AMAZON COM INC (AMZN): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $266.16, AMAZON COM INC (AMZN) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~8.3 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-08-07.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/AMZN

Headline

FieldValue
TickerAMZN
CompanyAMAZON COM INC
Sector / IndustryConsumer Cyclical
Current price$266.16/sh
CompositionOnline stores 38% / Physical stores 3% / Third-party seller services 24% / Advertising services 10% / Subscription services 7% / AWS 18% / Other 1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)6.2%
Operating margin today12.1%
Margin compression (value-band)-5.9pp
Must persist for8.3y
Multiple paid31x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 8: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.4% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling.

How unusual the bet is: elevated (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.27σ
cohort percentile (of 212 peers)86

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset4.20x5expensive
Earnings4.54x3expensive
Relative1.38x5expensive
Growth1.07x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=16)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$234.631.13xyesFCF base $95.5B, growth 16% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.6%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$303.740.88xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 15.9x / 17.9x / 19.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelative$193.121.38xyesP/E 28.6x (blended: static sector reference 20x + trailing (TTM) 49x), scenarios: 23.3x / 28.6x / 33.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$59.144.50xyesBV/sh $51.14, ROE (TTM) 10.7%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$63.444.20xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$247.651.07xyesRev $775.7B, growth 16% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.0x / 3.7x / 4.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$189.971.40xyesEPS $5.43, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.39 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$27.589.65xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $51.80B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.6% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$64.254.14xyesBV $51.14 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.7% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 7.0%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$79.033.37xyes√(22.5 × EPS $5.43 × BVPS $51.14) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$204.921.30xyesEBITDA $168.91B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$175.141.52xyesEPS $5.43 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$18.2914.55xyesBV $51.14 × (ROIC 3.1% / WACC 8.6%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$107.872.47xyesRevenue $775.68B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$203.541.31xyesEPS $5.43 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$58.684.54xyesEPS $5.43 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$23.8b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)0.32x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.25x
Interest coverage28.1x
Share count CAGR (dilution)1.7%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Start with the number that frightens people. Over the twelve months to June 30, 2026, Amazon put 173.0 billion dollars into property and equipment. Operations threw off 161.4 billion. Follow the company's own reconciliation and free cash flow comes out at negative 7.6 billion dollars, down from positive 18.2 billion a year earlier. A retailer that stops generating spare money is usually a retailer in trouble. So the only question that matters is what the spending bought.

It bought cloud capacity, and the cloud answered. AWS net sales were $42,232 million in the June 2026 quarter against $30,873 million a year earlier, growth of 37% in a segment that grew 17% in the comparable quarter of 2025. Businesses this large are supposed to decelerate. This one roughly doubled its growth rate. Segment operating income went from $10,160 million to $16,621 million over the same comparison, so the extra $11,359 million of revenue arrived with $6,461 million of extra profit attached to it. That is not the economics of renting out commodity servers. That is the economics of selling something customers cannot easily get elsewhere.

What they are buying is increasingly Amazon's own engineering rather than someone else's hardware resold. The AI business inside AWS passed a $25 billion annual revenue run rate growing at triple-digit rates year over year, and the in-house chips business passed the same threshold on the same trajectory; Anthropic and OpenAI have each committed multi-year, multi-gigawatt volumes to Trainium, and Graviton5 reached general availability. The margin consequence is direct, because of how the accounts are built: the 10-Q states that The majority of infrastructure costs recorded in Technology and infrastructure are allocated to the AWS segment based on usage. When a workload runs on silicon Amazon designed instead of silicon it bought, the saving lands in that segment's operating line rather than in a supplier's.

Advertising is the quieter compounder and gets less attention than it deserves. It brought in $19,809 million in the June quarter against $15,694 million a year before. The 10-K describes the business in flat terms: We provide advertising services to sellers, vendors, publishers, authors, and others, through programs such as sponsored ads, display, and video. What that description leaves out is where the audience comes from. Amazon is not buying traffic to sell ads against; it already owns the moment a shopper is deciding what to purchase, which is the single most valuable second in the entire advertising business. Selling access to that second costs almost nothing incremental.

