American States Water Co (AWR): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $88.53, American States Water Co (AWR) is priced for +3.6% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-09-07 · Exported: 2026-09-09 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/AWR
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | AWR |
| Company | American States Water Co |
| Sector / Industry | Utilities |
| Current price | $88.53/sh |
| Composition | Water 71% / Electric 9% / Contracted Services 21% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 13.3% |
| Operating margin today | 30.8% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -17.5pp |
| Implied growth | 3.6% |
| Multiple paid | 20x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7.4% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.32σ |
| cohort percentile (of 70 peers) | 46 |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.08x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.39x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 2.70x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.09x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $14.72 | 6.01x | yes | FCF base $0.0B, growth 12% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.7%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $92.81 | 0.95x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 14.4x / 16.4x / 18.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.5x / 20.0x / 23.5x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $36.84 | 2.40x | yes | BV/sh $27.14, ROE (TTM) 12.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $42.60 | 2.08x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $81.25 | 1.09x | yes | Rev $0.7B, growth 12% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.2x / 5.1x / 6.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $41.16 | 2.15x | yes | EPS $3.43, growth 5% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=4.91 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $23.65 | 3.74x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.17B × (1−25%) / WACC 7.7% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $43.80 | 2.02x | yes | BV $27.14 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 12.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.2%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $45.77 | 1.93x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $3.43 × BVPS $27.14) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $0.26B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 8853.00x | yes | FCF $38.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $54.86 | 1.61x | yes | EPS $3.43 × (8.5 + 2×5.3%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $7.39 | 11.98x | yes | BV $27.14 × (ROIC 2.1% / WACC 7.7%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $0.68B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $27.23 | 3.25x | yes | EPS $3.43 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 5.3% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 7.9x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $37.08 | 2.39x | yes | EPS $3.43 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | operating | enterprise | $464.1m | $158.4m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Electric | operating | enterprise | $57.2m | $14.3m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Contracted Services | operating | enterprise | $136.7m | $30.6m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $772.2m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 4.91x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 3.69x |
| Interest coverage | 4.5x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 1.4% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Three businesses sit inside one ticker: a California regulated water utility that supplies 71% of revenue, a small mountain electric utility at 9%, and a contracting arm that runs water and wastewater systems on United States military bases, where revenue is recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to the initial 50-year contract.
- The revenue safety net came off in 2024, and the annual report is blunt about the consequence: without full decoupling, revenues and earnings will be subject to future volatility as a result of significant fluctuations in customer consumption compared to adopted levels.
- Second-quarter results land after the close on August 5, 2026, the first look at peak-season water consumption under the rate increase that took effect in January.
Bull Case
Since 1931 there has not been a year without a common dividend from this company, and the latest annual report puts the streak precisely: it has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 71 consecutive years, which places it in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange. Seven decades of raises is not a slogan. It is a description of the machine underneath, which spends money on pipes, poles and treatment plants, asks a regulator for permission to earn a return on that spending, and passes a portion of the result out the door every single year.
The spending gets authorized before it happens, and that is what separates a water utility from an ordinary capital-hungry business. In the electric utility's last rate case the commission authorized BVES to invest approximately $52.5 million in capital infrastructure included in base rates over the four-year rate cycle and at least an additional $23.1 million recoverable later through advice letters as individual projects finish. Money spent inside that framework does not have to win a customer or beat a competitor to earn its return. It has to be spent prudently and found used and useful. Compared with almost any unregulated use of capital, that is a forgiving test, and it is why the raise can be scheduled rather than hoped for.
Then there is the third business, which most water utilities do not have at all. American States operates water and wastewater systems on military bases through a government-contracting subsidiary, where revenue is recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to the initial 50-year contract. Fifty years is an unusual visibility window in any industry. The customer is the federal government, the systems are already in the ground, and construction work performed on those bases converts into fee revenue without the assets landing on this company's own balance sheet. Contracted services is 21% of revenue and consumes almost none of the rate base the water utility requires.
The blend earns a 31.6% operating margin. AWK, the largest listed water utility, runs 36.5% on revenue of $5.2 billion, and CWT, the other large California water name, runs 17.0%. Landing between those two while operating under the same commission as the lower one is a cost-discipline result that no rate case document states outright.
