BECTON DICKINSON & CO (BDX): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $189.52, BECTON DICKINSON & CO (BDX) is priced for +10.7% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Exported: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/BDX

Headline

FieldValue
TickerBDX
CompanyBECTON DICKINSON & CO
Sector / IndustryHealthcare
Current price$189.52/sh
CompositionMedication Delivery Solutions 21% / Medication Management Solutions 16% / Pharmaceutical Systems 11% / Advanced Patient Monitoring 5% / Specimen Management 9% / Diagnostic Solutions 8% / Biosciences 7% / Surgery 7% / Peripheral Intervention 9% / Urology and Critical Care 8%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)6.0%
Operating margin today10.3%
Margin compression (value-band)-4.3pp
Implied growth10.7%
Multiple paid30x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.1% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.35σ
cohort percentile (of 115 peers)70

Valuation X-Ray

Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset8.03x5expensive
Earnings5.22x2expensive
Relative0
Growth5.76x2expensive

Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=9)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$18.6410.17xyesReference only (OCF-based, capex excluded): OCF $0.7B
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$0.00noNegative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 33.26x (blended: static sector reference 24x + trailing (TTM) 55x), scenarios: 27.8x / 33.3x / 38.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 16x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$37.355.07xyesBV/sh $89.64, ROE (TTM) 3.9%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$23.598.03xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$139.451.36xyesRev $20.8B, growth 5% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.1x / 2.5x / 2.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$36.805.15xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $2.32B × (1−18%) / WACC 7.1% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$17.9710.55xyesBV $89.64 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 3.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 2.5%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$81.712.32xyes√(22.5 × EPS $3.31 × BVPS $89.64) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $3.75B × sector EV/EBITDA 16.0x
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$2.7768.42xyesEPS $3.31 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$16.7711.30xyesBV $89.64 × (ROIC 1.3% / WACC 7.1%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $20.84B × sector P/S 4.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$35.785.30xyesEPS $3.31 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
BD Medicaloperatingenterprise$11.5bwithheldunresolved no unit value
BD Life Sciencesoperatingenterprise$5.2bwithheldunresolved no unit value
BD Interventionaloperatingenterprise$5.2bwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$16.1b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)8.53x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)6.96x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-1.1%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Watch where the money went, because it is the clearest statement management has made. The separation put 4 billion dollars of cash on the balance sheet, and in the March 2026 quarter BD spent it in two directions at once: an accelerated repurchase of $2.0 billion of its own stock, and the retirement of 2.1 billion dollars of borrowings. Roughly half to owners, roughly half to lenders, none of it to a large new acquisition. A company that believes its remaining business is undervalued buys the stock. A company that thinks its balance sheet is a constraint pays down what it owes. BD did both, which reads as a management team more interested in cleaning up than in building out.

What remains is more focused than the old conglomerate. Medication Delivery Solutions is the largest piece at 21% of revenue, Medication Management Solutions is 16%, and Pharmaceutical Systems is 11%. That last one is quietly the most interesting. The FY2025 10-K reports double-digit growth in sales of the Pharmaceutical Systems unit's prefillable solutions in the biologic drug category, which is the business of supplying the syringes and containment systems that injectable biologic drugs are shipped in. When a pharmaceutical company launches an injectable, someone has to make the glass or polymer barrel it comes in, and the qualification process for that container is written into the drug's own regulatory filing. Switching suppliers means touching the drug approval. That is a moat made of paperwork, and it is the most durable kind in this industry.

The operating picture is steadier than the reported profit suggests. Revenue in the March 2026 quarter reached $4.7 billion, up 5.2% as reported and 2.6% on a currency-neutral basis, with more than 90% of the business growing at a mid-single-digit rate. Averaged across five years and with one-time charges added back, operating profit runs meaningfully above the trailing twelve-month figure, which is what you would expect from a company that has spent recent years absorbing separation costs and acquisition amortisation.

Against the medical-device cohort, BD's reported profitability is not the outlier the headline suggests. On a trailing basis BD runs a 9.6% operating margin. BAX carries a negative 2.6% operating margin on $11.32 billion of revenue. ICUI runs 2.0% and TFX runs 3.0%. MMSI, one of the better performers in the group, runs 12.2% on $1.54 billion of revenue. The whole cohort is carrying heavy amortisation and restructuring, and BD sits in the upper half of it rather than the bottom.

The last structural piece is simplification. Effective 1 October 2025 the company reorganised into five distinct, separately-managed segments, replacing a unit structure that had grown to more than a dozen pieces. Simpler reporting is not a strategy on its own. It is, however, the precondition for the kind of margin recovery the price is asking for, because you cannot fix what you cannot separately measure.

Bear Case

Read a competitor's filing and the erosion is written down for you. Merit Medical's 10-K names its primary competitors in cardiac intervention as Teleflex, Cook Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Becton, Dickinson and Company, and describes the marketplace as characterized by rapid technological advancement, industry and customer consolidation, customer demands for price reductions, regulatory reform. Customer demands for price reductions is the phrase to sit with. BD's own 10-K puts the other half of it plainly, warning that even successfully developed new products or enhancements may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences, changing industry or regulatory standards, or competitors' innovations. Hospital purchasing has consolidated faster than device innovation has differentiated, and the incumbent with the broadest catalogue is the one with the most items on the price-reduction list.

