BOOT BARN HOLDINGS, INC. (BOOT): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $154.85, BOOT BARN HOLDINGS, INC. (BOOT) is priced for +24.7% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/BOOT
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | BOOT |
| Company | BOOT BARN HOLDINGS, INC. |
| Sector / Industry | Consumer Cyclical |
| Current price | $154.85/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 4.1% |
| Operating margin today | 13.6% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -9.5pp |
| Implied growth | 24.7% |
| Multiple paid | 18x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 10: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11.1% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.21σ |
| cohort percentile (of 212 peers) | 52 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.73x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.81x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.03x | 5 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.72x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=16)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $330.06 | 0.47x | yes | FCF base $0.3B, growth 18% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.9%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $215.71 | 0.72x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 15.9x / 17.9x / 19.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $149.64 | 1.03x | yes | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.3x / 20.0x / 23.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $86.60 | 1.79x | yes | BV/sh $44.87, ROE (TTM) 17.9%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $118.77 | 1.30x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $148.76 | 1.04x | yes | Rev $2.3B, growth 18% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.6x / 2.0x / 2.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $212.45 | 0.73x | yes | EPS $7.90, growth 27% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.72 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $30.05 | 5.15x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.25B × (1−24%) / WACC 7.9% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $118.26 | 1.31x | yes | BV $44.87 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $89.30 | 1.73x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $7.90 × BVPS $44.87) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $110.47 | 1.40x | yes | EBITDA $0.34B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 15485.00x | yes | FCF $116.7M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 15485.00x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.10B (FCF $0.12B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $254.91 | 0.61x | yes | EPS $7.90 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $14.01 | 11.05x | yes | BV $44.87 × (ROIC 2.5% / WACC 7.9%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $116.06 | 1.33x | yes | Revenue $2.34B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $296.25 | 0.52x | yes | EPS $7.90 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $85.41 | 1.81x | yes | EPS $7.90 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boot Barn (single retail segment) | operating | enterprise | 1.9B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $126.0m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.52x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -0.40x (net cash) |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.2% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Physical stores are the growth engine, and the 10-K counts them: "we have successfully added, on a net basis, 194 new stores through organic growth", with a record 80 opened in fiscal 2026 alone.
- The specific risk is that existing stores are slowing while the price assumes the whole company keeps compounding: management guides fiscal 2027 same-store sales to 2.0% to 4.0%, against 7.2% delivered in fiscal 2026.
- The next read is dated: first-quarter fiscal 2027 results are due after the close on July 29, 2026, against company guidance of 574 to 584 million dollars of quarterly sales.
Bull Case
Eighty new stores in a single year, in 2026, selling boots. That is the fact worth sitting with before anything else, because it runs against almost every assumption about where retail is going. Revenue rose 18% to 2.25 billion dollars in fiscal 2026 and earnings per diluted share grew 25% to $7.35. Growth in physical specialty retail is supposed to be over. Nobody appears to have told the customers.
The reason it works is that the competition is not other chains. The 10-K describes the landscape plainly: "The retail industry for western and work wear is highly fragmented and characterized by primarily regional competitors." The company frames its own opportunity the same way, in "the large, growing and highly fragmented western, country lifestyle and work wear markets of the broader apparel and footwear industry". Consolidating a fragmented category one store at a time is a slower business than building a platform, and a far more durable one. Every independent western store that closes hands over a customer who has nowhere else convenient to go.
Margin comes from a second lever that has nothing to do with store count. The company designs and sells its own labels alongside third-party brands, and "As of March 28, 2026, three of our five top selling brands were exclusive brands." Own-label goods carry a higher gross margin than the branded equivalent, so every point of exclusive-brand penetration lifts the merchandise margin without requiring a single extra transaction. That is why the trailing operating margin sits at 14.7%, ahead of ANF at 13.0%, URBN at 9.8%, LEVI at 10.6% and AEO at 6.0%.
The digital side is not an afterthought bolted on either. The company's websites and app "reached more than 164 million total visits during fiscal 2026", and in the fourth quarter e-commerce same-store sales grew 14.1% against 5.2% in the stores. A retailer whose online channel grows faster than its store base is not being disintermediated by one.
Growth of this kind normally arrives with a financing story attached, and here it does not. On a funded-debt basis the company finished the year holding roughly 128 million dollars more in liquid assets than in borrowings, with borrowed money of only about 13 million dollars. Expansion is being paid for out of the business. For a retailer adding stores at this pace, self-funding is the difference between a growth plan and a leveraged bet on one.
Bear Case
Fiscal 2026 was the best year this company has ever had, and management has already told you the next one will look different. Same-store sales grew 7.2% across the year. Guidance for fiscal 2027 puts them at 2.0% to 4.0%. That is roughly a halving of the rate at which existing stores are getting busier, and it matters more than the headline sales guidance of 14% to 16% growth, because the difference between those two numbers is almost entirely new stores. Total sales can keep climbing while the underlying store economics flatten. That is what a demand cycle rolling over looks like from the inside, and it looks like growth for a while.
