DUTCH BROS INC. (BROS): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $50.05, DUTCH BROS INC. (BROS) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~13.1 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/BROS
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | BROS |
| Company | DUTCH BROS INC. |
| Sector / Industry | Consumer Cyclical |
| Current price | $50.05/sh |
| Composition | Company-operated shops 92% / Franchising 7% / Other 0% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 7.6% |
| Operating margin today | 9.6% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -2.0pp |
| Must persist for | 13.1y |
| Multiple paid | 42x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 5: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11.5% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling.
How unusual the bet is: elevated (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.55σ |
| cohort percentile (of 212 peers) | 94 |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 5.91x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 6.43x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 3.82x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.70x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $80.73 | 0.62x | yes | FCF base $0.3B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.7%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $66.11 | 0.76x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 19.6x / 22.6x / 25.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 40.94x (blended: static sector reference 28x + trailing (TTM) 71x), scenarios: 32.8x / 40.9x / 49.1x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 18x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $7.61 | 6.58x | yes | BV/sh $6.08, ROE (TTM) 11.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $8.47 | 5.91x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $71.68 | 0.70x | yes | Rev $1.9B, growth 29% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.8x / 3.5x / 4.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $8.64 | 5.79x | yes | EPS $0.72, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=39.96 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $0.01 | 5005.00x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.06B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.7% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $8.64 | 5.79x | yes | BV $6.08 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 11.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 7.5%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $9.92 | 5.05x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $0.72 × BVPS $6.08) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $0.31B × sector EV/EBITDA 18.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $3.76 | 13.31x | yes | FCF $95.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $2.01 | 24.90x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.07B (FCF $0.10B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $23.23 | 2.15x | yes | EPS $0.72 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $2.93 | 17.08x | yes | BV $6.08 × (ROIC 4.2% / WACC 8.7%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $1.88B × sector P/S 4.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $27.00 | 1.85x | yes | EPS $0.72 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $7.78 | 6.43x | yes | EPS $0.72 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company-operated shops | operating | enterprise | $1.5b | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Franchising and other | operating | enterprise | $128.8m | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $342.9m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 2.41x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 1.90x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 27.5% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Dutch Bros builds and owns almost all of its own drive-thru coffee shops, which is why 92% of revenue comes from company-operated locations and why every new shop consumes capital before it returns any.
- The rare thing in the numbers is the combination: revenue grew 28.4% over the trailing year at a trailing operating margin of 9.7%, against CAVA at 24.1% growth on a 5.0% operating margin and SHAK at 16.2% on 3.8%.
- The risk is entirely in the duration of that growth, because the price pays about 56 times company-wide operating income, a multiple sitting at the very top of the restaurant cohort rather than merely above its middle.
Bull Case
One number decides this company, and taken on its own it is the wrong one. Revenue expanded 28.4% over the trailing year, which is the figure everybody quotes. Across that same stretch, and this is the half that matters, the trailing operating margin held at 9.7%. Fast-growing restaurant chains that own their own locations almost never manage both at once, because opening shops is expensive and new shops drag the average down. The comparison inside the cohort makes the point: CAVA grew 24.1% at a 5.0% operating margin and SHAK grew 16.2% at 3.8%. Dutch Bros is growing faster than either and converting more of each dollar while doing it.
The mechanism behind that is the format. A drive-thru beverage stand is small, cheap to build relative to a full restaurant, and staffed for throughput rather than table service. The company has been layering digital on top of it: order-ahead capability is now implemented in over 95% of shops, per the FY2025 10-K, and Dutch Rewards, the app-based loyalty programme, gives the company a direct line to repeat customers that a coffee stand would not otherwise have. The filing describes the operating philosophy candidly, noting that the majority of new shops each year "will continue to be company-operated shops" with "all operators recruited from within our organization". Growing your own managers is slower than franchising and produces a more consistent experience, which is what a brand built on service speed actually sells.
The menu is not finished expanding either. The company reports that it "began testing hot food offerings in a limited number of shops", which is an attempt to claim a daypart the format currently gives away. Beverage-only stands earn nothing at lunch. If food works even modestly, the incremental revenue lands on a shop whose rent and staffing are already paid for.
