Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $162.62, Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR) is priced for 17.5% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CFR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerCFR
CompanyCullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
Sector / IndustryFinancial Services
Current price$162.62/sh
CompositionBanking 90% / Frost Wealth Advisors 10%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basisfinancials
Elite ROE must persist for28.4y before normalizing (held at the 15.3% elite tier)
Perpetuity-equivalent ROE17.5%
Return on equity now14.5%
ROE gap+3.0pp
Price-to-book2.26x

Solve inputs: computed at a 10% cost of equity; ROE searched up to the 15.3% ROE ceiling.

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history+1.66σ
cohort percentile (of 121 peers)91
sustained it ~10 years at this level59%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.22x3expensive
Earnings1.42x1expensive
Relative0
Growth1.40x1expensive

Families that justify the price: Asset

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 2.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=5)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
Bank Fair Value (P/TBV)$161.061.01xyesTBVPS $74.38 × 2.17x (ROE (TTM) 14.8% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), credit 1.25% allowance/loans → ×0.94)
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.4x / 10.0x / 11.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$116.401.40xyesStage 1: 14% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$118.931.37xyesBV/sh $74.38, ROE (TTM) 14.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$148.641.09xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowthnoRev $2.3B, growth 7% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.7x / 4.4x / 5.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $10.58, growth 14% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.06 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAsset$133.061.22xyes√(22.5 × EPS $10.58 × BVPS $74.38) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativeno
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarningsnoEPS $10.58 × (8.5 + 2×14.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelativeno
PEG Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $10.58 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 14.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 20.9x
Earnings YieldEarnings$114.381.42xyesEPS $10.58 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

The issuer is a funded financial business. Debt, interest, and cash flows are operating inputs, so industrial EV, net-debt, WACC, and free-cash-flow lenses do not apply; value the common-equity claim with book, earnings, capital, and payout economics.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Bankingfinancialequity$2.0twithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required
Frost Wealth Advisorsfinancialequity$217.3bwithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required

No unit-level total common-equity value is stated. Each financial unit requires supported standalone common equity, normalized earnings, capital adequacy, and payout capacity. Consolidated debt, interest, and cash are operating balances, not an enterprise-to-equity bridge; company-level book, earnings, capital, and payout lenses remain the coherent cross-checks.

Solvency

FieldValue
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.8%

Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

A screen looking at this bank sees 2.35 times book value and stops there, which is the wrong place to stop. The number that explains the premium is not on the income statement at all. It is the price of money. During the first quarter of 2026 the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.72%, down 40 basis points from 2.12% a year earlier, while average deposits still grew by $567.9 million. Deposits got cheaper and there were more of them. That combination is rare, and it is the entire foundation of a bank's economics: what you pay for funding sets the floor under every loan you will ever make.

The second thing the screen misses is what the book value is made of. Stated book value per share and tangible book value per share are both $71.80. There is no gap between them, which means the equity carries essentially no goodwill, which in turn means the bank has not spent decades buying growth and capitalizing the receipts. A bank that grows by opening doors rather than by writing checks for other banks ends up with a smaller book value and a higher return on it, and the return on equity here has recently been running near 14.5%. Two banks with identical returns are not identically valuable if one of them has a third of its equity sitting in acquisition premiums.

The business behind that funding advantage is deliberately unfashionable. Frost is organized around two segments, Banking, which includes commercial and consumer services alongside the insurance agency, and Frost Wealth Advisors, with a third holding-company segment that is immaterial. Commercial services run to the practical: treasury and cash management, foreign exchange, standby and import/export letters of credit, documentary collections for customers doing business across the border. That is the plumbing of a mid-sized Texas company's finances, and once a business runs its payroll, its receivables and its trade paper through one bank, moving is genuinely painful. Relationship stickiness is what a 1.72% funding cost looks like from the customer's side.

Wealth is the quieter compounder. Trust and investment fees rose in the first quarter of 2026 on higher valuations in managed accounts and on growth in the number of accounts, with an additional contribution from the timing of court-approved fees on a large guardianship trust. Fee income of that kind carries no credit risk and consumes no capital. It is also the natural extension of the commercial franchise: the same business owners whose companies bank at Frost eventually need somewhere to put the proceeds.

Capital allocation is conservative in the specific way that suits this model. Roughly 64.4% of earnings went out as dividends and buybacks in the latest fiscal year, leaving more than a third retained to fund loan growth, and the share count has edged down about 0.5% a year over the four years to March 2026. No dilution, a growing book, and a return well above what shareholders require. That is what compounding looks like when nobody is doing anything clever.

Bear Case

Real estate made up 64.1% of total loans at the end of 2025, up from 63.0% a year earlier. That is the exposure that matters most, and it is not diversified away by geography, because the geography is Texas. The 10-K is direct about the linkage, listing among the factors that could reduce access to funding "a downturn in the Texas or national economy, difficult credit markets or adverse regulatory actions against us". Property values, construction activity, energy employment and state economic growth are not independent variables here. They are one variable wearing four hats, and every one of them is set outside the bank.

