Century Aluminum Company (CENX): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $46.81, Century Aluminum Company (CENX) is priced for +8.3% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CENX
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CENX |
| Company | Century Aluminum Company |
| Sector / Industry | Basic Materials |
| Current price | $46.81/sh |
| Composition | Aluminum 89% / Alumina 11% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 11.9% |
| Operating margin today | 25.6% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -13.7pp |
| Implied growth | 8.3% |
| Multiple paid | 7x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 15.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: n/a
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.67σ |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and relative-multiple value, while earnings-power lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.71x | 5 | justifies |
| Earnings | 2.34x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.69x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | — | 0 | — |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Relative Families that call it expensive: Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=10)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $35.14 | 1.33x | no | FCF base $0.2B, growth 10% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.3%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $45.96 | 1.02x | no | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 6.1x / 11.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $77.14 | 0.61x | yes | P/E 14x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.5x / 14.0x / 16.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $65.91 | 0.71x | yes | BV/sh $14.17, ROE (TTM) 43.0%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $162.21 | 0.29x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $38.68 | 1.21x | no | Rev $2.7B, growth 10% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.3x / 1.7x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $69.60 | 0.67x | no | EPS $5.80, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=3.84 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $19.17 | 2.44x | no | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.20B × (1−21%) / WACC 9.3% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $105.16 | 0.45x | yes | BV $14.17 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 43.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $43.01 | 1.09x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $5.80 × BVPS $14.17) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $60.48 | 0.77x | yes | EBITDA $0.71B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $19.98 | 2.34x | yes | FCF $151.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $14.06 | 3.33x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.10B (FCF $0.15B − SBC $0.05B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $187.15 | 0.25x | yes | EPS $5.80 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $24.17 | 1.94x | yes | BV $14.17 × (ROIC 15.8% / WACC 9.3%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $40.41 | 1.16x | no | Revenue $2.67B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $217.50 | 0.22x | no | EPS $5.80 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $62.70 | 0.75x | no | EPS $5.80 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $136.6m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 0.25x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.20x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 1.8% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- A 50% tariff on certain primary aluminum imports has left Century's American and Icelandic plants selling into those markets duty-free, a position the annual filing describes as an advantage "over our competitors who sell into these markets under these tariff regimes".
- The profit stream behind today's price is a cycle-peak stream: normalized across five years with one-time charges added back, operating income runs near 160 million dollars against the 490.8 million dollars booked over the trailing year.
- The next checkpoint is the Inola, Oklahoma smelter, where construction is expected to begin by the end of 2026 and still depends on a long-term power agreement, a definitive joint venture with EGA, and 500 million dollars of Department of Energy funding the company describes as subject to negotiation.
Bull Case
The market is paying close to ten dollars for every dollar of operating profit this business earned over the past year, and folded into that price is a demand for roughly 27% annual growth in operating profit held for five years. For a commodity smelter that reads as absurd until you look at what changed underneath it. Washington now applies a 50% tariff to certain primary aluminum imports, and Century's plants sit inside the wall. The 10-K puts it without decoration: "Our U.S. and Icelandic businesses currently access these respective markets duty-free which provides us with an advantage over our competitors who sell into these markets under these tariff regimes." A tariff does not raise the world price of aluminum. It raises the price paid inside the protected market, and a producer already inside collects that gap without building anything to get there.
Smelting is the business of turning electricity into metal, so the power contract is the business. Sebree runs on a market-based electrical power agreement, and the filing describes the fleet more broadly as running on "market-based power contracts that have historically provided electricity to these operations at competitive prices". On the input side the hedge is structural rather than financial: the company buys "certain of our alumina requirements under supply contracts with prices tied to the same indices as our aluminum sales contracts". When metal falls, that cost falls with it. What remains exposed is power and the handful of costs that do not track the exchange, which is exactly the ground the bear case works on.
Owning the alumina goes further than contracting for it. Century took 55% of Jamalco in May 2023, and the Jamaican operation is not a passive stake: 391 holes were drilled across the bauxite pits during 2025, producing 2,748 assays for the resource work. The reporting was recast in the March 2026 quarter to match how the company is actually run, concluding that "the Company has determined that it has only one operating and only one reportable segment, and that segment is managed on a consolidated basis". Aluminum is about 89% of revenue and alumina the remainder, but they are one machine. The value of holding the refinery is that when alumina spikes, the profit shows up on the other side of the same ledger instead of walking out the door to a supplier.
