BEST BUY CO., INC. (BBY): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $82.44, BEST BUY CO., INC. (BBY) is priced for +1.2% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Exported: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/BBY
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | BBY |
| Company | BEST BUY CO., INC. |
| Sector / Industry | Consumer Cyclical |
| Current price | $82.44/sh |
| Composition | Domestic 92% / International 8% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 1.7% |
| Operating margin today | 3.7% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -2.0pp |
| Implied growth | 1.2% |
| Multiple paid | 13x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.03σ |
| cohort percentile (of 212 peers) | 27 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.41x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.16x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.44x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.67x | 4 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=19)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $135.86 | 0.61x | yes | FCF base $1.6B, growth 1% (input: historical growth), terminal g 1.2%, WACC 7.5%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $112.51 | 0.73x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 6.4x / 8.4x / 10.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $127.44 | 0.65x | yes | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.9x / 20.0x / 23.1x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $135.95 | 0.61x | yes | Stage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $58.63 | 1.41x | yes | BV/sh $14.63, ROE (TTM) 37.1%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $127.37 | 0.65x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $68.45 | 1.20x | yes | Rev $41.9B, growth 1% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.3x / 0.4x / 0.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $189.00 | 0.44x | yes | EPS $5.40, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.43 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $96.88 | 0.85x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.80B × (1−21%) / WACC 7.5% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $92.01 | 0.90x | yes | BV $14.63 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 37.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $42.16 | 1.96x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $5.40 × BVPS $14.63) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $145.08 | 0.57x | yes | EBITDA $2.35B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $71.05 | 1.16x | yes | FCF $1605.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $63.92 | 1.29x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $1.47B (FCF $1.60B − SBC $0.14B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $174.24 | 0.47x | yes | EPS $5.40 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $10.42 | 7.91x | yes | BV $14.63 × (ROIC 5.4% / WACC 7.5%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $297.91 | 0.28x | yes | Revenue $41.86B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $202.50 | 0.41x | yes | EPS $5.40 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $58.38 | 1.41x | yes | EPS $5.40 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $548.0m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.45x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -0.36x (net cash) |
| Interest coverage | 33.5x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -1.9% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Best Buy earns about 2.8 cents of operating profit on each dollar of merchandise it moves, so the money is not in the markup: it sits in the attached layer of services, installation, memberships and vendor economics that the FY2026 10-K files under the Domestic segment alongside Geek Squad, Best Buy Ads and Best Buy Marketplace.
- Today's price asks for roughly 9.5% annual growth in operating profit sustained across five years, which is a demanding request of a company whose own fiscal 2027 outlook runs from a 1% decline to a 1% gain in comparable sales.
- Two checkpoints arrive in quick succession: a second-quarter report in late August, then a change of chief executive on November 1, 2026, with the finance chief's seat being filled from outside.
Bull Case
The moat here is not price, and it never was. Anyone can sell a television cheaper. What almost nobody else can do is put the television in a room where a customer can see it, deliver it, mount it, connect it to the rest of the house, and then answer the phone when it stops working. That chain of steps is why the Domestic segment carries Geek Squad, Best Buy Ads, Best Buy Business, Best Buy Essentials and Best Buy Marketplace under one roof rather than as separate ventures. Each one attaches to a transaction that has already happened. The merchandise gets the customer through the door at a 2.8% operating margin; the attachments are what turn a low-margin box into a relationship.
That attachment layer is larger than it looks from the income statement. Promotional financing runs through third-party banks rather than the balance sheet, and the 10-K is direct about what customers get from it: "Customers choosing promotional financing can receive extended payment terms and low- or no-interest financing on qualifying purchases." The economics come back as a profit share, which the filing describes as revenue recorded "over time using the most likely amount method, which reflects the amount earned each quarter when it is determined that the likelihood of a significant revenue reversal is not probable, which is typically quarterly." Translated: Best Buy collects a slice of the lending margin on purchases it originated, without carrying the credit risk of a single one of those loans.
The newest lever is the one that requires no inventory at all. The third-party marketplace lets other sellers list against Best Buy's traffic, and management has told investors where it is pointing next: "In fiscal 2027, we plan to continue to expand our third-party seller count, while investing in technology, advertising and our marketplace team to support future growth." A marketplace sale carries no purchase order, no shipping container and no markdown risk, which is precisely why it is the cleanest available path to lifting a 2.8% margin without lifting revenue. The incoming chief executive built that business before he was handed the whole company, which is a reasonable signal about where the next five years of capital and attention go.
