CITY HOLDING COMPANY (CHCO): what the price requires
At today's price, CITY HOLDING COMPANY (CHCO) is priced for 14.7% return on equity. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-14 · Exported: 2026-07-16 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CHCO
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CHCO |
| Company | CITY HOLDING COMPANY |
| Current price | $133.62/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | financials |
| Return on equity needed | 14.7% |
| Return on equity now | 16.1% |
| ROE gap | -1.4pp |
| Price-to-book | 2.37x |
Solve inputs: computed at a 8.5% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage, on common book equity (FY2026); each 1pp of cost of equity moves the implied ROE ~2.4pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.74σ |
| cohort percentile (of 119 peers) | 92 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 61% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.25x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | 0.93x | 2 | justifies |
| Relative | 1.08x | 3 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.19x | 2 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=10)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Bank Fair Value (P/TBV) | — | $151.92 | 0.88x | yes | TBVPS $55.65 × 2.73x (ROE (TTM) 16.6% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption)) |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $100.10 | 1.33x | yes | P/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.4x / 10.0x / 11.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $114.62 | 1.17x | yes | Stage 1: 14% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $99.88 | 1.34x | yes | BV/sh $55.65, ROE (TTM) 16.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $132.08 | 1.01x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $110.55 | 1.21x | yes | Rev $0.2B, growth 8% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 6.6x / 7.9x / 9.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $124.25 | 1.08x | yes | EPS $9.07, growth 14% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.06 (Fair) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | $106.57 | 1.25x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $9.07 × BVPS $55.65) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $272.88 | 0.49x | yes | EPS $9.07 × (8.5 + 2×13.7%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $186.37 | 0.72x | yes | EPS $9.07 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 13.7% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 20.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $98.05 | 1.36x | yes | EPS $9.07 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -1.2% |
Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).
Bullet Takeaways
- City Holding is a high-return community bank: Q1 2026 return on average equity was 15.6% and return on tangible common equity 19.3%, with net interest margin near 3.97%, and the franchise rests on roughly 13% to 24% deposit market share in its core West Virginia and eastern Kentucky counties.
- The biggest risk is margin and growth, not solvency: net interest income already slipped about 1.6% quarter-over-quarter to $59.6 million, and a bank this penetrated in slow-growth home markets grows per-share value mainly by shrinking its share count.
- At 2.3x book the price pays for an above-average return to persist; the next test is each quarter's margin and ROE, with a buyback of up to a million shares (about 7% of the company) and a $0.87 dividend backing the capital-return case.
Bull Case
City Holding is a mature bank, and mature is the right lens for reading every number it reports. It will not surprise anyone with a new growth engine. What it does instead is earn an unusually high return on the capital it already has, quarter after quarter, and return most of what it cannot reinvest. That makes the return on equity the whole story, and the return on equity is high. In the first quarter of 2026 the bank earned net income of $31.7 million and diluted EPS of $2.20, on a 1.92% return on assets and a 19.3% return on tangible common equity. Those are strong figures for a bank of any size, and the high return is the baseline rather than a spike: the bank has recently been earning around 16.1% return on equity.
The source of that return is a deposit base most banks would envy. City National Bank operates 96 offices concentrated in West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, Virginia, and a sliver of Ohio, and in its core counties it holds roughly "13% of the deposit market share in the counties of West Virginia where its bank branches are located" and "approximately 24%" in eastern Kentucky. A bank with that kind of local share funds itself cheaply and defends its margin: net interest margin improved to 3.97% in Q1 2026 from 3.94% the prior quarter. The 10-K describes the franchise plainly as a "retail and consumer-oriented community bank with 96 banking offices", and that consumer-deposit tilt is exactly what produces the low funding cost behind the margin.
The capital story closes the loop. A bank earning a high return it cannot fully reinvest at home returns the excess, and City Holding does both ends of that: it repurchased 262,017 shares in Q1 2026 and authorized buybacks of up to a million more shares, about 7% of the company, while paying a rising $0.87 quarterly dividend. Share count has been shrinking at roughly 1.2% a year. For a mature bank, that combination, a return well above its cost of equity and a disciplined return of the surplus, is the entire model working as designed.
