LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP vs Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., two Hotels & Resorts stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Wyndham franchises budget and mid-scale hotels for fees, while Las Vegas Sands pours capital into integrated resorts in Macau and Singapore. Their net margins are almost identical, 13.4% for Wyndham and 13.41% for Sands, reached by completely different means. Sands trades at half the multiple, 17.44 times earnings against Wyndham's 34.66, and throws off more free cash at 7.1% versus 4.59%. Both pay dividends, Sands at 2.12% and Wyndham at 1.88%. Size is lopsided, Sands at $31.6B against Wyndham's $6.6B. The margins match, though Sands earns its on casino floors and Wyndham earns its on franchise contracts.
Comparison updated 2026-07-11.
| Metric | LVS | WH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $46.69 | $78.52 |
| Market cap | $31.3B | $6.0B |
| Sector | Hotels & Resorts | Hotels & Resorts |
| Stage | Growth | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +0.1% | +12.7% |
| P/E | 17.3 | 31.2 |
| P/B | 19.48 | 13.32 |
| P/S | 2.28 | 4.13 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2 | 18.2 |
| Revenue growth | +22.6% | +1.6% |
| Operating margin | 25.2% | 34.9% |
| Net margin | 13.4% | 13.4% |
| Return on equity | 114.5% | 43.2% |
| Return on assets | 8.7% | 4.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 17.2% | 10.0% |
| FCF yield | 7.2% | 5.1% |
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Debt / equity | 8.64 | 5.88 |
| Current ratio | 0.92 | 0.98 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 2.04 | 1.53 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 8 / 9 | 5 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.