The obvious concession is dilution. The share count has climbed about 1.4% a year over the four years through March 2026, so per-share progress arrives net of steady equity issuance. What matters is where that money goes. Equity funds rate base, rate base carries an authorized return, and the return funds the dividend. Operating income covers the interest bill about 4.4 times over. A company issuing shares to buy assets with a regulated return attached is doing something structurally different from one issuing shares to cover losses.
Bear Case
The assumption buried in the price is not really about growth. It is about smoothness: that regulated water revenue arrives close to schedule, year after year, for long enough to warrant paying about 20 times operating income for it. The most fragile piece of that assumption is also the piece that changed most recently. From 2008 until 2024 a commission-approved mechanism trued up water revenue to the level the rate case had adopted, so a wet summer or a conservation campaign landed in a balancing account rather than in earnings. That mechanism has lapsed. The filing now states that without a full revenue decoupling mechanism, revenues and earnings will be subject to future volatility as a result of significant fluctuations in customer consumption compared to adopted levels.
Volatility costs a utility in a specific way. The premium multiple is paid for predictability rather than for the pace of expansion, so an earnings line turning lumpy hits the multiple before it hits the earnings. And there is a long way for that multiple to travel before any conventional lens catches it: the price currently sits at roughly twice what the earnings-power methods reach, and at roughly twice what the peer-multiple methods reach.
Set against that, the requirement itself is modest arithmetic. Operating profit needs to compound at about 3.2% a year for five years, and then settle into a quiet terminal life. This company has delivered around that pace before. What it has not been asked to prove is that the pace holds through a decade in which consumption swings now land directly on revenue rather than in a balancing account.
The contracted-services business carries a different fragility. Its customer is the federal government, and the filing is direct about what that means when Washington stops functioning: In the event a future U.S. government shutdown extends for an unprecedented and much longer period, ASUS's liquidity and earnings could be impacted. Government contracting also carries an audit posture that commercial work does not, since the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with contracting guidance. A fifth of revenue sits behind that door.
The electric utility is 9% of revenue and considerably more than 9% of the tail risk. It serves a mountain community in Southern California where fire season has become a permanent operating condition rather than a summer event. The company renews a safety certificate with the commission annually, and its own filing declines to treat that as a shield: Even with an approved safety certificate, BVES could be found liable for deaths, injuries and property damage. Preemptive power shutoffs are the mitigation, and the filing describes them cutting in two directions, since Shut-offs can reduce BVES's liquidity and decrease customer satisfaction, and de-energized lines feeding the water system's own pumps and plants interrupt the water business as well.
Then the funding. Net debt runs about 3.7 times operating profit, the share count climbs roughly 1.4% a year, and the capital program does not pause between rate cases. That combination is comfortable while regulatory decisions land where the filings ask. It is slow to repair when they do not, because rates are fixed for years at a stretch and an unfavourable decision is not renegotiated in the interim. The company may file for interim rates in California in situations where there may be delays in granting final rate relief, with refunds owed to customers if the final number comes in below the interim one.
Valuation
Twenty times operating income is the admission price here. Inverted, that asks for something modest: operating profit compounding at roughly 3.2% a year for five years, discounted at about 7.4%, before settling into a long terminal life. Measured against what this business has recently delivered, the pace is ordinary. The stretch is the duration rather than the rate, which is the familiar shape for a regulated utility and much of the reason these names trade where they do.
What is striking is how little of the price the conventional approaches actually reach. Book-value-and-profitability methods stop around half of today's price. The peer-multiple methods stop in the same neighbourhood, and the earnings-power methods stop below both. Only the forward-growth methods get home, with the price sitting about 9% above where that growth family lands. In plain terms the market is paying for durability that static frames are structurally unable to price.
Consider what those static frames are actually asking. Valued on its book equity and the 12.6% return it earns on that equity, the company is being priced as though it stops compounding tomorrow. For a utility whose entire proposition is that it does not stop, the answer will always read low. That is a limitation of the question, not of the company.
The one approach that does reach the price gets there by holding today's economics still. Its exit multiple is today's own cash-flow multiple carried unchanged into the final year of a six-year projection, with the bear scenario compressing that multiple and the bull expanding it. So the forward answer is less an independent verdict than today's pricing, extended.
Revenue leans on the California water utility at 71%, contracted services at 21%, and the electric utility at 9%. That last piece is small and moving: Electric revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $5.6 million to $57.2 million. The military-base contracting work does not consume rate base the way the utilities do, which is part of why the company-wide operating margin sits at 31.6% while CWT, operating under the same California commission, runs 17.0%. One caveat belongs on the reported profit: while projects are under construction the company may record an allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC") as a component of construction work in progress to offset the cost of financing, so a portion of reported earnings is deferred financing cost rather than cash collected from customers today.
