Callaway Golf Company (CALY): what the price requires
At today's price, Callaway Golf Company (CALY) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~11.5 years. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CALY
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CALY |
| Company | Callaway Golf Company |
| Current price | $18.40/sh |
| Composition | Golf clubs 51% / Golf balls 16% / Apparel 19% / Gear, accessories & other 14% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 6.5% |
| Operating margin today | 7.7% |
| Margin compression implied | -1.2pp |
| Must persist for | 11.5y |
| Multiple paid | 20x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 14.1% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~2.2 years.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~16.1%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: elevated
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.37σ |
| cohort percentile (of 212 peers) | 57 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 14% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple; asset-based land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.95x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | 1.22x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | — | 0 | — |
Families that justify the price: Relative Families that call it expensive: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=5)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $10.84 | 1.70x | no | Reference only (OCF-based, capex excluded): OCF $0.3B |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $22.94 | 0.80x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 1.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $10.48 | 1.76x | yes | Reference only (book value floor): BV/sh $10.48, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $9.43 | 1.95x | yes | Reference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $10.48, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $7.93 | 2.32x | no | Rev $3.1B, growth -12% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.0x / 1.2x / 1.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $20.67 | 0.89x | no | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.49B × (1−30%) / WACC 7.5% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $11.23 | 1.64x | yes | EBITDA $0.21B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $5.29 | 3.48x | yes | BV $10.48 × (ROIC 3.8% / WACC 7.5%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $22.94 | 0.80x | no | Revenue $3.10B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $27.0m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.24x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -0.17x (net cash) |
| Interest coverage | 1.2x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.2% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Callaway Golf is a company freshly reset: it sold majority control of Topgolf to private equity in early 2026 and renamed itself back to Callaway, returning to a pure-play golf-equipment and apparel business.
- The balance sheet was the point of the deal; the company used proceeds to repay $1.0 billion of term-loan debt, leaving roughly $480 million of debt against about $680 million of cash and a new $200 million buyback authorization.
- The defining risk is that a standalone golf-equipment maker is mature, seasonal, and tied to discretionary spending, yet the price still embeds years of growth that golf gear rarely sustains.
Bull Case
The most important development for Callaway is what just happened to its balance sheet, because the entire investment case now starts there. In early 2026 the company sold a 60% stake in Topgolf to Leonard Green & Partners at a valuation around $1.1 billion, used the proceeds to repay $1.0 billion of term-loan borrowings, and emerged with roughly $480 million of debt against about $680 million of cash. For a company that had carried heavy leverage since the 2021 Topgolf merger, that is a transformation: it converts a debt-burdened conglomerate into a net-cash, pure-play golf business that still holds a roughly 40% interest in Topgolf as a separate, monetizable asset. The board's authorization of a new $200 million buyback signals management believes the simplified company is undervalued.
The business it is left with is a strong franchise in its core market. Callaway is one of the leading names in golf clubs and balls, with established apparel and accessories lines under its Active Lifestyle segment, which the filing describes as "high quality soft good products which we design, develop" and sell alongside the equipment. Golf equipment is a brand-and-innovation business where the leaders refresh product lines on a cadence that keeps serious golfers upgrading, and Callaway's scale in clubs and balls gives it shelf position and tour presence that smaller rivals cannot match. The pure-play focus lets management concentrate capital and attention on that franchise rather than splitting it across a capital-hungry venue business.
The simplification is the thesis. Before the deal, investors valuing the combined company had to net a high-growth, high-capital entertainment business against a mature equipment maker, and the market struggled to price the blend. Now the structure is clean: a recognizable golf-equipment brand with a strengthened balance sheet, a buyback in place, and an additional stake in Topgolf that can be sold or distributed later. A company that has removed its debt overhang and clarified what it is gives the market a far easier business to value, and the retained Topgolf interest is optionality on top of the equipment franchise.
Bear Case
The structural truth a holder should sit with is plain: stripped of Topgolf, Callaway is a mature, cyclical maker of golf equipment, and that is not a business that grows quickly for long. Golf-equipment demand depends on golf participation and on discretionary spending, both of which ebb and flow with the economy and even the weather. The filing is direct that results turn on factors "beyond our control, including perceptions of our brand, competition, our ability to increase prices without adversely impacting traffic counts... and changes in consumer tastes and preferences and discretionary spending." A consumer-durable business at the mercy of those forces is the opposite of a steady compounder, and the recent surge in golf participation that lifted the whole industry is the kind of tailwind that can fade.