The Hawesville trade is the clearest read available on how management treats assets that have stopped earning. On February 2, 2026 Century "completed the sale of our Hawesville, Kentucky facility to an affiliate of Terawulf, Inc." for 200 million dollars plus a 6.8% non-dilutive interest in the buyer and a put option that comes alive once the site delivers at least 375 MW of critical IT load to data center customers. An idle Kentucky smelter became 200 million dollars, an interest and option carried together at 97.0 million dollars, and a claim on data center buildout. Note who is on each side of that: shareholders received the proceeds of a plant that was producing nothing, and the buyer received a site already wired for very large industrial load. Both sides got the thing they valued more.
Then there is Oklahoma. "The new plant, to be built in Inola, Oklahoma, is expected to produce 750,000 tonnes of aluminum per year, more than doubling current U.S. production." That is the company's own filed description of a project it intends to build and operate with EGA, with construction expected to start by the end of 2026. A domestic producer adding capacity of that scale, inside a tariff wall, with federal money attached, is underwriting something different from a bet on the metal price. It is a bet that American primary aluminum production is a policy priority for long enough to build a plant.
Against the wider metals cohort the current margin sits at the top. KALU earned a 6.6% operating margin on 3.70 billion dollars of revenue; ATI managed 14.3%; WS came in at 4.2%. Century's trailing operating margin is 19.3%. Those companies convert and fabricate while Century smelts, so the spread describes position on the chain rather than management skill. That is still the point. When the metal price and the tariff are both working, smelting is where the money lands first.
Bear Case
The balance sheet looks harmless, and that is the trap. Gross borrowings of 545.9 million dollars against 244.1 million dollars of liquid assets leave net debt near 301.8 million dollars, or 0.61 times operating profit, which is nothing at all for an industrial company. The problem is the denominator. Take the cycle out of it and the picture changes: normalized across five years with one-time charges added back, operating income runs near 160 million dollars, roughly a third of the trailing figure. The same borrowings measured against that number are not comfortable, and the London Metal Exchange, not management, decides which of the two figures describes next year.
Cash generation tells a harsher story than profit does. Free cash flow over the trailing year was about 27.3 million dollars, set against operating income of 490.8 million dollars. Aluminum plants absorb capital continuously: pots need relining, working capital swells with the metal price, and a 750,000-tonne project sits in front of them. A business converting that small a share of its operating profit into free cash has less room than a leverage ratio suggests, and that is before the first shovel goes into Oklahoma ground.
The credit line is sized for calm weather. At the end of 2025 the US revolving facility carried a 250 million dollar maximum with 205.3 million dollars of borrowing availability, and it contains "a springing financial covenant that requires us to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0 any time availability under the U.S. revolving credit facility is less than or equal to $25.0 million". A covenant shaped that way only engages after liquidity has already thinned, which is precisely the moment a smelter buying power at market prices is losing money on every tonne it ships. The structure is not fragile today. It is fragile in the state of the world where the rest of this section is right.
That state of the world has a specific mechanic behind it, and the filing states it flatly: "Because we sell our products based on published market prices, we are not able to pass on to our customers any increased cost of raw materials that are not linked to such prices." Revenue is set by an exchange. A meaningful slice of the cost base is not. Iceland supplies a second version of the same exposure, where output depends on hydrology rather than demand, and the filing notes that "The end of these curtailments remain subject to weather patterns and reservoir levels in Iceland and other factors." Policy is the third: the company's ability to collect Section 45X production credits is listed among its risk factors, with the warning that "expiration of the IRA may materially adversely affect the Company's future operating results and liquidity".
All of which returns to what the price requires. Roughly 27% annual growth in operating profit, sustained five years, is the assumption inside today's quote. Among comparable fast-growers that reached that pace, closer to three in ten were still delivering it half a decade later, and Century controls neither the metal price nor the tariff schedule that would put it in the majority. If the requirement fades, the multiple does not hold. The earnings-power methods, which capitalize normalized profit and assume no growth whatsoever, land far under today's quote, and that is the neighborhood a market that stops crediting the growth would be pricing toward.