The energy book is smaller than its reputation but it is moving the wrong way. Energy loans were 5.0% of total loans at December 31, 2025, down from 5.4%, yet the weighted-average risk grade on that portfolio deteriorated to 6.16 from 5.58 over the same year. Alongside it, commercial and industrial loans graded watch and special mention rose by $127.3 million. Neither figure is alarming on its own. Both are the kind of early drift that shows up in the risk grades a year or two before it shows up in charge-offs, and it is happening while oil and gas activity is being set by prices and policy the bank does not influence.

Rates are the second external lever, and they cut in the direction opposite to the last year's good news. The funding cost that fell 40 basis points in the first quarter fell because policy rates fell. The same policy path repriced the asset side too: the quarter's net interest income analysis attributes changes partly to the average yield on interest-bearing deposits held at the Federal Reserve, which is the most rate-sensitive asset a bank owns. A bank holding a large balance at the central bank earns exactly what policy pays and not a basis point more. The 10-K notes the obvious constraint, that interest rates "are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control".

Against all of that sits the price. At 2.35 times book the shares carry the highest price-to-book in their peer group, and the return the price is paying for runs above what the bank has actually earned: an elite-tier return sustained for something like three decades before it normalizes. Roughly half of the firms that have reached that level of return sustained it even ten years. The arithmetic of a bank is unsentimental about what happens if the assumption slips. Price-to-book and return on equity are two ends of the same lever: if the return drifts back toward the level a good but ordinary bank earns, the multiple of book the market will pay drifts with it, and a premium of this size has a long way to travel before it becomes a discount.

The competitive backdrop is not standing still either. The company names financial technology competitors among the forces that could pull deposits or offer customers alternative investment options. The funding advantage that justifies the premium is precisely the thing a digital competitor attacks first, because a deposit that pays little is the easiest deposit in the country to bid away.

Valuation

Nothing about this price is subtle. At $164.23 the shares change hands at 2.35 times book value, the highest multiple of book in the peer group, and the assumption embedded in that is specific: the market is paying for the bank to keep earning an elite-tier return on equity, a little above fifteen percent, for something on the order of three decades before it fades. Expressed as a level held forever rather than a level held for a long time, that is about 18.7%. The bank has recently been earning about 14.5%. So the premium is not asking for a transformation. It is asking for persistence, at a level slightly above what it currently achieves, for longer than most banks stay excellent. Roughly half the firms that have reached this level of return sustained it a decade.

The methods used to triangulate the business all land under the price, though they land at very different depths. The earnings-power lens is closest, with the price only about 2% above where that family centers. The price sits about 23% above the peer-multiple family, about 21% above the forward-growth family, and about 27% above the book-based family. Read the pattern rather than the individual numbers: no family reaches the price, but none of them is being left far behind either. This is a stock priced at a modest premium to every conventional lens at once, which is a different situation from one where a single growth method has run away from the others.

The lens built for banks is the most informative of the set. It multiplies tangible book by the ratio of the return the bank earns to the return its shareholders require, then trims the result for the credit reserve carried against the loan book, which stands at about 1.29% of loans. On those inputs it supports a multiple of tangible book only slightly under what the market is actually paying. That is a meaningfully different verdict from the one a generic screen produces, and the reason is the one that shows up everywhere in this bank's numbers: the equity here is not padded with goodwill, so the return is being measured against real capital. Book value per share and tangible book value per share are both 71.80 dollars.

Capital, not leverage, is the frame for a deposit-funded balance sheet, and the picture is orderly. About 64.4% of earnings went out as dividends and buybacks in the latest fiscal year, which leaves a real retention for funding loan growth, and the share count has been falling about 0.5% a year over the four years to March 2026. Trailing earnings of $10.27 against a book value of 71.80 dollars per share is the whole thesis in two numbers. What the buyer at today's price is underwriting is not a recovery and not an expansion, but the continuation of an ordinary-looking bank doing an unusual thing for a very long time.

Catalysts

The cost of money is the live variable, and it moved decisively in the most recent quarter. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities came down to 1.72% in the three months to March 31, 2026, from 2.12% in the same period a year earlier, while average deposits grew $567.9 million, or 1.4%. Both halves of that matter. Falling funding costs widen the margin, but a large share of the asset side sits in an interest-bearing account at the Federal Reserve, which reprices immediately when policy does. The next few margin prints will show which side of the balance sheet repriced faster, and that is the single most useful number to watch here.

Credit metrics are the second thing to track, because they have started to move before losses have. The weighted-average risk grade on the energy portfolio moved to 6.16 at the end of 2025 from 5.58 a year earlier, and commercial and industrial loans in the watch and special mention grades increased by $127.3 million over the same period. Risk grades are the earliest formal signal a bank publishes. If the next annual disclosure shows that drift continuing, provisions follow, and provisions hit earnings faster than any margin change.

Fee income has its own timing wrinkle worth knowing about in advance. Trust and investment management revenue rose in the first quarter of 2026 on higher managed-account valuations and a larger number of accounts, and partly on the timing of certain court-approved fees tied to a large guardianship trust. That last item is lumpy by nature. A reader comparing this segment quarter to quarter should expect the market-linked portion to track asset values and the court-approved portion to arrive whenever a court says so.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Banking (reported)

Frost Wealth Advisors (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 FY2026 10-Q · FY2025 10-K

View the full interactive CFR report on boothcheck