Management's forecasting record supports taking their plans seriously. Since 2021 they have raised guidance on 9 separate occasions and reaffirmed it on 2, with no cuts. That is not proof of durability, but a company that has never had to walk back a number in five years of public life is telling you something about how it sets them.
The last piece is the one the market is actually paying for. Only the forward cash-flow methods reach today's price, which means the bet is on compounding that lasts rather than on the current year's earnings. The bull case accepts that framing rather than resisting it. Dutch Bros has a format that works in the markets it has entered, a manager pipeline it grows internally, and a menu with an unclaimed daypart. Whether that supports a decade and a half of expansion is the question. Whether the machine works today is not.
Bear Case
Starbucks has 38.5 billion dollars of revenue and thousands of drive-thru locations. CAVA and SHAK are raising and spending capital to open units in the same markets. None of them needs permission to build a small building with a window and sell a cold sweet coffee drink out of it, and Dutch Bros knows it. The FY2025 10-K names the exposure directly, warning that if "our competitors begin to evolve their business strategies and adopt aspects of the Dutch Bros business model, such as our drive-thru convenience, digital ordering, and similar product offerings or branding", the business could be harmed. There is no patent on a drive-thru lane. The moat, such as it is, consists of brand affection and staff speed, and both are copyable by anyone willing to spend on them.
That matters because of what the price requires. At today's level the market pays roughly 56 times company-wide operating income, and inverting that gives a demanding answer: operating profit compounding at the fastest rate the company can fund internally for about 16.3 years. The near-term pace is not the problem, since the company has recently delivered it. Sixteen years of it is the problem. Only about 14% of comparable fast growers sustained that pace even a decade. And the multiple itself sits at the very top of the restaurant peer distribution, well beyond the upper quartile, so the market is not merely paying up within a category, it is paying more than anyone in the category.
The expansion also gets harder from here, and the filing says so. The company plans to keep opening company-operated shops "in markets, including in markets where we have little or no operating experience", and it cautions that past same-shop sales "may not be indicative of future results". The early markets were the Pacific Northwest and the Southwest, where the brand was already known. Texas and the Southeast are somebody else's home turf, and a customer with no prior affection for the brand is a customer who compares on price and convenience alone.
Input costs are outside the company's hands. The 10-K explains that the arabica it buys "tends to trade on a negotiated basis at a premium above the \"C\" price\", and that if there is a lag between cost increases and menu price increases, "our operating results could be" hurt. Passing coffee inflation to a customer buying a discretionary four-dollar drink is not the same as passing it to a customer buying groceries. There is a ceiling, and nobody knows where it is until they hit it.
The balance sheet is not dangerous, but it is no longer empty. Net borrowings run about 352.9 million dollars on the funded-debt measure, and closer to 899 million once the operating leases on all those shops are counted, which for a business whose growth model is signing more leases is the more honest number. The credit facility carried an interest rate of approximately 4.92% as of March 31, 2026. None of that threatens solvency. It does mean the shop-opening programme is now partly funded rather than entirely self-financed, and a growth story that needs external money is a growth story with a second master.
Valuation
The price is a statement about time. At 63.99 dollars a share, the market pays roughly 56 times what the business currently earns at the operating line, and that multiple resolves into a specific claim: operating profit compounding at the maximum rate the company can fund from its own cash flow, held for about 16.3 years. That is longer than most restaurant concepts stay fashionable.
The near-term rate is not the stretch. Dutch Bros has recently grown at that pace: revenue rose 28.4% over the trailing year, and the shops producing that growth managed it while holding a trailing operating margin of 9.7%. The stretch is persistence. Of companies that have grown that fast, only about 14% kept it going even ten years, and the priced-in horizon here runs well past that. Each additional percentage point of growth would shorten the required runway by roughly 2.46 years, which cuts both ways: a genuine acceleration relieves a great deal of the pressure, and a modest disappointment adds years the price has no room for.
Where the methods land tells you what kind of bet this is. The forward cash-flow methods are the only ones that reach today's price. Everything else is far beneath it: the price sits at more than eight times the asset-value reading and over nine times the earnings-power reading, and about 71% above where peer multiples land. That is the signature of a durability premium. Static frames value what a business earns now, and this one is being priced almost entirely on what it earns in the 2030s. There is nothing incoherent about that as a position. It simply cannot be defended with trailing arithmetic, and the report will not pretend otherwise.