There is also evidence the company understands the threat to its front door. Search is moving toward assistants that shop on a customer's behalf, and rather than wait to be disintermediated the 10-K describes an active response: "We are also partnering with various platform providers to create a more seamless agentic shopping journey, making it easier for customers to both find and purchase directly from our product catalog." Whether it works is unknowable from here. That it is being attempted before traffic erodes rather than after is the difference between a retailer managing a transition and one reacting to it.
The bear will point out that the merchandise margin is thin and the category deflates, and both are true. The counter is that the attached layer does not price off unit costs. A service plan, an installation, a marketplace commission and an advertising slot are all priced off the transaction, not off what a television costs to manufacture. Falling hardware prices shrink revenue per unit and can leave attachment profit intact.
Finally, the balance sheet is not an argument the bull has to win. Best Buy holds more cash and short-term investments than borrowings, with 548 million dollars of net cash on a funded-debt basis, and operating income covers the interest bill about 22.1 times over. Share count has fallen roughly 1.9% a year over the four years to May 2, 2026, which is buyback deployment showing up in the one place it cannot be dressed up. A company with that profile does not need the next five years to go well in order to survive them.
Bear Case
Start with the number a holder would rather skip past. Best Buy converts about 2.8 cents of every merchandise dollar into operating profit. That is not a temporary dip; it is what selling other companies' hardware in physical stores pays. And the category it sells into gets cheaper on purpose: the same specification of television, laptop or phone costs less every year, because that is how consumer electronics works. A retailer with a 2.8% margin in a deflating category has two directions available, and only one of them is pleasant.
Now put the price next to that. Today's quote embeds roughly 9.5% annual growth in operating profit, held for five years. Against it, management's own fiscal 2027 outlook is revenue of 41.2 billion to 42.1 billion dollars with comparable sales between a 1% decline and a 1% gain. Flat revenue and profit compounding at that pace can only be reconciled one way. The operating margin has to widen, year after year, from a starting point of 2.8%. Every point of that expansion has to be argued for. None of it comes free from volume.
The company's own words about where the pressure comes from are worth reading plainly. The FY2026 10-K warns that "Failure to manage these factors effectively while offering competitive delivery options could negatively impact our profit margins and the demand for our products." Delivery is the cost line that grows when e-commerce mix grows, which means the shift customers actually want is the shift that costs the most to serve. The same filing frames the traffic question directly: "Our ability to remain competitive also depends on effectively maintaining and growing our customer base and accurately forecasting their spending levels." Forecasting spending levels is the entire job in a business that must commit to inventory months ahead of a demand signal.
The most instructive evidence is what happened to the diversification attempt. Best Buy Health was the answer to the deflation problem: a services business in a growing end market, bought rather than built. It was written down. The 10-K explains why in terms that have nothing to do with retail execution: "The impairments reflect downward revisions of our revenue growth rates and margin rates compared to previous projections, in part due to pressures in the Medicaid and Medicare Advantage markets." A retailer that buys its way into healthcare inherits reimbursement risk it has no particular skill in managing. That is one adjacency down, and the marketplace and advertising businesses now carry the whole weight of the margin story.
Retail margin pressure is not unique to this company, and the cohort shows it even where the economics are far better. ULTA, a specialty retailer earning roughly four times the operating margin Best Buy does, still reported in its own 10-K that "Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 30 basis points to 38.8% in fiscal 2024 compared to 39.1% in fiscal 2023." When a business defending a 39% gross margin is fighting over thirty basis points, the cushion available to one earning single-digit operating margins is thinner than the headline comparison suggests.
There is a balance-sheet point the funded-borrowings figure hides. Best Buy's borrowings are genuinely modest, but a national chain of leased stores carries obligations that are debt in everything but label. Counted with the leases, the net position flips from a cushion to a liability, and those payments do not flex with comparable sales. A thin operating margin sitting on top of fixed occupancy is the definition of operating leverage running the wrong way in a soft year.