Which brings up what the price is actually asking for. At about 16 times company-wide operating income, the price implies operating profit compounding at roughly 21% a year for five years. Only about 36% of comparable fast-growers have sustained that pace for five years. The company has grown that fast recently, so the rate is not the improbable part. The duration is.
New stores are also not free options. Each one is a long lease signed before the sales exist, and the commitments have been building fast: operating right-of-use assets on the fiscal 2026 balance sheet stood at 631.4 million dollars against 461.7 million dollars a year earlier, an increase of well over a third in twelve months. The company's own filing names where that road ends: "to the extent that our store count increases, we may face risks associated with market saturation of our product offerings and locations". On a funded-debt basis this business carries more liquid assets than borrowings. On a lease-inclusive basis it carries roughly 891 million dollars of net obligations, and those obligations do not renegotiate when comparable sales slow.
The customer base concentrates two risks at once. The 10-K is direct about it: "Many of our stores operate in geographic areas where the local economies depend to a significant degree on oil and other commodity extraction, and many of our customers are employed in these industries." A sustained drop in the crude strip therefore hits the customer's paycheck and the regional economy the store sits in simultaneously. Work boots are a necessity purchase for someone who is working.
And underneath everything sits fashion. Western and country lifestyle apparel has been running hot, and the company acknowledges the exposure in the plainest available terms: "While we work to identify consumer preferences for products and product categories on an ongoing basis and aim to offer inventory and shopping experiences that align with those preferences, we may not do so effectively and/or on a timely basis." A cyclical category priced for five years of compounding has to keep the trend and the execution both. Against that combination, note what the peer set has been doing: LULU grew revenue 4.2% over the trailing year, ANF 5.1%, and COLM 0.6%. Apparel retail is not, at the moment, a growing industry.
Valuation
Sixteen times operating profit does not sound like a demanding price for a company growing at the pace this one is. Work out what has to happen for it to be the right price and the demand becomes visible: operating profit compounding at roughly 21% a year for the next five years, from a business earning a 14.7% operating margin on trailing results. The company has cleared that growth rate recently. Sustaining it for a full five years is the harder part, and the historical record puts the share of comparable fast-growers who managed it at about 36%. Note also how sensitive the arithmetic is: one percentage point of extra cost of capital moves the required growth rate by roughly 6.6 points. This is a reading, not a measurement.
The methods used to triangulate split cleanly along the growth line. The peer-multiple approaches and the forward cash-flow approaches both reach today's price. The book-value approaches and the earnings-power approaches, which value the business on what it has already assembled and already earns rather than on what it may earn next, land well below it. There is nothing pathological about that pattern for a retailer in the middle of an expansion program; it is simply where the money is being made. It does mean the price has no support from the static side of the ledger. What is being bought is the store-opening plan.
Two filing-sourced numbers do most of the work in the margin half of that plan. Own-label penetration is the first: "In fiscal 2026, sales from our exclusive brand products accounted for approximately 40.8% of our consolidated sales." The second is what is not there. This is a domestic business almost entirely, with "foreign-source revenue constituted approximately 0.3% of our overall net sales in fiscal 2026", so the revenue line carries no currency translation and the demand question is a purely American one.
The balance sheet reads two different ways depending on which obligations you count, and both readings are true. Measured on borrowed money, the company holds roughly 128 million dollars more in liquid assets than it owes. Measured with store leases included, it carries about 891 million dollars of net obligations. For a chain whose entire growth strategy is signing leases, the second figure is the one that describes the commitment, and the first is the one that describes the flexibility. A reader who only sees one of them will misjudge the risk in one direction or the other.
On the multiple itself, the shares sit in the lower half of the range their peer group trades in, which is the part of this picture that does not fit the rest. Peers are not growing: LULU at 4.2% trailing revenue growth, ANF at 5.1%, BKE at 7.1%, URBN at 11.2%. This business grew 18% in fiscal 2026. Either the market is discounting the durability of that gap, which is the honest reading of the guidance for slower comparable sales, or it is undervaluing a category consolidator. The July print is the next place that question gets tested rather than argued.
Catalysts
The next event has a date on it. First-quarter fiscal 2027 results, for the quarter ended June 27, 2026, are scheduled for release after the market close on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, with a call the same afternoon. Company guidance for that quarter puts sales between 574 and 584 million dollars. It is the first quarter to be measured against the slower comparable-sales plan rather than against the fiscal 2026 run rate.
Fiscal 2026, reported on May 14, 2026, closed strong. Fourth-quarter net sales rose 18.7% to 538.8 million dollars, same-store sales grew 6.1% with the stores up 5.2% and e-commerce up 14.1%, and quarterly net income reached 44.4 million dollars against 37.5 million dollars a year earlier. Twenty-five stores opened in the quarter. For the full year, revenue rose 18% to 2.25 billion dollars, earnings per diluted share grew 25% to $7.35, and 80 new stores opened, a record.
