Carnival Corporation Ltd. (CCL): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $24.89, Carnival Corporation Ltd. (CCL) is priced for +15.1% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Exported: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CCL
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CCL |
| Company | Carnival Corporation Ltd. |
| Sector / Industry | Industrials |
| Current price | $24.89/sh |
| Composition | Passenger ticket 65% / Onboard and other 35% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 4.2% |
| Operating margin today | 16.3% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -12.1pp |
| Implied growth | 15.1% |
| Multiple paid | 13x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 5: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.43σ |
| cohort percentile (of 225 peers) | 16 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.03x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.03x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.61x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.03x | 2 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=12)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $32.85 | 0.76x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 6.2x / 8.2x / 10.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.8x / 20.0x / 23.2x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $24.22 | 1.03x | yes | BV/sh $9.47, ROE (TTM) 23.7%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $38.72 | 0.64x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $19.17 | 1.30x | yes | Rev $27.3B, growth 5% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.0x / 1.2x / 1.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $26.88 | 0.93x | yes | EPS $2.24, growth 1% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=10.26 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $0.01 | 2488.50x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.88B × (1−3%) / WACC 5.5% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $35.41 | 0.70x | yes | BV $9.47 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 23.7% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $21.84 | 1.14x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.24 × BVPS $9.47) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $7.33B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $6.22 | 4.00x | yes | FCF $3200.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $72.28 | 0.34x | yes | EPS $2.24 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $3.64 | 6.84x | yes | BV $9.47 × (ROIC 2.1% / WACC 5.5%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $27.31B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $84.00 | 0.30x | yes | EPS $2.24 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $24.22 | 1.03x | yes | EPS $2.24 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cruise Support | operating | enterprise | 0.3B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Tour and Other | operating | enterprise | 0.2B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $23.3b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 5.39x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 5.23x |
| Interest coverage | 3.7x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 5.0% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Roughly two-thirds of what Carnival sells is the ticket and a third is what guests spend once aboard, and they pay ahead of sailing: the filing states that terms "generally require an initial deposit to confirm a reservation, with the balance due prior to the commencement of the voyage".
- Borrowings dominate the equity story, with net debt near 23.3 billion dollars, five times operating profit, and interest covered about 3.8 times.
- Industry supply is the variable to watch rather than demand, because NCLH alone reported 13 ships on order at the end of 2025 at combined contract prices of roughly $21.5 billion, and ships ordered years ago arrive whether or not the market wants them.
Bull Case
Conventional valuation arithmetic has an unusually hard time with this company, and for two reasons that have nothing to do with how the ships are doing. The first is the recent past. Any method that normalizes profit by averaging the last five years is averaging in a stretch when the fleet did not sail, which drags the "normal" earnings figure to something the business has not resembled for years. The second is the balance sheet. Book value works out to about $9.34 a share, but a cruise ship is a hotel that was bought once and depreciated ever since, so the carrying value describes the accounting rather than the asset. Neither distortion is a reason to buy. Both are reasons the cheap-looking and expensive-looking readings on this stock can be produced from the same accounts.
What the business actually does is collect money before it delivers anything. The 10-K describes payment terms that "generally require an initial deposit to confirm a reservation, with the balance due prior to the commencement of the voyage", and the company reports that it "had a working capital deficit of $8.9 billion as of November 30, 2025", an increase the filing attributes to "an increase in the current portion of long-term debt and customer deposits". Read the second half of that sentence carefully. A rising customer-deposit balance is a widening liability on the accounts and an interest-free loan in reality. Guests fund the working capital of the company they are about to sail with.
The operating performance underneath it is now solidly mid-cohort and improving. Revenue runs about $27.31B on a trailing basis with an operating margin near 17.1%. Against the two listed peers, that puts Carnival above NCLH, which earns a 15.9% operating margin on revenue of 10.031 billion dollars, and below RCL, which earns 27.9% on 18.388 billion dollars. Carnival is the largest of the three by revenue and sits between them on profitability, which is roughly where a mass-market operator with a premium arm should sit.
