APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE (AMAT): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $462.43, APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE (AMAT) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~13.0 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/AMAT

Headline

FieldValue
TickerAMAT
CompanyAPPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
Sector / IndustryTechnology
Current price$462.43/sh
CompositionSemiconductor Systems 73% / Applied Global Services 23% / Corporate and Other 4%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)61.9%
Operating margin today29.6%
Margin expansion (value-band)+32.3pp
Must persist for13.0y
Multiple paid40x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 12.7% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 27.5% self-funding ceiling.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.37σ
cohort percentile (of 188 peers)71

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset3.91x5expensive
Earnings3.94x5expensive
Relative1.18x2expensive
Growth1.48x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Relative Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$200.752.30xyesFCF base $6.0B, growth 8% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.1%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$502.690.92xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 36.4x / 38.4x / 40.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 28.09x (blended: static sector reference 22x + trailing (TTM) 42x), scenarios: 23.4x / 28.1x / 32.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 22.73x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$118.203.91xyesBV/sh $32.29, ROE (TTM) 33.9%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$239.501.93xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$313.321.48xyesRev $30.8B, growth 8% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 6.7x / 8.0x / 9.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$379.521.22xyesEPS $10.84, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.21 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$120.923.82xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $8.21B × (1−13%) / WACC 9.1% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$183.392.52xyesBV $32.29 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 33.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$88.765.21xyes√(22.5 × EPS $10.84 × BVPS $32.29) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $9.55B × sector EV/EBITDA 16.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$76.216.07xyesFCF $5623.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$66.666.94xyesSBC-adj FCF $4.92B (FCF $5.62B − SBC $0.70B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$349.881.32xyesEPS $10.84 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$36.8012.57xyesBV $32.29 × (ROIC 10.4% / WACC 9.1%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $30.84B × sector P/S 5.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$406.631.14xyesEPS $10.84 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$117.233.94xyesEPS $10.84 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Semiconductor Systemsoperatingenterprise$19.9b$10.5b operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Applied Global Servicesoperatingenterprise$6.2b$2.1b operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$1.5b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-0.19x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-0.16x (net cash)
Interest coverage33.0x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-2.1%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Most equipment companies own a step. Applied owns a shelf. Deposition, etch, chemical mechanical planarization, metrology and inspection, wafer packaging and ion implantation all sit inside one product line, which means the company sells into more of a fab's process flow than any single-technique competitor can reach. That breadth is not a marketing claim; it is the reason a chipmaker changing a transistor structure has to talk to Applied about several steps at once rather than one. The customer list follows the whole electronics economy rather than one end market: "Our customers' products are used across personal computing devices, mobile phones, artificial intelligence (AI) and data center servers, automobiles, connected devices, industrial applications and consumer electronics."

The quieter half of the moat is what happens after the tool ships. "The AGS segment provides services, spares and factory automation software to customer fabrication plants globally to help customers optimize performance of our large, global installed base of semiconductor and other equipment." Every system sold becomes an annuity of spares, upgrades and software, and the 10-Q says the driver plainly: demand for "service and spares is driven by our large and growing installed base of manufacturing systems". The scale of that annuity is easy to miss. Backlog at the October 2025 fiscal year end totaled $15,002 million, and Applied Global Services accounted for $7,141 million of it against $7,105 million for Semiconductor Systems. The services book is now marginally larger than the systems book, which is a different company from the one most people picture when they hear "equipment maker."

Profitability reflects both halves. On trailing revenue of about $29.0 billion the company produced roughly $8.8 billion of operating profit, a conversion rate of 29.9 cents on the dollar that sits in the top group of its peer set and ahead of Nova at 27.4, Teradyne at 26.5, ACM Research at 12.5 and Onto Innovation at 10.0. Return on equity runs 33.1% on a book of $29.92 a share. Interest is covered better than thirty times over, and the company is not consuming cash.

Capital comes back on a schedule rather than in gestures. During fiscal 2025 the board declared one quarterly dividend of $0.26 a share and three of $0.32, with dividends paid over the year of $1.4 billion, up from $1.2 billion the prior year. Share count has fallen about 2.5% a year over the four years to April 2026. Neither is dramatic on its own. Compounded against an installed base that grows every time a tool ships, they are the mechanism by which a cyclical business turns into a per-share one.

Bear Case

The uncomfortable fact is that the price has already booked the decade. Every family of valuation method lands below it, not narrowly but by wide distances: the asset-based approaches and the no-growth earnings-power lens both sit around a fifth of the price, peer multiples land well under it, and even the forward cash-flow methods do not reach it except by one route that assumes the exit multiple never compresses. There is no standard frame that gets to $536.80. What is being bought is a specific future, and the terms of that future are legible: today's economics, held, for roughly 14.6 years. Among companies that have grown comparably fast, only about 11% were still running at that pace a decade later.

That is the demand. The supply of reasons it might not be met starts with who writes the cheques. The 10-K's own heading is blunt: "We are exposed to risks associated with a highly concentrated customer base." A handful of leading-edge foundry, logic and memory manufacturers set the capital budget for the entire industry, and their spending is lumpy by construction, because a fab is built once and equipped once. Applied's own risk language names the mechanism that quietly erodes the annuity too: "manufacturers' ability to reconfigure and re-use equipment, resulting in diminished need to purchase new equipment and services from us". A tool re-purposed for another node is a tool not bought.

