← boothcheck

PANW vs SNDK stock comparison

PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC vs Sandisk Corporation, two Computer Hardware stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Economically this pair is a subscription estate under construction next to a commodity franchise enjoying the weather. Palo Alto sells security platforms whose revenue arrives as deferred contracts, running a negative 6.1% operating margin while it consolidates the category; Sandisk sells flash memory whose 69.1% operating margin is what a shortage pays until new supply arrives. The market prices the construction site above the harvest, 248.9 times earnings against 72.5, both extreme by any ordinary standard. Both are debt-free; Sandisk's 4.8 current ratio is cycle winnings held in reserve, Palo Alto's 0.86 is billing-model efficiency. Neither price survives its story failing, and the stories could not be less alike.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

PANW vs SNDK: the numbers

MetricPANWSNDK
Price$303.60$2084.54
Market cap$243.2B$327.3B
SectorComputer HardwareComputer Hardware
StageGrowthGrowth
P/E248.872.5
P/B8.7923.76
P/S22.9324.82
EV/EBITDA217.259.9
Revenue growth+19.4%+111.6%
Gross margin67.5%78.3%
Operating margin-6.1%69.1%
Net margin8.0%34.2%
Return on equity3.0%32.7%
Return on assets1.8%26.4%
Return on invested capital2.9%34.3%
FCF yield1.6%1.4%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio0.864.78
Altman Z (solvency)6.288.30
Piotroski F (quality)4 / 96 / 9
Full PANW report → Full SNDK report →
Get boothcheck's read on PANW and SNDK, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.