American States Water Co (AWR): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $88.53, American States Water Co (AWR) is priced for +3.6% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/AWR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerAWR
CompanyAmerican States Water Co
Sector / IndustryUtilities
Current price$88.53/sh
CompositionWater 71% / Electric 9% / Contracted Services 21%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)13.3%
Operating margin today30.8%
Margin compression (value-band)-17.5pp
Implied growth3.6%
Multiple paid20x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.4% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.32σ
cohort percentile (of 70 peers)46

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.08x5expensive
Earnings2.39x3expensive
Relative2.70x2expensive
Growth1.09x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=13)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$14.726.01xyesFCF base $0.0B, growth 12% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.7%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$92.810.95xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 14.4x / 16.4x / 18.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.5x / 20.0x / 23.5x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$36.842.40xyesBV/sh $27.14, ROE (TTM) 12.6%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$42.602.08xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$81.251.09xyesRev $0.7B, growth 12% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.2x / 5.1x / 6.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$41.162.15xyesEPS $3.43, growth 5% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=4.91 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$23.653.74xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.17B × (1−25%) / WACC 7.7% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$43.802.02xyesBV $27.14 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 12.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.2%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$45.771.93xyes√(22.5 × EPS $3.43 × BVPS $27.14) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.26B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$0.018853.00xyesFCF $38.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median)
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$54.861.61xyesEPS $3.43 × (8.5 + 2×5.3%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$7.3911.98xyesBV $27.14 × (ROIC 2.1% / WACC 7.7%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $0.68B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$27.233.25xyesEPS $3.43 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 5.3% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 7.9x
Earnings YieldEarnings$37.082.39xyesEPS $3.43 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Wateroperatingenterprise$464.1m$158.4m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Electricoperatingenterprise$57.2m$14.3m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Contracted Servicesoperatingenterprise$136.7m$30.6m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$772.2m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)4.91x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)3.69x
Interest coverage4.5x
Share count CAGR (dilution)1.4%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Since 1931 there has not been a year without a common dividend from this company, and the latest annual report puts the streak precisely: it has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 71 consecutive years, which places it in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange. Seven decades of raises is not a slogan. It is a description of the machine underneath, which spends money on pipes, poles and treatment plants, asks a regulator for permission to earn a return on that spending, and passes a portion of the result out the door every single year.

The spending gets authorized before it happens, and that is what separates a water utility from an ordinary capital-hungry business. In the electric utility's last rate case the commission authorized BVES to invest approximately $52.5 million in capital infrastructure included in base rates over the four-year rate cycle and at least an additional $23.1 million recoverable later through advice letters as individual projects finish. Money spent inside that framework does not have to win a customer or beat a competitor to earn its return. It has to be spent prudently and found used and useful. Compared with almost any unregulated use of capital, that is a forgiving test, and it is why the raise can be scheduled rather than hoped for.

Then there is the third business, which most water utilities do not have at all. American States operates water and wastewater systems on military bases through a government-contracting subsidiary, where revenue is recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to the initial 50-year contract. Fifty years is an unusual visibility window in any industry. The customer is the federal government, the systems are already in the ground, and construction work performed on those bases converts into fee revenue without the assets landing on this company's own balance sheet. Contracted services is 21% of revenue and consumes almost none of the rate base the water utility requires.

The blend earns a 31.6% operating margin. AWK, the largest listed water utility, runs 36.5% on revenue of $5.2 billion, and CWT, the other large California water name, runs 17.0%. Landing between those two while operating under the same commission as the lower one is a cost-discipline result that no rate case document states outright.

The obvious concession is dilution. The share count has climbed about 1.4% a year over the four years through March 2026, so per-share progress arrives net of steady equity issuance. What matters is where that money goes. Equity funds rate base, rate base carries an authorized return, and the return funds the dividend. Operating income covers the interest bill about 4.4 times over. A company issuing shares to buy assets with a regulated return attached is doing something structurally different from one issuing shares to cover losses.

Bear Case

The assumption buried in the price is not really about growth. It is about smoothness: that regulated water revenue arrives close to schedule, year after year, for long enough to warrant paying about 20 times operating income for it. The most fragile piece of that assumption is also the piece that changed most recently. From 2008 until 2024 a commission-approved mechanism trued up water revenue to the level the rate case had adopted, so a wet summer or a conservation campaign landed in a balancing account rather than in earnings. That mechanism has lapsed. The filing now states that without a full revenue decoupling mechanism, revenues and earnings will be subject to future volatility as a result of significant fluctuations in customer consumption compared to adopted levels.

Volatility costs a utility in a specific way. The premium multiple is paid for predictability rather than for the pace of expansion, so an earnings line turning lumpy hits the multiple before it hits the earnings. And there is a long way for that multiple to travel before any conventional lens catches it: the price currently sits at roughly twice what the earnings-power methods reach, and at roughly twice what the peer-multiple methods reach.