Underneath both of those sits a retail operation that has finally stopped needing help. North America turned $116,177 million of net sales into $9,123 million of operating income last quarter, and International, for years the segment that consumed rather than produced, turned $42,197 million into $1,717 million. Neither figure is thrilling in isolation. Together they mean the part of the company most people picture when they hear the name now funds itself, which is precisely what allows the capital budget to point almost entirely at the parts that are still being built.

None of this makes the spending safe. It does change what the spending is. A capital programme that outruns operating cash flow is reckless when it is defending a declining business and rational when it is supplying a segment whose growth rate went from 17% to 37% while the money was going in. Management's third-quarter guidance of $22.5 billion to $26.5 billion of operating income, against $17.4 billion a year earlier, says they expect the second reading.

Bear Case

The two companies best placed to take cloud share from AWS are also the two best placed to fund a long fight for it. MSFT converted $331.8 billion of trailing revenue into a 46.8% operating margin while growing 17.8%, and GOOGL managed 33.1% on $445.9 billion while growing 20.1%. ORCL, smaller at $67.4 billion, still runs a 30.6% operating margin and is adding capacity into the same demand. Amazon's trailing operating margin across the whole company is about 12.1%. Those gaps say nothing about the quality of anyone's management. They describe how far each firm can cut cloud prices before the pain reaches anywhere that matters, and on that measure Amazon has the least room of the three.

Its own risk disclosure declines to soften the point. The 10-K notes that Some of our current and potential competitors have greater resources, longer histories, more customers, and/or greater brand recognition, that They may secure better terms from vendors, adopt more aggressive pricing, and devote more resources to technology, infrastructure, fulfillment, and marketing, and that Competition continues to intensify, including with the development of new business models and the entry of new and well-funded competitors. Filings are written by lawyers, but that paragraph is a fair description of the cloud market as it stands.

Which brings the argument to what the buyer is being asked to underwrite. The market is currently paying about 31 times the operating income the company produced in the twelve months to June 30, 2026. Inverted, that price requires operating growth to hold at the ceiling the business can fund out of its own returns for roughly 8.6 years. Among comparable fast growers, only about 18% managed to sustain that level for that long. The multiple does not sit in the upper part of its peer range either; it sits at the top of it. If the run falls short and the rating drifts back toward what comparable businesses fetch, the compression is not marginal: the price already sits about 42% above where the peer-multiple methods land.

The bet is also being funded on borrowed money, which changes the shape of the downside. Amazon had 132.1 billion dollars of unsecured senior notes outstanding on June 30, 2026, including a March 2026 issuance of 37.0 billion dollars. Across the trailing year it drew 81.9 billion of long-term borrowings, and financing activities swung from an 8.7 billion outflow to a 75.2 billion inflow. Diluted shares went from 10,806 million to 10,903 million year over year, a count compounding at about 1.7% a year since mid-2022. Borrowings rising, share count rising, and free cash flow negative are each unremarkable on their own. Arriving together, they describe a company currently outrunning its own cash generation.

One figure in the June quarter needs handling separately, because it flatters everything above it. Non-operating income was 53.4 billion dollars for the three months, of which 50.5 billion was upward adjustments on equity investments in private companies. That is a revaluation, not a receipt; it builds no datacenters and pays no interest. The same disclosure is also the floor beneath the bear case, and it is a substantial one. The recorded value of Amazon's equity, warrant and convertible positions in public and private companies was 229.7 billion dollars on June 30, 2026, and the 10-Q says these primarily relate to our equity investments in Anthropic and OpenAI. If the operating story disappoints badly, those holdings do not evaporate. But a mark can move down as easily as it moved up, and this one moved a very long way up in a single quarter.

The bull and the bear here do not disagree about a single fact. AWS is accelerating; the capital programme is enormous; the stakes are real. They disagree about whether a run of growth that few comparable businesses have ever sustained is a forecast or an aspiration.

Valuation

Strip away everything else and today's price is mostly a statement about time. $272.62 a share values the company near 2.97 trillion dollars, roughly 31 times the operating income it produced in the twelve months to June 30, 2026. Sustaining that rating requires operating growth to run at the ceiling the business can fund from its own returns, and to keep running there for about 8.6 years.