The methods disagree, and the disagreement is instructive rather than reassuring. Several of the models that land well above today's price arrive there by projecting historical earnings growth in the twenties and thirties forward as though it were a run rate, off a base year that absorbed an impairment. Those are the arithmetic of a rebound, not of the flat outlook management is actually guiding to. The more conservative reads, which capitalize today's cash generation with no growth at all, land under the current quote. Between a model projecting earnings growth in the twenties and a company guiding to flat comparable sales, the company is the better source.
To be fair to the other side: none of this is a solvency problem, and interest coverage above twenty times means the bear thesis is about value, not survival. Governance adds a wrinkle rather than a crisis. A new chief executive arrives November 1, 2026 and the chief financial officer's seat is being filled from outside. Handing both of the top two seats to new occupants in the same year is a normal corporate event that happens to land in the year the margin expansion has to start.
Valuation
At $85.42, the market is paying roughly 17 times company-wide operating income for Best Buy. Work that backwards and it implies operating profit growing about 9.5% a year for five years. The interesting part is not the rate. Best Buy has posted growth at that pace before; what it has not done is post it for five consecutive years. The bet embedded in the price is a bet on persistence, not on a single good year, and the reference point that matters is that the company's own fiscal 2027 outlook calls for revenue of 41.2 billion to 42.1 billion dollars with comparable sales between a 1% decline and a 1% gain.
That solve is sensitive to one input in particular. It runs on a 9.1% cost of capital with a 4% terminal growth rate, and each additional percentage point of cost of capital pushes the required operating-profit growth up by about 6.4 points. A reader should hold the 9.5% loosely for that reason. It is a single solve under fixed assumptions, not a measurement, and a modest change in the rate environment moves it a long way.
The valuation methods do not line up behind a single verdict, which is itself the signal. The peer-multiple approaches and the cash-flow approaches both land above today's quote. The price sits about 21% above the earnings-power family, the group of methods that capitalizes current cash generation without assuming a single point of growth. The book-value approaches sit below the price as well. Nothing here reads as a stretched growth bet; the pattern is closer to a mature business priced modestly, with the disagreement concentrated in what growth rate gets projected forward. The methods reaching furthest above the price reach that level by projecting historical earnings growth in the twenties and thirties, which describes a different company from the one guiding to flat comparable sales.
Two filing-sourced inputs anchor the earnings base underneath all of that. The first is how much of the profit is deferred rather than transactional: the FY2026 10-K discloses that "A 10% change in the amount of services membership deferred revenue as of January 31, 2026, would have affected net earnings by approximately $42 million in fiscal 2026." That is the recurring layer showing its scale. The second is the physical base itself, which the company expects to grow slightly, adding about four Domestic Best Buy stores. Neither is a growth engine. Both describe a business whose profit expansion has to come from mix and attachment rather than from footprint.
The peer set sharpens why the multiple sits where it does. Against specialty retailers in the same cohort, Best Buy's 2.8% operating margin is the outlier on the low side: ULTA runs at 12.4%, WSM at 18.0% and BBWI at 15.8%, each on a far smaller revenue base. A thin margin on a large revenue base is a structurally different animal from a fat margin on a small one. It means a single point of margin change swings the earnings this multiple gets applied to by an enormous proportion. The modest multiple is not a discount for pessimism so much as an acknowledgment of that sensitivity.
Solvency bounds the downside without doing any of the valuation work. Best Buy holds 548 million dollars of net cash measured on funded borrowings, against roughly 650 million dollars of notes due October 1, 2030 and an earlier 2028 maturity. Operating income covers the interest bill about 22.1 times over, the company is not burning cash, and the share count has come down about 1.9% a year over the four years to May 2, 2026. The one qualification is that a leased store fleet carries obligations the funded-borrowings figure does not capture; on a lease-inclusive basis the net position is a liability rather than a cushion. That is normal for a store-based retailer and it is also the reason a soft comparable-sales year hurts more than the borrowings alone would suggest.
Catalysts
The most recent print gave the bulls something to work with. For the quarter ended May 2, 2026, reported on May 28, revenue reached 8.94 billion dollars against 8.77 billion a year earlier. Comparable sales rose 2%, with gaming, computing, mobile phones and services driving the gain and appliances going the other way. Management left the full-year fiscal 2027 outlook where it was: revenue of 41.2 billion to 42.1 billion dollars and comparable sales somewhere between a 1% decline and a 1% gain. A quarter of positive comparable sales inside a flat-for-the-year guide implies the company expects the rest of the year to be softer, which is the tension the August report will resolve one way or the other.
