Agree Realty Corporation (ADC): what the price requires

At today's price, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is priced for +1.6% FFO growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.

Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ADC

Headline

FieldValue
TickerADC
CompanyAgree Realty Corporation
Current price$78.53/sh

What The Price Requires (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basisreit
Implied FFO growth1.6%
Price-to-FFO21.1x
FFO yield4.8%

Solve inputs: computed at a 8.2% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of equity moves the implied growth ~5.2pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~6.5%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history-1.62σ
cohort percentile (of 88 peers)82
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore requires assumptions beyond what those standard frames encode.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset6.46x5expensive
Earnings1.72x5expensive
Relative1.62x6expensive
Growth1.38x5expensive

Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=21)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$75.631.04xyesFCF base $0.6B, growth 17% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.2%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$60.921.29xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 13.5x / 15.5x / 17.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelative$117.850.67xyesP/E 35x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 28.6x / 35.0x / 41.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 20x
Simple DDMGrowth$56.961.38xyesDPS $3.15, g=3.5% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3%
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$55.951.40xyesStage 1: 3% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$19.703.99xyesBV/sh $51.83, ROE (TTM) 3.5%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$12.166.46xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$45.331.73xyesRev $0.8B, growth 17% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 9.8x / 12.0x / 14.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$44.641.76xyesFFO/share $3.72, growth 3% (input: historical FFO/share growth, 10y median), PEG=13.64 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$10.997.15xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.28B × (1−21%) / WACC 9.2% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$9.168.57xyesBV $51.83 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 3.5% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 2.3%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$65.861.19xyes√(22.5 × FFO/share $3.72 × BVPS $51.83) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$101.300.78xyesEBITDA $0.61B × sector EV/EBITDA 20.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$46.801.68xyesFCF $522.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$45.601.72xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.51B (FCF $0.52B − SBC $0.01B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$46.201.70xyesFFO/share $3.72 × (8.5 + 2×3.2%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$6.9911.23xyesBV $51.83 × (ROIC 1.2% / WACC 9.2%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$38.402.05xyesRevenue $0.77B × sector P/S 6.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$18.604.22xyesFFO/share $3.72 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 3.2% (input: historical FFO/share growth, 10y median)) → PE 4.7x
Earnings YieldEarnings$40.221.95xyesFFO/share $3.72 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelative$52.781.49xyesFFO/share $3.72 × 14.2x P/FFO (route cohort median, n=85); FFO $0.45B (FFO incl. D&A + impairments, FY2025, companyfacts), shares 120M
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt (REIT basis)$2.6b
Net debt / FFO5.71x
Fixed-charge coverage (FFO basis)4.3x
Funds from operations (trailing)$448.1m
Share count CAGR (dilution)14.0%
Burning cashno

REIT basis: leverage is read against funds from operations (FFO), not depreciation-gutted operating income. The header's implied growth runs on ADJUSTED FFO — FFO minus recurring maintenance capex — so the header's multiple and this leverage ratio use bases that differ by that capex; neither substitutes for the other.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Net-lease REITs are best understood as spread businesses dressed up as landlords, and Agree Realty runs the model about as cleanly as it can be run. The company buys single-tenant retail properties leased to large national chains, then collects rent on long leases where the tenant, not the landlord, pays the operating costs: the filing notes the leases provide for "reimbursement from tenants for common area maintenance, insurance, real estate taxes and other operating expenses," which is what makes the rent stream so predictable. The bull case is that Agree pairs that predictable rent with disciplined tenant selection, its stated strategy is to "focus on 21st century industry-leading retailers," the chains most able to keep paying through a weak economy, which lowers the credit risk that sinks lesser net-lease portfolios.

The growth comes from acquisitions, and Agree has the balance sheet to keep buying. It carries an A-rated credit profile and more than $2.0 billion of available liquidity, which lets it raise capital cheaply and deploy it into new properties at a positive spread. Guidance calls for $1.4 billion to $1.6 billion of investment in 2026, and the recent results show the engine working: first-quarter adjusted funds from operations grew about 21% year over year. Each property bought at a yield above the cost of the capital used to buy it adds incrementally to per-share cash flow, and a company with cheap, plentiful capital can compound that spread quarter after quarter.

The income is the third leg and it is the point for most holders. Agree pays a monthly dividend, recently raised to an annualized $3.20 a share, up about 4.3% year over year, at a payout near 70% of adjusted funds from operations. A growing, well-covered dividend backed by long leases to strong tenants is exactly the durable income stream that net-lease investors pay a premium for, and the conservative payout leaves room for the dividend to keep rising with the portfolio. The bull case is a high-quality, A-rated compounding machine: predictable rent, disciplined growth, and a dividend that climbs as the property count does.