The cohort comparison sharpens where the premium comes from. Among the fast growers, CAVA runs a 5.0% operating margin and SHAK 3.8%, so Dutch Bros' 9.7% is genuinely better company economics at a faster growth rate. Among the mature operators, CMG earns 15.3% and WING 27.0%, which is where a successful concept eventually lands once the build-out slows. The market is pricing Dutch Bros as though it walks the second path while still growing at the first group's pace. Both halves have to happen.
The balance sheet buys some time but not much. Net borrowings of about 352.9 million dollars on funded debt, or roughly 899 million counting the operating leases behind the shop base, sit against 263.5 million of liquid assets, and the term loan and revolver carried approximately 4.92% interest as of March 31, 2026. Leverage of about 2.18 times operating profit is modest. What the balance sheet cannot do is create years, and years are the scarce input in this price.
Catalysts
One change worth knowing about arrived quietly in the accounting. Starting in 2026 the company redefined how it reports its two headline operating metrics: average unit volumes are now determined on a trailing twelve-month basis for both systemwide and company-operated shops, and same shop sales measure the comparable base of shops open at least 15 complete months as of the first day of the quarterly period. A redefinition of the growth metric in the middle of a growth story is not an accusation of anything, but it does mean this year's same-shop numbers are not straightforwardly comparable to prior years, and readers who track that line should know why.
The menu experiment is the operational catalyst with the most upside attached. The company disclosed that it began testing hot food in a limited number of shops, and separately that order-ahead capability now runs in over 95% of the base. Those two things work together: a beverage stand that can take a food order in advance is solving the throughput problem that would otherwise make food impossible in a drive-thru lane. Evidence on whether it works will show up in average unit volumes before it shows up anywhere else.
On the financing side, the 2025 credit facility is now the marginal funding source for the shop programme, with the term loan and revolving loan both bearing interest at approximately 4.92% as of March 31, 2026, 50 million dollars drawn on the revolver, and an interest rate swap with a notional amount of approximately 58 million dollars hedging part of the term loan. The pace at which that facility gets drawn is the cleanest available read on whether new-shop construction is outrunning the cash the existing shops throw off.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Company-operated shops (reported)
- SBUX (Starbucks Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …sales of packaged coffee, tea, and a variety of ready-to-drink beverages and single-serve coffee and tea products to customers outside of our company-operated and licensed stores. Sales of these products are generally recognized upon shipment to customers, depending on contract terms. Other revenues also include…
- FY2025 10-K: …Store growth in specific existing markets will vary due to many factors, including expected financial returns, the maturity of the market, economic conditions, consumer behavior, and the local business environment. Company-operated store data for the fiscal year-ended September 28, 2025: Stores Open as of Stores Open…
- CAVA (CAVA Group, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …as a percentage of revenue; "Average Unit Volume" or "AUV" represents total revenue of operating CAVA Restaurants that were open for the entire trailing thirteen periods and Digital Kitchens sales for such period divided by the number of operating CAVA Restaurants that were open for the entire trailing thirteen…
- FY2025 10-K: , is material to the conduct of our business and our marketing efforts, as our brand recognition is one of our key differentiating factors from our competitors. The success of our business depends in part on our ability to use our trademarks, service marks, and other intellectual property, including our name and…
- SHAK (SHAKE SHACK INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …80 net new system-wide Shacks, which included 44 net Company-operated and 36 net Licensed Shacks. We believe we remain well-positioned to continue significant, sustainable financial growth and we plan to continue to execute our growth strategies. Company-Operated Shacks We continued to expand our Company-operated…
- FY2025 10-K: …and new companies that compete directly and indirectly with us with respect to taste, menu, price, food quality, service, value, design, and location. We compete in the restaurant industry with multi-unit national, regional and locally-owned and/or operated limited-service restaurants, and full-service restaurants.…
- WING (WINGSTOP INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …upon sale to the customer. The Company collects and remits sales, food and beverage, alcoholic beverage, and hospitality taxes on transactions with customers and reports such amounts under the net method in its Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Accordingly, these taxes are not included in gross…
- FY2025 10-K: …of company-owned restaurants, including advertising expenses, but excludes depreciation and amortization, which are presented separately. Revenue During fiscal year 2025, total revenue was $696.9 million, an increase of $71.0 million, or 11.4%, compared to $625.8 million in the prior fiscal year. Royalty revenue,…