The balance sheet carries 772.2 million dollars of net debt, about 3.7 times operating profit, with operating income covering the interest bill about 4.4 times over. That is neither pristine nor meant to be, since a regulated utility carrying no leverage would be leaving authorized return uncollected. The more useful facts for the downside are that the company is not burning cash and that the borrowings sit against assets a regulator has already agreed it may earn on. Share issuance running near 1.4% a year is the visible cost of building rate base, and it is the figure to watch if regulatory outcomes tighten, because a capital programme funded increasingly with equity is where per-share progress slows even while the business itself keeps getting larger.
Catalysts
The rate cycle did the work in the first half of 2026. In December 2025 the California commission approved Golden State Water's full second-year increase, lifting adopted water revenue net of supply cost for 2026 by roughly 32 million dollars against 2025 adopted levels, effective January 1. Close to 11 million dollars of that sits in capital projects the settlement designated for advice-letter recovery, which means it arrives as those projects are completed rather than all at once.
The first quarter showed it flowing through. Earnings came to 76 cents a share against 70 cents in the same quarter of 2025, a gain of 8.6%, attributed to the new customer rates at both the water and electric utilities and to higher construction activity at the military-base business.
The next read is dated. Second-quarter results are scheduled for release after the close on August 5, 2026, with a management call the following afternoon. The second quarter is when California water consumption reaches its seasonal peak, which makes this the first genuinely informative test of how revenue behaves now that consumption swings are no longer smoothed back to the adopted level.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Water (reported)
- AWK (AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …strategies to improve distribution system water quality further; • using its research findings to communicate information to its customers regarding potential actions to limit occurrences of Legionella in their buildings; in this regard, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention statistics indicate that…
- FY2025 10-K: …pricing, including California, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. Seasonality Customer demand for the Company's water service is affected by weather and tends to vary with temperature and amount and frequency of rainfall. Customer demand is generally…
- WTRG (Essential Utilities, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …one-half of the total number of water or wastewater customers we serve. These customers are located in the suburban areas in counties north and west of the City of Philadelphia and in 28 other counties in Pennsylvania. Our other regulated water or wastewater utility subsidiaries provide similar services in seven…
- FY2025 10-K: …Regulated Water segment operating revenues are realized in the second and third quarters. In general, during these seasons, an extended period of dry weather increases consumption, while above-average rainfall decreases consumption. Also, an increase in the average temperature generally causes an increase in water…
- CWT (CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP)
- FY2025 10-K: …in 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The agreement allows us to request a rate change annually in order to recover costs. Hawaii Water provides service to approximately 6,800 water and wastewater customer connections on the islands of Kauai, Maui, Oahu, and Hawaii, including several large resorts and condominium…
- FY2025 10-K: …demand for our water. Finally, changes in prevailing weather patterns due to climate change may affect customer demand. If increased ambient temperatures affect our service areas, water used for irrigation and cooling may increase. If rainfall patterns change, our customers may change their patterns of water use…
- HTO (H2O AMERICA)
- FY2025 10-K: , which were sold in 2024. Chester Realty, Inc. owns commercial properties and parcels of land in Connecticut. Among other things, operating results from the water business fluctuate according to the demand for water, which is often influenced by seasonal conditions, such as impact of drought, summer temperatures or…
- FY2025 10-K: Services distribute water to customers in their respective service areas in accordance with accepted water utility methods. Water Utility Services also provide non-tariffed services under agreements with municipalities and other utilities. These non-tariffed services include water system operations, maintenance…
Electric (reported)
- EIX (EDISON INTERNATIONAL)
- FY2025 10-K: …on a functional basis (i.e., generation, distribution, transmission, etc.). Specific rate components are designed to recover the authorized revenue allocated to each customer class. SCE has a two-tier residential rate structure. The first tier is priced below the average rate and is intended to cover the customer's…
- FY2025 10-K: …Edison International's vision is to lead the transformation of the electric power industry and the company is focused on opportunities in delivering clean energy, advancing electrification, building a modernized and more reliable grid, and enabling customers' technology choices. SCE's ongoing focus to drive…