Bear Case
The variable with the most leverage over City Holding is the one the price barely acknowledges: interest rates and the deposit costs they drive. A community bank earning a 3.97% net interest margin is, underneath the franchise language, a spread business, and that spread is sensitive to where short-term rates go and how hard depositors push for higher yields. Net interest income already slipped about 1.6% from the fourth quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026, from $60.6 million to $59.6 million, even as the reported margin ticked up. At 2.3x book the price treats the high return as durable; it leaves little room for a stretch where funding costs rise faster than asset yields and the margin gives back its recent gains.
The growth question is the second pressure point, and for a maximally penetrated incumbent it is real. A bank that already holds 13% to 24% of deposits in its home counties does not have much organic runway, and those home markets, West Virginia and eastern Kentucky, are slow-growth, in places declining-population economies. The buybacks and the rising dividend are not only a sign of discipline; they are also the tell that the bank generates more capital than it can profitably redeploy at home. The 10-K notes a branch closure in Columbus, Ohio, during 2025, a reminder that the footprint is as likely to contract as to grow. Per-share growth here comes mostly from shrinking the share count, not from a bigger bank.
That puts the weight on the multiple. The price requires this bank to keep earning a return well above what most banks sustain, and to keep doing it for a long time. The price embeds a return near 14.3% against a long-run ceiling around 12.5%, which is to say it is paying for excess returns to persist well past the point most banks hold them. City Holding has earned that excess historically, so this is not a stretch in the way it would be for a lower-return bank at the same multiple. But it is still a bet that an above-average return does not fade, in a rate environment that can compress the margin and in home markets that are not growing. If the return on equity drifts back toward the sector, the price-to-book it supports compresses with it.
Valuation
A bank is worth the return it earns on its capital, so price-to-book is the frame, and at $127.10 (June 29, 2026) City Holding trades near 2.3x book. That multiple is doing one job: it prices a return on equity toward the top tier, discounted at a cost of equity around 8.6%. The unusual part is that the bank can plausibly back it. Most banks at 2.3x book would be pricing a return far above anything in their record; here the embedded return sits close to what City Holding actually earns. It has recently delivered about 16.1% return on equity and a 19.3% return on tangible common equity, so the premium reflects a demonstrated return rather than a hoped-for one.
Read across the families of method, the price lands in a coherent middle. The asset-value and growth lenses sit modestly below today's price, the earnings-power lens reads the price as somewhat full, and the peer-multiple lens lands almost exactly at it. No single family argues the stock is plainly cheap or plainly stretched; they cluster, which is what you expect when the multiple is paying for a return the bank genuinely earns rather than for a growth story it has to deliver. The bet the price makes is durability: the embedded return near 14.3% holding up against a long-run ceiling closer to 12.5%, so the price pays for above-average profitability to persist longer than the typical bank sustains it.
Solvency is not the question for a deposit-funded bank, and the standard corporate lenses, net debt, interest coverage, cash burn, do not apply: deposits are funding, not leverage. The relevant frame is capital return and the headroom behind it, and there the picture is clean, a return comfortably above the cost of equity, a share count shrinking about 1.2% a year, and a buyback authorization of roughly 7% of the company. The decisive variable is not the balance sheet; it is whether the high return on equity holds.
Catalysts
The most recent catalyst was the Q1 2026 print, and it confirmed the steady-quality profile rather than changing it. Net income of $31.7 million and diluted EPS of $2.20 beat the $2.15 consensus estimate, return on tangible common equity came in at 19.3%, and net interest margin improved to 3.97% from 3.94%. Reported revenue of about $79.25 million landed just under the roughly $79.34 million expected, so the beat was on profitability and efficiency rather than the top line. For a bank like this, that is the shape of the story: the quarterly question is whether the high return and the margin hold, not whether a new product lands.
The capital-return actions are the live catalysts to watch. On March 25, 2026, the board authorized a new buyback of up to 1,000,000 shares, roughly 7% of the company, with no expiration; the bank used part of it immediately, repurchasing 262,017 shares at an average price of $117.79 and leaving about 985,000 shares of authorization at quarter-end. The $0.87 quarterly dividend continues alongside it. With no transformative deal or product on the horizon, the pace of buybacks against the price paid, and any drift in funding costs that pressures the margin, are what will move the per-share numbers from here.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Community Banking (whole company) (reported)
- CVBF (CVB FINANCIAL CORP.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- HOMB (HOME BANCSHARES, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- ABCB (Ameris Bancorp)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- WSFS (WSFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PB (PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- BANR (Banner Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- BY (BYLINE BANCORP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FRME (FIRST MERCHANTS CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
company 8-K, March 25, 2026