The data shows where that lands. On a trailing basis BD earns a 9.6% operating margin and a 4.7% return on shareholder equity, and reported GAAP diluted earnings from continuing operations in the March 2026 quarter came in at negative $0.13. Strip out currency from the same quarter and revenue grew 2.6% rather than the 5.2% headline. A business whose real growth is running in the low single digits and whose reported returns sit below its cost of equity is not obviously a compounder.

Now hold that against what today's price asks. At $156.38 the market is paying roughly 32 times the operating profit the company currently earns, which resolves into operating profit growing about 12% a year for five years. Set 12% against 2.6% currency-neutral revenue growth and you can see the shape of the requirement: essentially all of it has to come from margin recovery rather than from selling more. That is a specific bet on separation costs falling away and amortisation rolling off, on a schedule nobody has committed to publicly.

The method disagreement makes the same point from a different angle. Peer multiples are the only lens that comes near today's price. The asset-value methods, the earnings-power methods and the cash-flow methods all land far beneath it. And the peer-multiple lens is exactly where the caution belongs, because on that comparison the multiple sits at the very top of the peer distribution, well beyond the upper quartile. The single approach that supports the price supports it by comparing BD to a group BD sits at the extreme end of. That is not a wide safety margin.

Debt is the amplifier under all of it. Even after retiring 2.1 billion dollars of borrowings in the March quarter, trailing operating profit covers interest expense a little over three times. Coverage at that level is manageable while profit is flat and uncomfortable if profit falls. The dividend, the buyback and the deleveraging all draw on the same cash, and in a year where growth disappoints, one of the three gives way. It is rarely the dividend, which means it is usually the buyback, which is the one supporting the share count.

Valuation

Today's price sets a specific and demanding task. At $156.38 the market pays roughly 32 times the operating profit BD currently earns, and that multiple resolves into operating profit compounding at about 12% a year for the next five years. Hold that figure loosely: the arithmetic is unusually sensitive here, with each percentage point of change in the assumed cost of capital moving the required growth rate by roughly 9.5 points. The direction is the durable part. The precise number is not.

Where that requirement gets uncomfortable is the comparison set. Against BD's own recent record the near-term pace is within reach, and historically about 54% of comparable fast growers kept a pace like that going for five years. Against the sector, though, the multiple sits at the very top of the peer distribution, well beyond the upper quartile. Investors are paying a full price for a recovery rather than a discount for a turnaround.

The methods split about as cleanly as they can. Peer-multiple approaches come closest, and even they put the price about 16% above where that family lands. The asset-value lenses, the earnings-power lenses and the cash-flow lenses all sit far below. When only the relative comparison reaches the price, the price is being defended by what other companies trade at rather than by what this one produces, and that is a defence that moves when sentiment toward the whole sector moves.

Two things about the composition matter for reading those figures. The trailing profit the multiple is built on still carries the Biosciences and Diagnostic Solutions business that left the company on 9 February 2026, so the earnings base and today's price are not describing quite the same enterprise. And what remains is weighted toward Medication Delivery Solutions at 21% of revenue, Medication Management Solutions at 16% and Pharmaceutical Systems at 11%, businesses with different growth profiles and different competitive intensity. A single company-wide margin target flattens that, which is one more reason to treat the implied figure as a direction rather than a forecast.

On the balance sheet the honest headline is coverage. Trailing operating profit covers interest expense a little over three times, after the company retired 2.1 billion dollars of borrowings and executed a $2.0 billion accelerated share repurchase in the March 2026 quarter using proceeds from the separation. Share count has drifted down about 0.6% a year over the four years to March 2026, which is a slow grind rather than a serious retirement of stock. The business generates cash rather than consuming it, so the downside here is not solvency. It is a multiple built on peer comparison, resting on earnings that have to recover on schedule for the comparison to keep making sense.

Catalysts

The next dated event is the fiscal third quarter. BD reports results for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 on 6 August 2026, with a webcast the same morning. It will be the second full period reported without Biosciences and Diagnostic Solutions, which makes it the first clean look at what the remaining company actually grows at.

The baseline it is measured against is the March 2026 quarter, reported on 7 May 2026: revenue of $4.7 billion, up 5.2% as reported and 2.6% currency-neutral, with more than 90% of the business delivering mid-single-digit growth, and GAAP diluted earnings from continuing operations of negative $0.13. The same quarter carried the capital deployment: a $2.0 billion accelerated share repurchase and the retirement of 2.1 billion dollars of borrowings. The gap between the 5.2% reported and the 2.6% currency-neutral figure is the one to watch, because a weaker dollar flatters a company with substantial international sales and reverses without warning.

The structural change behind all of it completed on 9 February 2026, when the Biosciences and Diagnostic Solutions business was spun off and merged with Waters Corporation. BD holders received 0.135 Waters shares for each BD share held at the 5 February record date, ending up with stock representing 39.2% of the combined company, and BD itself received 4 billion dollars in cash. Year-on-year comparisons through the rest of fiscal 2026 will therefore compare two different companies, and any figure quoted without specifying continuing operations should be treated with suspicion.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

BD Medical (reported)

BD Life Sciences (reported)

BD Interventional (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

BD spin-off completion announcement, February 2026 · BD earnings announcement, July 2026 · BD Q2 fiscal 2026 results release, 7 May 2026

View the full interactive BDX report on boothcheck