← boothcheck

O vs SPG stock comparison

REALTY INCOME CORP vs SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., two REIT stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Both are retail landlords, but Realty Income owns thousands of freestanding single-tenant properties while Simon owns Class-A malls, and their balance sheets diverge sharply: Simon runs 4.65 turns of debt against Realty Income's near-zero. Simon looks cheapest in the sector at 15.8 times earnings, Realty Income at 51.7, though both P/Es understate through REIT depreciation. Realty Income pays the bigger dividend, 5.10% against 3.77%, and yields more free cash, 6.92% against 4.38%. Simon trades at 12 times book on its irreplaceable mall locations, Realty Income at 1.43 on its dispersed portfolio. The two split retail real estate by structure: Realty Income spreads risk across many small tenants on long net leases and pays a monthly check, Simon concentrates it in premium malls with heavy leverage and the sector's lowest multiple.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

O vs SPG: the numbers

MetricOSPG
Price$63.09$226.89
Market cap$59.0B$73.7B
SectorREITREIT
StageMatureMature
P/E51.715.8
P/B1.4312.14
P/S9.9611.09
EV/EBITDA23.221.3
Revenue growth+9.8%+10.9%
Operating margin43.4%
Net margin19.1%82.0%
Return on equity2.7%89.8%
Return on assets1.5%13.8%
Return on invested capital7.4%
FCF yield6.9%4.4%
Dividend yield5.1%3.8%
Debt / equity0.014.65
Altman Z (solvency)1.141.39
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 98 / 9
Full O report → Full SPG report →
Get boothcheck's read on O and SPG, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.