The seasonality compounds the cyclicality. By the company's own description, "a majority of our sales from our Golf Equipment business and most, if not all, of our profitability from this segment generally occurs during the first half of the year," which concentrates the year's outcome into a narrow window and makes any weakness in the spring selling season disproportionately damaging. A business whose annual profit hinges on a few months has little room to recover if those months disappoint, and the equipment category is intensely competitive, with Callaway facing well-capitalized rivals in both clubs and balls.
Against that backdrop, the price is the problem. Every standard valuation lens, asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and even forward growth, lands below the current price; none of them reaches it. That is the signature of a stock priced beyond what any conventional method supports, embedding operating-profit growth sustained for over a decade, a pace only about one in seven companies achieves even for ten years, and an unusual ask for a mature golf-equipment maker. The retained Topgolf stake adds optionality, but it is a minority interest in a business the company just chose to step back from, so its value is uncertain and not in the company's control. The bear case is straightforward: the deal cleaned up the balance sheet, but it left behind a slow-growth, seasonal, discretionary business carrying a price that assumes it grows like something it is not.
Valuation
Callaway is best understood right now as a balance sheet plus a mature operating business, because the early-2026 Topgolf deal reshaped both. The company sold majority control of Topgolf, repaid $1.0 billion of debt, and now holds roughly $480 million of debt against about $680 million of cash, leaving it in a modest net-cash position with a $200 million buyback authorized. That financial cleanup is real value and lowers the risk in the equity. The operating business that remains earns a single-digit operating margin on its golf equipment and apparel lines, the normal profile for a consumer-durables maker.
The valuation methods deliver an unusually clear verdict, and it is cautionary. At about $18 (June 27, 2026), the price sits above every family of method: the asset-based, earnings-power, peer-multiple, and forward-growth lenses all land below it. When no standard frame reaches the price, the price is not supported by the business as any conventional method measures it; it is a bet beyond what those methods can justify. Inverting the price says it embeds operating-profit growth held near its ceiling for roughly twelve years, which for a mature, seasonal golf-equipment business is a demanding assumption. The cleanest way to read this is that the market is either crediting a recovery and re-rating that the methods do not yet see, or pricing in the value of the retained Topgolf stake and the deleveraged structure in a way the operating-only methods cannot capture.
Solvency is the part that improved and the reason the stock is not a distress situation despite the rich operating multiple. With cash now roughly matching debt and interest comfortably covered, the company has the flexibility to execute its buyback and invest in its product lines without balance-sheet strain. What a buyer at this price underwrites is twofold: that the standalone golf-equipment franchise grows faster and more durably than mature consumer-durables businesses typically do, and that the retained Topgolf interest holds or gains value. The deal made the company safer and simpler; it did not make a seasonal, discretionary equipment business into a fast grower, and the price is leaning on the assumption that it is one.
Catalysts
The transformation itself is the defining recent event. Effective the start of 2026, Callaway sold a 60% stake in Topgolf to Leonard Green & Partners at a roughly $1.1 billion valuation, changed its name from Topgolf Callaway Brands back to Callaway Golf Company on January 15, and shifted its NYSE ticker from MODG to CALY on January 16. The near-term catalysts are the execution items that follow: the deployment of the new $200 million buyback, the pace of further debt reduction, and how management chooses to handle or eventually monetize the retained Topgolf interest.
The operating signal to watch is the spring selling season. Because the golf-equipment business concentrates most of its profitability in the first half of the year, the upcoming equipment cycle and new product launches are the clearest read on demand for the standalone company. Strength there would support the case that the pure-play franchise is healthy; weakness, given the seasonal concentration, would weigh disproportionately on full-year results.