Then there is the part that is decided in Washington and Beijing rather than in Santa Clara. The most recent quarterly filing states that "The United States government has implemented export regulations for U.S. semiconductor technology sold or provided to customers in China, which have limited our ability to provide certain products", and China still accounted for 24% of combined Semiconductor Systems and Applied Global Services revenue in the most recent quarter. The company also warns that "Increases in tariffs increase our costs and can negatively impact our margins". Roughly a quarter of the revenue base sits behind a policy variable that no operating improvement can hedge.

Competitively, the breadth argument has a symmetrical reading. "Substantial competition exists across all the segments of our business." Applied competes with focused specialists at nearly every step, and on the trailing numbers the specialists are converting revenue into operating profit at least as well: Lam Research at 34.3 cents on the revenue dollar and ASML at 32.7, against Applied's 29.9. Being present at more steps has not translated into being the most profitable at any of them. None of this says the business is weak. It says a business with concentrated customers, a policy-exposed quarter of its revenue and peers who out-convert it is being priced as though the next fourteen years are already settled, and the settlement is the part nobody has seen yet.

Valuation

The unusual thing here is not the multiple. It is the calendar. At $536.80 the shares change hands at roughly 49 times trailing operating profit, and read backwards, that price is consistent with the company holding today's rate of profit growth, at the fastest pace it can fund out of its own returns, for about 14.6 years. The near-term rate is not the stretch; Applied has run at that kind of pace before. The stretch is the duration. Of companies that reached comparable growth, only around 11% carried it as far as a decade, and that is the record this price has to beat. Applied's multiple also stands above the upper quartile of its own peer group.

The methods are unanimous in a way that is itself the finding. Nothing reaches the price. The book-value approaches and the no-growth earnings-power lens, which capitalizes an average of five years of operating profit at the cost of capital and credits no growth at all, both land at roughly a fifth of where the shares trade. Peer multiples land under. The forward-looking discounted cash-flow work gets nearest, and the single route that approaches the price does so only by carrying the current exit multiple forward without compression, which is an assumption rather than a finding. When every frame lands below the price, the price is not expensive relative to a benchmark; it is outside what the benchmarks can describe.

Against the cohort, Applied's economics are strong but not singular. Trailing revenue of about $29.0 billion converted to roughly $8.8 billion of operating profit, 29.9 cents on the dollar. Lam Research runs 34.3 and ASML 32.7, while Nova sits at 27.4 and Teradyne at 26.5. Applied is comfortably in the upper half of that group and not at the top of it, which matters because the multiple it carries is at the top.

The filing-sourced inputs behind the picture are worth stating cleanly. The company reports two segments, Semiconductor Systems and Applied Global Services, with the display operations now folded into corporate and other. Backlog at the October 2025 fiscal year end was $15,002 million, split $7,105 million to Semiconductor Systems, $7,141 million to Applied Global Services and $756 million to corporate and other. Dividends paid during fiscal 2025 came to $1.4 billion against $1.2 billion the year before.

Solvency is the one part of the file that asks nothing of the reader. Operating profit covers the interest bill better than thirty times over, the company is not consuming cash, and the share count has fallen about 2.5% a year over the four years to April 2026. The balance sheet will not be what decides this holding. What decides it is whether a business whose customers number in the handful, whose largest single geography is subject to export licensing, and whose peers convert revenue at least as efficiently, can hold its current trajectory across a stretch of years longer than most technology cycles last.

Catalysts

The next hard information arrives on August 13, 2026, when Applied reports fiscal third-quarter results. The bar it set for itself is specific: revenue of $8.95 billion, give or take $500 million, which would be growth of close to 23% against the same quarter a year earlier. That guide is the single most consequential number in this report, because the entire price rests on how long a rate like that can persist rather than on whether it can be hit once.

The quarter behind it was strong. Fiscal second-quarter revenue reached $7.91 billion, up 11% on the year and 13% sequentially, with gross margin of 49.9% and net income of $2.81 billion. The sequential step is the part worth holding onto: it is the shape of an order book accelerating rather than a comparison flattering itself.

The offsetting item is jurisdictional. China represented 24% of combined Semiconductor Systems and Applied Global Services revenue in the quarter, and the company paid $253 million to resolve a United States export controls matter. Management's stated expectation is for the China business and the worldwide ICAPS product line, which serves non-leading-edge nodes, to be flat to slightly higher across the calendar year. Flat is a reasonable planning assumption. It is also a reminder that a quarter of the revenue base moves on licensing decisions rather than on customer demand.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Semiconductor Systems (reported)

Applied Global Services (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Applied Materials Q2 fiscal 2026 results, May 2026, and earnings-date release, July 23, 2026 · Applied Materials FY2025 Form 10-K · Applied Materials Q2 fiscal 2026 results, May 2026 · Applied Materials press release, July 23, 2026 · Applied Materials second-quarter fiscal 2026 results, May 2026

View the full interactive AMAT report on boothcheck