← boothcheck

CAI vs NTRA stock comparison

CARIS LIFE SCIENCES, INC. vs NATERA, INC., two Medical Diagnostics stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Caris and Natera occupy the same molecular-diagnostics aisle with opposite income statements mid-flight: Caris just profitable, a 3.8% net margin priced at 52.9 times earnings; Natera still spending, a negative 9.1% net margin carried by a $37B valuation, seven times Caris' size. Natera got to scale first, prenatal screening funding its oncology push, and the market pays for that altitude even at a loss; Caris' tumor-profiling franchise is smaller, tidier, and cheaper in absolute terms. Both hold defensive liquidity, current ratios near 3 and 7. The pair prices the sector's ladder: the market values proven scale still losing money above early profit still proving scale, by a wide margin.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CAI vs NTRA: the numbers

MetricCAINTRA
Price$18.52$260.64
Market cap$5.2B$36.9B
SectorMedical DiagnosticsMedical Diagnostics
StageGrowthGrowth
P/E52.9
P/B8.8220.79
P/S5.7714.75
EV/EBITDA37.2
Revenue growth+91.2%+36.4%
Operating margin2.4%-13.4%
Net margin3.8%-9.1%
Return on equity5.7%-12.8%
Return on assets2.9%-8.7%
Return on invested capital8.8%-13.8%
FCF yield2.4%0.3%
Debt / equity0.640.05
Current ratio7.052.96
Altman Z (solvency)4.145.81
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 94 / 9
Full CAI report → Full NTRA report →
Get boothcheck's read on CAI and NTRA, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.