One more item sits inside the trailing figures. The gain of 287.9 million dollars recognized on the February transaction was a genuinely good trade, and it happened once. Trailing net income of 349.6 million dollars flatters the run rate accordingly. Meanwhile the share count has drifted up about 1.9% a year over the four years to March 2026, so each share owns slightly less of the company than it did, which is the opposite of what a peak-earnings year is supposed to fund.
Valuation
Today's price embeds a demand. For the quote of $46.22 to make arithmetic sense, operating profit has to compound at roughly 27% a year for five years, and that is a whole-company demand rather than one product line carrying the load. The rate itself is not foreign here; the company has run at that pace recently. The stretch is duration. Of comparable fast-growers that reached it, about 31% were still there five years later. The requirement is also sensitive to the discount assumption sitting behind it, so it is best held as approximate rather than precise.
The methods used to triangulate the business split cleanly, and the split is the information. Asset-based approaches, working from book value near 11.00 dollars a share and the unusually high return the company earned on that book over the trailing year, land within reach: the price sits about 19% above where that family centers. Peer multiples land closer still, with the price roughly 6% above that family. Earnings power is where it breaks, and the price exceeds that family by about 4.7 times. The reason is visible in how one of those methods is built. It averages operating profit over five years, adds back one-time charges, taxes the result, and capitalizes it with no growth assumed at all. That method is not being pessimistic. It is asking what the business earns across a cycle rather than at the top of one, and for a smelter the difference between those two questions is the whole report.
Read together, that is a value read with a cyclical asterisk, not a growth bet. Book value and current-multiple math both defend the price; through-cycle earnings power does not come close. A buyer at today's level is underwriting a specific proposition: that the trailing year sits nearer to normal than the five-year average does, because the tariff structure and the domestic supply position have moved the whole earnings base up rather than merely produced one good year.
The cash line qualifies that further. Free cash flow of about 27.3 million dollars over the trailing year sits behind operating income of 490.8 million dollars, and one method in the set does nothing more than capitalize that free cash flow at a required return, which is why it lands so far below everything else. Neither figure is wrong. They measure different things at different points in a capital cycle, and a year heavy on relining and inventory build will produce exactly that gap. The balance sheet is not the binding constraint against any of it: net debt near 301.8 million dollars, 0.61 times operating profit, 244.1 million dollars of liquid assets, and no cash burn. The company also pushed its maturity wall out during the year, redeeming the 2028 notes into a 2032 issue and booking a 6.2 million dollar loss on the early extinguishment.
Cohort position sharpens the picture without settling it. KALU runs a 6.6% operating margin, ATI 14.3%, CRS 21.3%, and Century's trailing 19.3% sits near the top of that range while the business itself sits at a different point on the chain, closer to the raw metal. AA, the nearest domestic comparison at 12.66 billion dollars of revenue and an 8.2% profit margin, grew revenue essentially flat over the year. The message from the cohort is not that Century is better run than its neighbors. It is that smelting is where the operating leverage lives, and operating leverage is a two-way instrument.
Catalysts
The February transaction is already in the numbers and not yet fully in the story. On February 2, 2026 Century closed the sale of the Hawesville, Kentucky plant to an affiliate of Terawulf, taking 200 million dollars plus a 6.8% non-dilutive interest in the buyer and a put option tied to the site delivering at least 375 MW of critical IT load to data center customers; the interest and the option were carried together at 97.0 million dollars at closing, and the company recognized a gain of 287.9 million dollars. The put option is the piece worth tracking. It converts a stranded smelter site into a claim on data center construction rather than on the metal price, and it pays off on a milestone that is measured in megawatts.
Oklahoma is the larger event. The company intends to build a plant at Inola with EGA expected to produce 750,000 tonnes a year, with construction expected to start by the end of 2026, subject to completion of detailed engineering, a competitive long-term power supply agreement with Public Service Company of Oklahoma, and a definitive joint venture agreement. The federal piece, 500 million dollars from the Department of Energy, is described as "subject to review and will be subject to negotiation of specific terms and contingent on our compliance with the requirements negotiated with the DOE". Each of those three conditions resolves one way or the other over the coming quarters, and the power agreement is the one that sets the project's position on the cost curve for its entire life.