Bear Case

The advantage that built Agree's premium is the one most exposed to erosion: cheap capital. A net-lease REIT makes money on the spread between the yield it earns on a newly bought property and the cost of the capital it uses to buy it, and that spread is set by interest rates the company does not control. When rates rise, the cost of both its debt and its equity climbs, while the cap rates on the properties it wants to buy move more slowly, and the spread that powers external growth compresses. The model that looks like a compounding machine in a low-rate world looks like a treadmill in a high-rate one, because the company must keep issuing stock to grow, and it can only do so accretively when its own cost of equity stays low.

That dependence shows up directly in the share count, which has been growing rapidly, on the order of 14% a year, to fund the acquisitions. Issuing equity is how the model works, but it also means each new share has to be deployed at a positive spread or existing holders are diluted rather than enriched. If the acquisition market tightens or the cost of capital rises, the same growth machine that lifts per-share funds from operations can stall, and a REIT priced for continued accretive growth re-rates when that growth slows. The balance sheet also carries the usual REIT constraints: the filing flags restrictive covenants and "cross-default and cross-collateralization provisions" that let a lender "foreclose on multiple properties" if the company defaults, a reminder that leverage is structural to the model.

The valuation is where the bear has its clearest footing. On the static methods Agree looks richly valued: the asset, earnings-power, and peer-multiple lenses all sit below the price, and only a forward-growth assumption reaches it. The company trades at roughly 21 times adjusted funds from operations, which the data places at the very top of the REIT group. Inverted, that price implies only about 0.3% annual growth in adjusted funds from operations is needed to justify it, which sounds undemanding until you remember the premium multiple itself is the assumption: the market is paying top-of-group for the durability of the spread model. If rates stay high and accretive acquisitions get harder, the premium multiple, not the rent, is what corrects, and a top-of-group P/AFFO has the most room to compress.

Valuation

A REIT is valued on its adjusted funds from operations, the cash earnings plus property depreciation minus the maintenance spending that keeps buildings leasable, not on an operating multiple. At $73.29 (June 27, 2026) Agree trades at about 21 times adjusted funds from operations, and inverting that gives a deceptively gentle read: the price implies adjusted funds from operations growing only about 0.3% a year. The catch is that the 21-times multiple is itself the bet. The data places Agree's price-to-adjusted-funds-from-operations at the very top of the REIT peer group, so the market is not asking for fast growth; it is paying a premium price for the durability and quality of the cash flow.

The families of methods reflect that premium. The asset-value methods, which struggle with REITs because depreciation guts reported book and earnings, land well below the price, as does the normalized earnings-power method, both are the wrong lens for a property trust and the engine flags as much. The peer-multiple and dividend-based methods land closer, and the forward-growth method reaches the price. The honest summary is the familiar net-lease pattern: the static lenses say richly valued, and only the growth-and-quality read justifies the price. For a net-lease REIT the relevant comparison is to other net-lease names on a funds-from-operations basis, and on that comparison Agree sits at the top, which is a statement about quality as much as price, an A-rated balance sheet and best-in-class tenants command a premium, but a premium leaves less margin for error.

The balance-sheet read for a REIT is leverage against funds from operations and access to capital, not the corporate coverage math used for operating companies, and here the precise net-debt ratio cannot be cleanly resolved from the filing's debt tags. What is clear is the quality signal: an A-rated issuer profile from a major agency and more than $2.0 billion of liquidity, which is exactly the access to cheap capital the growth model depends on. The downside is bounded by the long leases and strong tenants; the upside, and the premium multiple, are gated by whether the cost of capital stays low enough to keep acquisitions accretive. The decisive variable is not the rent, which is contractual and durable, but the spread, which the interest-rate environment controls.

Catalysts

The recent print showed the acquisition engine running hot. First-quarter 2026 results included net income up about 33%, core funds from operations of $136.3 million up 21%, and adjusted funds from operations of $137.6 million up about 21% year over year, driven by acquisition volume. The company raised its 2026 adjusted-FFO guidance to $4.54 to $4.58 a share and set investment guidance at $1.4 billion to $1.6 billion, the spending that fuels the per-share growth.

The dividend is the steady catalyst for income holders. Agree declared a monthly dividend of $0.267 a share, an annualized $3.204, a 4.3% increase year over year, at a payout near 70% of adjusted funds from operations and a yield around 4.2%. A conservative payout against rising adjusted funds from operations is what supports continued dividend growth, so the dividend cadence tracks the health of the underlying portfolio.

Sentiment is constructive and steady. The covering analysts lean Buy, and several have nudged price targets higher into the low-to-mid $80s while keeping Outperform or Equal Weight ratings, reflecting confidence in the acquisition pipeline and the A-rated balance sheet rather than any single event. The variables that matter from here are the rate environment and the acquisition spread, because those determine whether the $1.4 billion to $1.6 billion of planned investment lands accretively, which is the engine behind both the guidance and the dividend growth.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Agree Realty (single segment - retail net-lease REIT) (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Agree Realty Q1 2026 results · company FY2026 guidance, 2026 · company announcement, 2026 · analyst actions, 2026

View the full interactive ADC report on boothcheck