← boothcheck

NTRA vs RDNT stock comparison

NATERA, INC. vs RadNet, Inc., two Medical Diagnostics stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Natera sequences DNA and RadNet reads scans, and economically they are landlord and laboratory in reverse: Natera's losses (negative 9.1% net) are chosen, growth spending on a screening franchise, while RadNet's (negative 0.7%) are the structural squeeze of imaging-center economics under 0.82 turns of debt. The market prices intent at seven times accident: $37B against $5B. RadNet generates real cash anyway, a 7.2% free-cash yield out of depreciation accounting; Natera returns almost nothing while it builds. Neither carries a usable multiple. The pair shows the diagnostics premium at its purest: molecular futures are priced on ambition, physical infrastructure on evidence, and the gap is enormous.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

NTRA vs RDNT: the numbers

MetricNTRARDNT
Price$260.64$60.71
Market cap$36.9B$4.7B
SectorMedical DiagnosticsMedical Diagnostics
StageGrowthGrowth
P/B20.793.46
P/S14.752.18
EV/EBITDA23.8
Revenue growth+36.4%+14.7%
Operating margin-13.4%-4.2%
Net margin-9.1%-0.7%
Return on equity-12.8%-1.1%
Return on assets-8.7%-0.4%
Return on invested capital-13.8%2.0%
FCF yield0.3%7.2%
Debt / equity0.050.82
Current ratio2.961.17
Altman Z (solvency)5.811.63
Piotroski F (quality)4 / 96 / 9
Full NTRA report → Full RDNT report →
Get boothcheck's read on NTRA and RDNT, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.