Two policy variables sit above everything management does. The 50% tariff on certain primary aluminum imports is what currently separates the price Century realizes from the world price, and the Section 45X production credits under the Inflation Reduction Act are a direct subsidy on domestic output that the company itself flags as uncertain in its risk factors. Neither is a company decision. Both move the earnings base further in a quarter than any operational change available to management could move it in a year.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- AA (Alcoa Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …is dependent upon the type of product we are selling. The market for primary aluminum is global, and demand for aluminum varies widely from region to region. We compete with commodity traders, such as Glencore, Trafigura, Vitol, Mercuria and Gunvor, and aluminum producers, such as Emirates Global Aluminum, Norsk…
- FY2025 10-K: …position depends, in part, on our ability to operate as an integrated aluminum value chain, leverage innovation expertise across businesses and key end markets, and access an economical power supply to sustain our operations in various countries. See Part I Item 1 of this Form 10-K under caption Competition. We may…
- CSTM (CONSTELLIUM SE)
- FY2025 10-K: …markets in regions with abundant natural resources, low-cost labor and energy, and lower environmental and other standards may pose a significant competitive threat to our business. Moreover, technological innovation is important to our customers who require us to lead or keep pace with new innovations to address…
- FY2025 10-K: …ability to maintain or raise prices in the future may be limited, including during periods of raw material and other cost increases. If we are forced to reduce or maintain prices or reduce volumes of production during periods of increased costs, or if we lose customers because of consolidation, pricing or other…
- KALU (KAISER ALUMINUM CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …to Net sales and Adjusted EBITDA to Net income, see below in "Results of Operations - Selected Operational and Financial Information." Metal Pricing Policies A fundamental part of our business model is to remain neutral to the impact from fluctuations in the market price for aluminum and certain alloys, thereby…
- FY2025 10-K: …30% is sold to metal service centers. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, our largest customer accounted for 16% of Net sales. While the loss of this customer could have a material adverse effect on us, we believe that our long-standing relationship with the customer is good and that the risk…
- CRS (CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …Products. The SAO segment is comprised of the Company's major premium alloy and stainless steel manufacturing operations. This includes operations performed at mills primarily in Reading and Latrobe, Pennsylvania and surrounding areas as well as South Carolina and Alabama. The combined assets of the SAO operations…
- FY2025 10-K: …statements. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for a full reconciliation of the statutory federal tax rate to the effective tax rates. Business Segment Results Summary information about our operating results on a segment basis is set forth…
- ATI (ATI INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …as the ATI Europe distribution operations thru 2024. Approximately 92 % of its revenue is derived from the aerospace & defense markets including nearly 68 % of its revenue from products for commercial jet engines and 11 % from defense products. HPMC produces a wide range of high performance materials, components, and…
- FY2025 10-K: …alloys and improved sales mix on higher demand for nickel-based alloys and titanium mill products. Results in fiscal year 2025 included $2.8 million of benefits related to the recognition of previously deferred employee retention tax credits. Fiscal year 2024 also included $7.7 million of benefits related to the…
- CMC (COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …This is a strategic advantage when imports increase as our steel mills can continue to supply our fabricators. Contract pricing that is utilized for these operations helps to stabilize short-term volatility. The construction-related solutions and value-added products within our Emerging Businesses Group segment…
- FY2025 10-K: …and meeting our business goals and objectives, and we depend on a qualified labor force for the manufacture of our products. The impact of labor shortages and increased competition for available workers may increase our costs or impede our ability to optimally staff our facilities and could have an adverse impact on…
- WS (WORTHINGTON STEEL, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: 1,200 customers during fiscal 2025 in many end markets including automotive, construction, machinery and equipment, agriculture, and heavy trucks, among others. The automotive industry is one of the largest consumers of flat-rolled steel, and the largest end market for us. During fiscal 2025, our top three customers…
- FY2025 10-K: …Competition for most of our products is primarily on the basis of price, product quality and our ability to meet delivery requirements. Our business has been subject to increasing consolidation of suppliers. Depending on a variety of factors, including raw material, energy, labor and capital costs, freight…
- WOR (WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …performance, competitive position, sales, volumes, cash flows, earnings, margins, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures; • pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes; • the ability to improve or maintain margins; • expected demand or…
- FY2025 10-K: …freight availability, government control of foreign currency exchange rates and government subsidies of foreign steel producers or competitors, our businesses may be materially adversely affected by competitive forces. Competition may also increase if suppliers to our customers begin to more directly compete with our…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 FY2026 10-Q, quarter ended March 31, 2026 · FY2025 10-K