- CMG (CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …the Middle East, Mexico and Asia. We believe guests expect the same high quality food and excellent customer service at partner-operated restaurants as they receive in Chipotle-owned and operated restaurants. We provide extensive training to our business partners and we require compliance with specific food quality…
- FY2025 10-K: …operating segment is comprised of all 11 operating segments located in the United States, which we have aggregated to a single operating segment in consideration of the aggregation criteria set forth in ASC 280. All other operating segments, which comprise our operations in Canada, Europe and international…
- DRI (DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …in North America as operating segments. The brands operate principally in the U.S. within full-service dining. We aggregate our operating segments into reportable segments based on a combination of the size, economic characteristics and sub-segment of full-service dining within which each brand operates. We have four…
- FY2025 10-K: …Cheddar's Scratch Kitchen, Chuy's, Yard House, Bahama Breeze, Seasons 52, The Capital Burger and ongoing royalties and other fees from our franchise operations and contractually managed locations). External sales are derived principally from food and beverage sales, we do not rely on any major customers as a source…
Franchising and other (reported)
- QSR (RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …system-wide sales growth to increase our future revenues. The costs of these incentives are capitalized and amortized as a reduction in franchise and property revenue over the term of the contract to which the incentive relates. Advertising revenues and other services Advertising revenues consist primarily of…
- FY2025 10-K: , 2025. See Note 7, " BK China, " to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for additional information regarding this transaction. Franchise and Development Agreements Our franchise model is designed to drive both operational…
- YUM (YUM! BRANDS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …individually distinct from the ongoing services we provide to our franchisees. As a result, upfront franchise fees are recognized as revenue over the term of each respective franchise or sub-franchise agreement. Revenues for these upfront franchise fees are recognized on a straight-line basis, which is consistent…
- FY2025 10-K: …business or other incidents, whether isolated or recurring, and whether originating from us, our Concepts' restaurants, franchisees, competitors, governments, third-party delivery providers, suppliers or distributors, can significantly reduce brand value and consumer perception, particularly if the incidents receive…
- WEN (Wendy's Co)
- FY2025 10-K: …valuation services and fees for selecting pre-approved buyers for Franchise Flips. Franchise Flip advisory fees are paid by the seller and are recognized as revenue at closing of the Franchise Flip transaction. Information technology and other fees are recognized as revenue as earned. "Franchise rental income"…
- FY2025 10-K: …in part, on new restaurant openings, which could be affected by factors beyond our control. Our business derives earnings from sales at Company-operated restaurants as well as royalties and other fees received from franchised restaurants. Growth in our revenues and earnings is dependent, in part, on new restaurant…
- DPZ (DPZ)
- FY2025 10-K: …our planned growth targets. We and our franchisees face many challenges in opening new stores, including, among others: • construction, permitting or development delays; • employment and training of qualified personnel, including availability of store team members; • selection and availability of suitable new store…
- FY2025 10-K: …and our franchisees operate. Our supply chain segment is also subject to competition from outside suppliers. While substantially all U.S. franchisees purchased food and other products from us and our suppliers in 2025, U.S. franchisees are not required to purchase food and other products from us, and they may choose…
- WING (WINGSTOP INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …in general, and the fast casual category in particular, are intensely competitive, and we compete with many well-established restaurant companies on the basis of food taste and quality, price, service, value, location, convenience, digital engagement, delivery and overall customer experience. Our competitors include…
- FY2025 10-K: …various state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises. The FTC and various state franchise laws require that we furnish a franchise disclosure document containing certain information to prospective franchisees in advance of any franchise sale or the receipt of any consideration for the franchise, and a…
- DRI (DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …short-term sales growth could be impacted if we are unable to drive near-term guest count and sales growth, and long-term sales growth could be impacted if we fail to extend our existing brands in ways that are relevant to our guests. A failure to innovate and extend our existing brands in ways that are relevant to…
- FY2025 10-K: …We believe that we have selected high-caliber operating partners and franchisees with significant experience in restaurant operations, and we are providing them with training and support. However, the probability of opening, ultimate success and quality of any franchise or licensed restaurant rests principally with…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 Form 10-Q · FY2025 Form 10-K