- PCG (PG&E CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …lines deliver electricity at high voltages and over long distances from power sources to transmission substations closer to customers. A strong transmission system supports reliable and affordable service, ability to meet state energy policy goals, and support for a diverse generation mix, including renewable energy.…
- FY2025 10-K: …from third parties into the wholesale market, to meet customer demand. In 2025, the Utility estimated total net deliveries of electricity to retail customers were 24,052 GWh. This amount represents the total amount of electricity generated and procured, net of electricity sold into the CAISO open market or to third…
- POR (PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …may apply to all large load customers. The OPUC is expected to issue an Order in UM 2377 in the second quarter of 2026. Operating Activities In addition to providing electricity from PGE's own generation portfolio, to meet retail load requirements and balance energy supply with customer demand, manage risk, and…
- FY2025 10-K: …and natural gas in an effort to meet the needs of, and obtain reasonably-priced power for its retail customers, manage risk, and administer its long-term wholesale contracts. The Company generates revenues and cash flows primarily from the sale and distribution of electricity to retail customers in its service…
- PNW (PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …generally represent a single performance obligation delivered over time. We have elected to apply the practical expedient that allows us to recognize revenue based on the amount to which we have a right to invoice for services performed. We derive electric revenues primarily from sales of electricity to our regulated…
- FY2025 10-K: 3.9%, adjusted to exclude the effects of weather variations. Due to the expected growth of several data centers and large manufacturing facilities, we currently project that annual retail electricity sales in kWh will increase in the range of 4.0% to 6.0% for 2026 and that average annual growth will be in the range of…
- IDA (IDACORP INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …service. If customers choose to generate their own energy, discontinue a portion or all service from Idaho Power, or replace electric power for heating with natural gas, demand for Idaho Power's energy may decline and adversely impact the affordability of its services for remaining customers. While Idaho Power has…
- FY2025 10-K: …in retail revenue from period to period. The primary influences on changes in customer demand for electricity are weather, economic conditions (including growth in the number of Idaho Power customers), and energy efficiency. Idaho Power's utility revenues are not earned evenly during the year. Retail revenues are…
- AVA (AVISTA CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: Utilities Electric Operating Statistics - Electric Operations" below for annual quantities of purchased power, wholesale power sales and power from exchanges in 2025, 2024 and 2023. See "Electric Operations" above for additional 12 AVISTA CORPORATION information on the use of wholesale purchases and sales as part of…
- FY2025 10-K: …2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0000104918 ava:OtherElectricMember ava:AlaskaElectricLightPowerMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0000104918 srt:MinimumMember ava:SecuredandUnsecuredDebtMember us-gaap:EstimateOfFairValueFairValueDisclosureMember us-gaap:MeasurementInputQuotedPriceMember 2025-12-31 0000104918…
Contracted Services (reported)
- AWK (AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …year ended December 31, 2023: Revenues from Contracts with Customers Other Revenues Not from Contracts with Customers (a) Total Operating Revenues Regulated Businesses: Water services: Residential $ 2,143 $ - $ 2,143 Commercial 798 - 798 Fire service 158 - 158 Industrial 167 - 167 Public and other 274 - 274 Total…
- FY2025 10-K: …amounts calculated based on estimated usage from the date of the meter reading associated with the latest customer bill, to the end of the accounting period. The amounts that the Company has a right to invoice are determined by each customer's actual usage, an indicator that the invoice amount corresponds directly to…
- CWT (CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP)
- FY2025 10-K: …amount per month. The Company satisfies its performance obligation of providing contract operating and maintenance services over time as services are rendered; as a result, the Company employs the invoice practical expedient and recognizes revenue in the amount that it has the right to invoice. Contract terms are…
- FY2025 10-K: …expressly noted. Regulated Business California water operations are conducted by Cal Water, which provides service to approximately 500,000 customer connections in 20 separate districts, which are subject to regulation by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). California water operations accounted for…
- WTRG (Essential Utilities, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of fifteen years for the customer relationships and five years for the non-compete agreements. Derivative Instruments - The Company's natural gas commodity price risk, driven mainly by price fluctuations of natural gas, is mitigated by…
- FY2025 10-K: …season billing months, with rates adjusted for the difference between actual revenues and revenues calculated under this mechanism billed to the customers. These revenue programs represent a contract between the utility and its regulators, not customers, and therefore are not within the scope of the FASB's accounting…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
company news release, January 12, 2026 · Q1 2026 results release · company announcement, July 21, 2026