The guidance attached to that release is the part that sets up the rest of the year. Management expects 70 new store openings in fiscal 2027, on top of 10 that were pulled forward into the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, with total sales of 2.578 to 2.623 billion dollars, growth of 14% to 16%, and same-store sales of 2.0% to 4.0%. Read together, those figures say the store-opening machine is still running at close to full speed while the existing base is expected to slow. Whether the comparable-sales number lands at the top or the bottom of that range is the single most informative line in the July report.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Boot Barn (single retail segment) (reported)
- URBN (Urban Outfitters, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …primarily operates in an apparel rental market in which our competitors offer varying types of subscription rental models and products that may have greater appeal to consumers. Our Wholesale segment competes with numerous wholesale companies on the basis of quality, price, performance and fashion of our merchandise…
- FY2025 10-K: …and home goods, among other things, in inviting and dynamic store settings. Our core strategy is to provide unified environments that establish emotional bonds with the customer, through Company-owned stores and franchisee-owned stores. In addition to retail stores, we offer our products and services directly to our…
- AEO (American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 67 Note 11 Share-Based Payments 67 Note 12 Retirement Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan 70 Note 13 Income Taxes 70 Note 14 Segment Reporting 73 Note 15 Impairment, Restructuring and Other Charges 75 Note 16 Subsequent Events 77 53 AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS, INC. Notes to…
- FY2025 10-K: …indicated, the percentage relationship to total net revenue of the listed items included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Fiscal Years Ending February 1, 2025 February 3, 2024 (In thousands) (Percentage of revenue) (In thousands) (Percentage of revenue) Total net revenue $ 5,328,652 100.0 % $ 5,261,770…
- ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of customer engagement and continues to explore new methods to connect with its customers. The Company also offers its loyalty programs, Abercrombie's myAbercrombie ® and Hollister's Hollister House Rewards ® . The Company believes that these programs are important enablers of its customer engagement strategy as the…
- FY2025 10-K: …to the Company's gift card and loyalty programs, refer to Note 3, " REVENUE RECOGNITION ." The Company also recognizes revenue under wholesale arrangements when control passes to the wholesale partner, which is generally upon shipment. Revenue from the Company's franchise and license arrangements, primarily royalties…
- BKE (BUCKLE, INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …of this or any other report The Buckle, Inc. files with, or furnishes to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements herein, including anticipated store openings, trends in or expectations regarding the Company's revenue and net earnings growth,…
- FY2025 10-K: …of The Buckle, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Revenue Recognition - Retail store sales are recorded, net of expected returns, upon the purchase of merchandise by customers. Online sales are recorded, net of expected returns, when…
- LULU (lululemon athletica inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and believe that as we continue to expand our operations and build our brand awareness, net revenue will continue to increase in this market. We believe China Mainland net revenue growth will drive an increase in our overall international net revenue. We plan to continue to invest in China Mainland and expect that…
- FY2025 10-K: …our technical product innovation. We also believe our ability to introduce new product innovations, combine function and fashion, and connect through in-store, online, and community experiences sets us apart from our competition. In addition, we believe our vertical retail distribution strategy and community-based…
- AS (Amer Sports, Inc.)
- FY2025 20-F: …them exactly where they shop, across digital and physical spaces. We generate revenue from the sale of our products through direct-to-consumer and wholesale channels: • Direct-to-Consumer includes sales of our brands' products through (i) owned e-commerce websites and (ii) owned retail stores, which include elevated…
- FY2025 20-F: …stores, particularly Arc'teryx and Salomon stores, have demonstrated strong productivity levels and our owned retail store rollout strategy looks to repeat and improve store productivity in the future. In addition, e-commerce has grown from 16.7% of our revenue in 2023 to 17.7% in 2025, and we believe we have…
- LEVI (LEVI STRAUSS & CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …channels for several reasons, including the following: • the retailers in these channels maintain-and seek to grow-substantial private-label and exclusive offerings as they strive to differentiate the brands and products they offer from those of their competitors; • the retailers change their apparel strategies in a…
- FY2025 10-K: …these strategies over the long term will set us up to deliver mid-single digit annual net revenue growth, reaching approximately $9 billion to $10 billion in total company net revenue, and to grow Adjusted EBIT margins to approximately 15% over the long term, all while living our mission of delivering profits through…
- COLM (COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …("EMEA"), and Canada. The following tables disaggregate the Company's reportable segment Net sales by product category and channel, which the Company believes provides a meaningful depiction of how the nature, timing and uncertainty of Net sales are affected by economic factors: Year Ended December 31, 2025 (in…
- FY2025 10-K: …In addition, we earn revenue through licensing certain of our trademarks across a range of apparel, accessories, equipment, and home products. U.S. U.S. is our largest segment and provides apparel, accessories and equipment products through our Columbia, Mountain Hardwear and prAna brands and footwear products…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q4 and fiscal 2026 results release, May 14, 2026 · fiscal 2027 guidance, May 14, 2026 · Boot Barn earnings-date announcement, July 22, 2026; fiscal 2027 guidance, May 14, 2026 · fiscal 2026 results release, May 14, 2026 · Q4 fiscal 2026 results release, May 14, 2026 · Boot Barn earnings-date announcement, July 22, 2026