Whether that is demanding depends on which reference you hold it against. Measured against Amazon's own recent record the pace itself is ordinary; it is close to what the business has been delivering. The stretch lives in the persistence rather than the rate. Of the companies that have grown at that level, only around 18% kept it up for that long. And the rating does not sit in the upper reaches of its peer group; it sits above the group entirely.

The methods normally used to triangulate a business like this disagree with each other sharply, and the shape of the disagreement carries more information than any single output. The price sits about 4.3 times above where the asset-value methods land and about 4.7 times above the earnings-power methods. Peer multiples do considerably better and still leave the price about 42% above them. Only the forward-growth methods get close, and the price sits about 7% above those as well. One family of method supports the quote and three do not, which is the signature of a durability premium rather than a valuation the static frames can express.

It is worth being precise about how the growth methods get there, because their assumptions are the whole argument. The exit-multiple cash-flow method holds today's 18.5x EV/EBITDA flat at the exit, with 16.5x in the bear case and 20.5x in the bull, and it reaches the quote largely because that multiple never compresses. The forward market-cap method works from revenue of $775.7 billion compounding at 16%, with terminal price-to-sales also held flat at today's 3.8x. Both are defensible constructions. Both also say that the future resembles the present, only larger.

Cohort position sharpens the picture in a way the consolidated numbers hide. The 10-Q defines the segment narrowly: The AWS segment consists of amounts earned from global sales of compute, storage, database, and other services. In the June quarter that segment earned $16,621 million on $42,232 million of net sales, profitability that sits comfortably between what MSFT reports across its whole business at 46.8% and what GOOGL reports at 33.1%. The consolidated figure is a different animal, held near 12.1% by the fact that most of Amazon's revenue still comes from moving physical goods at retail margins. A reader who compares the whole company to a software peer group is comparing the wrong things.

Solvency is not the binding constraint here. Cash and marketable securities stood near 123.0 billion dollars on June 30, 2026, and operating income covered the interest bill about 28.1 times over. Set against 132.1 billion dollars of unsecured senior notes, that is a company with a wide margin on its obligations. The genuine constraint sits elsewhere. Purchases of property and equipment over the trailing year exceeded what operations produced, so the pace of the buildout is now partly set by what the credit markets will fund rather than entirely by what the business itself throws off. That is a different kind of risk from the one most large-cap holders are used to pricing, and it is the one this price is quietly taking on.

Catalysts

The next scheduled information event is third-quarter results. Guidance published on July 30, 2026 puts net sales between $197.0 billion and $202.0 billion, growth of 9% to 12%, with the company noting that adjusting for the timing of Prime Day in both years would add nearly 400 basis points to that rate. Operating income is guided between $22.5 billion and $26.5 billion against $17.4 billion in the third quarter of 2025. The width of that guidance band, 4 billion dollars wide, is itself informative: the cost of the buildout is not yet predictable to management inside a tighter range.

Two disclosures in the same release probably matter more than the guidance does. The AI business inside AWS passed a $25 billion annual revenue run rate growing at triple-digit rates year over year, and the chips business passed the same threshold on the same trajectory. Anthropic and OpenAI have each made multi-year, multi-gigawatt commitments to Trainium, and Graviton5 reached general availability. Those two run rates are the closest thing available to a direct measurement of whether the capital programme is converting into revenue, and they are the lines to watch next quarter.

On the corporate side, Amazon agreed on April 13, 2026 to acquire Globalstar, and filed the registration statement covering the share consideration on July 31, 2026. Globalstar's stockholder approval has already been delivered by written consent, which leaves antitrust clearance and the usual governmental authorizations as the outstanding conditions. Funding, meanwhile, has been continuous rather than episodic: the March 2026 note issuance of 37.0 billion dollars sits inside the 132.1 billion outstanding at quarter end, with further shelf takedowns registered through June and July.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

AWS (reported)

Project Kuiper / Zoox (speculative)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q2 2026 Form 10-Q, segment note · Q2 2026 earnings release, July 30, 2026 · Q2 2026 Form 10-Q, Note 5 · Form S-4, July 31, 2026

View the full interactive AMZN report on boothcheck