The clearest bull mechanic is the transfer of value from lenders to shareholders as the debt comes down. During 2025 the company repriced its senior secured term loans maturing in 2027 and 2028 and prepaid a series of high-coupon issues; the filing states that "The aggregate amount of these prepayments was $11.6 billion", and reports "$ 4.5 billion available for borrowing under the Revolving Facility" at the November 2025 year end. Free cash flow ran at roughly 3.2 billion dollars. Retiring a 10.50% obligation with cash the ships generate is not glamorous, but it moves value across the capital structure in one direction only, and the direction is toward the equity.
The newest piece of the model is a destination the company controls rather than rents. Celebration Key in The Bahamas welcomed 2.4 million guests in its first year of operation, and a pier extension there was completed in late June. Port days at a company-owned destination change where the guest's spending lands. None of this makes the leverage disappear. It does mean that the cash flow servicing that leverage comes from a fleet that is fuller, priced better, and increasingly calling at places the company owns.
Bear Case
Here is the sentence a holder has to sit with: the equity is the residual claim on a balance sheet that owes roughly 23.3 billion dollars net, and the people who owned this company through the shutdown paid for its survival by being diluted. The share count has compounded at about 5% a year over the four years to May 2026. Every recovery in profit since then has been divided among more owners than were there at the bottom, and that arithmetic does not reverse.
The cost of the debt is visible in the filings and it is not uniform. Carnival's own disclosure lists prepayments across obligations including "10.38 % senior priority notes due 2028" and "10.50 % senior unsecured notes due 2030", and records that during 2025 it recognized "a total of $ 409 million of " debt extinguishment and modification costs. Refinancing at lower rates is genuine progress and it costs real money to execute. Interest is covered about 3.8 times, which is workable in a good year and thin in a bad one, and net borrowings sit at five times operating profit.
The supply side is where the erosion comes from, and the competitors say so themselves. RCL's risk disclosure warns that "The further net growth in capacity from these new ships and future orders, without an increase in the cruise industry's demand and/or share of the vacation market, could depress cruise prices and impede our ability to achieve yield improvement". That is not a hypothetical. NCLH disclosed that as of December 31, 2025 the combined contract prices of its 13 ships on order came to approximately €18.3 billion, or $21.5 billion. Ships are ordered half a decade before they float, they cannot be cancelled when the vacation market cools, and each one arrives needing to be filled. Fuel adds the second uncontrollable input: the company's own risk section notes that an increase in the global fuel price raises the cost of ship operations and, through airfares, "increase our guests' overall vacation costs", which hits the demand side and the cost side at once.
Set that against what the price asks. At about 13 times company-wide operating profit the quote implies operating growth of roughly 15.5% a year sustained for five years. That is not an outlandish rate for this company, which has recently delivered it, and that is precisely the trap. Of comparable fast growers, only about 44% held such a pace even five years, and Carnival has to hold it while carrying net debt at five times operating profit. Leverage does not change the odds of the growth arriving. It changes what happens if it does not: the earnings shortfall lands entirely on the thin equity slice, and the multiple the market is willing to pay for that slice compresses at the same moment.
Valuation
Two lines carry this business. Passenger tickets are about 65% of revenue and onboard spending is the other 35%, and they behave differently: the ticket is priced months ahead in a competitive booking market, while onboard spend is captive and set once the guest is already at sea. At $26.34 the market pays roughly 13 times company-wide operating profit for the pair. Run that price backwards and it implies operating growth near 15.5% a year across a five-year stage, with the multiple sitting in the lower half of the range this comparison group trades at.
The unusual feature of this name is that the methods largely agree. Asset value, earnings power and forward cash flow all land close to the quote rather than far from it, so the price is not a bet that outruns the standard frames. The peer-multiple methods are the outlier and they land well above the price, which is what produces the cheap reading people cite. Taken together the picture is a value-supported name rather than a growth story, and the interesting question is not whether the price exceeds the evidence but whether the evidence itself is durable.
