← boothcheck

ROK vs WAT stock comparison

Rockwell Automation, Inc. vs Waters Corporation, two Scientific Instruments stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Rockwell automates factories; Waters instruments laboratories, and this year the factory vendor is the one earning like itself, a 23.7% operating margin against Waters' negative 3.7%, a franchise mid-repair with an 11.9% net margin hinting the damage is transitory. The market prices both for better days, 49.5 and 47.4 times earnings, nearly identical multiples for one business at cruising altitude and one climbing back to it. Rockwell's 30.4% return on equity carries a turn of leverage; Waters' 3% needs no footnote, just patience. Free cash favors Rockwell, 2.5% against 1.1%, and only Rockwell pays a dividend. Same price per dollar of earnings; very different confidence in what next year's dollar looks like.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

ROK vs WAT: the numbers

MetricROKWAT
Price$476.45$374.11
Market cap$53.6B$30.7B
SectorScientific InstrumentsScientific Instruments
StageMatureGrowth
P/E49.547.4
P/B15.002.01
P/S6.098.09
EV/EBITDA50.754.6
Revenue growth+10.5%+28.6%
Gross margin50.3%
Operating margin23.7%-3.7%
Net margin12.4%11.9%
Return on equity30.4%3.0%
Return on assets9.7%1.8%
Return on invested capital10.6%2.4%
FCF yield2.5%1.1%
Dividend yield1.1%
Debt / equity1.030.32
Current ratio1.091.79
Altman Z (solvency)7.692.82
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 93 / 9
Full ROK report → Full WAT report →
Get boothcheck's read on ROK and WAT, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.