The leadership table is being rebuilt at the same time. Best Buy named Jason Bonfig, an internal promotion, to succeed Corie Barry as chief executive effective November 1, 2026. Bonfig is the executive who built the third-party marketplace, which is the clearest available statement about which part of the business the board wants prioritized. Separately, chief financial officer Matt Bilunas is departing at the end of July 2026 after two decades at the company, with an external search underway for his replacement. A new chief executive and an outside finance chief arriving within months of each other is a wider change than either announcement reads on its own.
The strategy those two will execute is already on the record. The FY2026 10-K commits to expanding the third-party seller count in fiscal 2027 while funding technology, advertising and marketplace staffing, and to partnering with platform providers on assistant-driven shopping journeys. The near-term test is narrower than the strategy: whether second-quarter comparable sales hold the direction set in the first quarter, and whether the margin moves at all. Flat revenue with an expanding margin is the outcome the current price is underwriting.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- GME (GameStop Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …relationships with our vendors is essential to our operations. Distribution and Information Management Our operating strategy involves providing a convenient and broad merchandise selection for our customers. We use our distribution facilities, store locations and inventory management systems to optimize the…
- FY2025 10-K: …States include retail operations in 50 states; our ecommerce website www.gamestop.com; and our GameStop Pro ® loyalty program. The United States segment also includes general and administrative expenses related to our corporate offices in Grapevine, Texas. Segment results for Canada include retail and ecommerce…
- ULTA (Ulta Beauty, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: 8203; $ 900,033 18. Segment reporting The Company operates specialty beauty retail stores in the United States selling cosmetics, fragrance, skincare products, haircare products, wellness products, and services. Nearly every store features a full-service salon. The Company has one operating segment and one…
- FY2025 10-K: 023. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 30 basis points to 38.8% in fiscal 2024 compared to 39.1% in fiscal 2023. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to: ● 40 basis points of deleverage in merchandise margins driven by lapping favorable price increase impacts from the prior year and…
- SIG (SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED)
- FY2025 10-K: …margin include pricing, promotional environment, changes in merchandise costs, changes in non-merchandise components of cost of sales (as described above), changes in sales mix, foreign exchange, and the economics of services such as repairs and extended service plans. The price of diamonds varies depending on their…
- FY2025 10-K: …brand and category assortments, availability of financing, deep customer service and relationship building with the Company's guest service professionals, as well as competitive pricing. Although not a singular differentiator to the Company's value proposition, if significant price increases are implemented by any…
- WSM (WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion on the effect the global supply chain disruption has had on our results of operations. COMPETITION AND SEASONALITY The specialty e-commerce and retail businesses are highly competitive.…
- FY2025 10-K: …to contribute meaningfully to our profitability. Additionally, we will be disciplined on selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A"), including employment and advertising costs. Our pricing power, high e-commerce sales mix, retail optimization and highly efficient advertising are expected to drive earnings…
- VSCO (VICTORIA'S SECRET & CO.)
- FY2025 10-K: …We may be impacted by our ability to attract, develop and retain qualified associates and manage labor-related costs. We believe one of our key competitive advantages is providing a positive, engaging and satisfying experience for each customer, which requires us to have highly trained and engaged associates. Our…
- FY2025 10-K: …our competitors on physical locations in shopping malls and retail centers and so declines in traffic to such locations may affect us more significantly than our competitors. Some of our competitors sell their products in stores that are located in the same shopping malls and retail centers as our stores. In addition…
- BBWI (BATH & BODY WORKS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …future, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Our net sales, operating income, cash and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis. We experience major seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating income, with a significant portion of our…
- FY2025 10-K: …centers and key product and support talent. The turnover rate in the retail industry is generally high, and qualified individuals of the requisite caliber and number needed to fill these positions have 8 Table of Contents been in short supply in some areas. Competition for such qualified individuals and shifts in the…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 FY2027 earnings release, May 28, 2026 · Best Buy CEO succession announcement, April 2026 · Best Buy executive announcements, April and July 2026 · FY2026 10-K · Best Buy CEO succession announcement, April 24, 2026 · Best Buy executive team update, 2026