Set against that, the requirement itself is modest arithmetic. Operating profit needs to compound at about 3.2% a year for five years, and then settle into a quiet terminal life. This company has delivered around that pace before. What it has not been asked to prove is that the pace holds through a decade in which consumption swings now land directly on revenue rather than in a balancing account.

The contracted-services business carries a different fragility. Its customer is the federal government, and the filing is direct about what that means when Washington stops functioning: In the event a future U.S. government shutdown extends for an unprecedented and much longer period, ASUS's liquidity and earnings could be impacted. Government contracting also carries an audit posture that commercial work does not, since the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with contracting guidance. A fifth of revenue sits behind that door.

The electric utility is 9% of revenue and considerably more than 9% of the tail risk. It serves a mountain community in Southern California where fire season has become a permanent operating condition rather than a summer event. The company renews a safety certificate with the commission annually, and its own filing declines to treat that as a shield: Even with an approved safety certificate, BVES could be found liable for deaths, injuries and property damage. Preemptive power shutoffs are the mitigation, and the filing describes them cutting in two directions, since Shut-offs can reduce BVES's liquidity and decrease customer satisfaction, and de-energized lines feeding the water system's own pumps and plants interrupt the water business as well.

Then the funding. Net debt runs about 3.7 times operating profit, the share count climbs roughly 1.4% a year, and the capital program does not pause between rate cases. That combination is comfortable while regulatory decisions land where the filings ask. It is slow to repair when they do not, because rates are fixed for years at a stretch and an unfavourable decision is not renegotiated in the interim. The company may file for interim rates in California in situations where there may be delays in granting final rate relief, with refunds owed to customers if the final number comes in below the interim one.

Valuation

Twenty times operating income is the admission price here. Inverted, that asks for something modest: operating profit compounding at roughly 3.2% a year for five years, discounted at about 7.4%, before settling into a long terminal life. Measured against what this business has recently delivered, the pace is ordinary. The stretch is the duration rather than the rate, which is the familiar shape for a regulated utility and much of the reason these names trade where they do.

What is striking is how little of the price the conventional approaches actually reach. Book-value-and-profitability methods stop around half of today's price. The peer-multiple methods stop in the same neighbourhood, and the earnings-power methods stop below both. Only the forward-growth methods get home, with the price sitting about 9% above where that growth family lands. In plain terms the market is paying for durability that static frames are structurally unable to price.

Consider what those static frames are actually asking. Valued on its book equity and the 12.6% return it earns on that equity, the company is being priced as though it stops compounding tomorrow. For a utility whose entire proposition is that it does not stop, the answer will always read low. That is a limitation of the question, not of the company.

The one approach that does reach the price gets there by holding today's economics still. Its exit multiple is today's own cash-flow multiple carried unchanged into the final year of a six-year projection, with the bear scenario compressing that multiple and the bull expanding it. So the forward answer is less an independent verdict than today's pricing, extended.

Revenue leans on the California water utility at 71%, contracted services at 21%, and the electric utility at 9%. That last piece is small and moving: Electric revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $5.6 million to $57.2 million. The military-base contracting work does not consume rate base the way the utilities do, which is part of why the company-wide operating margin sits at 31.6% while CWT, operating under the same California commission, runs 17.0%. One caveat belongs on the reported profit: while projects are under construction the company may record an allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC") as a component of construction work in progress to offset the cost of financing, so a portion of reported earnings is deferred financing cost rather than cash collected from customers today.

The balance sheet carries 772.2 million dollars of net debt, about 3.7 times operating profit, with operating income covering the interest bill about 4.4 times over. That is neither pristine nor meant to be, since a regulated utility carrying no leverage would be leaving authorized return uncollected. The more useful facts for the downside are that the company is not burning cash and that the borrowings sit against assets a regulator has already agreed it may earn on. Share issuance running near 1.4% a year is the visible cost of building rate base, and it is the figure to watch if regulatory outcomes tighten, because a capital programme funded increasingly with equity is where per-share progress slows even while the business itself keeps getting larger.

Catalysts

The rate cycle did the work in the first half of 2026. In December 2025 the California commission approved Golden State Water's full second-year increase, lifting adopted water revenue net of supply cost for 2026 by roughly 32 million dollars against 2025 adopted levels, effective January 1. Close to 11 million dollars of that sits in capital projects the settlement designated for advice-letter recovery, which means it arrives as those projects are completed rather than all at once.

The first quarter showed it flowing through. Earnings came to 76 cents a share against 70 cents in the same quarter of 2025, a gain of 8.6%, attributed to the new customer rates at both the water and electric utilities and to higher construction activity at the military-base business.

The next read is dated. Second-quarter results are scheduled for release after the close on August 5, 2026, with a management call the following afternoon. The second quarter is when California water consumption reaches its seasonal peak, which makes this the first genuinely informative test of how revenue behaves now that consumption swings are no longer smoothed back to the adopted level.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Water (reported)

Electric (reported)

Contracted Services (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

company news release, January 12, 2026 · Q1 2026 results release · company announcement, July 21, 2026

View the full interactive AWR report on boothcheck