← boothcheck

STN vs TTEK stock comparison

STANTEC INC. vs TETRA TECH, INC., two Consulting stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

One number splits these two engineering consultancies: 8.72 against 8.02, their free-cash yields, nearly identical, which makes everything else the pricing disagreement. Tetra Tech trades at 17.5 times earnings with the stronger economics, a 10.8% operating margin, a 23.6% return on equity, and a dividend; Stantec trades at 22.4 times with thinner margins (5.9% net) and no payout. Five multiple turns of premium for the firm earning less per dollar is a bet on backlog trajectory, Stantec's infrastructure-design book compounding faster than Tetra Tech's environmental one. Both are effectively debt-free. When the cash yields match this closely, the multiple gap is close to a pure forecast; the reader can decide whose backlog deserves it.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

STN vs TTEK: the numbers

MetricSTNTTEK
Price$69.32$29.25
Market cap$7.9B$7.7B
SectorConsultingConsulting
StageGrowthMature
Implied growth (priced in)+3.4%
P/E22.417.5
P/B3.324.11
P/S1.321.49
EV/EBITDA12.3
Revenue growth+15.6%-6.0%
Gross margin17.6%
Operating margin10.8%
Net margin5.9%8.6%
Return on equity14.8%23.6%
Return on assets6.0%10.1%
Return on invested capital16.6%
FCF yield8.0%8.7%
Dividend yield0.8%
Debt / equity0.000.47
Current ratio1.231.25
Altman Z (solvency)2.477.99
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 94 / 9
Full STN report → Full TTEK report →
Get boothcheck's read on STN and TTEK, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.