but they are the visible edge of a balance-sheet item that carries value independent of the drilling program.
The sell side spent five days in July revising in both directions, which is what commodity-deck maintenance looks like rather than a change of view on the company. Truist cut its target to 170 dollars from 185 on July 6, 2026. Citi cut to 130 dollars from 155 with a Neutral rating and UBS to 153 dollars from 179, both on July 9, 2026. Roth Capital moved the other way the following day, to 145 dollars from 140. Those revisions straddle the current quote in both directions inside a single week, which is the honest tell that the disagreement is about the oil price rather than about Chord's acreage or execution.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Exploration & Production (reported)
- FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to recruit and retain employees and customers. 25 Table of Contents Our success depends on developing our existing leasehold acreage and finding, developing or acquiring additional reserves. A significant portion of our net leasehold acreage is undeveloped, or acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed…
- FY2025 10-K: …Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risks emerge from time to time. We cannot predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from…
- PR (PERMIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and natural gas or related substances to market and all permits and…
- FY2025 10-K: …of which have investment-grade credit ratings. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The Company's oil and natural gas producing activities are accounted for using the successful efforts method of accounting. Under the successful efforts method, the costs incurred to acquire, drill, and complete development wells are…
- MTDR (Matador Resources Company)
- FY2025 10-K: …(including computational methods) that have been field tested and have been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation. In order to establish reasonable certainty with respect to our estimated proved reserves, we…
- FY2025 10-K: …with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. Producing well, or productive well . A well that is found to be capable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that proceeds from the sale of the well's production exceed production-related expenses and taxes. Production costs . Costs…
- MGY (Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …in the United States. Capitalized Costs The aggregate amounts of costs capitalized for oil and natural gas exploration and development activities and the related amounts of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization are shown below: (In thousands) December 31, 2025 December 31, 2024 Proved properties $…
- FY2025 10-K: …interest billings. The Company's existing historical credit losses have been de minimis and are expected to remain so in the future assuming no substantial changes to the business or creditworthiness of Magnolia's business partners. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The Company follows the successful efforts method of…
- EOG (EOG RESOURCES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …rates from other producing areas. We also analyze available geological, geophysical, production and engineering data, and the extent, quality and reliability of this data can vary. The process also involves economic assumptions relating to commodity prices, production costs, gathering, processing, compression,…
- FY2025 10-K: …activism, governmental inquiries and enforcement actions and litigation (including, but not limited to, litigation brought by governmental entities and shareholder litigation) and resulting expenses and potential disruption to our day-to-day operations. Regulatory, legislative and policy changes may materially and…
- CTRA (COTERRA ENERGY INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …14 percent of our total sales. During the year ended December 31, 2024, two customers accounted for approximately 21 percent and 19 percent of our total sales. If any one of our major customers were to stop purchasing our production, we believe there are other purchasers to whom we could sell our production. If…
- FY2025 10-K: …DD&A expense is dependent upon the estimate of proved reserves, which are utilized in the unit-of-production calculation. In estimating proved oil and natural gas reserves, management relies on interpretations and judgment of available geological, geophysical, engineering and production data, as well as the use of…
- APA (APA Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …technology establishes the reasonable certainty for the engineering analysis on which the project or program is based. Economically producible means a resource that generates revenue that exceeds, or is reasonably expected to exceed, the costs of the operation. Reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence…
- FY2025 10-K: …set to expire. The Company held approximately six million net undeveloped acres as of December 31, 2025, in other international locations. Exploration interests include Block 53 and Block 58 offshore Suriname and Block 4 and Block 6 offshore Uruguay. The Company continues to actively evaluate and analyze several…
- AR (ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …Corporation's consolidated financial statements. 55 Table of Contents Exploration and Production Segment The following table sets forth selected operating data of the exploration and production segment: Year Ended Amount of December 31, Increase Percent …
- FY2025 10-K: …for in advance of having sufficient production and infrastructure to fully utilize this excess capacity as marketing expenses, because we market this excess capacity to third parties. We enter into long-term firm transportation agreements for a significant portion of our current and expected future production in…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release, May 6, 2026 · company earnings calendar, 2026 · company announcement, May 20, 2026 · Truist research note, July 6, 2026 · Citi research note, July 9, 2026; UBS research note, July 9, 2026 · Roth Capital research note, July 10, 2026