Durability is where the growth requirement bites. Roughly 15.5% a year of operating growth is a rate Carnival has recently produced, coming off a recovery, and the record's own reference is that only about 44% of comparable fast growers held such a pace even five years. The cost of capital behind that solve is 11.4%, which is high because the equity carries the leverage; each percentage point of it moves the implied growth requirement by nearly six points. That sensitivity is worth stating plainly, because it means the price's demand on the business is not a precise figure so much as a range that widens with the discount rate.
The cohort is small and it frames the read well. RCL runs an operating margin of 27.9% and converts 24.4% of revenue of 18.388 billion dollars into net profit, growing 9.7%. NCLH earns 15.9% at the operating line on 10.031 billion dollars, growing 6.5%. Carnival's trailing operating margin of about 17.1% on the largest revenue base of the three puts it nearer the mass-market end than the premium one, and the multiple it trades at reflects that placement rather than contradicting it.
Where the balance sheet enters is not as a floor but as an amplifier. Net borrowings near 23.3 billion dollars equal five times operating profit, interest is covered about 3.8 times, and free cash flow of roughly 3.2 billion dollars is what services and reduces it. The filing records "The aggregate amount of these prepayments was $11.6 billion" during 2025, so the reduction is real and it is happening. But the share count has grown about 5% a year over four years, which means deleveraging has been running alongside dilution rather than instead of it, and the equity's claim on each future dollar of operating profit has been getting slightly smaller while the debt got smaller faster.
Catalysts
The most recent scheduled disclosure was the fiscal second-quarter report on June 23, 2026. Shortly after it, on July 9, 2026, the board declared a dividend of $0.15 a share. A dividend at that level is small against the cash the fleet generates, which is the point: it re-establishes a capital-return habit without diverting much from debt reduction, and it is the kind of signal that tends to precede larger distributions rather than substitute for them.
The operational news has centred on the company's owned destination in The Bahamas. A new pier extension at Celebration Key was completed on June 29, 2026, and the destination marked its first year of operation on July 21, 2026 having welcomed 2.4 million guests. Berth capacity is the binding constraint on a private destination, so a completed pier extension translates fairly directly into how many ships can call and how many guests spend a day there.
What to track from here is supply rather than sentiment. Industry orderbooks are contracted years ahead, and both listed peers describe the same pressure in their filings: capacity arriving faster than demand is what compresses pricing across the sector. Booking curves and per-diem pricing are the earliest place that shows up, and they show up in the quarterly reports before they show up anywhere else.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Tour and Other (reported)
- NCLH (NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS LTD.)
- FY2025 10-K: …the Northern Hemisphere's summer months. Passenger ticket revenue primarily consists of revenue for accommodations, meals in certain restaurants on the ship, certain onboard entertainment, government taxes, fees and port expenses and includes revenue for service charges and air and land transportation to and from the…
- FY2025 10-K: …and other obligations and to work with credit card processors to satisfy current or potential future demands for collateral on cash advanced from customers relating to future cruises; ● our need for additional financing or financing to optimize our balance sheet, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at…
- RCL (ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD)
- FY2025 10-K: …of this distribution channel and invest in maintaining strong relationships with our travel partners. To accomplish this goal, we seek to maintain competitive commission rates and incentive structures with the marketplace. We continuously work with travel advisors to sell upgrades and add-ons such as air and…
- FY2025 10-K: …Bank AG and the banks and financial institutions as lender parties thereto 8-K 10.1 12/18/2019 10.5 First Supplemental Agreement relating to Hull No. C34 at Chantiers de l'Atlantique (previously known as STX France S.A.), dated as of March 12, 2020, by and among Hibisyeu Finance Limited as borrower, Chantiers de…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Carnival Corporation press release, July 21, 2026 · Carnival Corporation press release, June 29, 2026 · Carnival Corporation quarterly earnings report, June 23, 2026 · Carnival Corporation press release, July 9, 2026