The broader backdrop is golf participation and consumer discretionary spending, the two external forces that move the category. Continued robust golf demand would help the equipment lines; a pullback in discretionary spending would pressure them. With the company only weeks into its new identity, the first few quarters of standalone reporting will be what allows the market to value the pure-play business on its own merits.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Golf Equipment (reported)
- GOLF (Acushnet Holdings Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …in the price segment of the golf ball market and capitalizes on the demand for affordable, high-quality golf balls that appeal to a wide range of golfers, from beginners to those dedicated to the game. Golf Clubs, Wedges and Putters We design, assemble and sell golf clubs (drivers, fairways, hybrids and irons) under…
- FY2025 10-K: …golfers, who are avid and skill‑biased, prioritize performance and commit the time, effort and money to improve their game. We believe that dedicated golfers are generally the most consistent purchasers of golf products, as we believe they are the most discerning and most likely to invest in premium performance…
- YETI (YETI Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Europe, and Japan, among others. We carefully evaluate and select retail partners that have an image and approach that are consistent with our premium brand and pricing. Our national and regional specialty retailers in the United States include…
- FY2025 10-K: …business. Similar to our strategy in 2025, we will strive to mitigate the impact of tariffs by managing operating expenses, working capital and cash; negotiating with suppliers; evaluating pricing strategies; leveraging tariff exemptions where possible; and pursuing other supply chain optimization activities.…
Apparel, Gear and Other (reported)
- COLM (COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …for our products, identify our company and differentiate our products from competitors' products. We own many trademarks, including Columbia Sportswear Company®, Columbia®, SOREL®, Mountain Hardwear®, prAna®, the Columbia diamond shaped logo, the Mountain Hardwear nut logo, the SOREL polar bear logo, and the prAna…
- FY2025 10-K: …In addition, we earn revenue through licensing certain of our trademarks across a range of apparel, accessories, equipment, and home products. U.S. U.S. is our largest segment and provides apparel, accessories and equipment products through our Columbia, Mountain Hardwear and prAna brands and footwear products…
- VFC (V. F. CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: 25 Form 10-K 1 Table of Conten ts The following table summarizes VF's brands by reportable segment: REPORTABLE SEGMENT BRANDS PRIMARY PRODUCTS Outdoor The North Face ® Performance and performance-inspired outdoor apparel, footwear, equipment, accessories Timberland ® Style-forward and weather-ready footwear, apparel,…
- FY2025 10-K: …sport activities, such as high altitude mountaineering, skiing, snowboarding, and ice climbing. Products are also designed for year-round trail and rock climbing activities. The North Face ® products are marketed globally, primarily through specialty outdoor and premium sporting goods stores, department stores,…
- UAA (UNDER ARMOUR, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to the financial condition and operating results of our business. We manage our inventory levels based on existing orders, anticipated sales and the rapid delivery requirements of our customers. Our inventory strategy is focused on meeting consumer demand while improving our inventory efficiency over the long term by…
- FY2025 10-K: …and trade names appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of their respective holders. Products Our product offerings consist of apparel, footwear and accessories for men, women and youth. We market our products at multiple price levels and provide consumers with products that we believe are…
- NKE (NIKE, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …laws by us, our employees, agents, suppliers and other partners. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information on risks relating to our international operations. COMPETITION The athletic footwear, apparel and equipment industry is highly competitive on a worldwide basis. We compete internationally with a…
- FY2025 10-K: …and casual footwear, apparel and accessories predominantly focused on sport performance and streetwear using the Jumpman trademark. Sales and operating results for Jordan Brand products are reported within the respective NIKE Brand geographic operating segments. Our wholly-owned subsidiary brand, Converse,…
- CROX (CROCS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …the image of our brands, undermine consumer confidence in us, and reduce long-term demand for our products, even if the regulatory or legal action is unfounded or not material to our operations. Negative claims or publicity involving us, our products, or any of our key employees, endorsers, or business partners could…
- FY2025 10-K: …do the laws of the U.S., and, therefore, we may have difficulty obtaining legal protection for our intellectual property in certain foreign jurisdictions. See the risk factor under "Risks Related to our Products - Failure to adequately protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights and counterfeiting…
- DECK (DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …resources, several of which compete directly with some of our products. In addition, access to offshore manufacturing and the growth of e-commerce has made it easier for new companies to enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing competition in the footwear, apparel, and accessories industry. In…
- FY2025 10-K: …existing orders, as well as forecasted sales and budgets by brand for both the wholesale and DTC channels, including consideration of the delivery requirements of our customers. Our systems and processes are designed to improve our product planning and forecasting, inventory control and supply chain management…
- ONON (On Holding AG)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Callaway 8-K, January 2026