← boothcheck

MTN vs SIRI stock comparison

Vail Resorts, Inc. vs SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC., two Entertainment stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Vail runs ski resorts; Sirius XM sells satellite radio subscriptions. Both pay dividends and both carry real debt, but the profiles diverge. Vail keeps a thinner 5.54% net margin against Sirius's 9.86%, yet earns more on equity, 17.12% to 7.21%, helped by heavier leverage, 3.3 times equity against Sirius's 0.83. Sirius is the stronger cash generator, a 14.2% free cash yield to Vail's 3.56%, and trades below book at 0.82 times. On dividends Vail pays far more, 6.43% against 0.35%. A levered, seasonal mountain business against a cash-rich subscription annuity priced under book.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

MTN vs SIRI: the numbers

MetricMTNSIRI
Price$150.34$30.42
Market cap$5.4B$10.3B
SectorEntertainmentEntertainment
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)-4.1%
P/E32.412.9
P/B5.860.88
P/S1.891.20
EV/EBITDA11.09.5
Revenue growth-1.3%-0.3%
Gross margin52.9%
Operating margin41.0%21.7%
Net margin5.5%9.9%
Return on equity17.1%7.2%
Return on assets2.8%3.1%
Return on invested capital8.3%5.4%
FCF yield3.3%13.2%
Dividend yield5.9%0.3%
Debt / equity3.300.83
Current ratio0.910.44
Altman Z (solvency)1.641.32
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 95 / 9
Full MTN report → Full SIRI report →
Get boothcheck's read on MTN and SIRI, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.